Focusing on a Max Goal

[quote]domcib wrote:

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

[quote]domcib wrote:
305 again.
i’m stuck here. [/quote]

Well that’s kinda good… you must stabilize a PR before being able to go up again.

I would recommend deloading for one week and retest after that, if it doesn’t go up, switch to another program and you’ll get back to the bench focus later on.[/quote]
OK. i’m gonna try and give it a try.
Honestly, I was pissed, so I was going to go for it every damn day for bit, til either I beat it or my shoulders give out.
Question. on the %, (70-80-90), should I, or could I, use my projected max of 315, or use the existing max of 305?
[/quote]

Projected 315

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

[quote]domcib wrote:

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

[quote]domcib wrote:
305 again.
i’m stuck here. [/quote]

Well that’s kinda good… you must stabilize a PR before being able to go up again.

I would recommend deloading for one week and retest after that, if it doesn’t go up, switch to another program and you’ll get back to the bench focus later on.[/quote]
OK. i’m gonna try and give it a try.
Honestly, I was pissed, so I was going to go for it every damn day for bit, til either I beat it or my shoulders give out.
Question. on the %, (70-80-90), should I, or could I, use my projected max of 315, or use the existing max of 305?
[/quote]

Projected 315[/quote]
I was hoping you would say that.:slight_smile:

Question for anyone who has done something like this: how much of the strength gain on the specialized movement stuck around, and how much evaporated once you got onto a more normal, balanced routine? CT, did your SGHP stay close to where it ended up, or did it quickly degrade back to where it was before? I’m curious.

[quote]Winatsis wrote:
Question for anyone who has done something like this: how much of the strength gain on the specialized movement stuck around, and how much evaporated once you got onto a more normal, balanced routine? CT, did your SGHP stay close to where it ended up, or did it quickly degrade back to where it was before? I’m curious.[/quote]

Why would it go back down??? Provided that you continue to include the exercise in your regular training there should be no reason for the strength on that lift to go down at all. If anything, the greatest strength gains often occur 1 or 2 weeks after the cessation of the specialization routine,

Now, if you stop doing the movement altogether as well as stop training similar movements, then yeah, your strength will go down mostly through losses in technical efficiency and neural factors (inter and intramuscular coordination).

For example after my high pull peak I got away from high pulls and started to focus more on the full olympic lifts. My goal was to re-program myself to be efficient at the actual olympic lifts. I did decrease overall strength work because I valued technique work more at the time. After 6 weeks or so I felt good about my olympic lifting technique and started to add strength work again. In my first session where I included the high pull again I could only work up to 140kg but within 3 sessions (6 days) I was back up to 170kg. 10kg less than my best… BUT this was (1) done at the end of a session after a lot of work on snatches and clean & jerks, (2) done without straps (I used straps for my 180kg) and (3) wasn’t a true all out effort.

So if I only looked at what happened the first time I did high pulls again I could have thought “man I got weak”… but it was only neural and technical elements because within 6 days it was back to where it was. Had I continued practicing the high pull my results in that lift would have been maintained or even increased even if it was not a specialization routine.

After all, what would be the purpose of a spec routine if the gains made didn’t stick with you?

[quote]domcib wrote:
305 again.
i’m stuck here. [/quote]

Haven’t you basically just done a high volume ramp of training the bench? Your performance may be lowered by the high volume you’ve been doing, but you are still deep down going to be stronger, the key is to back off. I usually peaked in strength with one week of reduced volume for every week of higher volume.

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
Hmm

Been stuck on 180kg for Back Squat for 3 sessions now & 100kg for Push Press… may give this a shot for both.

Paused BS could be a bit urgh to get out of the hole.
[/quote]

Paused back and front squats were critical for me getting my squat moving again. You have to maintain perfect posture longer, which is where everyone fails, AND I didn’t get back pain that I did from non-stop squats, or lack of carryover in the hole like I did from Box squats.

[quote]mertdawg wrote:

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
Hmm

Been stuck on 180kg for Back Squat for 3 sessions now & 100kg for Push Press… may give this a shot for both.

Paused BS could be a bit urgh to get out of the hole.
[/quote]

Paused back and front squats were critical for me getting my squat moving again. You have to maintain perfect posture longer, which is where everyone fails, AND I didn’t get back pain that I did from non-stop squats, or lack of carryover in the hole like I did from Box squats. [/quote]

I get the posture effect already really front BS, FS and overhead carries.

FS carry especially you need to push your arms effectively into the sky during the last 10 sec of the 1 min walk.

But ye, will add in :slight_smile:

So CT,

If I was silly enough to bet a bottle of Indigo on attaining one of the below goals by end of 2014 (Bauber’s 10 goal)
KG’s:
Bench: 120
1 - require 2251
Squat: 180
1 - require 2651
Dead: 200
1 - require 3201
Push Press: 100
1 - require 185*1

It strikes me that speccing the 4 would get me to the goal in the fastest time; if the focus was purely on strength numbers ? Would also have a SGHP day, as I love that exercise.

