Fighting

Hi scrappy,

Okay, once again, I am not and have never been against learning grappling, positioning, striking, clinch fighting, and all of the other things found in MMA competitions. Check back through my posts, I have advocated learning all of those things all along.

As far as training the other 5 arsenals taking away from training grappling and striking. Well, perhaps. But, you seem to still be thinking of a this or that mindset. I am talking about a this and that mindset.

Sure, the other five arsenals could be potential fight enders. But, that’s not the only way they can be used.

For instance, let’s take biting.
Now, I can use a bite to create space for a grappling escape, to create space to strike, to anchor myself onto my opponent and keep him from stretching me away from him, to set up a submission, to maim, to control, or yes, even to kill.

The same can be said of the other four arsenals as well. You need to stop thinking so one dimensionally.

And, as far as losing out on precious MMA training time. Well, let me just say that there have been plenty of Sento students who have competed in grappling, kickboxing, and MMA competitions. And, we have cleaned house almost every single time. Shihan Walt’s office is filled with trophies that his students have won.

Keep in mind that we were competing against guys who spent the entirety of their time practicing MMA type training. And yet, even with all the time we lost practicing the “dirty tricks” as you called them, we still beat them.

Also, I never said that crushing someone’s balls was fool proof, or would work in every situation, or that you should just grab the guy’s balls and do nothing else.

I also doubt that the guy who grabbed Renzo’s grandfather’s balls could have closed the COC #3 100 consecutive times. So, although I can see where you were going with your example, it’s not really all that great a comparison.

If Charlie Lysak grabbed Renzo’s grandfather’s balls, he would have literally crushed them, as in they would no longer exist. Imagine putting your balls in an industrial vice and that’s about what it would feel like. That is a completely different animal than just having the average Joe grab your balls.

Nor would he have just lay there like an idiot and thought that the fight was necessarily over. He most likely would have grabbed on squeezed about half as hard as he could and used it to improve his position. He then would have told Renzo’s grandfather to give up or he would continue to squeeze. If the other guy was stupid enough to try to continue to fight, Lysak would have squeezed harder, and so on and so on. This would have continued until either the other guy gave up, or Lysak had completely crushed the guy’s balls. At which point Lysak would have proceeded to smash the guy’s head in, or eat his face off.

Basically what I am getting at is it wouldn’t just be like “ok, now I got his balls, I can just hold on, not do anything else, and I will automatically win”. Grabbing the guy’s balls would just be a means to an end, and possibly an end in and of itself if the guy was smart.

I also understand your point about using Jiu Jitsu against real street thugs in Brazil. You have a point. But, I highly doubt that the guys they fought were even remotely close to them in terms of Jiu Jitsu, or were world class strikers, or knew “every dirty trick in the book”. By the way I know you didn’t suggest they knew anything except the “dirty tricks” I was just comparing a fully trained RBSD guy to the guys you mentioned.

Not everyone knows “every dirty trick in the book”. There are plenty of guys who come in to train in Sento who have been in numerous street fights, and they don’t know even a quarter of the things we teach.

As far as the “not seeing dirty tricks working in the fights that you have seen”, this is most likely due to the fact that not many people know how to do these things. And even if they do have some clue how to, then don’t know how to do it well, or combine it with grappling and striking like a really good RBSD guy does.

Most of the really skilled guys generally avoid fighting, or are capable of talking their way out of a fight. Therefore, you don’t see much fight footage of them.

Good training,

Sentoguy

ok bro here it is i take bjj classes 5 times a week for 4 years now and to be honest the best thing yopu can do is a front kick leaving him to either block his knee wich you should be aiming for and drill him in the face and if her doesnt block then you just blew out his knee. most fights end up on the ground anyway if it goes that far and if so beat his ass. oh yeah and go to bjjreno.com thats where i train baby!!!

I think my point about nut grabbing is.
I have a choke, he has my nuts. Or, I am mounted punching and he has my nuts.
Both our lives are about to suck, but mine will suck slightly less. Some will say my nuts get crushed, some will say i’ll punch or choke him out first. Whose to say until it happens?

Then most normal people watching will get uncomfortable about the nut grab.

Also, I don’t want to get into specific people. My dad can beat up your dad stuff. That is all athlete dependant. I have an issue with the Rickson story cause I cannot verify it. I have support for the BJJ fights cause I have seen it. And that is just my limitation, but it causes me to question certain things like, how do I go live with biting and nut grabbing? I mean, is it bare knuckle and BOTH guys are trying their hardest? Or is one guy pretending not to know grappling/boxing/biting and just feeding attacks? To some extent there must be some rule or difference between sparring and a live fight or every spar would be a bloody mess. Assuming equal boxing/grappling/biting?

Anyway, I’m focusing on the system and it’s reproducible results in in-shape, but not pro, athletes who practice with some consistency. Even pros win with BJJ/grappling and will continue to do so because it clearly works. The original post of, a grappler/bjj guy would be surprised in the street, is inaccurate. Surprised in the street? By who, Chuck Liddell? Okay, I’ll give you that. But against a guy whose just a tough guy with a good right hand, I’ll take my BJJ. However, I’ve seen tough guys with just a good right and street smarts womp on guys who threw technically nice punches but were outsized or just got caught. Or martial artists who ‘knew’ a whole lot but weren’t ready for the speed and ferocity of the attack and freaked out when put in a place they’d never been. The ground. The Gracies, like them or not, brought up a great point when they introduced BJJ. They marketed well, but any who got to know them, usually found them very nice. (most of them, it’s a big family though and they should not all be lumped in with Rorion for the comments he’s made about Jiu Jitsu and invincibility)
I’m saying, BJJ the way it was taught to me, gives you a plan and combats much of the unpredicatble factors in a fight. So if a guy is outweighed against some angry jerk trying to knock his head off he can deal with it through the clinch. Most fights lead with a big punch or a tackle. BJJ teaches to get the clinch and go to work.

Now of course you can’t run up to Chuck Liddell and take him down easy. I’m talking about regular people. Regular tough guys are just that. Tough. You may deck them and it doesn’t do much, they may be quick with punches and they may end up on top of you just cause of surprise or their sheer size. Or they may try to grab nuts or poke eyes. BJJ addresses this very common scenario. It has been beaten by those who learn it, and who have dedicated their lives to beat it. Even in that case, it is not the style but the athlete. Both are using the same systems but athletic attributes and strategy play into it. If a higher level grappler engages with a guy who knows some grappling with dirty tactics, I’d argue the dirty tactics will not be the equalizer people think.

