Good Mornings

[quote]rich44 wrote:
gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads.

Dude what are your stats?? 135 seems kind of low to be leaving bite marks. I am not trying to dog on ya but I was wondering if maybe your upper back development may need help. I do not get the bite marks until I hit around 315 or so. I am 5’8" and 220. I feel that my upper back development helps to ward off the marks until I hit the heavier weights.

I agree on the pad thing though, never use it. Keep at man.

[/quote]

She’s a girl.

Bear

[quote]bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.[/quote]

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear

[quote]Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear[/quote]

If he’s mimicking his conventional DL form then he could probably being doing a good morning squat and not a true good morning…

do any of you guys have more videos of good mornings? I’ve seen a few, some get close to parallel, some don’t. I’d say I go a bit lower than that guy in the oly lift video, but I use a real wide stance and keep my arch tight.

[quote]Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear[/quote]

I can GM more than I can squat, but less than I can pull.

[quote]Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear[/quote]

A post from Mike Robertson on the “fix my squat” thread:
“The torso is caving over partially because of the set-up, but also because your legs aren’t strong enough to take the weight - therefore your back is trying to good morning the weight up.” This is my problem exactly. Also, I am talking about a raw (with a belt), not a suited squat. I’m sure I’ve heard of guys doing 700 or 800lbs good mornings who would not raw squat that.

[quote]Mr. Bear wrote:
rich44 wrote:
gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads.

Dude what are your stats?? 135 seems kind of low to be leaving bite marks. I am not trying to dog on ya but I was wondering if maybe your upper back development may need help. I do not get the bite marks until I hit around 315 or so. I am 5’8" and 220. I feel that my upper back development helps to ward off the marks until I hit the heavier weights.

I agree on the pad thing though, never use it. Keep at man.

She’s a girl.

Bear[/quote]

My bad, and my apologies. I still would like to know her stats. I am training a female friend of mine and would like a comparison.

[quote]bigjoey wrote:
Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear

A post from Mike Robertson on the “fix my squat” thread:
“The torso is caving over partially because of the set-up, but also because your legs aren’t strong enough to take the weight - therefore your back is trying to good morning the weight up.” This is my problem exactly. Also, I am talking about a raw (with a belt), not a suited squat. I’m sure I’ve heard of guys doing 700 or 800lbs good mornings who would not raw squat that.[/quote]

Seriously, who the hell is doing 800lb GMs? Furthermore, even if you could, why would you? I know Jim Wendler squatted a grand, and he said his best good morning was in the 500s. Now, yes, he couldn’t squat a grand raw, but he sure as hell could get over 600.

OK, so say someone does have the problem you have, which is that you’re legs are weak. Still, in the squat you are actually able to use your legs, however weak they are, to help you lift the weight. Therefore, I would think you would be able to at least squat what you could good morning.

I guess my point is that if you can’t squat what you good morning, then you aren’t doing good morning correctly.

Bear

[quote]bigjoey wrote:

A post from Mike Robertson on the “fix my squat” thread:
“The torso is caving over partially because of the set-up, but also because your legs aren’t strong enough to take the weight - therefore your back is trying to good morning the weight up.” This is my problem exactly. Also, I am talking about a raw (with a belt), not a suited squat. I’m sure I’ve heard of guys doing 700 or 800lbs good mornings who would not raw squat that.[/quote]

That advice was given to me and having just squatted 10kg more than the vid for 3 reps today I have to conclude torso strength was not the problem, my set up was just shit. I think there’s an important leson to be learned there…

[quote]
I guess my point is that if you can’t squat what you good morning, then you aren’t doing good morning correctly.

Bear[/quote]

I should have added something, that I can’t squat with good form what I can GM. For whatever reason when I do past a certain weight in a squat, I lean forward and muscle it up with my back. In other words I do a good morning with it.

[quote]Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
Mr. Bear wrote:
bigjoey wrote:
my best good morning (240kg) is actually bigger than my best squat and deadlift (yes my sq and dl are weakass for my BW. embarassing. also probably why my squats always turn into good mornings once i’m out of the hole).

To those who are having trouble going heavy, I’d say get the bar low on your traps and your grip out wide and try to almost mimic your DL form (if you pull conventional). I also find a med stance better than the wide stance.

some people also try to go too low and keep their legs too straight - the pics on elitefts and robertson’s articles here are a good guide; and I remember there was a vid on some site called ‘powerlifting heads up’ or something.

This is ridiculous. NO ONE CAN GOOD MORNING MORE THAN THEY SQUAT. Also, if you could GM more than you squatted, the exact opposite would be true; you would probably never have a problem falling forward in the squat.

Bear

A post from Mike Robertson on the “fix my squat” thread:
“The torso is caving over partially because of the set-up, but also because your legs aren’t strong enough to take the weight - therefore your back is trying to good morning the weight up.” This is my problem exactly. Also, I am talking about a raw (with a belt), not a suited squat. I’m sure I’ve heard of guys doing 700 or 800lbs good mornings who would not raw squat that.

Seriously, who the hell is doing 800lb GMs? Furthermore, even if you could, why would you? I know Jim Wendler squatted a grand, and he said his best good morning was in the 500s. Now, yes, he couldn’t squat a grand raw, but he sure as hell could get over 600.

