That may be the case for the patient, but, at best, it’s off-label use. In any case, like you point out, as they manage side effects (blood pressure), they’re in effect finding their minimal effective dose (or at least identifying their own risk/ benefit profile).
1 Like
Agree.
1 Like
And yet there are countless of gear using gym goers who look like garbage while hyper-responders take amounts that online experts question and end up on the pro stage… 
S
1 Like
I agree somewhat. Most gear users don’t look great, just a bigger version of their bad physique.
I think with the pros claiming absurdly low doses that the probability is far greater that they are lying than telling the truth. With Levrone for example, he had an interview were he laid out his cycle, and it wasn’t much more than a beginner cycle. Then he went on RxMuscle and was talking with Dave who laid his cycles out for him back in the day. Dave recalled far higher doses and more compounds than Kevin did in the previous interview. So at least with Levrone, we know he lied or Dave lied.
I also saw the Priest interview. He was not even giving dosages. Just saying 2 cc’s of deca and 2 cc’s of primo per week. IMO, there are not good reasons to believe something like this. It is an unfalsifiable claim that he knows nobody can call him out with certainty on, so why not say it?
IME, most people are not honest about gear use. If they admit they use, they usually say lower amounts (I have heard one pro be called out by listing his cruise dose, like it was his blast dose). Some are honest, but there is a large incentive to lie.
Some like Mike O’Hearn are close to pro level at 50 Y/O, while self reporting no AAS use. He must just have even better genetics lol.
He won the first one FTR. Oh man, that judging pissed me off.
1 Like
Oh I dunno, maybe his shoulders appear too narrow in this awkwardly posed prepubescent photo
S
1 Like