My point is BJJ/Thai/boxing/wrestling with slight street emphasis will allow you to defend yourself quite well if you need to. You won’t be surprised on the street any more than any other system. When a knife or gun gets pulled, everyone is in for a surprise and you just have to hope you can get that weapon or get the hell out. Add biting, gouging, dirty tactics if you want, but do not be decieved into thinking a better fundamental fighter will be taken out by that. It is not always the equalizer people make it out to be.

To discuss environment and dirty tactics is important. But it isn’t a focus. How many levels of nut grabbing are there? Does anyone not know nut grabbing? Now take grappling/boxing. In time guys can get so good it’s unreal. Other grapplers who finish everyone get finished by Roger Gracie for example (not to use another Gracie). So there is a point where your level is important. Cause a guy knows how to grab nuts and a little grappling does not mean he’s gonna be okay when a high level guy gets a hold of him and his neck. It’s like the 175lb blue belts in BJJ who think they can beat Tyson cause he can’t grapple. I don’t think so. The level is too different. And like Tyson knows biting I’m sure Tyson probably innately knows how to defend a grappling attack from someone at that level, while wacking their head off. Now take a grappler with a very high level, he has a good chance of getting it to the ground and finishing it.

If a guy asks me, “I want to learn to fight, what do I do?” I say BJJ/Boxing/wrestling/thai
all with good coaches who have tested or have students who test their theories. They needn’t be unbeaten. All athletes lose sooner or later. They just need to know what they know and know what they don’t know. My contention is I know what I know and I don’t have confidence in myself to know something will work just cause I think it’ll hurt the other guy real bad or looks bad like biting and such. I’d rather develop as much skill in BJJ/boxing/wresling/thai as possible and address the dirty tactics once in a while. I think in most fights, if you’re skills in MMA are good, then why would you bite, gouge etc? You’ll win without that. Now, if you get into it with a guy with better MMA I think you’re kinda screwed. Why, cause the dirty tactics will not be the equalizer. He’s gonna have better position on you and be in a position to defend/control those tactics and inflict his own damage even worse. So, I see adding those things as only a way to really inflict massive pain/damage on someone who you could already beat/kill with MMA. In the case of the very close fight, one guy may bring out dirty tactics before the other but it probably wont’ finish the fight and now both guys are about to get very bloody. Will, heart and stomach for that come into play and that can’t be trained. It can be discussed but can not be done realistically unless everyone at the school gets their nuts ripped off.

I have no doubt your instructors are tough, and it is not my point to say how tough they are or aren’t or how good their grip is. The point is, how good can they make me and my grip? Maybe they can make it pretty good. I know BJJ’ers can make me a good grappler. I know against someone whose level is lower than mine in grappling I’ll be okay. So I’ll try to get my grappling level higher by training it against different types of trained guys.

In the decent mma trained guy vs. big, mean, tough guy on the street situation I’d take the decent mma training. If big mean tough guy starts winning, I don’t think the dirty tricks are gonna be that big of an equalizer cause he’s beating you, how? He’s out positioned or out struck you. If he’s got you out positioned, he’s going to see/feel your intentions to bite/grab and react accordingly. Out struck you, well you’re already out. Now if you are mma man beating him, why bite his esophagus out? It doesn’t make sense. Not to you can’t train it. You and your coaches can’t possibly train biting someones esophagus out cause it’d be murder. It’s nice to say I’d do that in the most hellish life or death situation, but I don’t know that. I know people pass out when choked.

Ugh…you guys just wont agree on what im saying. First of all…the BJJ i take is modern…so it is all geared to being in a real fight.

Also…i train stand-up for longer and just as much now. I have been boxing since i was 11 years old…because my dad boxed professionally…and his dad boxed professionally.

I know its hard to believe because im posting on the internet (lol)…but i have been in alot of fights. I have gotten my ass kicked alot of times…and i dont really care if i do or not.

Going to the ground is a good thing in a street fight if you are confident you are better than him on the ground…just like standing up would be a good thing if you are confident you are better than him standing up.

Sure you could win a fight by just punching some guy in the face and knocking him out…but for me i have NEVER lost a fight after i started training BJJ. And i trained muay thai and boxing before that for a long time. I dont know what you guys are talkin about being kicked by his friends when you take him to the ground.

IM NOT IN A FIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF…I GOTO HIGHSCHOOL AND IM IN A FIGHT WHEN SOMEONE AT SCHOOL HAS A PROBLEM AND ASKS ME TO MEET HIM AFTER SCHOOL TO FIGHT. If his friends jump in and i get my assed kicked…everyone will call him a pussy…and thats never happened to me.

I have never lost a fight by taking someone to the ground…especially now after really being able to work the ground. I always get mount and just pound the kid until he decides to give up…or someone stops me or until i feel like stopping.

As for carrying around edged weapons and/or guns…i dont do it…i fight with my hands and if someone is pussy enough to pull out a knife…and he stabs me…i goto the hospital and i have a story to tell…or i die…either one.

Interesting post from a high school brawler. It highlights some points.

  1. Many guys are looking to learn how to fight one on one. While some may see this as ego, others see it as a valid area of self defense. Not taking shit, but not killing people and not a true life/death confrontation. It is often criticized but in certain areas, like growing up, it is sometimes helpful to know how to fight even when your life isn’t on the line. Let’s be honest, who did not get in a fight during school?

  2. Everyone screams “What about multiple attackers?” when you say go to the ground. Well, what if multiple attackers PUT you on the ground? And how are we worried about multiple attackers if we can’t beat one? BJJ and the sports like wrestling/Judo are the best training for you to learn how to stay on your feet if you want to.
    I’ve seen multi attackers against BJJ. I’ve seen someone use the gaurd to keep a guy on top of him and move to avoid stomps and use the top guy for protection. No he didn’t want to be there. No he didn’t stay there. But he survived cause he was comfortable there.

