[quote]BrickHead wrote:
Personally I’d find dating, screwing, or even marrying ordinary women to be far more fulfilling than being lonely and celibate. [/quote]
Not me. I would NEVER date most women I encounter. I will never ever be with a women I don’t find attractive, even if she was the last women on earth. NO
I would rather live like a monk and make a wish of celibacy (no wanking). Since you never ejaculate you get more energy and bliss.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]En Sabah Nur wrote:
This is highly off topic, I know, but is becoming an Electrician a good trade?
I want to do something on the side to make more money, because I’m probably going to reach the cap on my current career soon for a non-managerial position and wanted to keep my options open.
Really don’t give a shit as to the “social stigma” of blue collar work from the ladies or anyone else. If I’m making bank, and I’m not stressed to shit, that’s all that matters.[/quote]
It’s certainly worked out well for me. Like anything, it’s what you make of it and about creating opportunity for yourself that you can capitalize upon. I am a union electrician and did a five year apprenticeship and have had lots of classes/certifications after that. I am not a “typical” electrician, nor is my salary “typical” - I make more than most superintendents. I am at where I’m at because I’ve been doing this since '96 and I’ve played my cards pretty well and never stopped learning. But even if you don’t get to my level, being an electrician is a good career with good pay. You can always find a job, so it’s somewhat “recession-proof”. If you’re good, you can make some serious loot.[/quote]
Not sure if you would know but, how hard is it to get an apprenticeship? In California it is damn near impossible now. Applications are accepted a few times a year and the waiting lists are already huge. I would be willing to relocate at this point.
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
I’ll echo something Mak just said and ask, what does it even mean to marry up or marry down? Why do we (men) use physical beauty as the ultimate ideal of marrying up? So, a guy can find a woman who cares about him, who loves him deeply, who will commit to him but if he’s a 6 and she’s a 4 he’s marrying down?
Fuck that. If you can find someone who truly loves and you allows you to love them, you’re marrying up. Or you’re at least equals.
You can not build a relationship on looks and money/status because they are temporal qualities. When they change - and they will and not always for the better - what are you left with?
[/quote]
Well said. This is what I was trying to get at with my earlier post.
The over-emphasis on physical beauty (and to some degree money) seems foolish and … immature? I’m not sure what word to use here.
We’re all (hopefully) gunna be octogenarians some day. [/quote]
By marrying up I thought they meant marrying into a rich family.
[quote]beachguy498 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
The over-emphasis on physical beauty (and to some degree money) seems foolish and … immature? I’m not sure what word to use here.
[/quote]
Over emphasis? Sure.
However, I’m not going to fault a newly divorced woman or man whom has an established career making $6X and accustomed to a certain life style for refusing to turn around and start dating someone who is 30+ and works at Wendy’s with no expectation or ambition for improvement over that.
Finances are an important factor in a long term relationship, and if someone doesn’t want to “support” the other I don’t see that as an unreasonable reason to avoid dating them. [/quote]
After my divorce and a couple of failed relationships, I really had to zero in on what I really wanted in a lady. I was always successful and made a decent buck, so she had to have a lot going for her as well.
Especially if you get older and have to think about retirement. Lots of women over 40 or 50 are looking for a sugar daddy. I’d never get involved with someone that couldn’t pull her own weight financially.
Rob [/quote]
I’m in this process right now and hope to have the sort of luck in finding a partner that you have. Or perhaps not luck, but rather good sense and open heart.
I’m very, very sorry to read about your wife’s illness and wish her and you all the best.
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]TheJonty wrote:
“You don’t love a woman because she’s beautiful, she’s beautiful because you love her.”
Anonymous[/quote]
So beta male talk
(I agree doe)[/quote]
I dont.
If she does not make my dick hard, no dice.
That may be superficial , well, I am how God made me.
[/quote]
Lol not sure where you are getting she doesn’t make your dick hard. Beauty normally does that. IMO it’s unfair to date someone you are truly not fully attracted to you. Basis for a poor relationship [/quote]
If people want to put it in vulgar terms, then fine: we shouldn’t be with women who don’t arouse us. However, there are many women who are not beautiful, but rather considered cute, average, or “attractive” (whatever this term means) who can turn any normal guy on. I refuse to believe that there are some men who are ONLY able to be aroused by a drop dead gorgeous woman and I don’t think orion has ONLY been with Ford runway material. [/quote]
Apologies if my language is offensive. It’s actually toned down in here vs me with the few ppl I am comfortable with. Anyways.
