Dominant Women

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]

I don’t know what to think about that. Why would anyone, male or female, want to run another human being to that degree? Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not. I get clothing requests. To many of them I reply with a no (generally to do with forgoing undergarments). Other times I comply, depending. (The hunt someone spoke of above is ongoing in a relationship worth having.)

But yeah, complete dominance is mystifying to me. I have no desire to be with someone who needs to be told what to do, and I’m far too headstrong to be managed to any significant extent.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]

I don’t know what to think about that. Why would anyone, male or female, want to run another human being to that degree? Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not. I get clothing requests. To many of them I reply with a no (generally to do with forgoing undergarments). Other times I comply, depending. (The hunt someone spoke of above is ongoing in a relationship worth having.)

But yeah, complete dominance is mystifying to me. I have no desire to be with someone who needs to be told what to do, and I’m far too headstrong to be managed to any significant extent. [/quote]

I can understand suggesting panties or a sexy outfit in certain circumstances and I enjoy a power exchange from time to time but this woman clearly has deep seeded issues. I think it is a matter of insecurity and most likely over compensation for a time when maybe her autonomy was taken from her. I feel sorry for her in a way but was just curious what a psychologist might think.

Anyways, I’m off to a party. Wish me luck for some masturbatory slut to keep me neutral and I hope you don’t disappear for months.

[quote]krazylarry wrote:
I banged a dominatrix for a while. She liked it rough. She used to tell me to go fuck myself while blowing me, good times.
[/quote]

Yep, sure sounds good to me…

Oh, officially? I think she’s nuts. Personally, I want someone with spirit and imagination, who wants the same from me.

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]
they try to do that regardless

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Oh, officially? I think she’s nuts. Personally, I want someone with spirit and imagination, who wants the same from me.[/quote]
Well I found one. And what would you spiritfully imagine?

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]

I don’t know what to think about that. Why would anyone, male or female, want to run another human being to that degree? Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not. I get clothing requests. To many of them I reply with a no (generally to do with forgoing undergarments). Other times I comply, depending. (The hunt someone spoke of above is ongoing in a relationship worth having.)

But yeah, complete dominance is mystifying to me. I have no desire to be with someone who needs to be told what to do, and I’m far too headstrong to be managed to any significant extent. [/quote]

I always enjoy seeing that you’ve posted.

I can’t imagine why you would want to control every aspect of another’s life. It sounds exhausting. Actually it sounds like having very young children.

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]

I don’t know what to think about that. Why would anyone, male or female, want to run another human being to that degree? Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not. I get clothing requests. To many of them I reply with a no (generally to do with forgoing undergarments). Other times I comply, depending. (The hunt someone spoke of above is ongoing in a relationship worth having.)

But yeah, complete dominance is mystifying to me. I have no desire to be with someone who needs to be told what to do, and I’m far too headstrong to be managed to any significant extent. [/quote]

I always enjoy seeing that you’ve posted.

I can’t imagine why you would want to control every aspect of another’s life. It sounds exhausting. Actually it sounds like having very young children.
[/quote]
I think this is an interesting perspective too. She is mid thirties with no children. I wonder if maybe she does have some kind of barren womb complex coupled with other issues.

Maybe I will just ask her why she needs to be that way.

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
Yep…HoustonGuy.[/quote]

lol, great call.

Poor Emily. She comes out of the woodwork to have a conversation and it turns out to be HG.
[/quote]

I don’t mind HG. Yes, he’s occasionally douchey but certainly not all the time. And he does start interesting discussions. This is not the first time I’ve done a skim-through of the forum and decided to post because something he’s said has sparked my curiosity. (Or activated my rescue complex.)[/quote]

Sex aside, what are your general thoughts on women who demand to flip traditional gender roles in relationships, and furthermore women who would choose all the minute details of everything from dressing to food selection for their mates?[/quote]

I don’t know what to think about that. Why would anyone, male or female, want to run another human being to that degree? Don’t they have better things to do? I guess not. I get clothing requests. To many of them I reply with a no (generally to do with forgoing undergarments). Other times I comply, depending. (The hunt someone spoke of above is ongoing in a relationship worth having.)