  3. What about the true life/death confrontation? Well, I’d argue these are rare for many people but it only takes one bad situation to lose your life and is a valid concern. Well, I think sport training still prepares you for this as it builds the attributes needed for a real fight.
    The mental and environmental aspects of fighting are important as are certain last ditch effort tactics and strategies. But you do not dedicate 3days/week or more to that type of training.
    Of course if your career is high risk/situation specific then you’ll want to prepare for that. But many tactical poice and feds train bjj and many say it was the only thing that’s saved them in crazy all out attacks on their life. While they are learning BJJ for MMA they are thinking about and asking about the cop or street situation.

It is all adaptable and that is why I think it’s such a great art. You learn the fundamentals of good position from where you can control/dominate or eliminate your opponenet and do so with minimal risk to yourself. Anything can happen in a fight. Anyone can be beat. It’s about seeing what you can do in most situtaions at a high percentage. BJJ and MMA gets you comfortable in high pressure, full speed, minimal pad attacks.

[quote]Scrappy wrote:
Interesting post from a high school brawler. It highlights some points.

  1. Many guys are looking to learn how to fight one on one. While some may see this as ego, others see it as a valid area of self defense. Not taking shit, but not killing people and not a true life/death confrontation. It is often criticized but in certain areas, like growing up, it is sometimes helpful to know how to fight even when your life isn’t on the line. Let’s be honest, who did not get in a fight during school?

  2. Everyone screams “What about multiple attackers?” when you say go to the ground. Well, what if multiple attackers PUT you on the ground? And how are we worried about multiple attackers if we can’t beat one? BJJ and the sports like wrestling/Judo are the best training for you to learn how to stay on your feet if you want to.
    I’ve seen multi attackers against BJJ. I’ve seen someone use the gaurd to keep a guy on top of him and move to avoid stomps and use the top guy for protection. No he didn’t want to be there. No he didn’t stay there. But he survived cause he was comfortable there.

  3. What about the true life/death confrontation? Well, I’d argue these are rare for many people but it only takes one bad situation to lose your life and is a valid concern. Well, I think sport training still prepares you for this as it builds the attributes needed for a real fight.
    The mental and environmental aspects of fighting are important as are certain last ditch effort tactics and strategies. But you do not dedicate 3days/week or more to that type of training.
    Of course if your career is high risk/situation specific then you’ll want to prepare for that. But many tactical poice and feds train bjj and many say it was the only thing that’s saved them in crazy all out attacks on their life. While they are learning BJJ for MMA they are thinking about and asking about the cop or street situation.

It is all adaptable and that is why I think it’s such a great art. You learn the fundamentals of good position from where you can control/dominate or eliminate your opponenet and do so with minimal risk to yourself. Anything can happen in a fight. Anyone can be beat. It’s about seeing what you can do in most situtaions at a high percentage. BJJ and MMA gets you comfortable in high pressure, full speed, minimal pad attacks. [/quote]

I really would like to get into BJJ a little. I’m thinking about starting it up after the New year.

And I think it depends where you come from with the multipple attackers. Where I’m from, a fight is NEVER one on one…ever. I haven’t had a one on one fight since eighth grade. All those since have been in groups, against groups.

Its good to know that kind of stuff, any fighting art, really. But just because you know it doesn’t mean you aren’t going to catch a beer bottle in the face and lose an eye (damn near happened to me). I try to stay away from fighting so much anymore.

I would like to learn krav magra- anyone have any experience with this? Did you like it?

[quote]Nightwing1 wrote:
Hey wats ups everybody, I’ve a question and I want some peoples advice. Now in a fight, a street fight to be more exact would it be good for me to try a double leg shot on a guy? Also would it be safe for a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu dude to try ground fighting when the guy he’s fighting goes crazy?[/quote]

I really don’t think all that fancy stuff is necessary in a street fight. Most people who fight on the streets are absolutely horrible fighters, they rely on scare tactics and intimidation more than anything else, once you take that part of the game away from them they are practically screwed, also i assume you are a decent fighter to begin with, and have a high tolerance for pain in case shit goes down. Please remember that THERE ARE NO RULES IN A STREETFIGHT!
with that said if someone has their back turned against you, or has their arms out by their sides and leaves their body totally exposed to an attack, quickly neutralize them! Kick them in their nuts, hyperextend their knee with a sidekick, and take them down hard, most streets have gravel roads, once you throw them down, chances are they won’t get up! Make the fight as quick as possible, but also remember that no matter how good you are at martial arts, this ain’t fucking Hollywood, chances are very high that even if you win, their friends will get at you or even worse shoot you!

Hi guys,

Well, I also believe that one on one fighting is very important and should definetely be paid a lot of attention.

However, I also believe that choosing to fight out of ego/insecurity/reputation is flat out stupid. In my opinion that is exactly the type of people who give martial arts a bad name.

Sadly, I see more and more of this these days. Schools teaching people how to fight, but not why to fight.

If you keep this up, then chances are either:

  1. You will get into a fight with the wrong person/people and get killed/crippled/etc…
  2. You will end up in jail, where I hope you really do enjoy fighting, because you’re going to have to do it everyday for the time you’re there with people who don’t give a crap if you think they’re a pussy for ganging up on you and beating you within an inch of your life, or raping you, or even killing you.

Facko, if you say that you don’t care whether or not you die, then once again I am very sorry to hear that. I sincerely hope that you seek professional help (psychologist, psychiatrist, pastor, etc…), or that you find out whatever it is that has given you such a depressed and sad outlook on life and remedy it.

Scrappy,

Well, I can understand your apprehension to just change your views on combat based soley on what works against a compliant partner, and I agree with you for the most part.

However, do I really need to smash someone’s head in with a rock to know that it will work? Do I really need to slit someone’s carotid artery to know that it will kill them? No. A simple understanding of anatomy will tell me this.

Now, understand that we obviously must have some level of control/rules while sparring in order to survive the training. After all if we were constantly smashing each other’s heads in with rocks, we would run out of training partners real fast.

However, there is a lot to say for simulated weapons.

For instance, we sometimes use focus pads/foam blocks as simulated rocks. We will leave them lying around to use as potential environmental weapons. Now, if I can get a hold of that foam block while sparring and smash my opponent’s head with it several times, then had it been a real rock, I would have just split my opponent’s skull open.