Seems to me you are either clairfiying what I said or not agreeing? But I am in agreement with what you replied with so if you were trying to argue sorry that was my point in my post. Though I chose to type short since my iPad sucks.
But I think attraction is extremely important in a relationship. And it needs to be equal between the two. Otherwise there is gonna be issues. But attraction is built off many things. And can grow with time. I’ve found this out and enjoy it. Gf was hot the first day I met her now after plenty of time with eachother I am more attracted to her. Physically she hasn’t changed but doesn’t mean I can be more attracted to her. And we share more things in common than I thought a female could have with me or even stand. 
got lucky
Until I reached my 30s, I placed way too much emphasis on beauty. But what I found was this: I was never satisfied with what I had. I would be single, find a good looking girl, then I would get tired of her. I was always looking for something new and exciting, and I was a shallow person. I dated and got laid a lot, but overall I was unhappy.
After I focused a little more on myself (esp. with strengthening my faith), I began to realize what I wanted: They of course have be attractive to gain my interest at first. But integrity, kindness, honesty and a sense of humor as what I was really looking for. I began to seek someone with these qualities. I’m sorry, but if you can’t make me laugh… that was a deal-breaker.
So now I’m happily married. My wife still “turns me on”, but there is many things that she does that makes me more attracted to her besides her dress and heels. It’s tough to articulate, but the happily married guys know exactly what I’m talking about.
[quote]maverick88 wrote:
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
I’ll echo something Mak just said and ask, what does it even mean to marry up or marry down? Why do we (men) use physical beauty as the ultimate ideal of marrying up? So, a guy can find a woman who cares about him, who loves him deeply, who will commit to him but if he’s a 6 and she’s a 4 he’s marrying down?
Fuck that. If you can find someone who truly loves and you allows you to love them, you’re marrying up. Or you’re at least equals.
You can not build a relationship on looks and money/status because they are temporal qualities. When they change - and they will and not always for the better - what are you left with?
[/quote]
Well said. This is what I was trying to get at with my earlier post.
The over-emphasis on physical beauty (and to some degree money) seems foolish and … immature? I’m not sure what word to use here.
We’re all (hopefully) gunna be octogenarians some day. [/quote]
By marrying up I thought they meant marrying into a rich family.
[/quote]
The definition above is correct. I would define marrying up or down as looks, money/status. Finding someone you love and who loves you as just much is a given. The point is one should not be limited by such barriers, whether real or perceived, in the pursuit of such a partner (within reason of course).
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
All this talk about Elliott Rodger got me thinking, and much of the talk reminds me of George Sodini, the guy who shot a few women in an LA Fitness gym.
[/quote]
Where/when/how do people develop a capacity for love?
In my opinion it comes from the mother. It’s the mother who needs to teach the son about love, patience and understanding. Obviously these idiots were so misguided that they were quicker to look outwards for problem-solving instead of inwards.
It’s something that has been occupying my mind lately because I’m speaking to one of my ex-girlfriends and she complains so much about how this guy or that guy would be perfect for her if they just showed some interest.
How the fuck do people grow up to become so oblivious?[/quote]
I am not sure they weren’t raised right. George Sodini spoke of his brother who was successful in his career and had a marriage. Well, how loving that marriage is beyond me. Who knows?
My mom is a very loving woman and spoiled and still does spoiled me in many ways. Well, now she attempts to still spoil me, but it doesn’t always work out. I believe she compensated because of my bottom-feeding, sinfully lazy dad who she divorced long ago. She probably thought, “I am taking over this family or this family is going nowhere.”
Meanwhile my brother and I have completely different personalities and tendencies. He not once had a self-esteem issue while I did. Not once in his life did he think, “Am I ever going to get a woman who likes me?” or “Am I ever going to be in love?” or “I am going to die alone”.
Perhaps these guys were misguided but they could have just turned out the way they did because despite parenting styles, people can still encounter all sorts of problems or lead their lives nothing like the way their parents did or espoused.
I am certain these two men could have had women if they had normal social skills and a healthier outlook on life.
