How Do You Train Prof X ?

[quote]RJ24 wrote:
Excuse me X, but I have a couple of questions for you, if you don’t mind.

  1. How much do you usually eat when bulking? What’s the most you’ve eaten for any given period of time?[/quote]

The most at my heaviest body weight would be about 8,000cals a day as an estimation. I don’t count specific calories. How much I usually eat when gaining varies so there are no specifics. It usually takes a lot of food just for me to maintain my body weight.

[quote]
2) Do you have any good high-calorie recipes you used while trying to get your daily calorie alotment?[/quote]

I don’t even want to get into that discussion because comprehension skills on this site are extremely weak and anything written will be reversed, flipped and misconstrued by newbies until the internet ceases to exist.

I will say that the current extreme definition of what “clean” has become in relation to food and how restricted some people seem to eat has gotten out of hand. No one gets big eating like some of the crap I see listed on this forum.

If you want size on you, don’t be afraid of large amounts of beef, whole eggs and whole milk. I am going to avoid any discussion of even hamburgers because people are fucking stupid.

I’ve tried to explain the reason I mentioned the free weights is because I thought that was what was being discussed. It was a misunderstanding as you were talking about lever arms.

I was just adding my thoughts. Im not here for “Get Big” advice. I just like to share knowlege and ideas. My interest is in rehab and performance.

Of course you have to be strong to move 5 plates on whatever machine. Im not competing with anyone here.

You guys make out that you cant have an opinion unless you can do better.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I am going to avoid any discussion of even hamburgers because people are fucking stupid.[/quote]

Seriously, I love cheeseburgers and there is no way I could maintain a bulking period without them…though I’m not talking the Mickey D’s double quarter pounder for every meal.

I seriously have no idea how people could eat enough to gain appreciable size with some of the food suggestions I have seen, there is just no way I could eat portions large enough to get the required calories.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
heavythrower wrote:
first off, i like machines, i think they serve a purpose in anybodies training routine depending on what your needs goals are at any given time. i use lots of machines, seems i use more and
more as i get older and more banged up.

but i beg to differ about the difference in how much weight one can use on a hammer machine verses free weight. a quick look at my training logs on this sit will show that i have used up to 4 plates each side on a hammer incline, when due to chronic shoulder problems i at the time found 185lbs on the free weight incline too painful to do.

i found the weight i could use on a hammer machine more like the weight i could use on a similar barbell movement when i used mini-bands on the machine for added resistance.

What you mentioned from your training log after an injury implies that part of the injury involved an area more worked in stabilizing the weight during a free weight movement, not that you were somehow able to lift twice as much because the machine is so easy. I rarely see anyone at all using even 4 plates a side on those machines unless they are carrying a good deal of muscle mass on them and clearly look as if they can usually handle quite a bit of weight on barbell presses.

It takes the need for stabilization out of the picture. It doesn’t somehow make the movement “easier” or lift the weight for you. Considering the progress I have made since adding them in, I will continue laughing at anyone attempting to degrade how effective they are. I am still wondering why you are attempting to make it seem as if someone who can only lift 185lbs on an incline press can equally move 4 plates a side on a Hammer strength incline machine. That’s retarded. You could lift that much because your muscles were strong enough from being able to incline press more than that before the injury…which puts the focus back on the specific muscles injured during your injury and NOT some comparison of 185lbs barbells with 8 plates on a HS machine.

The only person attempting to compare free weight directly to Hammer Strength machines…is you. They are different. They are not more or less effective and, personally, I am impressed by anyone who can lift as much and more than I can on anything, including any machine.

I mean, is this some sort of contest for you and others any time someone mentions a weight lifted? If not, why the attempt to make the comparison you did?[/quote]

i knew that it would be impossible to make the point i was trying to make with you not taking it personally, though it was not to belittle you in any way. i stand by my statement/point i was trying to make.

a post on another forum i used to belong too (i can link it to you if you would like) a long time ago will show that i do not discount the relative strength of people who use primarily machines for training.

on that board, which is dominated by powerlifters, i relayed a story of how i say a "body-builder type" guy who was using he entire stack for cable flys plus some extra resistance for reps, and some insane amount of plates on a hack squat machine(LIKE 7-8 EACH SIDE!) but i never saw him bench, squat or pull. 

though i thought he would have had a lot of trouble doing some of the things i do for training, i had to admit that there is NO WAY i could even come close to lifting what he did on those machines.

  what i was trying to say was how different the hammer machines are and you cannot compare them to what one can lift with free weights, just my personal experience. 

