Fiscal Cliff Deal Reached

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

You’re not the only one who wonders these types of things. [/quote]

Undoubtedly true. The class-warfare propaganda is great and effective and pervasive thoughou the media and schools.

Most people are not independent thinkers and cannot see the scam.[/quote]

The thing that gets me is the moral relativism of it all. Poor people on welfare with X-boxes and cars. Is what you are being paid for what you are able to do fair? While, if you aren’t forced into your job, I don’t think it matters because you are a volunteer, that is at least a reasonable question. But when you base your objection on what OTHERS have and make, it becomes absurdity at it’s finest. What the guy down the street has doesn’t affect what you deserve.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/poor_some_ugar_on_me_0Hq1d3iPnvj2RwpsEDS7MN[/quote]

This sort of thing, people on welfare/unemployment, that have gaming systems, iphones, etc, then whine about how unfair society is to them. Let’s see here…don’t spend the money you receive on entertainment crap, and instead, spend it on food, or towards education yourself so you can become a greater asset in the workforce. While you’re at it, that time you were going to spend playing that Xbox? Spend it working, looking for work, growing some dang food for your family, etc.

I can’t help but think how many people wouldn’t be poor, if they would stop trying to live like they’re not.

[quote]NickViar wrote:
Even if luck has something to do with longterm success, what should it be replaced with?

People are different, they have different backgrounds, upbringings, incomes, talents, etc.

Not everyone can be equal. A ruler can make MOST people equal financially by taking almost everything from some and distributing it to others. That will make the ruled somewhat equal(obviously this would result in most everyone living in third world conditions-but MOST would be equal). However, there is still a ruler. That ruler is not going to live like the ruled so there would still not be total equality, even if a ruler forcibly makes everyone else equal.

What if everyone could somehow start off with total equality of circumstances? How do we assure the equality of genetics?

Freedom, not equality, must be the goal of government. Pursuit of anything else will bring out evil in people.[/quote]

Well put.

Everyone should ease up a bit from the “people getting welfrare are people sitting around playing video games and making illegitimate babies” rhetoric.

While there certainly is a lot of that going on; a large portion of Medicaid, Medicaire and SS (in the form of SSI/Disability) goes to the overall care, health needs, basic housing and job training, rehabilitation and feeding of the mentally and/or physically disabled…

And its not a small portion.

And for those of you who scream “Let Families and Churches take care of it all!”

  1. the numbers are STAGGERING and 2) often times, Families have reached the absolute limits of what they can do alone. DESPITE ALL THIS, there are STIILL many of the mentally and/or physically disabled who fall through the cracks.

SO I would say cut out out all the waste and fraud; but to characterize Medicaid,Medicaire and SS as programs for the lazy and useless to have time to play video games and make babies is beyond short-sighted.

Mufasa

Also…much like Push suggested for those who abuse Fire Arms?

Those who defraud and abuse these systems should get the worst punishments possible.

Mufasa

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Everyone should ease up a bit from the “people getting welfrare are people sitting around playing video games and making illegitimate babies” rhetoric.

While there certainly is a lot of that going on; a large portion of Medicaid, Medicaire and SS (in the form of SSI/Disability) goes to the overall care, health needs, basic housing and job training, rehabilitation and feeding of the mentally and/or physically disabled…

And its not a small portion.

And for those of you who scream “Let Families and Churches take care of it all!”

  1. the numbers are STAGGERING and 2) often times, Families have reached the absolute limits of what they can do alone. DESPITE ALL THIS, there are STIILL many of the mentally and/or physically disabled who fall through the cracks.

SO I would say cut out out all the waste and fraud; but to characterize Medicaid,Medicaire and SS as programs for the lazy and useless to have time to play video games and make babies is beyond short-sighted.

Mufasa[/quote]

Minus the like 70% administrative cost and the large amount of fraud, the money that does go to people who need it sometimes does some good. I’ll grant you that.

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Also…much like Push suggested for those who abuse Fire Arms?

Those who defraud and abuse these systems should get the worst punishments possible.

Mufasa[/quote]

Negative vs positive right. Completely different subjects.

If the government were using tax money to buy and hand out guns to the less gun fortunate, and those guns were getting used in crimes, then the situation would be similar.

DD:

I’m not quite sure about your point; but I was speaking in terms of the punishments for those who abuse either a right or a program that is meant to help those in need.

