[quote]MissHarber wrote:
[quote]tsantos wrote:
I don’t want to sound like a prick but had this been a male, the rating would be 2 with more pictures required.
If this is a “would bang?” poll, then great - rate highly - but if we are rating physique quality then there is not enough shots here to make a determination, and certainly not enough to rate 8+. Look at the quality of male physique which get that score…[/quote]
So because of the fact that the physique I consider ideal doesn’t entail >8% bodyfat, blocky abs, or danna linn biceps I’m not deserving of a higher rank?? Do you know how hard I’ve had to bust my ass get this 14 inch hip-waist ratio? You obviously don’t, because if you did, you would have given me a little more credit instead of simply casting me into the same lot as every other ‘2’ because I’m not shooting to look like a dude with a wig. Thanks for being fantastic.
[/quote]
What would you like? To be marked against the criteria of this forum and (trolls aside) how everyone else is judged to provide a fair and level playing field or by your own set of rules because you want us to be fantastic because you worked really hard? Plenty of guys have freaky biceps…