I’m mid way into my first tren cycle. Currently on tren A 350/week, compounded test at my TRT dose of 180/week and mast P at 350/week. Feel good. Strength is up and appetite is through the roof. Only sides to speak of are mild night sweats and slightly elevated BP. I may be lucky with the sides though.
Just had mid cycle bloods and all is good. Was expecting to see cholesterol issues but it’s actually better now than 4 weeks ago which was surprising.
No real advice hear just my experience.
WTF your not making any sense …200 to 250, no your trt is a set weekly dose and to say you’ve gone’ up to 500 wk trt ??? 500 weekly for trt … you have no clue what your doing and def shouldnt be involving tren.
I have run a cycle at 200. A different cycle at 250. And I have run a cycle at 500. Which I understand is not TRT. I was running an AI at that dose. I’ve also done blood work consistently and all is well. Thanks for the reply, though.
Guess it depends on what aspect of tren someone is looking at. If you’re talking about pure growth then MENT is superior to tren. If you’re talking about its ability to aid in a recomp then nothing is close to tren. Application matters when making these distinctions.
If the comparison is strictly about mass gained with no other parameters? It’s on the same level as nandrolone, maybe a hair better.
If we’re including side effects and potential long term problems as part of our criteria? It blows away every other steroid and it’s not particularly close.
At what dosage compared to nand? I know you’re seeing great results at a very low daily amount. Much of the information out there is 5+ years older and it’s guys running 2-400mg a week of MENT. I know E2 can be an issue at those doses for a lot…
I know it’s not really factual to compare it as such, and I hate to even ask, but it’s the only way I could come up with…what would you say X amount of nand is similar to X amount of MENT weekly?