Elliot Rodger did lead a tumultuous life from what I gather and was mercilessly bullied. However, he probably could have nabbed a petite bookworm, perhaps the type of person some would refer to as “mousy” or “a nerd” I believe, maybe even a cute one. Do I think he could have attracted the strapping, blonde Nordic women he fantasized about? No, I don’t. But he felt entitled to them, so much that he was driven mad and right in his own words sought out to kill such women.
I don’t think George Sodini was good looking, but he was ordinary looking and I’m convinced he could have had opportunities with more than enough women in his life in the twenty years that he spent without so much as kissing one. From the way he spoke and wrote, it was clear his thinking and worldview were completely warped and it seemed he too was another one fixated on beautiful women when he could have had some cute or ordinary women considering he worked out, appeared healthy, and had an alright job and a modest home. Seriously, if a guy has those things and doesn’t find a woman, it’s likely something is off. Personally I’d find dating, screwing, or even marrying ordinary women to be far more fulfilling than being lonely and celibate. [/quote]
I’m right next to the campus. The scene over here as far as women is pretty varied ethnically with the exception of Blacks. There’s a ton of Nord kids who come to town for Junior/ City College… A lot of them are pretty unassuming and open minded, the women are quite liberal in their sexuality. The tall blonde is a staple where they are from so you tend to see them date anything other than tall blondes, especially blacks and latinos. They are sort of notoriously easy.
Out in Isla Vista, as most campuses things are pretty wide open. It’s literally, “Hi my names blah, hey what are you doing tonight?” You can literally say that to 5 women, and unless you have herpes on your face, or vomit on your shirt you will probably have some success. Hell, if you want to go low you could probably get sex simply by staying sober enough to be dragged to bed by some horny sophomore.
I think it’s that this kid never learned the social skills as far as approaching the opposite sex without seeming needy or creepy. If girls were creeped out by him in the first place then the poor guy probably never even got friend zoned… And if he did get friend zoned he didn’t use that as an opportunity to learn and at least get comfortable and learn how to speak.
[quote]maverick88 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]En Sabah Nur wrote:
This is highly off topic, I know, but is becoming an Electrician a good trade?
I want to do something on the side to make more money, because I’m probably going to reach the cap on my current career soon for a non-managerial position and wanted to keep my options open.
Really don’t give a shit as to the “social stigma” of blue collar work from the ladies or anyone else. If I’m making bank, and I’m not stressed to shit, that’s all that matters.[/quote]
It’s certainly worked out well for me. Like anything, it’s what you make of it and about creating opportunity for yourself that you can capitalize upon. I am a union electrician and did a five year apprenticeship and have had lots of classes/certifications after that. I am not a “typical” electrician, nor is my salary “typical” - I make more than most superintendents. I am at where I’m at because I’ve been doing this since '96 and I’ve played my cards pretty well and never stopped learning. But even if you don’t get to my level, being an electrician is a good career with good pay. You can always find a job, so it’s somewhat “recession-proof”. If you’re good, you can make some serious loot.[/quote]
Not sure if you would know but, how hard is it to get an apprenticeship? In California it is damn near impossible now. Applications are accepted a few times a year and the waiting lists are already huge. I would be willing to relocate at this point.
[/quote]
It took me three years and “networking” my ass off to get in. I was a an electrician’s helper while I was waiting. Most people aren’t that patient. It helps weed out the people that aren’t serious. I had applied to the Steam Fitter apprenticeship too since I was working for a controls company that had both electricians and fitters. The electrical apprenticeship was the first one to call me back.
I’m sure there are parts of the country where work is booming right now where there is no wait if you want to relocate. I’m not sure where though.
For the record, it was worth the wait. Good luck.
[quote]Brett620 wrote:
Until I reached my 30s, I placed way too much emphasis on beauty. But what I found was this: I was never satisfied with what I had. I would be single, find a good looking girl, then I would get tired of her. I was always looking for something new and exciting, and I was a shallow person. I dated and got laid a lot, but overall I was unhappy.
After I focused a little more on myself (esp. with strengthening my faith), I began to realize what I wanted: They of course have be attractive to gain my interest at first. But integrity, kindness, honesty and a sense of humor as what I was really looking for. I began to seek someone with these qualities. I’m sorry, but if you can’t make me laugh… that was a deal-breaker.
