How Long to Stay at Weight After Bulk?

Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.

Another way to look at it: how often do big guys decide to diet and give up halfway through? A lot. Because its hard. You dont see them giving up halfway through a mass phase.

Has anybody run a statistical analysis to find out the correlation between a thread in which X posts and one which ends up being a huge shit storm/argument? I’m serious…

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.[/quote]

Agree with this.

Gaining muscle is easier than getting shredded but takes much longer.

Getting shredded is more difficult than building muscle but it can be done in a shorter time frame.

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.[/quote]

I just don’t agree.
1st let me say if you require mutiply extended cardio sessions[>30 min.] to get in shape I think you are missing something. If you are experiancing a dramatic decrease in strength, you are doing it wrong. Following the instructions is always easier than ‘breaking new ground’!

FTR…how close are you to 3lbs /inch of height…you look very developed.

[quote]gregron wrote:
Getting shredded is more difficult than building muscle but it can be done in a shorter time frame.[/quote]

Even though I disagree w/you…you are one big MF and I have nothing but repsects for you!
I have no doubt you’ve paid your dues!

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
At 50, I can get as lean as I desire, I suspect my LBM gaining days are in the rear view mirror. Most serious restricted diets last 12-16 weeks. IMO…it takes a decade to assemble a stage-ready body; assuming I error x2 and it only takes 5 years; that’s is 260 weeks. If worst case is a 16 week period of restriction, that’s less than 7% of the time required to assemble the mass. If a lifter can’t ‘suck it up’ for less then 10% of time in…just say’n.
[/quote]

Again, for me, this.

If your avi is current, you look amazing for 50. I don’t mean that to sound like I’m minimizing the compliment because you’re 50 (“… for 50”).

Many should strive for your look/strength period. I will shoot for that at 50 (10 years).

Are you keeping a log on TN?

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.[/quote]

you can count macros when bulking

at least you can eat 1k less calories on a cut which is convenient

[/quote]

It does have to do with me…What did me getting up to 255lbs have to do with anything besides make me look like shit.

I’m on an agenda to teach people how to do things right. I don’t want anyone following the stupidity that my old teenage mind embraced off this site.[/quote]

Umm, just a quick question. You said you were up to 255lbs and it had nothing to do with you having as much muscle as you have right now. And that your on an agenda now to tell people to do the opposite of what you did, even though you don’t know that it actually may be the reason you actually have the amount of muscle that you do. Please explain because what you just said is extremely illogical, or perhaps I’m mistaken.

If dieting was the easy part, X wouldn’t quit diets after 1-2 weeks because he felt like he was “losing size” or need biweekly pizza buffet cheat meals right from the get-go. When someone who has both increased their initial bodyweight by 50+ lean lbs AND gotten to “back of the hand” leanness tells me, I’ll listen, but right now X might as well be trying to tell me what it’s like to grow up as a Mexican in Moscow.

My fiance has an elite powerlifting total and also took overall in her first physique show. She will tell you straight up that those 12 weeks leading into the physique show were far and above the most difficult 3 months of her life. I bulked up initially, spent 4 years pushing my weight up from 140 and lean to 220fat.

I did it the way X is always endorsing on this site. As a matter of fact, I followed his advice to a “t” for the better part of my college years and graduated a full 80 lbs heavier. That’s all well and good if you take simple scale weight as a measuring stick of progress, but in order to get to the same level of leanness I had at the beginning of the push, I had to drop back down to the mid 160’s, and this took me EIGHT MONTHS of dedicated work and dealing with hunger, tiredness, and my lifts going to shit.

Five years of work yielded 25 lbs of actual muscle (you know, that thing we’re all here to build). That’s right, 25 lbs in 4 years. I’m convinced I could have done better than that had I not chased the scale and fucked my hormonal profile up by being a fat ass at 20% bodyfat.

In the year and a half since I finally lost the weight, my weight has only varied +/-10 lbs, but I’ve made huge changes in my physique, as those who know me IRL on this forum can attest. I really believe this is mostly attributable to my insulin sensitivity, p ratio, etc getting un-fucked as I was no longer forcing food on my body that it didn’t need. When it comes to bodybuilding, weight is a garbage metric.

It’s like trying to judge how fast a car can go based on the size of it’s gas tank.

The quotes messed up, that was in regards to AustinBiceps post. How can you say you made a mistake by getting to 255 when it clearly did something beneficial for you?

And wow, I don’t check the thread for about 1 day and just wow, don’t people respect other’s opinions anymore. Some people believe the “just stay lean” mantra, others believe the “put on as much mass as possible an then cut down” side. Everyone needs to respect others views a bit more, especially when both sides have merit based on your own personal goals.

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.[/quote]

I just don’t agree.
1st let me say if you require mutiply extended cardio sessions[>30 min.] to get in shape I think you are missing something. If you are experiancing a dramatic decrease in strength, you are doing it wrong. Following the instructions is always easier than ‘breaking new ground’!

