Oh, I know. My opinions on these subjects were formed from years of neglect, abuse and violence.
Nice when someone lays out a template for living that can be synopsized with “Do the opposite.”.
Or to go all Gandhi & shit- “Be the change you wish to see in this world” or something to that effect.
Thats what makes the difference between actual men and pouty lipped man children.
When the going gets tough chronological age and male genitalia don’t mean shit.
Promiscuity is by definition a pattern of behavior.
Here’s a request, which you will probably avoid: provide evidence that supports the benefits of promiscuity.
Not the right questions. It’s not about whether or not she will cheat but whether or not she will be a good partner. Cheating is simply one of several relationship killing consequences.
One of the best pieces I’ve read about how promiscuity hurts society. @zecarlo you might like this one.
What are we focusing on here? Is body count important for us as individuals, or does promiscuity hurt civilization?
We sentimentally agree. How we apply:
is likely where we will have different views. As a general curiosity relating to whether or not body count matters, I want to know why it does for those in the yes camp. This is where I begin to see projected insecurity. Again, generally speaking. If a woman loves you, is committed to monogamy with you, enjoys sex with you and on and on, why does her past matter.
And most people are misapplying studies and shifting blame of unrelated behavior to sex itself, which I see as faulty logic. While I don’t disagree that sex can be unhealthy in some circumstances, tying it to missed credit payments, projecting cheating on to anyone casually sexually active et cetera is disingenuous at worst and a misapplication at best. Like projecting negative qualities of an ex on to a new partner sort of.
I still need to read your article fully. I see some similar tactics used by the author as he makes a point but he has some interesting angles to digest too.
Id say anything north of 100 is quite concerning. We could probably cut that in half and still be just as concerned. Maybe even in half again with the same risk level.
Despite your arguments against it being a subjective answer, it literally is. There is no guaranteed number at which a woman is certain to cuck a man.
That being said, I’m willing to bet there is correlation between those 10% of “paternal discrepancies” and body count of the woman.
There is no hard number, but that doesnt mean there is nothing left to learn from the trends.
I think i see why youre so hard up on your stance here. Careful, Freud has been slipping today.
OK, sounds good.
I have not read this guy’s book, but he has been referred to amongst those whose content I’ve consumed. This is something to think about.
This is actually my point.
I fucked a lot of women. I have not and will not cheat. I didn’t take my vows lightly 
no Freudian slip here. This is why I think the other side of the coin is a little silly. It’s all projected nonsense.
Or is body count only a question for women?
I am curious why you feel the article was good. I haven’t read it yet, but wonder about the writer’s intent.
I don’t think an argument can be made that promoting promiscuity and attacking marriage are not part of the feminist agenda (the sexual revolution). Feminism is not only a civilization destroyer but it is the desired goal of feminism. Feminists explicitly state they want to destroy society as we know it and replace it with… well, they really haven’t worked that part out yet. They see themselves as competing against men, and that human history itself has been an ongoing competition between men and women when the truth is, men and women for most of human history were not competitors. But rest assured, if women destroy civilization it will be men who rebuild it.
What you say here is reasonable to me, except what you wrote about insecurity, which you have mentioned a few times. Yes, there are probably men who care about body count because of insecurity. Others are not insecure.
However, even if a man is insecure, I do not see a problem considering this because if he does not like a large body count, he will not associate with a woman who has one, and there will be no harm or disappointment to anyone. That goes for any other characteristic wanted or unwanted in a potential mate. If a woman wants a certain kind of man, she can reject a man who does not fit this kind. In all cases of choice to not associate or disassociate in dating or even an initial conversation, no one is a problem. I mean, how can they be?
From some of what I’ve read about some feminists, including their own words, that appears to be the goal.
I read it several months ago. I remember his intent was to show that promiscuity hurts and stunts civilization. And he explained that in a cogent manner, from what I remember.
I am always concerned with the motivation of the speaker. I will read it.
Thanks!
I believe men and women differ here, to a degree. Women tend to be more impulsive than men, 80% of commercials wouldn’t target women if that wasn’t the case. Women also tend to act on their emotions more than men, and women have a number of hormonal reasons to be more emotionally inconsistent.
Men with a high bodycount tend to wgate some of the same emotional/mental damages that women with a high bodycount have, but in a much less severe degree.
You’re welcome.
I’m actually someone who does not pay much attention to authors’ motivations. Even if I dislike an author or his motivations, I will see what he or she reveals. I can read things in a completely detached manner, mull the contents over in my mind, measure it up what I see in the world around me, and come to my own conclusion.
I also consider it useful to get content from the horse’s mouth in some cases, regardless of who I like or dislike.
I think it’s interesting you’re placing impulsivity in the female camp.
I agree women tend to allow emotion to factor in to their decision making process at a higher rate than men do, but as a generalized blanket statement I see men acting much, much more impulsively than women. Especially sexually.
Commercials have traditionally targeted women because they have traditionally been the shoppers. Commercials targeting men use the same “buy now” tactics, which speaks to impulse more than targeting your target market. The content is just tinted blue instead of pink.
Under what circumstances can you envision a woman with a high “body count” making a good wife? What personality traits create that high body count and also make one attractive as a spouse? The only situation I can picture in which the high body count woman could be attractive as a potential spouse is, maybe, a religious conversion/awakening.