Mufasa

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Everyone should ease up a bit from the “people getting welfrare are people sitting around playing video games and making illegitimate babies” rhetoric.

While there certainly is a lot of that going on; a large portion of Medicaid, Medicaire and SS (in the form of SSI/Disability) goes to the overall care, health needs, basic housing and job training, rehabilitation and feeding of the mentally and/or physically disabled…

And its not a small portion.

And for those of you who scream “Let Families and Churches take care of it all!”

  1. the numbers are STAGGERING and 2) often times, Families have reached the absolute limits of what they can do alone. DESPITE ALL THIS, there are STIILL many of the mentally and/or physically disabled who fall through the cracks.

SO I would say cut out out all the waste and fraud; but to characterize Medicaid,Medicaire and SS as programs for the lazy and useless to have time to play video games and make babies is beyond short-sighted.

Mufasa[/quote]

Minus the like 70% administrative cost and the large amount of fraud, the money that does go to people who need it sometimes does some good. I’ll grant you that.[/quote]

Pretty much my line of thinking. It’s an inefficient system.

Growing up, we had these neighbors who were generally known for not being the best of people. Their father tried to commit suicide, shot himself in the leg. He survived. Now, he gets a check from the government each month/week/whatever, for being disabled and unemployable. That is ridiculous.

[quote]kpsnap wrote:
I knew my comment would draw ire.

But maybe someone can address the concern I have with income disparity. I struggle with understanding why there are jobs in this country that are essential to the workings of the “machine” but do not pay enough to live on. Cleaning restrooms, working at daycare centers, working with the mentally ill, waiting tables, washing dishes, harvesting crops, cooking food, caring for the elderly in nursing homes, serving as a cashier, etc. etc. All of these jobs are essential to having a functioning society but do not pay enough for people to live respectably.

It’s not that I like giving lazy people a handout. I don’t. And I’m not lobbying for that at all. But I do think about the people who work their asses off for minimum wage. So it frustrates me to hear people who make so much money whine about having a little less. Eh, I’ve gone soft in my old age.[/quote]

Outside of the excellent posts by Trib and Jewbacca, who is as sharp and rational–and reasonable–as they come, my answer to you is this:

You speak about “not paying enough to live on” and then you speak about “living respectably”.

You can absolutely live on the salary of a waiter, a bouncer, a farmer’s hand, or a cook. The fact that you may not make enough money to BUY ALL THE THINGS YOU WANT is absolutely irrelevant. Respectably is more than a consumerist’s standard. It has nothing to do with the shit in your house, apartment, shared home, whatever. It has to do with YOU the person, having respect for yourself and pride in being able to take care of yourself.

And here’s the point–in the vast, vast, vast majority of the country, people CAN live on those wages.

I did.

My mom’s relatives did, they’re farmers and while growing up their sons did “harvesting work” and were otherwise farm hands when they were old enough to get a job, in ADDITION to the home chores. They made the bills. I made the bills. They and I both had a comfortable place, albeit small, to live, sleep and eat in.

I did not have a plasma tv. I did not have internet or cable. I did not have a smartphone. I did not have a Playstation 3. I did not get a new car, I had an old car that had rust on parts of it but that got me where I needed.

I see a bunch of people complaining on their iPads and smartphones and thru the “Playstation network” during online games about how they are broke and can’t make ends meet. TOO FUCKING BAD FOR THEM. Does that seem harsh to you? Probably. But I did the same thing they somehow can’t afford to do…while complaining over an appliance expensive enough to pay for food for a couple months, or rent for a month. And they usually have a bunch of these–all the poor college kids I see, yeah they work 15-20 hours a week and get playstation 3s, smart phones, and big tvs. I have no sympathy for that when you then start to complain about “unfair wages”. No, you could have lived if you worked full time–and don’t tell me working full time means you can’t go to school, I had 2 of my closest friends work 40-50 hours a week while going to school. They made ends meet with some student loans, and now they make good money. I had one very close friend hold 2 jobs while going to VET SCHOOL…which is a 50 hour job itself. She slept maybe 4 hours a night, but made it through.

What you might not realize, or might not want to realize, is that this sort of thing…the complaining about being broke while spending all your money on expensive toys…is not the exception. It is the RULE, brought about by the consumeristic culture of mass media and advertising materialism.

