Fiscal Cliff Deal Reached

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

Not to mention all the capital gains and estate and gift tax preferences given to all those poor people with all those stock holdings, estates, and gift-giving.
[/quote]

Capital gain taxes are lower because capital is easily moved and capital goes where it is loved and well-treated. It is also the foundation upon which higher-paying jobs are created.

For example, a sweat shop in China takes very little capital. It’s unskilled workers are also paid crap.

A robotic shop takes a lot of capital and its (sometimes fewer, but often not — production is higher) skilled workers are paid a lot.

Sometime during the Industrial Revolution, the USA decided that it wanted higher-paid workers so it (used to) make capital investment in the USA attractive.

Now, capital will slowly slip away and other countries will enjoy the fruits of cheaper capital.

In short, raising those taxes is a stupid decision, long term.

BUT, for those full of hate and envy, I guess enjoy spreading misery.

The higher tax rates on ordinary income will similarly see highly-skilled, hard-working, people move elsewhere.

Right now, I just made a lot of money moving a lawn-tool business from the USA to Costa Rica. The management and skilled engineers moved to Costa Rica. The unionied thugs who sued themselves out of jobs get unemployment paid for with borrowed money from China.

[quote]SteelyD wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
This went exactly like I thought it would go. So none of it is a surprise to me. If you step back and look at from a far, it’s actually how politics should work. Nobody got exactly what they wanted, everybody compromised and reached a deal.
The democrats control the senate and the executive, they were going to get things they wanted, period. But the republican controlled house prevented it from being a model reversal to bubble-up economics in a time where such a shift would absolutely traumatize the economy.
In the end it’s not great, but it better than it could have been. And now that it’s over, I can proceed in some investing with out the looming panic that ensues from an impending disaster.

Anybody who dug in their heals on the basis of principle at a time like this is a fool. Averting this cliff was more important than principle. In the end, the system worked…Kudos to our forefathers for their foresight.[/quote]

Great post, Pat.

It’s DAMN frustrating at times…but this is the way things were meant to work.

Mufasa
[/quote]

I quite disagree with Pat here.

This ‘crisis’ is the result of laziness and lack of accountability. There was no reason this had to be hashed out at the last minute. Literally.

As details of how this went down continue to emerge, it smells even worse. Some hundred pages of legislation, loaded with pork no less, delivered unread, literally minutes before the vote.

That is NOT how the Founding Fathers intended legislation to be enacted. They actually used “thought”. We have elected representatives literally and directly affecting our lives voting on things they have not read.

The fact that they slightly mitigated some things is irrelevant in my mind. There is this thing called “entropy” that must be dealt with sooner or later.

All this did was administer some morpine and place a band-aid on a scratch on the forehead while the severed limbs continue to bleed out. They slightly prolonged a painful excrutiating death.

Sorry, at some point the mess needs to be dealt with and the spending must stop. Better sooner than later IMHO. Things are going to get much worse before the get better (long term).

This was just another dose of medicine for the people.[/quote]

I am just saying the system worked despite the stupidity of the politicians involved. I never had an illusions that it was going to be a great piece of legislation. Just that a deal was reached and compromises were made and it was that way because of the way the system was setup initially.
They didn’t design the system with political parties in mind either. It was the inevitable after birth of a political system.
The way things came out was far from ideal. Yes, this should have been handled much sooner, but that doesn’t play in to the rules and constraints of the system. The system doesn’t deal with ideology, it deals with legislative process. The legislative process worked as designed.
I think a lot of people put the early Americans on a pedestal. There was bad legislation in the olden days to, Alien and Sedition act anyone?

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Now, capital will slowly slip away and other countries will enjoy the fruits of cheaper capital.

In short, raising those taxes is a stupid decision, long term.

BUT, for those full of hate and envy, I guess enjoy spreading misery.

[/quote]

Yup, that’s definitely the trickle-down theory. I was not addressing the merits of trickle down economics, but Zeb’s direct challenge to show how the more-wealthy benefited more from the Bush cuts than the less-wealthy.

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
Now, capital will slowly slip away and other countries will enjoy the fruits of cheaper capital.

