Talk about fake.
[quote]jlesk68 wrote:
Talk about fake.[/quote]
Talk about an imploding campaign!
Holy crap! Hillary haters couldn’t get a better break. It was pretty painful to watch.
This is what I hate about the media. Small snipits of info that misinterpret.
If you would watch the whole speech she gave, not once did she use a fake accent. She was recreating the accent only for the particular part of the speech when she quoted a historical figure.
This is much ado about nothing.
But I am confident that she will show her true colors when the campaign heats up. (i.e. she will move even more to the center and distance herself from her true left wing liberal beliefs)
Something that should have received more notice was her thesis paper on Saul Alinsky.
Cool. This is extacly like Bush developing some sort of military record before his campaign.
[quote]brucevangeorge wrote:
Cool. This is extacly like Bush developing some sort of military record before his campaign.[/quote]
Or claiming you were named after Sir Edmund Hillary (of Mt. Everest fame) but he climbed Mt. Everest 3 years after you were born.
Stick a fork in Hillary…she done.
To my liberal friends like bradley, tme, and irish:
PLEASE, if you have any compassion for the rest of us, PLEASE, do not let her win the nomination.
Send up obama, richardson, or even john “trial lawyer” edwards.
Watching hillary morph, slither, and slime for the next 1.5 years is going to be physically painful to watch.
PLEASE HAVE MERCY ON YOUR CONSERVATIVE FRIENDS!!!
Thank you,
JeffR
It’s 11 months until the mega-primary and the campaign is already underway. Given that the big three on both sides are deeply flawed as candidates, I don’t believe the odds of any surviving to go the distance to be too spectacular.
[quote]rugbyhit wrote:
This is what I hate about the media. Small snipits of info that misinterpret.
If you would watch the whole speech she gave, not once did she use a fake accent. She was recreating the accent only for the particular part of the speech when she quoted a historical figure.
This is much ado about nothing.
But I am confident that she will show her true colors when the campaign heats up. (i.e. she will move even more to the center and distance herself from her true left wing liberal beliefs)
Something that should have received more notice was her thesis paper on Saul Alinsky.
[/quote]
Beat me to it.
Fucking media monkey retards…
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
brucevangeorge wrote:
Cool. This is extacly like Bush developing some sort of military record before his campaign.
Or claiming you were named after Sir Edmund Hillary (of Mt. Everest fame) but he climbed Mt. Everest 3 years after you were born.
[/quote]
Does who she was named after really matter?
No.
Does the presidents military record, and AWOL record matter?
That’d be a yes, HH.
[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Does the presidents military record, and AWOL record matter?
That’d be a yes, HH.[/quote]
Why bother to serve in the military when you can just say you did? Politicians lie about everything else. Why not this?
[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
brucevangeorge wrote:
Cool. This is extacly like Bush developing some sort of military record before his campaign.
Or claiming you were named after Sir Edmund Hillary (of Mt. Everest fame) but he climbed Mt. Everest 3 years after you were born.
Does who she was named after really matter?
No.
Does the presidents military record, and AWOL record matter?
That’d be a yes, HH.[/quote]
beowolf,
Please correct me if I’m wrong, however, it sounds like you are sympathetic towards hillary.
You may be the only liberal besides mufasa who seems to be even luke warm about her.
Out of sincere curiousity, what is it that attracts you to her?
What stance in particular do you agree with?
If her name was Jane Smith and not clinton, would it matter to you?
I’m sincerely curious.
Thanks in advance,
JeffR
Solve the riddle…
Well, since nobody cares…
“I love country music.”
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Holy crap! Hillary haters couldn’t get a better break. It was pretty painful to watch.[/quote]
No shit. I fucking hate her, and if they put her up against Giuliani, I’ll vote for him.
Otherwise, I’m out of this one…that bitch will not get my vote.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
brucevangeorge wrote:
Cool. This is extacly like Bush developing some sort of military record before his campaign.