Was going to alternate the Death by with normal layer outlined while back (1RM, 80% 9 mins, Carries)…

Either which, twill be one hell of a challenge to get 1.

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
So CT,

If I was silly enough to bet a bottle of Indigo on attaining one of the below goals by end of 2014 (Bauber’s 10 goal)
KG’s:
Bench: 120
1 - require 2251
Squat: 180
1 - require 2651
Dead: 200
1 - require 3201
Push Press: 100
1 - require 185*1

It strikes me that speccing the 4 would get me to the goal in the fastest time; if the focus was purely on strength numbers ? Would also have a SGHP day, as I love that exercise.

Was going to alternate the Death by with normal layer outlined while back (1RM, 80% 9 mins, Carries)…

Either which, twill be one hell of a challenge to get 1.[/quote]

I hate to be negative, but I don’t see any of these goals as being realistic, even with the best program and nutrition. The number on the right are world class numbers that very very few lifters can hope to achieve in their lifetime. Don’t merely look at the amount of improvement but at the “finished lift”… the number on on right in all cases are world class lifts that few people even have the potential to reach in their lifetime. Sometimes we get a false idea of what is possible from looking at records… with the bench shirts, squat suits and steroids/growth hormone all the records are so high that we get a warped perception of what i possible.

I do not know many people who can do a 225kg bench press without a bench shirt. In my life I’ve seen maybe 4 or 5 and they were all above 120kg in bodyweight and not fat… one was Canada’s strongest man, one was a pro football player. And I only saw 2 that were not using drugs: the football player (but the guy was a freak who benched 140kg during his first 3 months of training when he was 15) and an amateur strongman (also with good genetics, his father went to the world championships in olympic lifting in 1982) but it took him many many many years of focusing on his bench press to get there.

The push press is the least realistic IMHO. Yeah it’s “only” a 85kg increase but the ceiling for that lift is lower. Seriously a 180kg push press would put you in the world elite. Maybe one person out of a million has the genetics to do that without drugs. And going from two plates per side to 4 plates per side on that lift in one year, or even two is not realistic.

The deadlift of 320kg is technically a more achievable lift. I’ve seen many people do more than that at a fairly young age. But it would certainly require more than one year to go from 200kg to 320kg.

I know that you are probably using what happened with my high pull to estimate that these are possible. But keep in mind that the high pull is more of a technical and power lift, it’s not that much of a strength movement. Yes I did increase my power and strength in those 3 weeks, BUT a vast portion of the increase in poundage was due to improved technique (Tim Patterson and I spent hours experimenting and discussing perfect technique) and improved neural efficiency.

When doing a spec program you do the lift daily or almost. A lot of the rapid gains are due to an improvement in technique and technical efficiency/neural efficiency. The sad thing is that these have a very low ceiling: you can always increase strength but when you have a perfectly efficient technique you can’t get grains from further improvements in technique. For that reason you cannot duplicate the increase you get from your first spec block in subsequent blocks… you cannot think that because you added 20kg on a lift during a spec block you will get the same increase, or even half the increase the next time you do such a block. For example, yeah I went from 125 to 180kg in 3 weeks. But even if I continued doing spec blocks for the high pull I doubt that I would ever get to 200kg in my lifetime.

Another thing is that every spec program takes a HUGE toll on your CNS. I know it took me a few weeks to recover from the high pull spec. So it’s not like you can go all year going from one spec to the next, you’ll burn out within 2 months.

I hate to rain on your parade but I honestly don’t see these goals happening. But then again stranger things have happened and anyway, you’ll get great gains just trying to get those goals.

The only semi-realitic one is the squat, and even then that’s quite a challenge. a 260kg squat might not seem that high when you look at the world records… but if that 260kg is done properly… a full squat, ass to grass, without a squat suit or knee wraps that 260 is a very impressive lift. I’m build for squatting and my best ever squat was 260kg and that was done when I was competing as an olympic lifter.

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
So CT,

If I was silly enough to bet a bottle of Indigo on attaining one of the below goals by end of 2014 (Bauber’s 10 goal)
KG’s:
Bench: 120
1 - require 2251
Squat: 180
1 - require 2651
Dead: 200
1 - require 3201
Push Press: 100
1 - require 185*1

It strikes me that speccing the 4 would get me to the goal in the fastest time; if the focus was purely on strength numbers ? Would also have a SGHP day, as I love that exercise.

Was going to alternate the Death by with normal layer outlined while back (1RM, 80% 9 mins, Carries)…

Either which, twill be one hell of a challenge to get 1.[/quote]

Ewww, I’m telling on you…

J/k, I’d love to see you hit one of these goals, although I agree with Flip and CT.