There are people in real dire straights, yes. People who really DIDN’T get a fair shake, who have little brothers and sisters to raise cuz mom and dad are fucked on drugs or dead. They should be helped, yes. So should the people who messed up in high school and are trying to get back on track. But the bottom line is that across a large, large chunk of the country the majority of the people “broke” brought it on themselves by being complete fucking dumbasses and lazy.

You can live on a waiter’s wage. If not, get another job OR quit buying shit you “want” and buy food and pay bills. Or work two. I did. A lot of people did. That’s called having pride in yourself. Almost everyone around me when I was working to get by at that point was also smart enough to work two jobs, do what they needed. However, A ton of people who “work their asses off” for minimum wage also buy shit with their money that they have absolutely ZERO need for, which pinches them with bills. And is entirely their fault–I’ve done it to myself, then fixed the problem. Most people just complain.

There is absolutely zero reality to the idea that someone is guaranteed a 40 hour work week and enough spare money to buy the newest phone on the market. I know your intentions were good, but man it really aggravates me–I still am what many such as yourself would consider “poor”, but I’ll be damned if I’m a lazy ass. I could make ends meet back then, and I’m better off now with money to buy supplements and take road trips.

here’s the bottom line: people need to take responsibility for their financial decisions. Don’t blame me or somebody richer like jewbacca for your problems when you take your pay check and tip money–and remember I worked almost exclusively for tips as my wage for years–and buy a smartphone or playstation and then can’t meet rent or pay the electric bill. Pay the bloody bill first and don’t eat out. Cook.

As a last point, yes I will admit and readily admit that there are parts of this country where the cost of living is so high you can’t really make ends meet with the same “ease” as I described. In general, these are places where the cost of living has skyrocketed due to HIGH TAXES and high bureaucracy costs. Or in other words, the very government that is trying to “help” them is hurting them worse than their job’s wages.

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

You’re not the only one who wonders these types of things. [/quote]

Undoubtedly true. The class-warfare propaganda is great and effective and pervasive thoughou the media and schools.

Most people are not independent thinkers and cannot see the scam.[/quote]

The thing that gets me is the moral relativism of it all. Poor people on welfare with X-boxes and cars. Is what you are being paid for what you are able to do fair? While, if you aren’t forced into your job, I don’t think it matters because you are a volunteer, that is at least a reasonable question. But when you base your objection on what OTHERS have and make, it becomes absurdity at it’s finest. What the guy down the street has doesn’t affect what you deserve.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/poor_some_ugar_on_me_0Hq1d3iPnvj2RwpsEDS7MN[/quote]

This sort of thing, people on welfare/unemployment, that have gaming systems, iphones, etc, then whine about how unfair society is to them. Let’s see here…don’t spend the money you receive on entertainment crap, and instead, spend it on food, or towards education yourself so you can become a greater asset in the workforce. While you’re at it, that time you were going to spend playing that Xbox? Spend it working, looking for work, growing some dang food for your family, etc.

I can’t help but think how many people wouldn’t be poor, if they would stop trying to live like they’re not. [/quote]

Damn. I just posted a giant rant about the same thing when I should have just quoted this from you. Look, I did the same thing: I worked for tips, picked up a second job, and didn’t buy xbox and plasma tvs and iphones. And I lived just fine with plenty of food as well as some beer and occasional vacations then…by saving for them. I had a comfy bed and warm home to go to.

Fucking lazy. You can either “live like you’re not poor” and always be in debt or scraping by…or you can actually put-off your instant gratification for a few years and live infinitely better. The fundamental concept of investment that those “EVIL RICH” people grasped with money, only done with time and work. Same precise concept. The only difference is we don’t want to put off what we want any more. We want the six pack abs NOW, the iphone NOW, the xbox NOW, or God help me someone else will have what I don’t yet and i’ll be ostracized and made fun of in my social twitter net!!1!!1

It’s “keeping up with the joneses” from the 50s on steroids and adhd now.

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
DD:

I’m not quite sure about your point; but I was speaking in terms of the punishments for those who abuse either a right or a program that is meant to help those in need.

Mufasa[/quote]

For a positive right, supplied by other people, the people forced to supply the right have complete authority and in all fairness to criticize every nuance of how it is used.

For a negative right, where no one is force to supply that right, you do not have that same authority.

It’s just a bad analogy.

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Everyone should ease up a bit from the “people getting welfrare are people sitting around playing video games and making illegitimate babies” rhetoric.