Or claiming you were named after Sir Edmund Hillary (of Mt. Everest fame) but he climbed Mt. Everest 3 years after you were born.
Does who she was named after really matter?
No.
Does the presidents military record, and AWOL record matter?
That’d be a yes, HH.
beowolf,
Please correct me if I’m wrong, however, it sounds like you are sympathetic towards hillary.
You may be the only liberal besides mufasa who seems to be even luke warm about her.
Out of sincere curiousity, what is it that attracts you to her?
What stance in particular do you agree with?
If her name was Jane Smith and not clinton, would it matter to you?
I’m sincerely curious.
Thanks in advance,
JeffR
[/quote]
I’m sympathetic to her only in the sense that there are those who seek to ruin her simply because she is married to Bill.
As for her policy, I do not know enough to make a real comment. All I can say with a bit of conviction is she’s been damn OK for NY. Is damn OK good enough for a presidential candidate? I don’t know.
Personality wise, I think she comes off as VERY insincere (regardless of whether she is or not). However, with Bill backing her, she has some power I’d like to see put to use for good things.
I doubt she’d ever be elected. She’s female and married to a man who is so great (or so awful, depending on who you talk to) it’s going to be hard for her to ever REALLY escape from his shadow.
Barak Obama as well, has little chance at election due to his easily exploitable sort-of Muslim background and of course his skin color. Too many racist fucks still live in this country for us to see a black president. Though he has a better chance than a Gay guy or an Atheist in these days.
I’d actually like to see Ron Paul or Mike Huckabee win it on the conservative side. But I know that they both really don’t have a good shot.
As for the left side of the fence, I’d love it if Gore ran again. I think he’s gained a lot of charisma since he started his global warming crusade. And I’ve always favored his policy (though I’m a bit biased, as he was the first politician I ever really saw speak, learned about, and became interested in). Once again, I doubt he’d even consider running.
I don’t really like Hilary so much as I feel a bit of anger towards the way people make mountains out of molehills. Like the fact she didn’t really know who she was named after, or that she used a southern accent during a presentation in an attempt to sound colloquial while reading a quotation.
Much like a true politician all Hillary ever tells groups is what they want to hear. She is still flip floppy about her vote towards Iraq. She likes to twist her stance from then as opposed to now. I have heard quite a bit of contradictory tape of her in 01 and 03 as opposed to now.
I know all politicians regardless of dem or repub “politic” but as was evident in 2004 the left side seems to flip flop more on foreign policy issues as opposed to the right.
I don’t think I could ever vote democrat just because I watched Clinton destroy the military while I served.
I do believe a McCain or Giuliani(someone more centered in the right wing) might actually do some good for this country. I think they will be strong on crime, national defense and border security. I aslo believe that abortion and marriage rights are something that should be left the way they are and I believe these two both feel the same regardless of what they say to secure a right wing bid. If these 2 team up I think they win in a landslide of Reagan vs. Mondale proportions. Just my .20 cents…
[quote]snipeout wrote:
…
I don’t think I could ever vote democrat just because I watched Clinton destroy the military while I served.
…[/quote]
Hmmm, the army performed pretty well in Afghanistan and Iraq, just after being destroyed by Clinton.
How do you like what Bush is putting the military through?
[quote]snipeout wrote:
I know all politicians regardless of dem or repub “politic” but as was evident in 2004 the left side seems to flip flop more on foreign policy issues as opposed to the right.[/quote]
To the outside observer, the only difference between the left and right on your foreign policy is that the left implements it more quietly. The right is much more arrogant, but at the end of the day, it’s exactly the same interventionist shit.
A country that has enough nukes to blow up the solar system, spends around half a trillion dollar on the military (real figure!), has hundreds of bases in over a hundred countries on all continents and bombed more countries than any other has done in history needs to get strong on national defense? Are the Martians attacking?
As for the crime bit, you’re unarguably strong enough.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/uk/06/prisons/html/nn2page1.stm