[quote]Plisskin wrote:
- How many of you people consider 28 Days Later a zombie movie? Seriously, its a plague movie. The victims of the virus were normal and then went insane with rage. They weren’t rotting corpses, though they did have physical symptoms from the rage virus that included bleeding–but the human body is pretty friggin tough, especially when driven with a constant adrenaline dump. They didn’t eat people, they just wanted to kill them and each other. They were more like wild animals. And it appeared they died from starvation by the end. Seems more like plague victims to me, not the walking dead. Fun movie, but not really a zombie flick.[/quote]
I don’t know if you’ve had any experience with rabid animals or animals with parasitic infections, but this is what the movie reminded me of. And a rabid animal meandering around is the nearest thing I’ve seen in real life to what I would call the walking dead. It’s a zombie movie to me.
Besides, plague movies involve people getting sick and dying rapidly and in large numbers, not getting sick, mauling everyone in their immediate vicinity, and eventually starving to death.