[quote]Spike9726 wrote:
DirtyRedneck wrote:
Spike9726 wrote:
You are right, TCU didn’t do it on the field. If they’d beaten Utah I wouldn’t be cursing our bowl destinations. If they’d beaten Utah and OU would they be playing for a national championship? Why not?
This is starting to change, but TCU has not gotten the respect they deserve because they are not part of the exclusionary bowl championship series.
Here’s their schedule:
@ New Mexico
Stephen F. Austin
Stanford
@ Southern Methodist
@ Oklahoma
San Diego State
@ Colorado State
Brigham Young
Wyoming
@ UNLV
@ Utah
Air Force
They don’t get respect because they’re 1-2 in games that matter. The rest of their schedule is fluff. They are a good team, and I think this year they could have made a case for the BCS if they had run the table.
The only real BCS opponent they faced drilled them. They also essentially get bye weeks between their big games. Teams in BCS conferences have tough games nearly every week.
Playing 5-6 teams that at the very least flirt with the top 25 in a row is very different from playing powderpuff teams 3 weeks, then gearing up for a big game. Ask Texas about that.
As much as everyone talks about the mighty Big 12 and the mighty SEC who do any of them play in OOC? Even my beloved Bama has played a dissapointing Clemson, Tulane, Arkansas State, and the mighty Hilltoppers of Western Kentucky, what does beating them prove? The B12 and SEC play crap OOC then beat up on each other, what does that prove?
Some teams do better in this regard than others. Part of this is luck, as well. Clemson was supposed to be quite a force this year, but obviously that didn’t pan out. So teams need a little bit of luck in their OOC schedules.
Consider Florida, who plays Miami and Florida State. Some years, that’s a near impossible task, other years, not so much.
The bigger issue is that non-BCS teams need OOC games, because their conference schedule is so flimsy. Not so with the BCS conferences. TCU would be an 8 win team in the SEC at best, no matter their OOC schedule.
SFA (yeah they sucked but aleast there was some local interest and they brought some fans) was a last minute addition because Arkansas backed out. SMU is a local rivalry that the old timer powers that be insist on maintaining. I hate that. Stanford beat USC last year.
It’s hard to tell several years in advance how good a team will be. The year we played the home half of a 2 game series with Arizona they started the year ranked #2.
In the last decade we’ve played a 4 game series with Northwestern that was signed after Northwestern went to the Rose Bowl. Some years they were better than others but we won 3 out of 4.
We are far from getting weeks off before our big games. As that idiot Corso says NOT SO FAST! This conference we are in insists that most of the important games be played on Thursdays. The BYU game was a home game, on a Thursday night.
The previous Saturday we traveled to Colorado State. They are not a great team but the travel and short week does not help. We beat them in crappy weather with our back up QB. The Utah game, a road game, was also on a Thursday night, after having to travel to Las Vegas 5 days before.
Last years loss at Air Force (an improving team) was a road game on a Thursday night, 5 days after the UT game, which was basically our super bowl. There was definitely a hangover there.
Who says our conference schedule is flimsy! Wyoming beat Tennessee there, and our conference pretty much owned the Pac 10. There are other examples. You say BCS like all qualifier schools are somehow better.
We’d clean house in the Pac 10, and I think the stats already bear that out. We’d clean house in the Big Least, we owned Louisville back in the day. The ACC is hard to read, you’ve got a bunch of pretty good teams that beat each other up. There’s another conference I can’t think of but I’m on my second beer. Oh yeah, the B10, is anyone really impressed with them?
As for the B12 and the SEC, I think there are some great programs there. I’ll submit this to you and I’ll close:
TCU has done fairly well playing in conferences with generally uninteresting, far away opponents that do not bring a lot of fans nor do they stimulate much interest from the casual fans in the DFW area.
They’ve played a ton of mid week games and we are generally locked out of the more prestigious bowls with decent payouts. We are actually pondering our 3rd trip to Houston in 4 years (Texas, OTOH can have their most dissapointing season in years and they still get to treat their fans to a weekend of sipping margaritas on the Riverwalk in San Antonio, and a decent payout from the bowl).
Our TV deals have generally sucked (I had to pay $10/month extra to get VS, and does anyone actually have the MTN?). In spite of all these disadvantages we’ve had a number of 10 win seasons, are 7-2 vs the BCS since 2005, have beaten Tech, and are 1 of 2 of Bob Stoops losses ever in Norman.
Put TCU in the SEC or B12 and you are talking about an immediate infusion of BCS $, better bowl tie ins, a better TV deal, no more mid week football (the bane of my existence), you’re bringing teams to Fort Worth that are close enough to bring a lot of fans plus would draw some casual fans.
(I was really impressed that Ole Miss brought atleast 100 fans for a 3 game series last baseball season). Add all of this to what we have already and there’s no telling how good we might be.
Hope you had a good Thanksgiving and got to spend it with the people you love.[/quote]
I can’t read this much about TCU. Sorry.