Ok…you’re doing
delts and triceps
back and biceps
chest/triceps/shoulders
quads (no hamstrings here) and biceps.
You’re hitting triceps and biceps 2x as much as legs, only have a couple lifts that hit your chest at all, and have minimal hamstring work. Those are the obvious problems to me.
I don’t have time to write how I would restructure it right now. I’ll try to remember to come back later.
You’re hitting triceps and biceps 2x as much as legs, only have a couple lifts that hit your chest at all, and have minimal hamstring work. Those are the obvious problems to me.
[/quote]
He’s got deadlifts and squats in there, I wouldn’t call that minimal hamstring work as long as his form is good. I do agree that he could do with some additional hamstring work though. As far as chest work, he’s got incline and bench press; OP, might be worth doing some DBs instead of or in addition to your current chest movements.
If you’re worried about getting stronger at the main lifts then do them and variations of them. Instead of inclines do floor or board presses, rack pulls, box squats.
[quote]yalb93 wrote:
Also, does strength necessarily mean size? If my deadlift goes up to 160kg (which i hope it will by the summer) will my hams and back be bigger?[/quote]
Depends how much you deadlift now. Simply put, getting significantly stronger usually means getting bigger and vice versa.
EDIT: Sorry, just saw your OP; you could potentially get another 40kgs on your dead just from form improvements and beginners’ gains. As such, you may get to 160 fairly quickly with not an awful lot of size gain - however, if you target 200kgs, you can pretty much guarantee you’ll get bigger along the way. Make sure you’re eating well!