But yeah, complete dominance is mystifying to me. I have no desire to be with someone who needs to be told what to do, and I’m far too headstrong to be managed to any significant extent. [/quote]

I always enjoy seeing that you’ve posted.

I can’t imagine why you would want to control every aspect of another’s life. It sounds exhausting. Actually it sounds like having very young children.
[/quote]
I think this is an interesting perspective too. She is mid thirties with no children. I wonder if maybe she does have some kind of barren womb complex coupled with other issues.

Maybe I will just ask her why she needs to be that way.[/quote]

untreated chlamydia=barren womb complex!!!

Well if I get a drippy tip at least I will know where it came from.

God, yes, exactly. All fine and good in a three-year-old, but I would have serious trouble respecting an adult who required the same. It definitely wouldn’t feel sexy to me.

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
@ pangloss:

In a dating/relationship scenario (never an interest) she would order for you. Dress you, direct your life in general.

Sexually I have no idea what her whole sexuality encompasses but I’d say we were in between your examples. I was not tied up and totally helpless and while she was “responsible” for her own orgasm, she was responsible for mine too and as mentioned it wasn’t a tease and denial, prolong the pleasure thing. It was a power trip for her to refuse activity leading to mine. Ultimately I got off but I would bet her “boyfriends” eventually lose that “privilege”. It was highly irritating.

@ Frankie:

she was hot, the sex was frustrating as mentioned but ultimately ended well. There won’t be a repeat and a relationship was never considered.[/quote]

How big is she? Maybe I’m not able to generalize beyond my own experience, but all of the men I’ve slept with have had a considerable strength advantage over me. I may, and often do, start out in the role of aggressor or tease, but at some point generally the dominant option is removed if I’m teasing or lingering too long. Or talking! Sometimes that happens. lol

Couldn’t you just…take over, and get off when you were ready?
[/quote]
Petite. And yes, I could but again this wasn’t a tease and denial scenario. Legitimate “no” lines would’ve been crossed. Maybe she’s in to the rape fantasy (i’m not) and missed it but considering her relationship parameters I doubt it.

Whatever her issue is, it did not settle my ennui ;)[/quote]

So, are you saying that in the middle of it, if she declared “oh no, you’re not doing that right now,” or however she verbalized her control, and you said “oh yes I am,” she would have removed her consent and declared the situation nonconsensual?

I can only imagine that this would, if anything, worsen one’s ennui. It would mine, if I had both random hookups and a general sense of dissatisfaction with life. But of course these two things feed one another, so I don’t have either one. :)[/quote]
In paragraph one, yes, exactly.

I disagree random sex creates dissatisfaction in life however, it merely satisfies a natural urge. Unless you encounter a highly irritating personality clash.[/quote]

I’m not suggesting that it creates dissatisfaction, but rather that it does nothing to create satisfaction. Random sex itself is neutral, however the pursuit of it requires a focus of energy in a direction that does not increase emotional well being. It’s a masturbatory exercise to some extent.[/quote]
Well this is certainly an interesting perspective. I never thought about the energy used to get to a relatively neutral place. I don’t understand how it would lead to dissatisfaction though, considering the satisfaction of sex, excepting this particular, irritating woman.

Edit:

I also think when you’re horny and unsatisfied you are on the negative side of your personal satisfaction line and even if getting neutral is all casual sex does for you, it is a positive step.[/quote]

I was thinking about neutral vs satisfied in the car this weekend and what I mean when I suggest that random sex leaves something out. The analogy I came up with is eating. I love eating. I never, ever miss a meal and I always enjoy them. Sometimes the food is exceptionally good or exciting (take-out Indian! yay!) but either way, rarely do I encounter bad food. After all, it’s food! I’m a decent cook and don’t mind doing it, but when I’m cooking for myself alone I go for quick, easy, and lean. Make it, enjoy it, clean it up, forget it. Two hours later start thinking about the next food.