The same can be said of using rubber/dull training knives to simulate real weapons. Or, even magic markers. If I can take that rubber/dull/magic marker knife and drag it across your trachea/carotid artery, then had it be a real knife, you’d be dead.

Also, once again, please don’t think so one dimensionally about arsenals such as biting, eye attacks, etc… You don’t necessarily need to take a chunk out of someone to effectively use a bite. Nor do you have to gouge someone’s eyes out to effectively do an eye attack.

We do use eye attacks at full speed against resisting opponents. We do bite each other. We do use nerve attacks. We do use body handles. We also use grappling and striking. None of these arsenals is necessarily superior, or more important than any other. What is important is, what is appropriate at the moment.

For instance, you used the example of if someone gets you in mount and holds down both your wrists. Well, obviously in this situation biting isn’t an option (unless the guy is stupid enough to keep a close enough proximatey to you to allow you to bite him), nor is grabbing his balls, nor are body handles, striking, smashing his head in with a rock, etc…

But, let’s say a guy grabs you in a head lock. Well, now going into his eyes is a very effective option, as is grabbing his groin.

I am not trying to suggest that biting, eye attacks, body handles, nerve attacks and environmental weapons are necessarily superior to striking and/or grappling. But, also do not agree with the notion that they are inferior either. That would be like asking a carpenter whether his saw was more important than his hammer. His reply would almost definetely be, “it depends on the job”. The same applies here.

We spend a considerable amount of time learning proper stiking, grappling, positioning, footwork, and all of the other components found in MMA. We also however, spend time perfecting our other arsenals.

You argued that these things do not require a large amount of practice. But I would disagree with you for several reasons.

  1. Just because you know how to grab someone’s balls, doesn’t mean that you’re going to be able to do it in real time. Nor does it mean that you’ll know how to use that grab to it’s maximum potential.

  2. The same could be said of weapons such as guns. I mean little kids end up accidentely shooting each other with their parent’s guns without even having any training whatsoever on how to use them. Yet, every year law enforcement officers are killed because they fail to operate their firearms correctly in the heat of battle. And these are individuals who dedicate countless hours of time training how to use these weapons.

One more point that I want to mention is; ok, you used the example of “what if you end up on the ground in a multiple opponent fight, not by choice?” as a way to argue the need to learn how to ground fight. On this I am in complete agreement with you. In Sento we group postures into 3 categories:

Intentional- any position that you intentially adopt
Incidental- a position that you are in, not by choice, but just by chance
Accidental- a position that you are in because something went wrong

Basically, when you look at things through this lens, you realize that any and all positions are fighing positions, because you may have to fight from any and all positions.

Your example falls into either the Incidental, or Accidental category, depending on the situation.

You then suggested that one reason to train in BJJ/Judo/Greco/ect… was to learn how to defend getting taken down. With this I am also in complete agreement with. However, couldn’t the same be said of any of the other arsenals? For instance, can you think of any better way for learning how to not get hit than by boxing/kickboxing? I can’t. Why wouldn’t the same be said of biting, eye attacks, nerve attacks, body handles, and environmental weapons?

Basically, even if say you didn’t think that you would use them in a fight, wouldn’t it be better to have trained against them in real time, to be able to defend against someone else’s attempts at doing them to you?

Think about it like this, let’s take a MMA figher (we’ll use Fedor again for conveniance sake). Now, I am not in anyway arguing that he is most likely going to kick the ever living crap out of pretty much anyone who he gets into a fight with in the street.

However, let’s say he gets into a fight with a guy and because he hasn’t trained specifically against guys who are trying to bite him real time, his opponent bites a chunk out of him. Now, I doubt that this is going to stop Fedor, because he is one tough son of a gun. So, Fedor deals with the pain of the bite and then preceeds to pound the guy’s head in, thus ending the fight.

However, when he goes to the hospital to get the wound worked on, he finds out that the guy who he got into a fight with has Aids. Sure, enough about a year or so later he finds out that he has contracted the disease.

Now, he must immedietely stop fighting in MMA competitions, which means that he does not have any income coming in, he can no longer make love to his wife for the rest of his life, nor can he ever have any children.

Do you really think that his trophies, or titles, or fame will comfort him at night? No.

Now, if he had never been informed that there were systems where he could train how to defend against bites, then this would be a tragic tale indeed. On the other hand, if he had known of such a system and just chose not to do it, because either he would never need it, or he couldn’t do it in a sporting setting. Then he would unfortunately only have himself to blame for his situation. Basically because he had chosen to be led around by his ego, he had paid the price.

Now, to be honest, I would have remorse for his situation regardless of why it happened. But, I think I would feel worse for him if the former had been the case.

Of course, you might argue “well what if you spent all that time training to prevent bites and you ended up getting bitten anyways”? To this I would say; well if you really gave it everything you had and did everything you could to prevent it from happening, and it happened anyways, then maybe it was just meant to be. But if I knew that there was much more that I could have done but chose not to, then I would only have myself to blame.

Good training,

Sentoguy

okay my man i have already left you with one post and everyone else seems to know everything about fighting or everyone is in one form of martial art or whatever. it all depends where who and when. if you know when your gonna fight the guy youll get all pumped up and worried about the fight. if he in your face talkin shit you should just end it right ther take him by surprise.

if you know your gonna fight the guy regardless might as well take advantage and hit him on the the throught and continue to beat him down until its over or broke up. if you some how end up on the ground and your getting your ass beat cover your face an curl up and protect your self. if multiple dudes jump in just cover or take as you can.

you really should look into bjj it really does work. or since your in high school at least take wrestling as i did just because if you ever get into a fight sooner or later youll be kinda of used to reading people and will be able to pick up some flaws and youll also have a new bad of arsinal. any way hope it all makes sense and if you can cath him by surprise

?Hi guys,

Well, I also believe that one on one fighting is very important and should definetely be paid a lot of attention.?
If you anticipate street fighting you have to ask why that is. Bullies at school, rough neighborhood, profession (Law enforcement)?

?However, I also believe that choosing to fight out of ego/insecurity/reputation is flat out stupid. In my opinion that is exactly the type of people who give martial arts a bad name.?
Most of the time this type of fight is wrong. But it is also common, especially when younger. And sometimes, at that stage it seems necessary to the kid because he can?t report bullying unless he wants it 10x worse. Sooner or later most youths have to fight their own battle. Sometimes, unfortunately, that is really a fight.