OK, so say someone does have the problem you have, which is that you’re legs are weak. Still, in the squat you are actually able to use your legs, however weak they are, to help you lift the weight. Therefore, I would think you would be able to at least squat what you could good morning.

I guess my point is that if you can’t squat what you good morning, then you aren’t doing good morning correctly.

Bear[/quote]

Yes, you can use your legs more during a squat, but it’s a longer ROM. There are different ways of doing GMs. Some go all the way down to parallel and use barely any legs; (Mikesell’s workout log usually specifies ‘GMs to Parallel’), and in this case you are right, no one would ever squat more than they GM. However, this is not the only way to do them. If you look at the guy in Robertson’s ‘Erector Set’ article, or in the ‘heavy good morning’ video on Joe Skopec’s websites, this is closer to my form; - above parallel and actually a fair bit of legs. I also use a bit more rounding on the heavier sets. Shoulders are still in front of the knees.

Also, it may not be so much that I am GMing wrong as it is that I am squatting and DLing wrong. The first time I ever did singles was on deadlifts, and I did that for quite a while before going really heavy on squats; so my low back was probably already strong in comparison to my legs. I also started trying out Westside methods early on in my development, which may have been a mistake because I didn’t fully understand how to use them. I gained little from the speed work on the box squat, and knew nothing about squatting technique, other than trying to sit back (it wasn’t until I did a heavy overhead squat that I really understood what that meant). Meanwhile I was using good mornings on 70% of M/E days (as per early recommendations); which meant that I got lots of motor learning and technique perfection with heavy weights on GMs and very little with squats and DLs, which is why those lifts didn’t improve nearly as much. I am trying to correct this now but it is a process.

[quote]gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads. [/quote]

Don’t let your elbows flare back. Keep them pulled FORWARD hard.

[quote]gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads. [/quote]

Try a bar without center knurling. If it is resting properly on your shoulder/traps it should stay in place fairly well and not dig into your skin.

[quote]TTewell342 wrote:
gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads.

Don’t let your elbows flare back. Keep them pulled FORWARD hard.[/quote]

This last bit of info is very interesting. I was setting up like I was doing a powerlifting squat, ie bar a little lower with the elbows flaired out and back. I might go and try some easy ones today with elbows forward and in then. Im assuming they must rotate foward as you decend down.

[quote]Julius_Caesar wrote:
Kir Dog wrote:
As far as tilting to one side, is there any specific weakness that might be the cause, or could it be any number of weaknesses?

Everyone has a dominant side. If you tilt, you are probably just stronger on your right or left side. On any sort of barbell movement, your strong side will try to dominate. It’s more obvious with things like the bench or military press, but it is everywhere where you use a barbell as opposed to dumbells.
[/quote]

With a closer stance you can also alternately put one foot about two feet in front of the other. This kill the ham and you need less weight to overload so it can be easier on the back if you want to hit the hams.

By the way, my upper back strength was really holding me back in squatting and DL, and I got a safety squat bar. I feels easier at lighter weights, but the upper back gets torched when you add weight, and especially for 8+ reps.

[quote]gojira wrote:
In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads. [/quote]

The gym we use here has a few different types of Oly bars. One has no knurling in the center 18 inches or so. I suppose there may be a specific name for it, but something like that should help.

[quote]Patrick Williams wrote:
gojira wrote:
In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads.

The gym we use here has a few different types of Oly bars. One has no knurling in the center 18 inches or so. I suppose there may be a specific name for it, but something like that should help.

[/quote]

good advice with the bar,

try them with a wider stance, just seems to really work your hip/glute/lumbars/whole body just right.

Have trained some women with this movement and they really gain from it with lesser weight.

I just did these for the first time last night and I went really light. I felt it more in my hamstrings than I did in my lower back. My stance was really narrow, maybe 2-3 inches of space between my feet. Is that too narrow of a stance?

I started out with just the bar to see what it was like. Then added 20 pounds, then added 10 more, and 10 more again. So, I didn’t go very heavy. Since it was my first time doing these I really wanted to concentrate on my form.

Should I be going heavier than this? And should I use a wider stance?

[quote]waltny wrote:
TTewell342 wrote:
gojira wrote:
I would love to be able to do GM’s heavy, but I have this odd problem. I suppose it’s because I don’t have as much meat on my back as you guys do. But as I get up to 135 I always wind up getting “knurled”.

In other words, as the weight gets heavier, it bites into my flesh. Yes, I have my shoulder blades together and my elbows back. No, it’s not sitting on my neck. Maybe I just need to suck it up and accept the pain and torn flesh.

Anyone else have this problem?

Don’t tell me to use a pad. I don’t use pads.

Don’t let your elbows flare back. Keep them pulled FORWARD hard.

This last bit of info is very interesting. I was setting up like I was doing a powerlifting squat, ie bar a little lower with the elbows flaired out and back. I might go and try some easy ones today with elbows forward and in then. Im assuming they must rotate foward as you decend down.

[/quote]

Responding to my own post here, but it was much more smooth and I didnt round out when I pushed the elbows forward and rotated them down as you decent in the lift. Good stuff everyone, Thanks

ALot to learn on this thread. Good job JC.