While there certainly is a lot of that going on; a large portion of Medicaid, Medicaire and SS (in the form of SSI/Disability) goes to the overall care, health needs, basic housing and job training, rehabilitation and feeding of the mentally and/or physically disabled…

And its not a small portion.

And for those of you who scream “Let Families and Churches take care of it all!”

  1. the numbers are STAGGERING and 2) often times, Families have reached the absolute limits of what they can do alone. DESPITE ALL THIS, there are STIILL many of the mentally and/or physically disabled who fall through the cracks.

SO I would say cut out out all the waste and fraud; but to characterize Medicaid,Medicaire and SS as programs for the lazy and useless to have time to play video games and make babies is beyond short-sighted.

Mufasa[/quote]

And that’s not what I am doing, reading between my rant, or many others. However, the flip side is also true: If the government can’t get a clue as to how to operate MY money efficiently to help those people, and instead makes the problem worse through ever worsening bureaucracy and indeed outright IRRESPONSIBLE spending, then why the hell am I giving my money to them in the first place? I don’t want to give even more when I know they are going to blow that shit–MY hard earned money–on stuff that is wasteful and pet projects for some politician’s vote-buying attempts. It’s gone beyond the pale, and I see through the lies they spout to “help the poor”. Nobody is doing what is needed to help them or anybody else in government, it’s all more power grabs.

That’s the whole point. If the government actually was willing to do what I’ve done my whole life: cut waste, tighten the belt, address the problem at hand and ACTUALLY help the poor without sucking literally hundreds of billions of dollars away in waste and red-tape…well yeah, I’m a team player I’d chip in in a heartbeat.

But they don’t. They don’t attempt to fix the problem. They grandstand. They don’t tighten their belt. They spend even more. They want me to do things they, as MY public servants, are not willing to do. They buy their votes with my money. So I say fuck them.

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

You’re not the only one who wonders these types of things. [/quote]

Undoubtedly true. The class-warfare propaganda is great and effective and pervasive thoughou the media and schools.

Most people are not independent thinkers and cannot see the scam.[/quote]

The thing that gets me is the moral relativism of it all. Poor people on welfare with X-boxes and cars. Is what you are being paid for what you are able to do fair? While, if you aren’t forced into your job, I don’t think it matters because you are a volunteer, that is at least a reasonable question. But when you base your objection on what OTHERS have and make, it becomes absurdity at it’s finest. What the guy down the street has doesn’t affect what you deserve.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/poor_some_ugar_on_me_0Hq1d3iPnvj2RwpsEDS7MN[/quote]

This sort of thing, people on welfare/unemployment, that have gaming systems, iphones, etc, then whine about how unfair society is to them. Let’s see here…don’t spend the money you receive on entertainment crap, and instead, spend it on food, or towards education yourself so you can become a greater asset in the workforce. While you’re at it, that time you were going to spend playing that Xbox? Spend it working, looking for work, growing some dang food for your family, etc.

I can’t help but think how many people wouldn’t be poor, if they would stop trying to live like they’re not. [/quote]

Damn. I just posted a giant rant about the same thing when I should have just quoted this from you. Look, I did the same thing: I worked for tips, picked up a second job, and didn’t buy xbox and plasma tvs and iphones. And I lived just fine with plenty of food as well as some beer and occasional vacations then…by saving for them. I had a comfy bed and warm home to go to.

Fucking lazy. You can either “live like you’re not poor” and always be in debt or scraping by…or you can actually put-off your instant gratification for a few years and live infinitely better. The fundamental concept of investment that those “EVIL RICH” people grasped with money, only done with time and work. Same precise concept. The only difference is we don’t want to put off what we want any more. We want the six pack abs NOW, the iphone NOW, the xbox NOW, or God help me someone else will have what I don’t yet and i’ll be ostracized and made fun of in my social twitter net!!1!!1

It’s “keeping up with the joneses” from the 50s on steroids and adhd now.
[/quote]

It’s alright, you made the point much better and more thoroughly than I. I touched on this same concept back in the minimum wage thread, where I think pittbull was advocating raising minimum wage, as some sort of magic fairy-tale solution to poor people’s situations. I even came up with a quick basic budget for how someone can pretty easily live on minimum wage by themselves, and EASILY with a roommate/significant other. It’s so simple, but people are so caught up in societal appearances, and wanting to appear wealthier than they are, that they guarantee their continued poverty. Insane.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

Also I know you are fond of calling Obama a socialist for one reason being the healthcare issue. However Nixon was to the left of Obama on healthcare and you wouldn’t call him a socialist, would you? You ought to revisit your thoughts on a President who governs like a moderate Republican instead of calling him a socialist.[/quote]

That’s funny I don’t remember “Nixoncare” being passed.