[quote]Professor X wrote:
heavythrower wrote:
first off, i like machines, i think they serve a purpose in anybodies training routine depending on what your needs goals are at any given time. i use lots of machines, seems i use more and
more as i get older and more banged up.

but i beg to differ about the difference in how much weight one can use on a hammer machine verses free weight. a quick look at my training logs on this sit will show that i have used up to 4 plates each side on a hammer incline, when due to chronic shoulder problems i at the time found 185lbs on the free weight incline too painful to do.

i found the weight i could use on a hammer machine more like the weight i could use on a similar barbell movement when i used mini-bands on the machine for added resistance.

I rarely see anyone at all using even 4 plates a side on those machines unless they are carrying a good deal of muscle mass on them and clearly look as if they can usually handle quite a bit of weight on barbell presses.

It takes the need for stabilization out of the picture. It doesn’t somehow make the movement “easier” or lift the weight for you. Considering the progress I have made since adding them in, I will continue laughing at anyone attempting to degrade how effective they are. I am still wondering why you are attempting to make it seem as if someone who can only lift 185lbs on an incline press can equally move 4 plates a side on a Hammer strength incline machine. That’s retarded. You could lift that much because your muscles were strong enough from being able to incline press more than that before the injury…which puts the focus back on the specific muscles injured during your injury and NOT some comparison of 185lbs barbells with 8 plates on a HS machine.

The only person attempting to compare free weight directly to Hammer Strength machines…is you. They are different. They are not more or less effective and, personally, I am impressed by anyone who can lift as much and more than I can on anything, including any machine.
[/quote]

X - your talking crap.

There is NO WAY on this planet that you could even suggest that a machine press is anywhere as near justifiable as a free press.

IF you REALLY do press as much as you say (400 something?) you do on an incline in the machine you use, I highly doubt it would be ANYWHERE near as much if you were to do it in a rack with a bench. I refuse to believe that a machine can be anywhere as near as effective.

Free weights are paramount - FACT.

Wings, for someone with no body stats or photos, you seem really confident in your knowledge of how to exercise.

Two facts:

  1. X says he is aiming to get as big as he can right now.
  2. He doesn’t accept whatever dogmatism is spoon-fed to him by people with PhDs, he finds out what works best for himself.

If you put those two things together, and swish them around for a bit, what would result?
… that if free weights were as paramount as you say they are, he’d be doing them?

[quote]wings_931 wrote:
X - your talking crap.

There is NO WAY on this planet that you could even suggest that a machine press is anywhere as near justifiable as a free press.

IF you REALLY do press as much as you say (400 something?) you do on an incline in the machine you use, I highly doubt it would be ANYWHERE near as much if you were to do it in a rack with a bench. I refuse to believe that a machine can be anywhere as near as effective.

Free weights are paramount - FACT.
[/quote]

You’re a fucking idiot. I wrote:

Now, tell me how this is “talking crap”. What is crap is how things need elementary school definitions for some of you.

[quote]Jason van Wyk wrote:
Wings, for someone with no body stats or photos, you seem really confident in your knowledge of how to exercise.

Like I have to prove myself to anyone here. It’s an internet Forum where anyone can be anyone my friend.

Two facts:

  1. X says he is aiming to get as big as he can right now.
    This is alot of peoples target. He is not doing anything special.

  2. He doesn’t accept whatever dogmatism is spoon-fed to him by people with PhDs, he finds out what works best for himself.
    Like the majority of people with any brain cell’s in their skulls are doing.

If you put those two things together, and swish them around for a bit, what would result?

Umm…alot of people?

… that if free weights were as paramount as you say they are, he’d be doing them?

He is not special, just another guy who likes the weight. The way he claims to train is individual but not inspiring.

[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:

If you want size on you, don’t be afraid of large amounts of beef, whole eggs and whole milk. I am going to avoid any discussion of even hamburgers because people are fucking stupid.[/quote]

Hamburgers are a protein/fat/carb meal. You are not allowed to combine these.

Do you eat the burger and save the bun for post work out?

Mmmmm…a Fucking Idiot? - my my my thats mature!