So now I’m happily married. My wife still “turns me on”, but there is many things that she does that makes me more attracted to her besides her dress and heels. It’s tough to articulate, but the happily married guys know exactly what I’m talking about.[/quote]
I’m married 30 years and don’t think we’ll be seeing 31 years together with her being so ill. But I still feel the same for her now as I did when I first met her. Funny how when you really KNOW when you have a one in a million lady.
A big part of her is her career, her friends and how everyone thinks about her. There’s not 1 person that can say anything bad about her.
My son is 25 and his girlfriend, she’s one of those. They’ve been together since college and I hope they get married soon.
Rob
Writing is too easy…
“If you are not rich, you cant get beatiful women” bla bla bla…
But accepting this “cold” hard truth, is very painful. Life, is unfortunately not fear, and we have to “DEAL” with it.
Usually this “Dealing offer” comes from Rich people. They "Cant " understand the emotions of poor of middle class people.
Sure, in a Darwinian world, “They are better”, “They are superior” “They have better genes from the birth”, so they deserve everything.
Those problems will be solved in future I believe. Which is a post scarcity world, which is full of nano assemblers.
Also I believe, with genetic engineering, everyone in the future will be handsome and beatifull. Todays technology is very crude, if you born smart and beatiful, you rock. If you dont, you suck. Thats due to our crude technology to manipulate genetics.
But at the same time, since we cant change our genes now, we cant delete death genes, and we cant manipulate cells to live much longer, as a result WE DIE.
So both, Smart, Wealthy, Good Looking male which bangs SUPERIOR AND BEATIFULL CHICKS , will DIE one day.
At the end of the day, there is no difference. Everyone will die one day. And if we beat death, we can certainly beat lots of things. Society will become equal as the technology increases.
In the past, there was no democracy, no human rights and huge amounts of enslavement. Even the kings, they were not rich as Middle Class person in todays world.
Hopefully, things are getting better.
But, this guy did wrong in my opinion. He looks not bad, and also it seems he has money. He can trip to other country and bang lots of beatifull chicks with his money. He could do it.
The other reason for , very Attractive girls are Scarce, is maybe USA. Average American girl is not attractive, so finding an attractive girl is very hard.
On the other hand, countries like Russia, has MUCH BETTER girls than USA. Even the average girls physique is looking like model , compared to a 180 Lbs Fat Ass of USA Women.
[quote]Wector wrote:
Writing is too easy…
“If you are not rich, you cant get beatiful women” bla bla bla…
But accepting this “cold” hard truth, is very painful. Life, is unfortunately not fear, and we have to “DEAL” with it.
Usually this “Dealing offer” comes from Rich people. They "Cant " understand the emotions of poor of middle class people.
Sure, in a Darwinian world, “They are better”, “They are superior” “They have better genes from the birth”, so they deserve everything.
Those problems will be solved in future I believe. Which is a post scarcity world, which is full of nano assemblers.
Also I believe, with genetic engineering, everyone in the future will be handsome and beatifull. Todays technology is very crude, if you born smart and beatiful, you rock. If you dont, you suck. Thats due to our crude technology to manipulate genetics.
But at the same time, since we cant change our genes now, we cant delete death genes, and we cant manipulate cells to live much longer, as a result WE DIE.
So both, Smart, Wealthy, Good Looking male which bangs SUPERIOR AND BEATIFULL CHICKS , will DIE one day.
At the end of the day, there is no difference. Everyone will die one day. And if we beat death, we can certainly beat lots of things. Society will become equal as the technology increases.
In the past, there was no democracy, no human rights and huge amounts of enslavement. Even the kings, they were not rich as Middle Class person in todays world.
Hopefully, things are getting better.
But, this guy did wrong in my opinion. He looks not bad, and also it seems he has money. He can trip to other country and bang lots of beatifull chicks with his money. He could do it.
The other reason for , very Attractive girls are Scarce, is maybe USA. Average American girl is not attractive, so finding an attractive girl is very hard.
On the other hand, countries like Russia, has MUCH BETTER girls than USA. Even the average girls physique is looking like model , compared to a 180 Lbs Fat Ass of USA Women.
[/quote]
WHAT?!