In short, raising those taxes is a stupid decision, long term.

BUT, for those full of hate and envy, I guess enjoy spreading misery.

[/quote]

Yup, that’s definitely the trickle-down theory. I was not addressing the merits of trickle down economics, but Zeb’s direct challenge to show how the more-wealthy benefited more from the Bush cuts than the less-wealthy.[/quote]

I don’t know about the “theory.” I do know that capital flight is very real, as is “brain drain” of highly-skilled, motivated people.

The USA benefited from this for over a century.

Now, it’s flowing out, because work-a-holics don’t want to “redistribute” 50% of the money they work for.

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

I would expect nothing less than this from some dumbass backwoods hillbilly that can’t even fucking conceive of the millions of people making an honest living working in the non-private sector.

Hey genius, you do realize that means the MILITARY too right? Fucking dumbass
[/quote]

Childish logic. Government is necessary. Taxes are necessary. But it is pure unadulterated bullshit to forget that they are a necessary evil. To wish taxes on someone else is to wish them evil. To revel in getting paid from those taxes is to take joy in profiting from evil. You are a piece of shit, and you let anyone with a brain see it.

There are honest hard working people in the non-private sector. My mom is one of them. Instead of running off on the anarchist I hate all government workers strawman, I’m talking about you. YOU specifically. You personally are an evil, corrupt turd. You are the reason public servants get a bad name.

You laugh at and enjoy having money coerced from someone else who is powerless to resist and given to you. I will pray for you soul.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

I would expect nothing less than this from some dumbass backwoods hillbilly that can’t even fucking conceive of the millions of people making an honest living working in the non-private sector.

Hey genius, you do realize that means the MILITARY too right? Fucking dumbass
[/quote]

Childish logic. Government is necessary. Taxes are necessary. But it is pure unadulterated bullshit to forget that they are a necessary evil. To wish taxes on someone else is to wish them evil. To revel in getting paid from those taxes is to take joy in profiting from evil. You are a piece of shit, and you let anyone with a brain see it.

There are honest hard working people in the non-private sector. My mom is one of them. Instead of running off on the anarchist I hate all government workers strawman, I’m talking about you. YOU specifically. You personally are an evil, corrupt turd. You are the reason public servants get a bad name.

You laugh at and enjoy having money coerced from someone else who is powerless to resist and given to you. I will pray for you soul.[/quote]

I thought I was on your ignore list? So how did you see that? Or were you just bluffing and grandstanding? Couldn’t resist taking a peek at my response, could ya?

You were talking about ME, but I wasnt talking about YOU. I was talking about ZEB because i have absolutely zero respect for him. But you are now on my list that I am absolutely happy helps pay my salary. I’ll be sure to send you a Christmas card.

The real ironic part is I guaran-fucking-tee I contribute more money in taxes than you do. THe difference is that I don’t sit with a bunch of like minded lunatics and bitch about it, while evoking some nostalgia of the tea party of the 1700’s

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

I would expect nothing less than this from some dumbass backwoods hillbilly that can’t even fucking conceive of the millions of people making an honest living working in the non-private sector.

Hey genius, you do realize that means the MILITARY too right? Fucking dumbass
[/quote]

Childish logic. Government is necessary. Taxes are necessary. But it is pure unadulterated bullshit to forget that they are a necessary evil. To wish taxes on someone else is to wish them evil. To revel in getting paid from those taxes is to take joy in profiting from evil. You are a piece of shit, and you let anyone with a brain see it.

There are honest hard working people in the non-private sector. My mom is one of them. Instead of running off on the anarchist I hate all government workers strawman, I’m talking about you. YOU specifically. You personally are an evil, corrupt turd. You are the reason public servants get a bad name.

You laugh at and enjoy having money coerced from someone else who is powerless to resist and given to you. I will pray for you soul.[/quote]

By the way can I get a cheatsheet or something to help decode your posts and what battles you want to fight? You clearly hold the opinion that not all non-private employees aren’t pieces of shit, so when do they cross the line from being your mother to “evil pieces of shit”? Just when they go on a message board and disagree with you? Somewhere before that? After? Just trying to figure out what kinda egg shells I have to walk on with you.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
You laugh at and enjoy having money coerced from someone else who is powerless to resist and given to you. [/quote]

Powerless? Wow that’s an interesting concept. Isn’t that why the founding fathers you speak so fondly of invoked the powers of a representative government? Or are you saying that the founding fathers were wrong?

