This is an amazing thread…
Our culture has literally come full circle. It used to be that a lady would date a guy for a while, and when she felt comfortable enough with him, then she would sleep with him… thus holding the sex as the higher ideal.
Now, we have girls who are willing to sleep with a guy, but do not date them… thus holding that the dating is a higher ideal.
(Note the use of lady vs. girl)
Hmmm… if you weren’t dating, and now he isn’t good enough to date, then why were you banging him?
Also, did you tell your new boyfriend that you had to cut off a month long fuck-buddy relationship with a guy that wasn’t really good enough to date? I would bet not.
My past has as many ghosts as anybody’s, but where are we headed…?
Sometimes I like to go to the zoo and watch the monkeys. They will swing from branch to branch, and then, once in a while, one monkey will just start banging the hell out of some other monkey. Then, a couple other monkeys will start kicking one out right there while we are all watching… it makes for such a nice afternoon. Especially when the monkeys that just finished badgering the witness take a big handful of their DNA Milkshakes and toss them on the ground from 40 feet up. Ahh… days at the zoo…
Are we evolving…or devolving?
Next time, if you are going to let a guy treat you like a barnyard animal, maybe you could get a burger and a milkshake out of him first…
Unless, you truly are just doing it because it feels good… if so, do it in a tree.
It begs the age old question of morality:
Is sex morally justified if both partners enjoy it, it is consentual, and no one gets hurt?
(ie. this premise would justify homosexuality…)
If this is the justification, and if taking that step was just repressed due to conservative thinking… then let’s take the premise further… could we apply this to bestiality? Both partners consent, and the animals often come back for more…so, obviously they both enjoy it. Am I twisted here, or just liberal? Am I being progressive?
Remember, homosexuality had the same aversion as bestiality just a couple decades ago… now, if you condemn it, you are a homophobe… somehow belittled and scared of the idea of one grown man lubing up his erect penis in order to facilitate his cramming it in another man’s ass. Somehow, if this strikes you as not quite right, you are a homophobe, ignorant, and probably a religiious zealot.
Let’s make sure when we decide what is right and wrong, we make sure we understand the principles which justify it as acceptable.
Gays: both people consent and enjoy.
Fuck-buddies: both people consent and enjoy.
Two dogs in the road: Both partners accept and enjoy.
Bestiality: Both partners accept and enjoy.
Relationship: Sexual relations built on a solid friendship and trust to hopefully bring two people together. The act is morally justified because it will someday promote the perpetuation of our species, and is not accomplished through the use of force. (It betters humans without hurting or using force… maybe a very simple test for morality.)
Ericka, the guy probably was just hurt because he was rejected… or maybe he actually had some respect for you, and was under the impression you and he weren’t monkeys. Boy was he wrong… huh? But, it’s probably just easier to think the former…his feeling probably got hurt.
Good luck to you… and to all of us.