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
[quote]Wector wrote:
Writing is too easy…
“If you are not rich, you cant get beatiful women” bla bla bla…
But accepting this “cold” hard truth, is very painful. Life, is unfortunately not fear, and we have to “DEAL” with it.
Usually this “Dealing offer” comes from Rich people. They "Cant " understand the emotions of poor of middle class people.
Sure, in a Darwinian world, “They are better”, “They are superior” “They have better genes from the birth”, so they deserve everything.
Those problems will be solved in future I believe. Which is a post scarcity world, which is full of nano assemblers.
Also I believe, with genetic engineering, everyone in the future will be handsome and beatifull. Todays technology is very crude, if you born smart and beatiful, you rock. If you dont, you suck. Thats due to our crude technology to manipulate genetics.
But at the same time, since we cant change our genes now, we cant delete death genes, and we cant manipulate cells to live much longer, as a result WE DIE.
So both, Smart, Wealthy, Good Looking male which bangs SUPERIOR AND BEATIFULL CHICKS , will DIE one day.
At the end of the day, there is no difference. Everyone will die one day. And if we beat death, we can certainly beat lots of things. Society will become equal as the technology increases.
In the past, there was no democracy, no human rights and huge amounts of enslavement. Even the kings, they were not rich as Middle Class person in todays world.
Hopefully, things are getting better.
But, this guy did wrong in my opinion. He looks not bad, and also it seems he has money. He can trip to other country and bang lots of beatifull chicks with his money. He could do it.
The other reason for , very Attractive girls are Scarce, is maybe USA. Average American girl is not attractive, so finding an attractive girl is very hard.
On the other hand, countries like Russia, has MUCH BETTER girls than USA. Even the average girls physique is looking like model , compared to a 180 Lbs Fat Ass of USA Women.
[/quote]
WHAT?![/quote]
WHAT ???
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
WHAT?![/quote]
Ah, the good old transhumanism post-singularity line of thought. Stross, Stephenson, Vinge, Banks.
However, it is true that the average Russian girl is more attractive than the average American girl. There are several countries like that, where women don’t actually feel like “being sexy” is catering to some feminist view of a patriarchal society. Slowly I’m seeing more of that in the US too… where women don’t feel shame for wanting to be sexually attractive and be treated well by a guy.
I dated a girl once who struggled a lot with getting “I want to be treated equal” and “I really like when a guy opens the door for me”… thinking that somehow allowing a guy to buy her dinner, dressing up, wearing makeup, was somehow making her “less equal”. Some girls even have this weird feeling of shame, that they’re letting women down (as a whole) by acting that way. Doesn’t sound too empowering to me.
However… the majority of that post, lol.
[quote]LoRez wrote:
[quote]BrickHead wrote:
WHAT?![/quote]
Ah, the good old transhumanism post-singularity line of thought. Stross, Stephenson, Vinge, Banks.
However, it is true that the average Russian girl is more attractive than the average American girl. There are several countries like that, where women don’t actually feel like “being sexy” is catering to some feminist view of a patriarchal society. Slowly I’m seeing more of that in the US too… where women don’t feel shame for wanting to be sexually attractive and be treated well by a guy.
I dated a girl once who struggled a lot with getting “I want to be treated equal” and “I really like when a guy opens the door for me”… thinking that somehow allowing a guy to buy her dinner, dressing up, wearing makeup, was somehow making her “less equal”. Some girls even have this weird feeling of shame, that they’re letting women down (as a whole) by acting that way. Doesn’t sound too empowering to me.
However… the majority of that post, lol.[/quote]
Well, Transhumanism may seem like a science fiction from todays perspective, but I do believe majority of our issues are connected to genetics.
As I mentioned before, nowadays, Women has lots of opportunities to make them selves better. Breast Implants, Make Ups, Lips Surgery, Liposuction to lose weight etc. Or she can buy contact lenses to change her eye color.
In the past, they did not exist. Todays female are more lucky in this case.
But todays technology still does not enough to change face. If you have ugly face, your choices are limited, unfortunately.
But if wont stay like this.
You know, being immortal may be too hard, but consider that Average Human Life Span was about 20 in Stone Age, now its about 70-80 in developed countries. So why not 150, or 200, or even Infinite?
