COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

You make no sense. 400-800 m runners train at maximum 3-4 times a week and their training consist mostly of technique. Including warm up they probably do not log more than 2-3k per workout.

I know how distance runners train. I had a team mate when playing soccer who was a distance runner as well. I was training with him sometimes, although he was mostly running 10k as it was the most popular distance.

Academy and professional soccer players are first payed more than track athletes and teams have a numerous coaches and specialists. Soccer players are competing at least once per week, sometimes twice. They train almost every day and training is at least with 4-5 km per workout even if it is tactical or technical. Most teams train twice per day. Academy trains every day once per day with usually Saturday’s off.

You cant really compare the accumulated fatigue in other sports with soccer and how hard the heart works in a daily basis and how often soccer players compete.

What if
 the heart problems aren’t from vaccines

What if
 it’s the waffles?

Like I said, I am for it at the beginning of treatment, until the ancilary habits and old friends are discarded. If after that, the patient is stable with the regiment, I would take off the naloxone because it’s not good for you and can and has been known to block other medications.
Also, the bioavailability of naloxone seems to be higher than reported because the treatment drugs, buprenorphine and methadone appear truncated, they wear off quicker requiring the addict to need more to remain unsick. And because treatment can last years, I don’t think its a good thing long term. Good thing short term, not a good thing long term.

I don’t think the risks of the vaccine outweigh the benefits en masse. And if you don’t want to take the vaccine, don’t. And people need to discuss it with their doctors if they have any potential risk factors regarding vaccine ingredients.
The vaccine is not for everybody, but it helps with most people.

My issue is the government pushing the vaccine and separating a person from their jobs, their livelihood and their lives if they don’t comply with insane mandates for a drug not everybody needs to take or should take. There is no drug in the world everybody should take.
If you don’t want the vaccine and you have your reasons, I don’t need an explanation, you do you. Don’t let the government dictate what’s best for your health, in either direction. I have always kept up with vaccines and will continue whether the government is for it or not.

Remember just a year ago, the same people trying to punish people for not taking the stupid vaccine said they would refuse to take it because Trump. Now they are ramming down everybody’s throat. It’s cognitive dissonance at a governmental level.
Makes not a damn to me whether or not somebody is vaccinated. I don’t care and I don’t even want to know your “status” because it’s not my business.

1 Like

What? I think there were some people who mocked Trump for saying it was his vaccine, but they were largely accepting of taking the vaccine. The group mostly refusing was always the group supporting Trump (if we are going to break things down into two groups).

No they weren’t
 democrats were playing politics with the vaccine, saying they won’t take it because Trump was in office

1 Like

Sure, a small minority of them. In general, the group that supported Trump was more hesitant then and is still now.

what?? You could probably find a few, but statistically, that’s absolutely not true.

For one thing, the vaccine wasn’t readily available to the public when Trump was in office. It was VERY limited in December/January. Almost exclusively reserved for healthcare workers and the elderly. I got the vaccine as early as I possibly could, and that was in March.

Aside from that, Democrats were getting the vaccine at a MUCH higher rate than Republicans, statistically. That has been a fact since the vaccine first hit the market.

It’s one thing to get your information from shitty sources. It’s another to not even remember when the vaccine was available, lol. This is just absurd.

1 Like

Biden, Harris, CNN, MSNBC to name just a few

go back an watch the news clips of right before the election when they were asked if they would take vaccine
they said no because of Trump

Then after the election they got vaccinated

You can’t change history to suit your beliefs

2 Likes

Ok. You’re making a claim. Prove your claim. Show me one clip. Any clip. Anything showing either Biden or Harris saying they won’t take the vaccine. Biden and Harris both got their first two shots while he was in office. Biden got his first shot in December 2020, and his second 3 weeks after.

You’re right, you can’t. So, here. I’ll disprove your version of history.

This timeline shows that December 11 2020 was the date when the first vaccines were approved, which was AFTER THE ELECTION. So no, they didn’t refuse the vaccine prior to the election. It wasn’t fucking available.

THEN here’s the evidence that Biden received the vaccine while Trump was still in office.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/21/politics/bidens-coronavirus-vaccination/index.html

Both shots taken before Biden took office.

Can you please stop with the bullshit now?

1 Like

Also, I went ahead and found what you’re probably talking about
 I’m pretty sure your ‘news source’ was a tik tok video. but here. PolitiFact | Biden, Harris distrusted Trump with COVID-19 vaccines, not the vaccines themselves

That’s a full rundown of the comments you’re probably referring to. Neither Biden nor Harris EVER said that they distrusted the vaccine in and of itself. While still being developed, they said Trump’s handling of the rollout would be problematic, and they said that they would require trusted sources outside of Trump to confirm the efficacy and safety of a vaccine once one became available.

1 Like

I don’t do tik tok videos

My point is they were against the vaccine because of Trump
when the election was over and Trump lost the election
then they were for the vaccine and they got vaccinated (you made my point)
it was all politics

And for you to deny that politics was not in play
then you are just plain blind as a Wuhan lab bat

They were deceiving the public with their anti vaccine rhetoric to get Trump out of office

Bull.Shit.

2 Likes

Ding Ding Ding! Yup, to say that the media and politicians were saying they wouldn’t take a vaccine developed under Trump was epidemic. Pelosi said, Shumer said, CNN said, MSNBC said it, all of them said it.

1 Like

Sure, you can cherry pick a few. Do stats matter to you?

Done and done

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-the-left-said-it-wouldnt-trust-the-trump-vaccine-now-theyre-shaming-the-unvaccinated/ar-AAMLI1k

Keep in mind, the vaccine is still touted by Trump


My how times have changed:

Is that enough or do you need more?

1 Like

This is how the game is played.
“Nu uh! Prove it!”
~Proof provided~
“You’re cherry picking”

She’s the VP and I posted 4 articles and a congressional letter. Am I cherry picking, or are you being deliberately niave to protect your cult and pretend the things that were said, were not said by government officials and the media?
You may forget what happened literally last year, but I didn’t.

1 Like

That last article seems to mean something different than what you think.

Biden would trust the vaccine if approved by Trump, and the scientists involved with the approval. He would not trust it if only approved by Trump. I think that is reasonable.

Enough of the personal attacks.

The original claim is that democrats largely avoided the vaccine because of Trump being in office. Democrats being democratic politicians and the people who support them. You found a handful of people among the more than 100 million democrats. It is like statistics don’t matter to you if you can find a few democrats that fit your narrative.

You also used misleading articles to prove your point (see my above comment).

That wasn’t the original claim. This was:

Did I? The congressional letter was a misleading article? The actual articles the leftwing media wrote are misleading about their own opinions? Don’t red herring me, I know what is up


How the fuck is that reasonable? That’s not in the remote ballpark of reasonable.

1 Like