Final Hughes Vs. Gracie Thread?

[quote]otoko wrote:
But remember this; MMA money is fairly limited compared to other sports. It is just not attacting the top athletes and maybe not even the most skilled fighters. And until it does, competition will be watered down (relatively). Imagine a boxer with world class boxing skills learning submissions, etc at an early point in his career and what type of fighter he’d be? Won’t happen though. Why? Boxing money is so much bigger. Someone said it in another post and they were right - imagine if the Jevon Kearse’ of the world were attracted to MMA at an early age? Won’t happen until the MMA money here gets BIG. Six figure contract? Are you kidding me? Whats that? A three year contract for $105k? C’mon. This is why the competition is relatively mediocre. It’s a tough tough way to make a living to begin with; now consider the relatively low pay.

I have thought about this alot. Initially it makes sense. Though I think there are a few holes in this argument.
I don’t agree that the most skilled fighters are not fighting. Maybe not in the UFC. But the best bjj fighters do fight in Pride, Arona, Nogueira brothers, Bustamante, etc. Sambo, Fedor, three time World Combat Sambo champion. Olympic caliber wrestlers. K-1 kickboxers.

Boxing money isn’t good for everybody, only the guys at the top. Having world class boxing skills doesn’t mean you would be a great champion.
The money at the top in boxing is great, why don’t more heavyweight athletes try to become heavyweight champion of the world. The sport is tough. Being strong and quick are great, but it isn’t nearly enough. For every great physical specimen like Tyson and Roy Jones jr. there is a Bernard Hopkins and James Toney.

Alot of people just cannot fight, they don’t have it in them. Andthat is normal. Just because you are a freak athlete doesn’t change that.
Guys like Bob Sapp, he shouldn’t fight. He can. But with tears in his eyes and showing his back it is a disgrace. I think even if mma money was the same as american football more people would still choose to play football.
Top guys in Pride make decent money, 500,000-2,000,000dollars a fight. [/quote]

Well I’m not sure we entirely disagree. First, my thoughts were more about the UFC. UFC money is shit and the competition in the UFC is not great. And that is my criticism of all the Hughes fans and their mentioning of his “accomplishments”. I really believe the measure of the man will be known when and if he fights outside of the UFC.

I mention boxing, again, when considering the lack of (relative) skills in the UFC; if you had a guy with world class hands and reactions learning MMA early on, you’d have one tough competitor. I can’t take it when people talk about how good this guy Hughes is, about how he is the best in a division that is loaded, and his hands aint shit. What does that tell you about the competition?

Why don’t more heavyweight guys go into boxing? Same reason they don’t go into MMA. The money, top to bottom, is not there. Only at the very top. And the top is occupied by 4 at most. Social and popularity issues at work here too. Basketball and football are far more popular outlets for the young and developing athlete. You’re surely not going to argue that these MMA guys top to bottom are “elite” athletes are you? There is more athletic talent sitting on the bench on an NFL football team than there is the UFC. Heck, there is more talent from the guys CUT from the NFL that currently in the UFC.

I’m not sure I understand your point about Hopkins and Toney? What was the point? That they are not “physical specimens”. Uh boy, you’re wrong. Hopkins is a marvelous physical specimen for his weight class - its not even a debate. It’s a boxing match - not a BB contest. And the man is a specimen. And are you forgetting what Toney was like in his prime at his true weight? You lost me there friend.

Alot of people can’t fight? Again, what is your point. If you can’t fight - the economic law of competition takes over. Can’t fight? You disappear from the scene. Only in places like crazy-ass Japan where they tolerate and reward a big CUR like Sapps can a loser make money. You quit here and you’re done.

I certainly understand your points about athletic skill does not always beget a fighter. The point was that from top to bottom, these fighters out there are by no means “remarkable” athletes. If and when the sport attracts those type of athletes who of course, need to be able to fight, we might have something special to watch. And that will NEVER happen until the money is big and of course, social issues develop to push the sport like basketball, football, etc. It’s still not just popular enough.

Does anyone know when we can expect Hughes to leave the comfy confines of the UFC and show us his mettle overseas?

[quote]Rookie21 wrote:
Hughes is supposed to be gettin paid roughly 100k-200k
while gracie is gettin about 400k

rich franklin got 27k for his fight against loiseau, and is now out for god knows how long.[/quote]

YUP; now that’s the pay scale attracting the best right? Ninjas please.

[quote]swivel wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
fedor_is_king wrote:
“The young champion on top of his game ALWAYS beats the washed up old former champion in boxing.”

How about Foreman beating Moorer

As for Gracie doing it i’m gonna go out on a limb and agree with whoever said he’ll frustrate matt and submit him when he makes a mistake. But even if matt wins theres no way he’s beating GSP.

Moorer was a joke and he was not on top of his game.