?Sadly, I see more and more of this these days. Schools teaching people how to fight, but not why to fight.

If you keep this up, then chances are either:

  1. You will get into a fight with the wrong person/people and get killed/crippled/etc…
  2. You will end up in jail, where I hope you really do enjoy fighting, because you’re going to have to do it everyday for the time you’re there with people who don’t give a crap if you think they’re a pussy for ganging up on you and beating you within an inch of your life, or raping you, or even killing you?.
    Really? Many martial arts teach ?lethal? and ?crippling? techniques. Every time there is death/crippling in a fight it makes the news big time. There are way more fights than deaths/crippling from them. It leads to a point. Many street styles purport that they can kill easily. They even site ?medical science? and say it takes x amount of pressure to break a skull or a hit here then a hit there will cause a cascading reaction which will kill someone. Many times this is false. It is hard to do this kind of thing to a living, resisting person.

?Facko, if you say that you don’t care whether or not you die, then once again I am very sorry to hear that. I sincerely hope that you seek professional help (psychologist, psychiatrist, pastor, etc…), or that you find out whatever it is that has given you such a depressed and sad outlook on life and remedy it.

Scrappy,

Well, I can understand your apprehension to just change your views on combat based soley on what works against a compliant partner, and I agree with you for the most part.

However, do I really need to smash someone’s head in with a rock to know that it will work? Do I really need to slit someone’s carotid artery to know that it will kill them? No. A simple understanding of anatomy will tell me this.?
Will it? And will it do it before they can hurt you? I?ve heard soldiers tell me many ways they?ve been taught to kill fast didn?t work. Then I heard some of the ways they actually do it. Well before they got some of those tricks you wouldn?t believe the punishment some people took before dying. I do not condone or wish to glorify this. I do think eventually if you think you know how to kill you need to talk to someone who?s done it and see what they say. The point is, you don?t know until you experience or hear reliable experience.

?Now, understand that we obviously must have some level of control/rules while sparring in order to survive the training. After all if we were constantly smashing each other’s heads in with rocks, we would run out of training partners real fast.

However, there is a lot to say for simulated weapons.

For instance, we sometimes use focus pads/foam blocks as simulated rocks. We will leave them lying around to use as potential environmental weapons. Now, if I can get a hold of that foam block while sparring and smash my opponent’s head with it several times, then had it been a real rock, I would have just split my opponent’s skull open.?
Maybe, I saw a man take a full swing to the head with a bat once. He beat the crap out of the guy who did it. It was insane. If the bat attacker just walked up and choked the guy. Case closed.

?The same can be said of using rubber/dull training knives to simulate real weapons. Or, even magic markers. If I can take that rubber/dull/magic marker knife and drag it across your trachea/carotid artery, then had it be a real knife, you’d be dead?
. Maybe, but does your opponent die before he gets a major shot off?

?Also, once again, please don’t think so one dimensionally about arsenals such as biting, eye attacks, etc… You don’t necessarily need to take a chunk out of someone to effectively use a bite. Nor do you have to gouge someone’s eyes out to effectively do an eye attack.

We do use eye attacks at full speed against resisting opponents. We do bite each other. We do use nerve attacks. We do use body handles. We also use grappling and striking. None of these arsenals is necessarily superior, or more important than any other. What is important is, what is appropriate at the moment.

For instance, you used the example of if someone gets you in mount and holds down both your wrists. Well, obviously in this situation biting isn’t an option (unless the guy is stupid enough to keep a close enough proximatey to you to allow you to bite him), nor is grabbing his balls, nor are body handles, striking, smashing his head in with a rock, etc…

But, let’s say a guy grabs you in a head lock. Well, now going into his eyes is a very effective option, as is grabbing his groin.?
This brings up a big point for me in this. If you cannot escape the head lock with leverage you may not escape by inflicting pain. A good head locker usually goes head and arm and wips you to the ground hard and in all the commotion it?s hard to get a good grab for eyes/groin. He doesn?t walk up and hug your head. The fight moves, covers major ground as he tries to drive and you maintain balance you may cover 30 feet before you fall on top of each other. It is not static. Also, he can disrupt breathing once on the ground and transition to other positions and not perseverate on one move as he is being bit. People react to pain like a hot stove, fast, then they address and reposition. Grappling teaches this. Goes back to grappler won?t be surprised by this at all. It is addressed a lot.

?I am not trying to suggest that biting, eye attacks, body handles, nerve attacks and environmental weapons are necessarily superior to striking and/or grappling. But, also do not agree with the notion that they are inferior either. That would be like asking a carpenter whether his saw was more important than his hammer. His reply would almost definetely be, “it depends on the job”. The same applies here.?
Agreed with the last part. But, in a fight between a guy with 3 years of mma vs. 3 years of biting, eye gouging training. I?d bet mma guy.

?We spend a considerable amount of time learning proper stiking, grappling, positioning, footwork, and all of the other components found in MMA. We also however, spend time perfecting our other arsenals?
. That is good because pain does not change the outcomes of fights. Position does. Watch UFC where Trigg beat the hell out of Hughes and Hughes came back. Dirty tactics would not have helped. His luck/skill in not getting knocked out did. Trigg could?ve used better submission/strike training to finish. Maybe dirty tactics would?ve helped him. But that is my point, they usually only give the guy already winning a brutal way to win. They do not reverse the situation all the time and it is falsely confident to believe they would.

?You argued that these things do not require a large amount of practice. But I would disagree with you for several reasons.

  1. Just because you know how to grab someone’s balls, doesn’t mean that you’re going to be able to do it in real time. Nor does it mean that you’ll know how to use that grab to it’s maximum potential?
    . I agree. I think in many real grappling situations you can?t grab the groin and get a good hold. But I have been shown all the best ways to execute dirty tactics by several ?authorities?. It is why I still do BJJ. The thing is I?ve studied a lot of this stuff for years and noticed a lot of interesting patterns. Even with the personalities that do different arts.

?2. The same could be said of weapons such as guns. I mean little kids end up accidentely shooting each other with their parent’s guns without even having any training whatsoever on how to use them. Yet, every year law enforcement officers are killed because they fail to operate their firearms correctly in the heat of battle. And these are individuals who dedicate countless hours of time training how to use these weapons.?
True. Shows that certain people need different training to get it down ?for real?. There are tons of other martial arts experts, soldiers, spec ops, fbi, secret service and many others that come to learn with us. They all know dirty tricks, weapons and have crazy experiences to tell. They all believe in BJJ and have used it.