And the only reason Obama has not done more things like Obamacare is that he no longer has both house and senate democrat majority. If he gets both during the mid-terms he will pull more socialist policies like Obamacare. As long as there are republicans to stop him he has to lean center left.[/quote]
It

Whether Nixoncare passed or not is beside the point. He introduced it. So does that mean Nixon was a socialsit?

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
Whether Nixoncare passed or not is beside the point. He introduced it. So does that mean Nixon was a socialsit?[/quote]

Nixon was from the left end of Republican politics at the time, with strong centralization and socialist tendancies.

Basically Bill Clinton without the whores and lies under oath.

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Everyone should ease up a bit from the “people getting welfrare are people sitting around playing video games and making illegitimate babies” rhetoric.[/quote]

I see it on a daily basis and I won’t be easing up on it any time soon. The very people who are collecting welfare are the ones with the cigarette hanging from their mouths and a case of beer in the back seat of their car. And yes more kids than they should have had. We’ve have encouraged these people to become lazy by giving them things that they did not earn and do not deserve. And we’ve punished the hard working people by taking money from them to encourage this entitlement mentality from the welfare crowd.

This country took a huge step backwards with LBJ’s war on poverty. He was the single worst modern day President. And now Obama is adding to the pain.

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

You’re not the only one who wonders these types of things. [/quote]

Undoubtedly true. The class-warfare propaganda is great and effective and pervasive thoughou the media and schools.

Most people are not independent thinkers and cannot see the scam.[/quote]

The thing that gets me is the moral relativism of it all. Poor people on welfare with X-boxes and cars. Is what you are being paid for what you are able to do fair? While, if you aren’t forced into your job, I don’t think it matters because you are a volunteer, that is at least a reasonable question. But when you base your objection on what OTHERS have and make, it becomes absurdity at it’s finest. What the guy down the street has doesn’t affect what you deserve.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/poor_some_ugar_on_me_0Hq1d3iPnvj2RwpsEDS7MN[/quote]

This sort of thing, people on welfare/unemployment, that have gaming systems, iphones, etc, then whine about how unfair society is to them. Let’s see here…don’t spend the money you receive on entertainment crap, and instead, spend it on food, or towards education yourself so you can become a greater asset in the workforce. While you’re at it, that time you were going to spend playing that Xbox? Spend it working, looking for work, growing some dang food for your family, etc.

I can’t help but think how many people wouldn’t be poor, if they would stop trying to live like they’re not. [/quote]

Damn. I just posted a giant rant about the same thing when I should have just quoted this from you. Look, I did the same thing: I worked for tips, picked up a second job, and didn’t buy xbox and plasma tvs and iphones. And I lived just fine with plenty of food as well as some beer and occasional vacations then…by saving for them. I had a comfy bed and warm home to go to.

Fucking lazy. You can either “live like you’re not poor” and always be in debt or scraping by…or you can actually put-off your instant gratification for a few years and live infinitely better. The fundamental concept of investment that those “EVIL RICH” people grasped with money, only done with time and work. Same precise concept. The only difference is we don’t want to put off what we want any more. We want the six pack abs NOW, the iphone NOW, the xbox NOW, or God help me someone else will have what I don’t yet and i’ll be ostracized and made fun of in my social twitter net!!1!!1

It’s “keeping up with the joneses” from the 50s on steroids and adhd now.
[/quote]

It’s alright, you made the point much better and more thoroughly than I. I touched on this same concept back in the minimum wage thread, where I think pittbull was advocating raising minimum wage, as some sort of magic fairy-tale solution to poor people’s situations. I even came up with a quick basic budget for how someone can pretty easily live on minimum wage by themselves, and EASILY with a roommate/significant other. It’s so simple, but people are so caught up in societal appearances, and wanting to appear wealthier than they are, that they guarantee their continued poverty. Insane. [/quote]

Oh yes, I remember that post of yours. It was excellent. Btw, you are a great poster to have around PWI, I hope you stick around because I enjoy listening to your thoughts.

ok, /circle jerk (looks at Pittbull pointedly)

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]Aragorn wrote:

[quote]hungry4more wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

You’re not the only one who wonders these types of things. [/quote]

Undoubtedly true. The class-warfare propaganda is great and effective and pervasive thoughou the media and schools.

