[quote]thetruth24 wrote:
Hey Guys,
Thanks for your response.
I don’t have too much time right now, so Ill just post something regarding “CNS Factorization”.
I have been posting on Jame Smith’s powerdevelopmentinc site.
He stated that his “CNS Factorization” does not match our definition of adding ME work to a traditional load, and spreading it over a week.
James Smith:
spreading and intensive volume of the same lifts over the course of a training week is not something I would suggest. In regards to maximal effort lifting, by repeating the exact same motor program at the exact same intensity the chances are fairly high that you would severely fatigue the CNS.
You must be recovered enough to yield a positive training effect from the imposed workload. This requires at least 48 hours in order to perform the same means at high intensity; however, maximal weight training presents much greater stress to the muscles then, for example, short sprints. This is largely a function of where a means lies on the F:T curve.
Now I have never tried to, for instance, squat above 90% three or more times a week, so I cannot say from experience that this is a wise or unwise choice. If you intend on trying something like this the best I can do is to suggest to GREATLY reduce the volume of each workout.
Keep in mind that the powerlifters and weightlifters who train with high frequency wave the intensity. Powerlifters even more so because the powerlifts are to the right of weightlifts on the F:T curve.
It seems to me that it would be OK, as long as volume is kept low, and intensity is waved.
(1) Does waving intensity necc. mean up-down-up (85-95-90)?
[/quote]
No. Think DE work at westside. They have a 4 week wave that goes up and increases each week - 50, 60, 70 etc etc then you start at a new target and the 4 week wave starts again. It doesnt have to go up-down-up.
jtrinsey’s coupling methos sounds great imo. Your at a stage in planning imo where its hard to justify what set and rep schemes to use exactly without having a workout or two under the belt. Dont forget eccentrics are traditionally 130% 1RM or thereabouts. Youll be sore!!!
The band work with 3 second negatives was taken from a louis interview on how to incorperate westide into bodybuilding and if i had the set up id definately have a go.
[quote]
(3)Would it be appropriate to follow up these frequent ME lifts, with reps in the 4-6 range?
Thanks,
-The Truth[/quote]
are these reps in the same lifts or assistance exercises? are you doing assistance work in the traditional RE range in your ME blocks?
I think this is looking good. We need to try some shit out.