Hughes is at the peak of his abilities and is in great shape.

dude , leonard vs. hagler.[/quote]

Leonard is two years younger than Hagler.

While he had been “retired” he was neither old nor washed up as Gracie appears to be.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
swivel wrote:

dude , leonard vs. hagler.

Leonard is two years younger than Hagler.

While he had been “retired” he was neither old nor washed up as Gracie appears to be.[/quote]

I don’t think Gracie is “washed up” as in old.

At 38 he is about 4 years younger than Randy Couture when he won the LH belt.

The problem with Gracie is that he is one dimensional. In the beginning that didn’t hurt him because no one had ever seen that dimension before. And that’s essentially what launched him into world wide mma super stardom.

However, that is the very thing that will keep him from ever being at the top of the game again.

Everyone knows what he now knows. That can’t be emphasized enough!

He tore through all of the other fighters in the mid 90’s because they had no idea how or what he was doing. It’s a new day in mma and Matt Hughes, while not being the most complete fighter in the UFC, understands the submission game and has in fact used submissions in the past.

That in addition to his enormous power and wrestling ability will be difficult for Gracie to overcome.

But…he’s not washed up…he just needs to add to his game and I’m not sure that he is able to do that.

[quote]slimjim wrote:
BSims wrote:
hey y’all check out these links…

[/quote]

FTR, that first one is Royler, not Royce.

Although I do have to say, “holy crap, what a finish!” IMO Heroes is a second-rate promotion, especially compared to Pride. I’d really love to see Sudo against his counterparts over there, he is absolutely phenomenal.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

Why don’t more heavyweight guys go into boxing? Same reason they don’t go into MMA. The money, top to bottom, is not there. Only at the very top. And the top is occupied by 4 at most. Social and popularity issues at work here too. Basketball and football are far more popular outlets for the young and developing athlete. You’re surely not going to argue that these MMA guys top to bottom are “elite” athletes are you? There is more athletic talent sitting on the bench on an NFL football team than there is the UFC. Heck, there is more talent from the guys CUT from the NFL that currently in the UFC.

I’m not sure I understand your point about Hopkins and Toney? What was the point? That they are not “physical specimens”. Uh boy, you’re wrong. Hopkins is a marvelous physical specimen for his weight class - its not even a debate. It’s a boxing match - not a BB contest. And the man is a specimen. And are you forgetting what Toney was like in his prime at his true weight? You lost me there friend.

Alot of people can’t fight? Again, what is your point. If you can’t fight - the economic law of competition takes over. Can’t fight? You disappear from the scene. Only in places like crazy-ass Japan where they tolerate and reward a big CUR like Sapps can a loser make money. You quit here and you’re done.

I certainly understand your points about athletic skill does not always beget a fighter. The point was that from top to bottom, these fighters out there are by no means “remarkable” athletes. If and when the sport attracts those type of athletes who of course, need to be able to fight, we might have something special to watch. And that will NEVER happen until the money is big and of course, social issues develop to push the sport like basketball, football, etc. It’s still not just popular enough.

Does anyone know when we can expect Hughes to leave the comfy confines of the UFC and show us his mettle overseas?

[/quote]

ALrighty, a few points I’d like to contest here. First, by claiming that our youth are attracted to basketball and football and therefore the top athletes(world class I believe is the term you are using) in the world are drawn to those sports, you discount the rest of the world’s athletes. Fedor is world class. Even your Jevon Kearse’s of the “world” could train for twenty years and never beat him. Second, you’re also assuming that the genetic characteristics that make for a good basketball player or football player would carry over to MMA which is also faulty. Wrestling is more akin to MMA, and look at the body types of the world’s best wrestlers…not exactly many basketball players in the bunch.

Third, boxers suck at MMA. Maybe a some cross training from somebody with a wrestling background towards boxing would help, but please don’t claim Mike Tyson could come in a wreck shop…that is ridiculous. Totally different strategies involved. Boxers tend to string together punches over the course of a fight, the best strikers in MMA defend the takedown and drop the bomb that puts a guy out.

Fourth, why the hell should Hughes go overseas? That is probably the most ridiculous statement in your entire post. The best welterweight division in the world is right here in the UFC. Penn, GSP, Diego Sanchez, Nick Diaz, Karo Parisian, Jason Miller, Robbie Lawler, Shawn Sherk, Frank Trigg, Charuto, etc, etc, have all taken part in matches here…what the fuck does Pride or K-1 have to offer in depth that the UFC doesn’t?

I don’t know who will win between Hughes and Gracie. I say 60% chance Hughes on points or 40% Gracie catches him in a arm bar if Matt gets to aggressive…which I can see that happening. I believe Matt might feel like he has to punish Gracie to prove he is superior.

I will say that both can kick my arse.