On the other hand, meals with friends and family are rich in pleasure and meaning. To cook with people I care about makes it an entirely different thing. Under those circumstances there really is no effort too great, because the joy is in the companionship…but the food is still food, and therefore good as always.

Imagine cooking with strangers…where is the comfort or joy in that? I’d be all “oh, did you need the vegetable peeler? sorry.” Sort of awkward and polite, though we might have some laughs/fun, too, since we’re there together and both like to cook. But there wouldn’t be any in-jokes or the good rhythm that comes from working together long term.

Same thing meals out. A good meal and a book = pleasure. A couple of friends and a bottle of wine = joy.

Sex is good. I like it. In and of itself it is a positive. But for me the joy is in the intimacy of falling asleep all mashed up together and of having ongoing teasing banter. “What I’m going to do to you” is a big theme in my relationship. Some of it is real, some of it is completely over the top. But it adds an element of fun (and of the hunt). I don’t see a casual sex partner handling some of the sex threats I make well. And what if he got excited?? ~shudder~

And then there’s the deep satisfaction I get from serving up something, whether sex or food, that makes someone I love moan with pleasure. I really, really like hearing the people I care about make happy noises. That’s what gives it all meaning.

I think the food analogy is a good one, and I love Indian food too. Chicken vindaloo especially. I agree family events centered around food can give meals a unique experience with an emotional appeal and also enjoy these scenarios though I typically prefer to be served myself.

I also enjoy tailgating, cook offs, fairs et cetera where I walk around mingling with strangers, meeting new people, sampling various foods and while I can’t connect with them emotionally I absolutely enjoy the variety and find it to be a satisfying spice of life, including sexually.

Where does a “masturbatory” experience end and a truly meaningful, positive flow of energies begin with self satisfaction? I believe we are back to a familiar matter of preference and personal bias. Exploration for me is deeply satisfying, especially when it is a new, unknown body with its own set of turn ons and preferences to find and manipulate.

I have no idea what you and your partner suggest to each other but it is my experience that most encounters begin the same way with kissing, stroking, oral and on from there. I’ve found when suggestions are made and enthusiasm isn’t reciprocated, it is easy to just brush it off and keep exploring to find mutual pleasure, exciting and new. This isn’t to say I don’t see value in familiar sex or emotional ties through physicality but that I do believe exploring and “conquering” a new challenge is rewarding, almost like achieving a goal (mutual pleasure) by satisfying a primal urge. Win win.

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
I think the food analogy is a good one, and I love Indian food too. Chicken vindaloo especially. I agree family events centered around food can give meals a unique experience with an emotional appeal and also enjoy these scenarios though I typically prefer to be served myself.

I also enjoy tailgating, cook offs, fairs et cetera where I walk around mingling with strangers, meeting new people, sampling various foods and while I can’t connect with them emotionally I absolutely enjoy the variety and find it to be a satisfying spice of life, including sexually.

Where does a “masturbatory” experience end and a truly meaningful, positive flow of energies begin with self satisfaction? I believe we are back to a familiar matter of preference and personal bias. Exploration for me is deeply satisfying, especially when it is a new, unknown body with its own set of turn ons and preferences to find and manipulate.

