[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Mega Newb wrote:
Kataklysm wrote:
Well I believe that with average genetics, no steroids, good dieting, supplements and good workouts you can hardly build more than 2-5 pounds of lean body mass a year, after your first few years anyway.
I also think that it’s a masterpiece of irony to see guys who have been using gear consistently for years tell natural lifters that they should gain more than 10 pounds of muscle a year.
But to answer the OP, I think your goal would leave you dissapointed because you already carry a good amount of fat. Maybe set the same goal over a longer period of time.
dude… no.
Sad, isn’t it.
Jesus people, take up sewing or something… Really…
[/quote]
It’s like they get off on making excuses for why they aren’t making progress.
For some, it is “pound for pound” strength…as if this is a great justification for why the 150lbs weakling is still 150lbs but at least they know how to do an exercise better now…after only 3 years. Guess what, if you have to pull out a calculator to prove to people how “relatively strong” you are, you aren’t that damn strong.
I want ABSOLUTE strength, not “relative strength”. Ants are amazing creatures, but they are still just moving dead insects and leaves.
For the rest, it is the assumption that anyone making more progress than “2-5lbs of muscle a year” is some genetic freak.
If you only gain 2lbs of muscle in a year, you had better already be pretty big and near the peak of what you can achieve.
I would expect an advanced bodybuilder to make the claim that he only gains 2lbs of muscle a year, not someone under 180lbs whether they are a beginner or not.