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

The real ironic part is I guaran-fucking-tee I contribute more money in taxes than you do.
[/quote]

And I guarantee I do more good and help more people than you do.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

The real ironic part is I guaran-fucking-tee I contribute more money in taxes than you do.
[/quote]

And I guarantee I do more good and help more people than you do.[/quote]

Helping is subjective…

Edit

And I’m still baffled about how you can keep seeing my posts after putting me on your ignore list. Is this a technical glitch?

Pat said:

“…The system doesn’t deal with ideology, it deals with legislative process. The legislative process worked as designed…”

Said much better than I could have!

Mufasa

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

By the way can I get a cheatsheet or something to help decode your posts and what battles you want to fight? You clearly hold the opinion that not all non-private employees aren’t pieces of shit, so when do they cross the line from being your mother to “evil pieces of shit”? Just when they go on a message board and disagree with you? Somewhere before that? After? Just trying to figure out what kinda egg shells I have to walk on with you.[/quote]

It has nothing to do with disagreeing with me. I don’t at all think guys like pit are evil, and we don’t agree on much of anything. I call people that when they reveal themselves to be such.

For the record, I don’t hate you. I hate what you do and what’s in your heart. I feel sorry for you.

You are like a cancerous cell. I’d much rather you be cured than cut out. Even a cancerous cell is still part of the living organism.

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Helping is subjective…
[/quote]

No, it isn’t.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Helping is subjective…
[/quote]

No, it isn’t.[/quote]

Ok, then I also help a shitload more than you do…

So you volunteer at a soup kitchen every once in a while? Show a fatherless child how to swing a baseball bat? When you start making sure we don’t get nuked by the Chinese, come and talk to me

^^^^

BTW “making sure we don’t get nuked by the Chinese” is not my actual career. I obviously wouldn’t be stupid enough to talk about that on the internet in a forum full of vengeful lunatics. But volunteering your time to help people and doing ACTUAL work to protect people is different as night and day. But that’s just my “subjective” opinion.

Number of people VTBalla34 helps on a daily basis: 311,591,917 (not including allies and others that might be affected by mutually assured destruction)

Number of people Double Duce helps: ???

I PM’ed the mods about that ignore list technical glitch too DD. Hopefully they can figure it out.

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
^^^^

BTW “making sure we don’t get nuked by the Chinese” is not my actual career. I obviously wouldn’t be stupid enough to talk about that on the internet in a forum full of vengeful lunatics. But volunteering your time to help people and doing ACTUAL work to protect people is different as night and day. But that’s just my “subjective” opinion.[/quote]

You accept compensation. And would not do what you do without such compensation. The work I do pays your salary, why then do you not share the credit the way you revel in sharing the burden?

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Number of people VTBalla34 helps on a daily basis: 311,591,917 (not including allies and others that might be affected by mutually assured destruction)

Number of people Double Duce helps: ???

I PM’ed the mods about that ignore list technical glitch too DD. Hopefully they can figure it out.[/quote]

Do you help these people on your free time, or is it part of a job you are paid for? It only counts a good deed if it would not be done by someone else.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

Do you help these people on your free time, or is it part of a job you are paid for? It only counts a good deed if it would not be done by someone else.[/quote]

That’s a pretty “subjective” opinion.

So volunteering to coach a little league team is not a good deed by your definition? Soup kitchens turn volunteers away all the time–they literally have people lining up to help at certain times of the year. Good to know that’s not appreciated as a good deed.

What would qualify as a good deed under your conveniently narrow definition?

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
You accept compensation. And would not do what you do without such compensation.[/quote]

So the men and women in uniform don’t “help people” since they are compensated for their efforts? Man, it would really suck to be a National Guardsman around your area if everyone holds the same thought you do during natural disasters. That Tennessee River doesn’t ever overflow and require sandbagging? Do you just tell them to go home and “you got this”?