Most people are not independent thinkers and cannot see the scam.[/quote]

The thing that gets me is the moral relativism of it all. Poor people on welfare with X-boxes and cars. Is what you are being paid for what you are able to do fair? While, if you aren’t forced into your job, I don’t think it matters because you are a volunteer, that is at least a reasonable question. But when you base your objection on what OTHERS have and make, it becomes absurdity at it’s finest. What the guy down the street has doesn’t affect what you deserve.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/poor_some_ugar_on_me_0Hq1d3iPnvj2RwpsEDS7MN[/quote]

This sort of thing, people on welfare/unemployment, that have gaming systems, iphones, etc, then whine about how unfair society is to them. Let’s see here…don’t spend the money you receive on entertainment crap, and instead, spend it on food, or towards education yourself so you can become a greater asset in the workforce. While you’re at it, that time you were going to spend playing that Xbox? Spend it working, looking for work, growing some dang food for your family, etc.

I can’t help but think how many people wouldn’t be poor, if they would stop trying to live like they’re not. [/quote]

Damn. I just posted a giant rant about the same thing when I should have just quoted this from you. Look, I did the same thing: I worked for tips, picked up a second job, and didn’t buy xbox and plasma tvs and iphones. And I lived just fine with plenty of food as well as some beer and occasional vacations then…by saving for them. I had a comfy bed and warm home to go to.

Fucking lazy. You can either “live like you’re not poor” and always be in debt or scraping by…or you can actually put-off your instant gratification for a few years and live infinitely better. The fundamental concept of investment that those “EVIL RICH” people grasped with money, only done with time and work. Same precise concept. The only difference is we don’t want to put off what we want any more. We want the six pack abs NOW, the iphone NOW, the xbox NOW, or God help me someone else will have what I don’t yet and i’ll be ostracized and made fun of in my social twitter net!!1!!1

It’s “keeping up with the joneses” from the 50s on steroids and adhd now.
[/quote]

It’s alright, you made the point much better and more thoroughly than I. I touched on this same concept back in the minimum wage thread, where I think pittbull was advocating raising minimum wage, as some sort of magic fairy-tale solution to poor people’s situations. I even came up with a quick basic budget for how someone can pretty easily live on minimum wage by themselves, and EASILY with a roommate/significant other. It’s so simple, but people are so caught up in societal appearances, and wanting to appear wealthier than they are, that they guarantee their continued poverty. Insane. [/quote]

Oh yes, I remember that post of yours. It was excellent. Btw, you are a great poster to have around PWI, I hope you stick around because I enjoy listening to your thoughts.

ok, /circle jerk (looks at Pittbull pointedly)[/quote]

That’s his only comeback…there is no arguing this train of logic, unless you are on the receiving end of the handout, or are jealous of those who are successful.

Don’t forget the :slight_smile: Pitt!

Thanks for all the responses. I spent time really pondering.

I agree wholeheartedly that people are just not equal and never will be. And the notion of the “handicapper general” is a ridiculous one. It’s been said that if all the money were evenly distributed, it would largely be right back in the hands it’s in now within a short time. And it’s not surprising why.

My views are largely informed by the community I live in: extremely affluent and empty-hearted souls. Elitist, entitled women who don’t work and pay people to do all their bidding: housecleaners, nannies, nail technicians, personal trainers. And then send emails out about the inequity of their taxes potentially being raised. Really annoys the hell outta me. Seems like something is lost when hard work is removed from the equation.

Carry on.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:
the people who use words like “job creators” will never admit it, there is some serious luck involved in success. Some kids are born to educated parents; others are born to drug addicts. Or with FAS. Or with HIV. And our social system should try to address this element of randomness–but not after these children have grown, by trying to stuff more money into their bank accounts than they already earn for the menial job they’ve taken. Any help should be given in childhood–pre-natal nutrition programs, good schooling, etc.[/quote]

You are referring to “luck” as in being born to the proper parents. For want of a better word I suppose you can use luck. However, what about the kids that grow up and climb out of the ghetto? That is not a story that the MSLM wants to tell, but it is not uncommon. What skills did they apply to their own lives which lead them to long-term success?

[/quote]

The natural inequality of man, of course.

Anyway, I doubt you really disagree with what I’m saying: if we are going to give help, it should be to children before the circumstances of their birth are allowed to mold them into something incorrigible.