FTR…how close are you to 3lbs /inch of height…you look very developed. [/quote]

No problem. I definitely think it is arguable both ways and also one could be harder than another depending on someones genetics. All imo really from what ive experienced. I just know for me ine day of cutting is harder than one day of gaining. As far as the cardio, many pro bbers would do alot of cardio. Not too taxing but it sure takes more time, is boring as hell, and i would rather gain so i dont have to do it!

Thanks for the compliment, means a lot from someone with your strength and experience. Im 205 right now at 68.5 inches but not nearly as lean as in the avi pic. I think i was around 190 there not sure though.

[quote]fr0gger666 wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
Not sure if its really a fair comparison. Gaining muscle definitely takes more time, but the single day is much easirr than cutting. Gaining mass you dont have to be exact or even calculate macros. You can go to the gym 4 times a week. Or 5 times a week. Getting shredded however takes a much shorter time, but the single day is much harder. Your counting every macro, going to the gym multiple times a day for cardio and weights, and it wears on you mentally.

Comparing single day to single day, i would prefer to gain mass, its easier.[/quote]

you can count macros when bulking

at least you can eat 1k less calories on a cut which is convenient

[/quote]

My point is, when your gaining and feel like beer and pizza, its not going to fuck you up and you dont need to reaaly know how many calories you just engulfed. On a cut, if you feel like beer and pizza, you just end up feeling empty and sad.

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
If dieting was the easy part, X wouldn’t quit diets after 1-2 weeks because he felt like he was “losing size” or need biweekly pizza buffet cheat meals right from the get-go. When someone who has both increased their initial bodyweight by 50+ lean lbs AND gotten to “back of the hand” leanness tells me, I’ll listen, but right now X might as well be trying to tell me what it’s like to grow up as a Mexican in Moscow.

My fiance has an elite powerlifting total and also took overall in her first physique show. She will tell you straight up that those 12 weeks leading into the physique show were far and above the most difficult 3 months of her life. I bulked up initially, spent 4 years pushing my weight up from 140 and lean to 220fat. I did it the way X is always endorsing on this site. As a matter of fact, I followed his advice to a “t” for the better part of my college years and graduated a full 80 lbs heavier. That’s all well and good if you take simple scale weight as a measuring stick of progress, but in order to get to the same level of leanness I had at the beginning of the push, I had to drop back down to the mid 160’s, and this took me EIGHT MONTHS of dedicated work and dealing with hunger, tiredness, and my lifts going to shit. Five years of work yielded 25 lbs of actual muscle (you know, that thing we’re all here to build). That’s right, 25 lbs in 4 years. I’m convinced I could have done better than that had I not chased the scale and fucked my hormonal profile up by being a fat ass at 20% bodyfat. In the year and a half since I finally lost the weight, my weight has only varied +/-10 lbs, but I’ve made huge changes in my physique, as those who know me IRL on this forum can attest. I really believe this is mostly attributable to my insulin sensitivity, p ratio, etc getting un-fucked as I was no longer forcing food on my body that it didn’t need. When it comes to bodybuilding, weight is a garbage metric. It’s like trying to judge how fast a car can go based on the size of it’s gas tank.[/quote]

yeah blame X because you didn’t know what you were doing.

did you ever consider that you weren’t eating enough protein, or that your routine was garbage, instead of blindly blaming calorie intake, though?

from 140 you should be able to get to 180-190 lean within 4 years, maybe even less… 140 is almost no muscle mass to begin with

[quote]DaBeard wrote:
The quotes messed up, that was in regards to AustinBiceps post. How can you say you made a mistake by getting to 255 when it clearly did something beneficial for you?

And wow, I don’t check the thread for about 1 day and just wow, don’t people respect other’s opinions anymore. Some people believe the “just stay lean” mantra, others believe the “put on as much mass as possible an then cut down” side. Everyone needs to respect others views a bit more, especially when both sides have merit based on your own personal goals. [/quote]

Hey do what you want.

[quote]fr0gger666 wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
If dieting was the easy part, X wouldn’t quit diets after 1-2 weeks because he felt like he was “losing size” or need biweekly pizza buffet cheat meals right from the get-go. When someone who has both increased their initial bodyweight by 50+ lean lbs AND gotten to “back of the hand” leanness tells me, I’ll listen, but right now X might as well be trying to tell me what it’s like to grow up as a Mexican in Moscow.