All jokes aside, the fact that Royce’s single focus of style allows a 38 year old average athletic body to compete with an athletic stud such as Olympic level wrestler like Hughes says something for BJJ. I hope even the Gracie naysayers can recognize that. Maybe that is the message more than who will win the fight mano to mano. If I tried to manhandle Royce without him using BJJ… no problem. I would struggle a lot more manhandling Hughes.

I can’t wait to see the day a Brock Lesnar prototype takes MMA from time of 12 years old.

Then again that was Mark Kerr. My god if he had have kept his head on straight…in Kerr’s prime…I think Fedor would have met his match. IMO

Honestly this is one horrible UFC card. The main event is the only real draw in it, and its a huge mismatch. Heck the WFA main event with Lindland vs Rampage sounds more competitive and entertaining.

Hughes by whatever he wants.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
swivel wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
fedor_is_king wrote:
“The young champion on top of his game ALWAYS beats the washed up old former champion in boxing.”

How about Foreman beating Moorer

As for Gracie doing it i’m gonna go out on a limb and agree with whoever said he’ll frustrate matt and submit him when he makes a mistake. But even if matt wins theres no way he’s beating GSP.

Moorer was a joke and he was not on top of his game.

Hughes is at the peak of his abilities and is in great shape.

dude , leonard vs. hagler.

Leonard is two years younger than Hagler.

While he had been “retired” he was neither old nor washed up as Gracie appears to be.[/quote]

leonard vs. lalonde :wink:

[quote]Hunthor wrote:
I don’t know who will win between Hughes and Gracie. I say 60% chance Hughes on points or 40% Gracie catches him in a arm bar if Matt gets to aggressive…which I can see that happening. I believe Matt might feel like he has to punish Gracie to prove he is superior.

I will say that both can kick my arse.

All jokes aside, the fact that Royce’s single focus of style allows a 38 year old average athletic body to compete with an athletic stud such as Olympic level wrestler like Hughes says something for BJJ…
[/quote]

just to clarify: hughes is a d1 all-american level wrestler.

Hi guys,

Ok, first I honestly believe, as several others have already speculated, that the result of the fight will either be a decision win for Hughes, or a submission win for Gracie.

As for it being a mismatch, well everybody thought that the match between Hughes and Penn was a mismatch in Hughes favor, and look what happened there. In fact, if you look back through Hughes’ career you will notice that the fighters who he has had the most trouble with, and lost to for that matter, have been submission specialists.

He lost to Ken Hallman twice! I know I know it was at the begginning of his MMA career, but nonetheless he got submitted in the first round in both fights. He also lost to Penn by, you guessed it, a submission (read naked choke in this instance).

I honestly think he also lost the fight to Verissimo (sorry if I spelled that wrong), although he got an early Christmas present from the judges in the form of a decision win.

Now, is anyone here arguing that Gracie is not at the very least as good at submissions as any of the above mentioned fighers?

That being said, Hughes has indeed stepped up his game since losing to Penn and has undoubtedly been working on his submission game. But, does that mean that he will be able to hang with someone who has been practicing submissions for the majority of his life? We’ll have to see won’t we.

Finally, as far as Gracie’s dominance in the early UFC’s, yeah he dominated, but the guys he dominated weren’t the best fighters out there at the time. The whole UFC was designed to showcase Gracie Jiu Jitsu. Therefore, they chose mediocre, at best, fighters for Royce to fight.

The result? Sure enough everyone was sold on the idea that Gracie Jiu Jitsu was the ultimate fighting system. If there is one thing the Gracie family is better at than Jiu Jitsu, it’s self promotion.

Good training,

Sentoguy

First off all, what the fuck is with R’s sounding like H’s? Second of all, after watching the Royce training video its quite evident that Matt Hughes will win. He is simply way more powerful and stronger than Gracie, however Gracie could be more technically proficient in BJJ. But I think Matt can power out of any holds that Royce might try. I could and probably will be wrong though.

[quote]slimjim wrote:

The best welterweight division in the world is right here in the UFC. Penn, GSP, Diego Sanchez, Nick Diaz, Karo Parisian, Jason Miller, Robbie Lawler, Shawn Sherk, Frank Trigg, Charuto, etc, etc, have all taken part in matches here.
[/quote]

True.

[quote]slimjim wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:

Why don’t more heavyweight guys go into boxing? Same reason they don’t go into MMA. The money, top to bottom, is not there. Only at the very top. And the top is occupied by 4 at most. Social and popularity issues at work here too. Basketball and football are far more popular outlets for the young and developing athlete. You’re surely not going to argue that these MMA guys top to bottom are “elite” athletes are you? There is more athletic talent sitting on the bench on an NFL football team than there is the UFC. Heck, there is more talent from the guys CUT from the NFL that currently in the UFC.