?One more point that I want to mention is; ok, you used the example of “what if you end up on the ground in a multiple opponent fight, not by choice?” as a way to argue the need to learn how to ground fight. On this I am in complete agreement with you. In Sento we group postures into 3 categories:

Intentional- any position that you intentially adopt
Incidental- a position that you are in, not by choice, but just by chance
Accidental- a position that you are in because something went wrong

Basically, when you look at things through this lens, you realize that any and all positions are fighing positions, because you may have to fight from any and all positions?
. That?s good you guys train BJJ. It is a valid system. Grappler will not be surprised on the street is my theme and anyone will be surprised by a sneakily drawn weapon. So that?s all I?m saying. Get good at BJJ or MMA, win most of your fights. It?s simply been proven over and over and over.

?Your example falls into either the Incidental, or Accidental category, depending on the situation.

You then suggested that one reason to train in BJJ/Judo/Greco/ect… was to learn how to defend getting taken down. With this I am also in complete agreement with. However, couldn’t the same be said of any of the other arsenals? For instance, can you think of any better way for learning how to not get hit than by boxing/kickboxing? I can’t. Why wouldn’t the same be said of biting, eye attacks, nerve attacks, body handles, and environmental weapons? ?
Yes, but this doesn?t take as long to learn and be good at as good BJJ/boxing. It just doesn?t.

?Basically, even if say you didn’t think that you would use them in a fight, wouldn’t it be better to have trained against them in real time, to be able to defend against someone else’s attempts at doing them to you?

Think about it like this, let’s take a MMA figher (we’ll use Fedor again for conveniance sake). Now, I am not in anyway arguing that he is most likely going to kick the ever living crap out of pretty much anyone who he gets into a fight with in the street.

However, let’s say he gets into a fight with a guy and because he hasn’t trained specifically against guys who are trying to bite him real time, his opponent bites a chunk out of him. Now, I doubt that this is going to stop Fedor, because he is one tough son of a gun. So, Fedor deals with the pain of the bite and then preceeds to pound the guy’s head in, thus ending the fight.

However, when he goes to the hospital to get the wound worked on, he finds out that the guy who he got into a fight with has Aids. Sure, enough about a year or so later he finds out that he has contracted the disease.

Now, he must immedietely stop fighting in MMA competitions, which means that he does not have any income coming in, he can no longer make love to his wife for the rest of his life, nor can he ever have any children.?
First, what if you bite a guy and you get AIDS!!! I mean, your suggesting biting??! And, this goes back to something I didn?t want to say. Street guys are always wrapped up with this stuff. These 1 in a million cases. What if there are 20 guys, what if it?s on ice, what if this and that. Well, those things all suck. But you can?t walk around paranoid about all this stuff. You can train for the high percentage attacks and go through life and be fine. Go looking for trouble and you?re sure to find it. But go out and have a good time and super trained mma guys and professional soldiers who?ve killed people with improvised weapons usually don?t pick a fight with you. It?s usally a right hand punch or a tackle from a bigger guy who played football, lifts weights, boxed a little, wrestled a little and that guy can be dangerous if you don?t? have a good handle on the clinch. Or you?ve got a false sense of security about what you ?know? will ?brutally stop any attacker in seconds? cause you think it would hurt to get your nuts bitten. As for the multi attackers, how do you beat many if you cant? beat one? And if you?re going out to a rough place take some friends or something. I mean. I met one of the street guys you mentioned on another thread or maybe earlier in this one, I don?t remember, but it was not the Lysaks. He was paranoid about all this crazy stuff. He didn?t grapple well though he claimed to incorporate grappling and his EGO PREVENTED HIM FROM ROLLING WITH ANY OF US. He did not have an inner peace to the extent that he had nothing to prove. He didn?t want to lose or feel exposed. Not that we were being dicks. Medium rolling is a part of all our classes. He had his students roll with us and told us where they could fit in these attacks. They got smeared easily and we weren?t going hard or anything. But he told us after they tapped like 50 times that they ?could?ve? used all these eye/throat/groin attacks. I didn?t see it. But all the talk about fighting mma and competing is about ego isn?t true. People who don?t want to see where they have weaknesses or don?t want others to see, don?t spar. They don?t spar because of their ego. I?m talking about friendly rolling with the students even. Many street guys don?t train with their students in that way. They?re too ?lethal?, or it?s to unrealistic and they don?t want to train like they wouldn?t fight and all these excuses. This guy had nothing to lose. Just roll, we were nice, and receptive to what he was saying and saw some points on the nature of attacks and all but it?s like hey man, we?re not guys looking for a weekend seminar, we know how to handle an attack. Some of the guys there were so shocked at what he was saying to do. Soldiers and Law enforcement guys with a lot of real world experience. He sells a lot of videos and stuff. I later read on a net forum that at one of his seminars a low level guy beat him easily, a few times with BJJ techniques. I could see it happening the way he was, but I don?t know. I do know he looked like the type of guy people would start with. Sort of jacked on the short side and angry looking. He said he could?ve tore the guys eyes out 6 times. Maybe he could?ve. I don?t know and neither does he and that?s why he walks around very insecure and he was not super nice, he was condescending and he wasn?t anywhere near as accomplished as my coach who just hangs out with us as one of the guys. Matt Thornton talks about this on a few of the interviews on his DVD?s and man he is right on in many cases.
Some of the guys at our camp wanted to smack him around but most of us felt sorry for him. He was really weird. I don?t see myself ever getting into another ?street fight? again. But having been around martial arts and fighting since I was 6 I can say a few things about them now looking back.

Anything can happen.
Train for the most common attacks.
Sooner or later get into fighting as a growing, evolving sport and remember at the core it?s for fighting but realize that with your confidence you?ll be friendlier, people will see that and you?ll be less likely to be chosen as a victim. The sport should have some ruled competitions and you?ll see it evolve over the years. New things are developed to counter old and that?s how it should be. Not fixed and not in any way should you think you know it all and are a bad ass.
BJJ, as I learned it, works in many real street confrontations and it?s rare that a dirty trick will overcome a good position. There are people who can beat me no matter what dirty tricks I know so I better have a decent personality so I don?t get in a fight with people. I know this cause my ego did not get in the way of testing my skills against other guys and winning a few and losing a few.

