[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
^Yeah, but I believe that, in X’s case, 405 was probably getting close to max effort for him. Therefore, it was probably not safe for him to work with that weight without a spotter, as he probably couldn’t handle it well enough to attempt it when alone. That’s my guess.[/quote]
I always felt like that was more of PX’s bullshit. He claimed all these numbers, then when seen on vid he’s struggling with considerably less WITH band assistance. Yeah, I know he was “injured” and has “asthma” and it was “conditioning” and he’s “fat”, but it still reeked of bullshit. He’s the same guy who claimed there’s only a 5 or so pound difference between hammer strength and free weights…[/quote]
5lb diff between HS and free weight. Ha that’s a new gem[/quote]
His exact quote was “4-5 lb difference”, but he’s recently backtracked to a 10-20% difference. Still doesn’t explain his claim of benching 405 then struggling MIGHTILY with a band assisted 315. He also gripped the bar unevenly a few times, which I always found funny.[/quote]
I thought the same: how can he have a 405 bench if he struggled with a band assisted 315? Also judged this from the way he overhead pressed and the amount on that too (not that i judge people’s lifts but was wondering how he could have a 405 bench based on those two lifts.)
[/quote]
Interesting. So because I was injured and haven’t done a bench press in a decade…you thought I should have been repping with 405 when we weren’t even focusing on strength training?
Strange that you think the way you do.
Considering I didn’t get to warm up before taping ad that was literally the first rep on a bench I had done in quite a while, it is strange you find fault in that.
A truly weak person wouldn’t have been using that first the first time doing the exercise in years…again not to mention CT was using similar weight…