Sorry to high Jack your thread X but it needed it.

You have such a “Following” from people on here that believe every word you say I thought it was about time to challenge it and bring out the best in you…from your post I can see it has worked.

[quote]wings_931 wrote:

Free weights are paramount - FACT.
[/quote]

Over here you started a thread that says you do not count the bar as weight.

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=1544644

It seems you have much to learn. This is a good place to do it.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:

Free weights are paramount - FACT.

Over here you started a thread that says you do not count the bar as weight.

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=1544644

It seems you have much to learn. This is a good place to do it.[/quote]

Read the rest of my post, you can see why.

Plus it completely comes down to personal preference, just like peoples choice to use machines instead!

Everyone is allowed to express any matter of opinion they have.

Remember its just a forum, people can be/say whatever they like.

[quote]wings_931 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:

Free weights are paramount - FACT.

Over here you started a thread that says you do not count the bar as weight.

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=1544644

It seems you have much to learn. This is a good place to do it.

Read the rest of my post, you can see why.

Plus it completely comes down to personal preference, just like peoples choice to use machines instead!

Everyone is allowed to express any matter of opinion they have.

Remember its just a forum, people can be/say whatever they like.

[/quote]

Of course they can. My opinion is you have much to learn.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:

Free weights are paramount - FACT.

Over here you started a thread that says you do not count the bar as weight.

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=1544644

It seems you have much to learn. This is a good place to do it.

Read the rest of my post, you can see why.

Plus it completely comes down to personal preference, just like peoples choice to use machines instead!

Everyone is allowed to express any matter of opinion they have.

Remember its just a forum, people can be/say whatever they like.

Of course they can. My opinion is you have much to learn.[/quote]

And my opinion is that yours is not valid.

[quote]wings_931 wrote:

And my opinion is that yours is not valid.[/quote]

Since you consider the bar as a “counter weight” and do not count it in your lifts I frankly do not value youe opinion in the area of weight training.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:

And my opinion is that yours is not valid.

Since you consider the bar as a “counter weight” and do not count it in your lifts I frankly do not value youe opinion in the area of weight training.[/quote]

Yeah, I read that and it made me chuckle.

Hey wings_931, what weight is the bar countering ?

I’m not really waiting for an answer.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
wings_931 wrote:

And my opinion is that yours is not valid.

Since you consider the bar as a “counter weight” and do not count it in your lifts I frankly do not value youe opinion in the area of weight training.[/quote]

Thanks for opinion but considering that is all you have to base your opiion on me what kind of reason is that ?

Like I kep saying - anyone can choose to be ANYONE or ANYTHING on a forum.

I don’t value your opinion on matter that is relevant in any subject at all - basis being that … who are you again?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I don’t even want to get into that discussion because comprehension skills on this site are extremely weak and anything written will be reversed, flipped and misconstrued by newbies until the internet ceases to exist.

[/quote]

I’m glad I’m not the only one who feels like this. Sometimes these forums are like walking on eggshells.

[quote]wings_931 wrote:
Mmmmm…a Fucking Idiot? - my my my thats mature!

Sorry to high Jack your thread X but it needed it.

You have such a “Following” from people on here that believe every word you say I thought it was about time to challenge it and bring out the best in you…from your post I can see it has worked.[/quote]

It seems that every couple of months one of these guys decides to ‘call out’ Prof X.

There is a fantastical David and Goliath undertone to these ‘giant killers’ posts. Seemingly they believe that challenging the Prof will secure our undying gratitude for ‘opening our eyes’ to his tyrannical rule.

This is indicative of an inability to show humility and learn from people who have achieved greater things than them in the gym.

I for one, do not dogmatically follow everything the Prof says. However, I’ve followed a lot of his advice and were it not for his posts I wouldn’t have come close to the 70lbs weight gain I’ve seen this year.

I know he doesn’t need anyone fighting his corner for him but I felt the need to speak up, these kids are starting to piss me off.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Professor X wrote:

If you want size on you, don’t be afraid of large amounts of beef, whole eggs and whole milk. I am going to avoid any discussion of even hamburgers because people are fucking stupid.

Hamburgers are a protein/fat/carb meal. You are not allowed to combine these.

Do you eat the burger and save the bun for post work out?[/quote]

LOL Do you have any shows coming up? maybe at Carolines ?