We?re making some assumptions about each other also. I?m judging by the posts that you have not dedicated a year to studying BJJ as a system but have seen maybe the In Action tapes or UFC?s? I?m assuming you haven?t been put in a really good head lock where you weren?t able to grab or bite cause he had a head and arm and was putting a lot of weight on you. I?m assuming you don?t roll medium to hard every class. And you?re assuming I don?t know the ?intricacies? of dirty tactics. Well, Not from the lysaks but from a ton of other ?experts?. I mean ?top? well known guys who are out there selling dvds and have web sites. I?ve seen it all except the Lysaks and I?m wondering, is this one place I haven?t seen for myself the source of how to really work biting and eye gouging, and it?s different from all the other guys who are sort of famous in the street self defense world and sell dvd?s. I?m assuming, No. But I could be wrong.
I know though that I had my eyes poked and groin grabbed and attempted bites and they were not a problem. I?ve also been beat by better boxers and grapplers.

?Do you really think that his trophies, or titles, or fame will comfort him at night? No.

Now, if he had never been informed that there were systems where he could train how to defend against bites, then this would be a tragic tale indeed. On the other hand, if he had known of such a system and just chose not to do it, because either he would never need it, or he couldn’t do it in a sporting setting. Then he would unfortunately only have himself to blame for his situation. Basically because he had chosen to be led around by his ego, he had paid the price.

Now, to be honest, I would have remorse for his situation regardless of why it happened. But, I think I would feel worse for him if the former had been the case.

Of course, you might argue “well what if you spent all that time training to prevent bites and you ended up getting bitten anyways”? To this I would say; well if you really gave it everything you had and did everything you could to prevent it from happening, and it happened anyways, then maybe it was just meant to be. But if I knew that there was much more that I could have done but chose not to, then I would only have myself to blame.?

[quote]D-RoiD wrote:
it all depends where who and when. [/quote]

Very rational and very true.

Reminds me of that scene in “Unforgiven” where Clint gets beat up in the bar. Obviously he could have killed everyone there if he was feeling healthy and mad. But when he was sick, he was as easy to beat as a little girl.

Hi scrappy,

Ok, first off, what’s with all the ??? I could understand using them to distinguish between when you quoting me and when you were replying, but why are your sentences wrought with them?

I don’t have too much time at the moment, so I will only address a couple of major topics that you questioned me on.

First, you suggested that I ask some people who have actually killed people in the line of duty whether what I know is really effective. Ok. Done. Shihan Lysak trains numerous Special Forces (green berets), Swat, CIA, and law enforcement officers. Many of which have killed in the line of duty. They swear by Sento. Oh, and many of them have previous Martial arts experience (including some in grappling arts such as Judo, BJJ, Greco, etc…).

One of our black belts has trained with Royce, and he still finds what we do in Sento to be both worthwhile and effective. Oh, and he is not our most skilled black belt by the way (even though he is one tough SOB).

In fact, one of our new students was actually sent to us by one of the Gracies (not sure which one at the moment) who told him “that what we do is more versatile and effective for street combat than BJJ”.

Second, I can’t even believe that you would make a comment in regards to getting your throat slit like “yeah, but does he get a major shot off before he does (die)?”

Come on! So what if he does? Ok, I’m knocked out and he’s dead. I’d take that trade off any day of the week.

Seriously, if someone slashes your trachea, then unless you happen to have the incredible good luck to have it happen right in front of a hospital, or have Mcgyver as your best friend there ready to do an emergency Tracheotomy with a ball point pen, then you are dead. Period. We live in the real world here.

Third, in regards to using eye attacks/biting against a head lock. Notice I said OPTION. Yes, I realize that in some instances you can use leverage to escape the position. But, are you going to try to tell a 100 lb to try to use leverage on Bill Kazmyer? I know I wouldn’t. Now if roles were reversed, then heck yeah.

The reason I like going into someone’s eyes is because it works, regardless of their size/strength. No one can toughen up their eyes.

Now, once again will it necessarily end the fight. No. But it will as you said cause the opponent to react to it.

How will he react? Exactly as you said, by pulling his head head away from the pain, which will in turn make it very easy for you to gain superior leverage and reverse the position.

Or, he may release the lock and try to remove your fingers from his eyes with his hands, either way, you’ve escaped the position.

Also, try running forward when someone has an eye attack on you (meaning moving into the attack), not as easy as you suggest.

We actually do a drill where we will position our thumb/finger in the correct place for an eye attack (also works with nerve attacks) and have the partner try to resist being pushed backwards (or try to push us backwards). No one who I have ever done this with has been able to even resist me from moving them backwards (and I have done this with individuals who out weigh me by over 100 lbs). I have even seen Shihan Lysak’s 5 year old niece be able to push adult men (not small one’s either) backwards using only 1 finger placed in the right position.

Lastly, as for live training/rolling. Well, I honestly can’t speak for all RBSD martial artists. I know that we do it, and if it had been one of our students, they would have gladly rolled with you guys.

Sadly many don’t and site the reasons that you said this individual sited. I personally agree with you and I’d say that goes for everyone who trains in Sento. But, as you said there are plenty more out there who are led around by their egos and don’t want to admit that they have weaknesses. The same can be said of the MMA world as well. Your comment about slitting the trachea is a perfect example of that.

Good training,

Sentoguy

I don’t know why my post came out so weird.
I think you misunderstood the throat slit thing. I meant, when you slit a guys throat, he could still fire a gun or stab you fatally in his last second. I heard of a couple other ways to kill with a knife from soldiers that were supposedly faster. But my point isn’t whose right about how to kill, it’s that an interest in that crap is kind of sick. I don’t carry guns/knives cause I’m not a soldier/cop.

Anyway, it is not my interest to talk about that kind of stuff as it is kind of nuts. I’m into training and fighting, not killing. And not acting like I can kill anyone. The whole ego thing you keep on saying is annoying. We arent’ the ones with egos. We do what we do and we don’t go around saying we’re capable of this or that unless we do it. We’re capable of fighting and defending ourselves, grappling and striking.