I have no idea what you and your partner suggest to each other but it is my experience that most encounters begin the same way with kissing, stroking, oral and on from there. I’ve found when suggestions are made and enthusiasm isn’t reciprocated, it is easy to just brush it off and keep exploring to find mutual pleasure, exciting and new. This isn’t to say I don’t see value in familiar sex or emotional ties through physicality but that I do believe exploring and “conquering” a new challenge is rewarding, almost like achieving a goal (mutual pleasure) by satisfying a primal urge. Win win.[/quote]

Hmm, yes, I think we are just wired differently. I like new things, too, and I’m certainly curious and outgoing…but sex is not even remotely exciting as a “sampling” thing for me. I’ve moved a great deal, and one of the things I hate about settling into a new town is finding a decent Chinese restaurant. So much potential for gaggy dishwater-tasting sauces and weird, gross meat. But one of those strip mall China Palaces is going to have awesome food, and you have to tolerate the process of sampling until you find it. Strange sex has a revulsion factor for me alike to unknown Chinese food. I’m much more interested in exploring interesting dishes once I know I like a place. Until then I stick to bland, common stuff. Fried rice, for example.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
I think the food analogy is a good one, and I love Indian food too. Chicken vindaloo especially. I agree family events centered around food can give meals a unique experience with an emotional appeal and also enjoy these scenarios though I typically prefer to be served myself.

I also enjoy tailgating, cook offs, fairs et cetera where I walk around mingling with strangers, meeting new people, sampling various foods and while I can’t connect with them emotionally I absolutely enjoy the variety and find it to be a satisfying spice of life, including sexually.

Where does a “masturbatory” experience end and a truly meaningful, positive flow of energies begin with self satisfaction? I believe we are back to a familiar matter of preference and personal bias. Exploration for me is deeply satisfying, especially when it is a new, unknown body with its own set of turn ons and preferences to find and manipulate.

I have no idea what you and your partner suggest to each other but it is my experience that most encounters begin the same way with kissing, stroking, oral and on from there. I’ve found when suggestions are made and enthusiasm isn’t reciprocated, it is easy to just brush it off and keep exploring to find mutual pleasure, exciting and new. This isn’t to say I don’t see value in familiar sex or emotional ties through physicality but that I do believe exploring and “conquering” a new challenge is rewarding, almost like achieving a goal (mutual pleasure) by satisfying a primal urge. Win win.[/quote]

Hmm, yes, I think we are just wired differently. I like new things, too, and I’m certainly curious and outgoing…but sex is not even remotely exciting as a “sampling” thing for me. I’ve moved a great deal, and one of the things I hate about settling into a new town is finding a decent Chinese restaurant. So much potential for gaggy dishwater-tasting sauces and weird, gross meat. But one of those strip mall China Palaces is going to have awesome food, and you have to tolerate the process of sampling until you find it. Strange sex has a revulsion factor for me alike to unknown Chinese food. I’m much more interested in exploring interesting dishes once I know I like a place. Until then I stick to bland, common stuff. Fried rice, for example.

[/quote]
Well some times you just get hungry I guess. I can usually judge a restaurant by its appearance and know if I will pass it by or try it. Generally if it looks good, it may not be the all time top spot but will satisfy my appetite. And when I do find my top spot, I may really enjoy the orange chicken but the other restaurant down the street serves an orange chicken with a slightly different flavor that I like some times. I like exploring dishes in a place I enjoy too, but that doesn’t mean another place won’t have something different and enjoyable to offer. And maybe one will have excellent kung pow chicken but leaves something to be desired in broccoli beef department. Or maybe I just want a hamburger instead.

I’ve waded through some bad meals unfortunately but at least left with my hunger satisfied and knew to move on.

Fuck buddies are great but you can’t juggle enough if you have a truly adventurous palate.

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
Maybe I will just ask her why she needs to be that way.[/quote]

Just bang her and leave when she gets too annoying. Why you gotta complicate, brah?

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
Maybe I will just ask her why she needs to be that way.[/quote]

Just bang her and leave when she gets too annoying. Why you gotta complicate, brah?[/quote]
One time and she was too annoying. The only thing I can pull from her now is either the answer or a hilarious reaction to the question. I would like the answer but I will take either.

She’s probably gonna kick your ass for getting uppity.