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
So CT,

If I was silly enough to bet a bottle of Indigo on attaining one of the below goals by end of 2014 (Bauber’s 10 goal)
KG’s:
Bench: 120
1 - require 2251
Squat: 180
1 - require 2651
Dead: 200
1 - require 3201
Push Press: 100
1 - require 185*1

It strikes me that speccing the 4 would get me to the goal in the fastest time; if the focus was purely on strength numbers ? Would also have a SGHP day, as I love that exercise.

Was going to alternate the Death by with normal layer outlined while back (1RM, 80% 9 mins, Carries)…

Either which, twill be one hell of a challenge to get 1.[/quote]

Once you have decent strength experience, I don’t think you can gain more than about 25% on a big lift in a year (about 2% per month long term) with everything going perfect. You could probably gain 25% in 6 months, but would then spend the rest of the year until you are physiologically ready to do it again.

I am interested CT, do you like to see a short periods of rapid strength gain followed by periods of making that the “new norm” or is it better to just keep your pace slow enough to keep the gains coming steadily?

Most of my new strength gains occurred in 3, 4 or 6 month periods followed by longer periods of no gains. Over an 11-12 year period my bench press went up from 170 to 360, but all of the new gains occurred in 6 stretches that only totaled about 24 months.

[quote]mertdawg wrote:
I am interested CT, do you like to see a short periods of rapid strength gain followed by periods of making that the “new norm” or is it better to just keep your pace slow enough to keep the gains coming steadily?

Most of my new strength gains occurred in 3, 4 or 6 month periods followed by longer periods of no gains. Over an 11-12 year period my bench press went up from 170 to 360, but all of the new gains occurred in 6 stretches that only totaled about 24 months. [/quote]

That’s actually a very good question.

I’m naturally inclined toward working super hard on one specific goal for a short period of time then switching to a different focus. So my tendency would be to tell you that I prefer rapid gains followed by strength maintenance. That probably fits my psychological profile the most: I’m borderline obsessive, excessive and impatient plus I have a very short attention span!

But I learned from experience that you cannot always “force” gains. So even if you blitz a lift it will not always work and sometimes it can have negative repercussions.

I’m now learning the virtue of a slower, more steady progression. And although it lacks the instant gratification of a huge PR, the smaller but frequent improvements can be just as satisfying. That having been said, even if someone is using a slower/steadier approach to gains, I feel that if a strength gain burst naturally comes (e.g. you feel super strong and can beat the planned improvement by 20lbs) then you should go for it, but don’t force it.

Survey says - No :slight_smile:

But what’s life without a challenge… actually I’m quietly confident on squat. But hey 11.25 months left… best get eating.

If it works, twill be your programming only.

[quote]Voluminous wrote:
Survey says - No :slight_smile:

But what’s life without a challenge… actually I’m quietly confident on squat. But hey 11.25 months left… best get eating.

If it works, twill be your programming only.[/quote]

Yeah, the squat is possible. Still a very very very lofty goal but possible. Just make sure that you do not compromise technique and depth in search for numbers.

Course not.

Need to provide videos @ the end: so be fooling myself.

[quote]mertdawg wrote:

[quote]domcib wrote:
305 again.
i’m stuck here. [/quote]

Haven’t you basically just done a high volume ramp of training the bench? Your performance may be lowered by the high volume you’ve been doing, but you are still deep down going to be stronger, the key is to back off. I usually peaked in strength with one week of reduced volume for every week of higher volume.
[/quote]

I did the program Ct wrote about for 2 weeks. went from 275-295-305. Since the goal changed from 300 to 315, we decided to do 1 more week, then a deload week.

Ct was driving the car going 100MPH, but I hit an ice slick when the snowstorm came. I toasted my shoulders and elbows. So, for the next week I laid off the pressing.
Then I started back at it using a false grip(wonderful), and, after 1 week of the main program, I hit 305 again. So now I’m doing the Deload Week.
Overall I am pleased with the achievements. When I hit 300 while I was at Rutgers,I was 19,and, I couldn’t manage more than 280 for the rest of the year.(Then I left school and had not trained for many years). Now I’m 55, so, this is very positive progress.

I am going for the 315 at the end of this training week!
Paint the flag red, Put your balls to the wall, And Go For It!

5x1 @ 90& day
i went from barely making a lift – felt like i blew a piston rod.
to doing it easily,
then adding weight and doing it easily also.
I guess the CNS turned on or something.
It would be nice to find that switch that turns it on and off.

After 10 days of flu and work 14 hours a day 7 days a week, and no training whatsoever.
I managed to squeek out 295. That’s it

[quote]domcib wrote:
After 10 days of flu and work 14 hours a day 7 days a week, and no training whatsoever.
I managed to squeek out 295. That’s it[/quote]

Not too bad for 10 days of the worst possible situation! Not to mention that the flu will tend to dehydrate you which will significantly decrease pressing strength.