But as I mentioned before, I am strongly looking forward for genetic enhancements. Genetics are the key. Lots of our suffering is related to genetics, in my view.
[quote]Wector wrote:
Writing is too easy…
“If you are not rich, you cant get beatiful women” bla bla bla…
But accepting this “cold” hard truth, is very painful. Life, is unfortunately not fear, and we have to “DEAL” with it.
Usually this “Dealing offer” comes from Rich people. They "Cant " understand the emotions of poor of middle class people.
Sure, in a Darwinian world, “They are better”, “They are superior” “They have better genes from the birth”, so they deserve everything.
Those problems will be solved in future I believe. Which is a post scarcity world, which is full of nano assemblers.
Also I believe, with genetic engineering, everyone in the future will be handsome and beatifull. Todays technology is very crude, if you born smart and beatiful, you rock. If you dont, you suck. Thats due to our crude technology to manipulate genetics.
But at the same time, since we cant change our genes now, we cant delete death genes, and we cant manipulate cells to live much longer, as a result WE DIE.
So both, Smart, Wealthy, Good Looking male which bangs SUPERIOR AND BEATIFULL CHICKS , will DIE one day.
At the end of the day, there is no difference. Everyone will die one day. And if we beat death, we can certainly beat lots of things. Society will become equal as the technology increases.
In the past, there was no democracy, no human rights and huge amounts of enslavement. Even the kings, they were not rich as Middle Class person in todays world.
Hopefully, things are getting better.
But, this guy did wrong in my opinion. He looks not bad, and also it seems he has money. He can trip to other country and bang lots of beatifull chicks with his money. He could do it.
The other reason for , very Attractive girls are Scarce, is maybe USA. Average American girl is not attractive, so finding an attractive girl is very hard.
On the other hand, countries like Russia, has MUCH BETTER girls than USA. Even the average girls physique is looking like model , compared to a 180 Lbs Fat Ass of USA Women.
[/quote]
I read the first several sentences and all I could think of was this:
Do not try to bend the spoon…
Cueball,
What the hell are you posting?
Do you think you read and understand my statements correctly?
I dont think I am wrong. Because lots of people in this forum, usually successfull people, throw a shit to “ordinary” people that, “Sorry , I have great genetics, I rock, you suck”.
So what if they they have better genes? At the end of the day, still they going to be fuckin dead.
And I think genetic engineering will change nearly everything we know about human. I still persist on my view of future women. Nearly all of them would be engineered and they would be much more attractive than todays.
Uhhhhh…
[quote]Wector wrote:
Writing is too easy…
“If you are not rich, you cant get beatiful women” bla bla bla…
But accepting this “cold” hard truth, is very painful. Life, is unfortunately not fear, and we have to “DEAL” with it.
Usually this “Dealing offer” comes from Rich people. They "Cant " understand the emotions of poor of middle class people.
Sure, in a Darwinian world, “They are better”, “They are superior” “They have better genes from the birth”, so they deserve everything.
Those problems will be solved in future I believe. Which is a post scarcity world, which is full of nano assemblers.
Also I believe, with genetic engineering, everyone in the future will be handsome and beatifull. Todays technology is very crude, if you born smart and beatiful, you rock. If you dont, you suck. Thats due to our crude technology to manipulate genetics.
But at the same time, since we cant change our genes now, we cant delete death genes, and we cant manipulate cells to live much longer, as a result WE DIE.
So both, Smart, Wealthy, Good Looking male which bangs SUPERIOR AND BEATIFULL CHICKS , will DIE one day.
At the end of the day, there is no difference. Everyone will die one day. And if we beat death, we can certainly beat lots of things. Society will become equal as the technology increases.
In the past, there was no democracy, no human rights and huge amounts of enslavement. Even the kings, they were not rich as Middle Class person in todays world.
Hopefully, things are getting better.
But, this guy did wrong in my opinion. He looks not bad, and also it seems he has money. He can trip to other country and bang lots of beatifull chicks with his money. He could do it.
The other reason for , very Attractive girls are Scarce, is maybe USA. Average American girl is not attractive, so finding an attractive girl is very hard.
On the other hand, countries like Russia, has MUCH BETTER girls than USA. Even the average girls physique is looking like model , compared to a 180 Lbs Fat Ass of USA Women.
[/quote]