My fiance has an elite powerlifting total and also took overall in her first physique show. She will tell you straight up that those 12 weeks leading into the physique show were far and above the most difficult 3 months of her life. I bulked up initially, spent 4 years pushing my weight up from 140 and lean to 220fat. I did it the way X is always endorsing on this site. As a matter of fact, I followed his advice to a “t” for the better part of my college years and graduated a full 80 lbs heavier. That’s all well and good if you take simple scale weight as a measuring stick of progress, but in order to get to the same level of leanness I had at the beginning of the push, I had to drop back down to the mid 160’s, and this took me EIGHT MONTHS of dedicated work and dealing with hunger, tiredness, and my lifts going to shit. Five years of work yielded 25 lbs of actual muscle (you know, that thing we’re all here to build). That’s right, 25 lbs in 4 years. I’m convinced I could have done better than that had I not chased the scale and fucked my hormonal profile up by being a fat ass at 20% bodyfat. In the year and a half since I finally lost the weight, my weight has only varied +/-10 lbs, but I’ve made huge changes in my physique, as those who know me IRL on this forum can attest. I really believe this is mostly attributable to my insulin sensitivity, p ratio, etc getting un-fucked as I was no longer forcing food on my body that it didn’t need. When it comes to bodybuilding, weight is a garbage metric. It’s like trying to judge how fast a car can go based on the size of it’s gas tank.[/quote]

yeah blame X because you didn’t know what you were doing.

did you ever consider that you weren’t eating enough protein, or that your routine was garbage, instead of blindly blaming calorie intake, though?

from 140 you should be able to get to 180-190 lean within 4 years, maybe even less… 140 is almost no muscle mass to begin with

[/quote]

Yeah, go ahead and assume you know what I did for 4 years of training and apply some arbitrary number to what I personally should have been able to accomplish. Who’s the idiot in this conversation? Nice try with the troll account, though, X.

You’re right about one thing, 140 isn’t much muscle mass. I’m glad you can make that assertion without knowing my height (5’8"), but I’m in good “natural” shape at my current weight.

I really like the assumptions you make in the mental gymnastics you’re doing to dispute my assertions. Protein? 275-300g a day for the entire time I was in college. I stole a LOT of chicken from the dining hall over the years. A “lot of garbage”? Mostly chicken, eggs, pb, and red meat. I ate burgers when I felt like it and avoided fried foods and sweets for the most part. Some garbage, low protein diet, right?

You seem to be doing some grade-A nut swinging lately. Do you have any pics?

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

Yeah, go ahead and assume you know what I did for 4 years of training and apply some arbitrary number to what I personally should have been able to accomplish. Who’s the idiot in this conversation? Nice try with the troll account, though, X.

You’re right about one thing, 140 isn’t much muscle mass. I’m glad you can make that assertion without knowing my height (5’8"), but I’m in good “natural” shape at my current weight.

I really like the assumptions you make in the mental gymnastics you’re doing to dispute my assertions. Protein? 275-300g a day for the entire time I was in college. I stole a LOT of chicken from the dining hall over the years. A “lot of garbage”? Mostly chicken, eggs, pb, and red meat. I ate burgers when I felt like it and avoided fried foods and sweets for the most part. Some garbage, low protein diet, right?

You seem to be doing some grade-A nut swinging lately. Do you have any pics?[/quote]

no pics, i’m just a fat person who put on 70 lbs(of fat) in 2 years… it’s hard being super obese

but like I said, maybe something else is off

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]fr0gger666 wrote:

[quote]Stronghold wrote:
[/quote]

Nice try with the troll account, though, X.
[/quote]

:open_mouth:

You may be onto something here

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:
Getting shredded is more difficult than building muscle but it can be done in a shorter time frame.[/quote]

Even though I disagree w/you…you are one big MF and I have nothing but repsects for you!
I have no doubt you’ve paid your dues! [/quote]

I think that a lot of this discussion is colored by the fact that most on these boards are in college or their early 20s and do not have to make real priorities/choices compared to an adult like BlueCollar.

The 16 weeks of dieting is much more difficult than 16 weeks of bulking, of course. But if you’re someone with a demanding job, kids, and maybe one other hobby in life, then being someone who can consistently train for years on end to gain LBM is a real challenge and takes more dedication than a diet that’s measured in weeks, imo.

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:

[quote]GrindOverMatter wrote:

[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
Many of you guys act like getting lean is the hard part…?[/quote]
have you ever gone through a full bodybuilding prep?[/quote]

I will be 50 this summer.
I did a couple of tested events in the early nineties. Not even enough people then to have weight classes…over or under 175. I was one of three over(178-184) in both shows and the only one with any wheels at all. 2010 was the last time I ‘leaned out’ there is a video in my HUB at 195. The lighting sucks and my posing knowledge is no better, but it represents well enough. That was in my 47th year, I looked like that at 210 in my mid thirties through my early forties. How far from Master Natty stage ready would you estimate I am, if I had any decent chest development I mean?

FTR- I’m 5’10" and started at 160lbs [all abs in]
the heaviest I’ve ever been was 235-240 [no abs in]
[/quote]

I’m very impressed with your video.

have you or do you plan to go the trt route. And I mean nooooo disrespect just wondering because you are getting older my dude and it is a subject that interests me because my levels have tested very incredibly low for my age.