I’m not sure I understand your point about Hopkins and Toney? What was the point? That they are not “physical specimens”. Uh boy, you’re wrong. Hopkins is a marvelous physical specimen for his weight class - its not even a debate. It’s a boxing match - not a BB contest. And the man is a specimen. And are you forgetting what Toney was like in his prime at his true weight? You lost me there friend.

Alot of people can’t fight? Again, what is your point. If you can’t fight - the economic law of competition takes over. Can’t fight? You disappear from the scene. Only in places like crazy-ass Japan where they tolerate and reward a big CUR like Sapps can a loser make money. You quit here and you’re done.

I certainly understand your points about athletic skill does not always beget a fighter. The point was that from top to bottom, these fighters out there are by no means “remarkable” athletes. If and when the sport attracts those type of athletes who of course, need to be able to fight, we might have something special to watch. And that will NEVER happen until the money is big and of course, social issues develop to push the sport like basketball, football, etc. It’s still not just popular enough.

Does anyone know when we can expect Hughes to leave the comfy confines of the UFC and show us his mettle overseas?

ALrighty, a few points I’d like to contest here. First, by claiming that our youth are attracted to basketball and football and therefore the top athletes(world class I believe is the term you are using) in the world are drawn to those sports, you discount the rest of the world’s athletes. Fedor is world class. Even your Jevon Kearse’s of the “world” could train for twenty years and never beat him. Second, you’re also assuming that the genetic characteristics that make for a good basketball player or football player would carry over to MMA which is also faulty. Wrestling is more akin to MMA, and look at the body types of the world’s best wrestlers…not exactly many basketball players in the bunch.

Third, boxers suck at MMA. Maybe a some cross training from somebody with a wrestling background towards boxing would help, but please don’t claim Mike Tyson could come in a wreck shop…that is ridiculous. Totally different strategies involved. Boxers tend to string together punches over the course of a fight, the best strikers in MMA defend the takedown and drop the bomb that puts a guy out.

Fourth, why the hell should Hughes go overseas? That is probably the most ridiculous statement in your entire post. The best welterweight division in the world is right here in the UFC. Penn, GSP, Diego Sanchez, Nick Diaz, Karo Parisian, Jason Miller, Robbie Lawler, Shawn Sherk, Frank Trigg, Charuto, etc, etc, have all taken part in matches here…what the fuck does Pride or K-1 have to offer in depth that the UFC doesn’t?
[/quote]

You’re nitpicking and it’s just silly as they internet debates become…just nitpicking…no offense.

I merely used football and basketball as an example of great athletes. An example nothing more.

And a guy like Mike Tyson would have wrecked shop had he trained MMA at an early age. He still would have ended up with world class hands. I don’t see any world class hands in UFC and my god, they do still stand up and swing crazy at each other like two drunks in a bar fight. You be impressed - I am not.

And you might have a point about overseas. I don’t follow the so called sport that closely. I just know enough to see all of Hughes flaws - technical and personality. I’m rooting for Gracie and we’ll all just have to wait until the fight.

And I stand by my statement - top to bottom, the UFC and MMA in general is not filled with elite athletes. And yes, I believe skills being equal, the “stuff” that makes a good football player or basketball player (removing for obvious things like extreme body types like too much height you nitpicker) has absolute transfer to MMA and any other sport for that matter.

[quote]Hunthor wrote:

Then again that was Mark Kerr. My god if he had have kept his head on straight…in Kerr’s prime…I think Fedor would have met his match. IMO
[/quote]

You’re kidding.
I could compare them now en detail but I realized it would be pretty ridiculous.

Kerr was a strong, extremely specialized ground and pounder with shitty nerves and no true fighter’s attitude.

Let us see… CroCop was chosen to spar with the Ukrainian twins, beacauyse he was one of the best pair of hands in the eastern europe at the time, Alexander Emilianko has quite nice hands, Igor… The list is quite long… It is relatively ignorant to come with the claims that some here do without any knowledge about MMA… if you even knew how populare MMA is in Japan and other countries in the Far east, you would stfu and go back to watching American football and baseball… sports that are dwarfes internationally speaking… :slight_smile:

[quote]StevenF wrote:
First off all, what the fuck is with R’s sounding like H’s? [/quote]

I believe it’s called Portuguese.

Yeah, they’re not from around here.

I think at this point we all need to go out on a limb and actually predict not only who will win but the round, and how the win comes about.

One prediction per person. :slight_smile:

Me first:

Hughes wins by referee stoppage in the 2nd round.

COME ON LAY DOWN A PREDICTION!

[quote]ZEB wrote:
One prediction per person. :slight_smile:
[/quote]

Hughes wins.
Referee stoppage, third round.
Hughes’ will physically overpower Gracie.