[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:
I am not fat, though.[/quote]
Stop making Wolverine look bad. Fox doesn’t need any help.
Congruence.
legendaryblaze is so cool he gets on the internet to tell people how not cool they are. that’s cool, man.
I have given up on women. I am 38 and all I seem to find are woman that smoke and drink like fishes …some do lots of drugs. Or they are jaded and hurt by all the men they have known that you can’t get a break. Or they just want sex and for you to get lost. Or a free dinner or night out.
[quote]StevenF wrote:
legendaryblaze is so cool he gets on the internet to tell people how not cool they are. that’s cool, man. [/quote]
I am part of the cool-or-not internet police. It’s like grammar nazis but less infuriating.
The only difference between a winner and a loser is that a winner has picked himself off the ground exactly as often as he has fallen down, whereas the loser chose to stay put.
Insofar, calling someone a loser does not identify losers, it creates them by discouraging them from getting their ass back in the game.
[quote]orion wrote:
Insofar, calling someone a loser does not identify losers, it creates them by discouraging them from getting their ass back in the game.
[/quote]
Exactly.
[quote]orion wrote:
The only difference between a winner and a loser is that a winner has picked himself off the ground exactly as often as he has fallen down, whereas the loser chose to stay put.
[/quote]
Doesn’t this spit in the face of the whole socio-sexual hierarchy?
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
The only difference between a winner and a loser is that a winner has picked himself off the ground exactly as often as he has fallen down, whereas the loser chose to stay put.
[/quote]
Doesn’t this spit in the face of the whole socio-sexual hierarchy? [/quote]
And again, getting laid is alpha, alphas get laid is tautological.
You can cook meth, be tatted out in prison tats and fuck strippers all day and that would make you alpha.
Just because women have no taste in men does not mean that men are not supposed to have somne standards.
Since I do not want to fuck men, their sexual desirability means nothing to me.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
The only difference between a winner and a loser is that a winner has picked himself off the ground exactly as often as he has fallen down, whereas the loser chose to stay put.
[/quote]
Doesn’t this spit in the face of the whole socio-sexual hierarchy? [/quote]
Socio-sexual hierarchy, while having some bases, is nothing more than broad generalizations. As a guy with a group of friends you really see this happening when you get together?
[quote]Typhoon wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
The only difference between a winner and a loser is that a winner has picked himself off the ground exactly as often as he has fallen down, whereas the loser chose to stay put.
[/quote]
Doesn’t this spit in the face of the whole socio-sexual hierarchy? [/quote]
Socio-sexual hierarchy, while having some bases, is nothing more than broad generalizations. As a guy with a group of friends you really see this happening when you get together? [/quote]
Yes.
Unfortunately.
[quote]dirtman wrote:
I have given up on women. I am 38 and all I seem to find are woman that smoke and drink like fishes …some do lots of drugs. Or they are jaded and hurt by all the men they have known that you can’t get a break. Or they just want sex and for you to get lost. Or a free dinner or night out.[/quote]
Stop going to bars to find women
I have a question. does “persistence” EVER win you girl?
I mean sometimes you are dating a woman and she becomes too busy to see you. maybe because work, or family or college preoccupying her. and then you see her 1 or 2 times a month. a lot of guys say quit there she isn’t interested. I hope sometimes if one tries enough he will get the girl in the end. what do you guys think?
I was in a situation like that. I dragged it out for like 8 months and it ended very badly. If she can only see you twice a month, it means she doesn’t have the heart to tell you the truth: that she is not interested in you.
There is a rule that all humans abide by. If a person is interested in someone or something, (s)he WILL make time.
Deal with it, cut ties and move on.
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
I have a question. does “persistence” EVER win you girl?
I mean sometimes you are dating a woman and she becomes too busy to see you. maybe because work, or family or college preoccupying her. and then you see her 1 or 2 times a month. a lot of guys say quit there she isn’t interested. I hope sometimes if one tries enough he will get the girl in the end. what do you guys think?[/quote]
EVER?
Maybe?
Usually?
No.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
I have a question. does “persistence” EVER win you girl?
I mean sometimes you are dating a woman and she becomes too busy to see you. maybe because work, or family or college preoccupying her. and then you see her 1 or 2 times a month. a lot of guys say quit there she isn’t interested. I hope sometimes if one tries enough he will get the girl in the end. what do you guys think?[/quote]
EVER?
Maybe?
Usually?
No. [/quote]
thats my weakness. not being humble enough to call the quits. is it the norm now for women break up with you by being “preoccupied?”
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
I have a question. does “persistence” EVER win you girl?
I mean sometimes you are dating a woman and she becomes too busy to see you. maybe because work, or family or college preoccupying her. and then you see her 1 or 2 times a month. a lot of guys say quit there she isn’t interested. I hope sometimes if one tries enough he will get the girl in the end. what do you guys think?[/quote]
EVER?
Maybe?
Usually?
No. [/quote]
thats my weakness. not being humble enough to call the quits. is it the norm now for women break up with you by being “preoccupied?”[/quote]
Depends how old they are IMO.
If relatively young, then yes.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]CircaThursday wrote:
I have a question. does “persistence” EVER win you girl?
I mean sometimes you are dating a woman and she becomes too busy to see you. maybe because work, or family or college preoccupying her. and then you see her 1 or 2 times a month. a lot of guys say quit there she isn’t interested. I hope sometimes if one tries enough he will get the girl in the end. what do you guys think?[/quote]
EVER?
Maybe?
Usually?
No. [/quote]
thats my weakness. not being humble enough to call the quits. is it the norm now for women break up with you by being “preoccupied?”[/quote]
Depends how old they are IMO.
If relatively young, then yes. [/quote]
yep females are contemptible .
If it does ‘work out’ under those conditions, it’s only because she’s settling and you’ll never have her respect no matter how well you treat her and there’s a good chance she’ll upgrade as soon as the opportunity presents itself.
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:
If it does ‘work out’ under those conditions, it’s only because she’s settling and you’ll never have her respect no matter how well you treat her and there’s a good chance she’ll upgrade as soon as the opportunity presents itself.[/quote]
that sucks. women are all the same. maybe they all had meeting and decided to never be straight forward.