If multiple attackers come at us with guns and knives, well then we’re probably as dead as the next guy. All I’m saying is grappler would not be surprised on the street by most fights. By 4 guys with knives, well, who can deal with that? I mean what am I arguing about here? Not weapons training that is for sure. I’m saying it is not a great idea to rely on eye gouging to escape a competent grapplers holds. That’s all.

And in a world’s strongest man contest bill kazmier, who was winning all his events of course, was thrown right out of the ring by a wrestler and I believe a football player. Size/strength matter but you better know what your’re doing with it.

Any and every one is at a distinct disadvantage taking a fight to the ground in a real life confrontation. What works in the Octagon/Cage will not work in the street.

There are to many variables including but not limited to the actual terrain and debris on the ground. Your opponants friends stepping in and stompping a mudhole in your ass etc.

This is not to say that you should not know how to defend on the ground or a knock against grapplers. Everything has its place and sometimes you get lucky.

But as a rule stay on your feet at all costs and of course avoid every potential confrontation at all costs, ego and street cred have been responsible for more people getting their ass handed to them or their families attending funerals!

If a confrontation can not be avoided defend your self as if your life depended upon it as it may very well and end it as quickly as possible.

If the threat of bodily harm or death does not get your attention please remember that any time you place your hands on someone you are opening your self up to possible criminal and civil charges everything from Murder, assault, great bodily harm less than murder, wrongful death etc.

Fights burden the whole of society and impact families on both sides. Avoid bad situations.

None of what I just wrote was a commentary on anything anyone else wrote just my personal 20yrs plus worth of experiance.

having said all of the above I believe you have the right to defend yourself and loved ones. I beleive everyone should learn competant self defense. But more so I believe everyone should be accountable and see the big picture before a lapse in judgement ruins one life to many.

When I get into fights I look into the persons eyes so I can see what he’s doing. While punching fast and horizontally into their face. If their taller then me I might tackle them first then punch him in the face repeatedly. It depends on the circumstances. The last fight i got into i was in jail and I won.

I think the best thing to do is to give the guy a little push, then throw your hands up to the side(picture iron cross) and then tilt your head back as if to say,“what’s up?” leaving yourself open to multiple attacks…I’ve seen this manuever played out on countless occasions, and hundreds of people can’t be wrong on this.

all this is bullshit.

1.)you’ll probably going to kick his ass in no time if you’re a trained fighter and the other guy is not.

2.)if the other guy has friends that would jump in, you’re fucked no matter standing up or on the ground.

3.)knife, he is not going to pull it out of his pocket when you are gound n pounding him.

4.)shooting for a double/single leg works… you might get knee, but you may not; I supposed you don’t going in a fight and expecting you won’t get hit.

5.)eye goughing, nut kick, biting, etc. He can do it and you can do it. every fucking body can do it so… no, it does not give you an edge.

6.)however, I do think that being on the bottom sucks ass but that where your BJJ training pays off, at least you can sweep or get out of it.

I know I am going to get blasted for this but I don’t give a shit. This is a stupid post and you are a stupid, stupid man for asking this type of thing. I can’t count the number of reports I took in the ER from big bad ass ‘trained’ fighters that got their ass capped, cut, beat or just plain destroyed in in a street fight.

You get in a fight the cops show up and on TV they spend all night asking all the witnesses how it started, who threw the first punch and try to talk it out. Well that is bullshit and real life don’t play that way.You get in a fight in a bar, the cops show up, you go to jail. Or if you try that freaky martial art ju-jitsu shit you go to the ER. The cops, on a fight call, are going to pick the dude doing the most damage and use him as an example. On my beat, in my bars, you break someone’s leg in a fight you just committed a felony. You fight me when I try to cuff you, you will get the first shot to your throat, a nightstick to your kidney and I hope you’ve been doing squats because your knee is just about to bend the wrong way. And just in case you are that good and you get a shot on me, you’ll be drinking mace and answer to the rest of the dept who shows up to find you kicked my ass. Then there are even less rules. Then your paying my hospital bills too.

I won’t wanna go to the ground ince you don’t know if someone will jump you from behind. About the takedown, try to catch him off guard first or stun him before going for the shoot. IMHO, if I can end the fight standing, that would be much better.

[quote]Killer Rabbit wrote:
95% of all street fights end up on the ground. [/quote]

I don’t agree, even if it’s repeated time and again.
Fact is, if two opponents are equal in skill and are both determined to hurt the other, the fight will probably go to the ground (95%).
But if one guy is better, he can usually dominate the other quite well - on his feet.

Bear in mind that MMA is relatively new. Personally, I’ve never seen or been in a street fight which involved sophisticated grappling like BJJ.
Some other reasons why you should fight on your feet, besides the already mentioned:

I If your style is about forcing the other guy to submission, this could be risky, because often, you expose certain bodyparts to bites or headbutts, which are banned from sport.
My brother, with whom I somtimes train groundfighting, is way better than me and he weighs 20 KG more. But in a real fight, I could break from about 70% of all his locks with a butt, a punch to his balls or a bite to his calves.

II Also sometimes your opponent just won’t tap out. So, are you gonna break his knee now?
During military duty, I had a fight with
a guy who was, I’d say, some 50 pounds heavier.
We didn’t want to kill each other, so it quickly went to the ground. I applied an armlock but the bastich somehow managed to wiggle himself out of it. So I switched to a Aikido like wrist lock and maintained preassure for about a minute.
We grunted and panted as we robbed on the floor. I know I could have probably broken his bones, but to which gain?
Because of his enormous strength and because I didn’t apply 100% force, he broke free and put me in a sissy headlock.
Half a minute later he stopped fighting. Perhaps he was fatigued, perhaps this was the best he had, I won’t ever know.
The point is: It’s hard to fight someone on the ground halfheartedly who’s a lot stronger than you. To win, you probably have to break some bone.

III Depending on the environment, a slam style takedown can be extremely lethal. Actually, it is easier to to kill somebody accidently while slamming him unto the pavement than with the often recited strike-to-windpip-bullshit-moves which won’t work in a real situation.
Generelly, it’s stupid to kill the other guy if you’re having a bar brawl unless you believe your life sucks and you want to write a novel about jail rape from firsthand experience.