[quote]Panther1015 wrote:
Bauer97 wrote:
Ah, a reference to Penn State’s HIT… my stomach is churning already.
I just got done playing 4 years as a Penn State defensive end, and their weight training program is the worst I have ever seen.
For example, dropping from 265 @ 8% bodyfat, down to 238 at 16% bodyfat… within the first 9 months of being there.
How is this possible, under a division 1 lifting program? Try never touching a barbell or dumbbell for the first 2 years I was there. Oh, and on the machines, which is all we did besides manual resistance, try going 8 seconds concentric, follwed by 8 seconds eccentric.
Any PSU player with a physique resembling somebody who lifts weights is the result of unbelievable genetics that would respond to anything.
Just try taking a comparison of the body structure, specifically lower, of PSU lineman vs. Ohio State lineman when they play this year.
I love my alma mater, but that lifting program is ruining one of the best football traditions in America. Machine based HIT should be reserved for Octogenarians, if anybody.
PSU used to get away with this because they brought in so many uber talented players. Now that their overall recruiting has taken a nosedive, the HIT program is catching up to them. It’s sad, really. As much as I don’t like PSU, I think it’s inexcusable to see young players wasting away and not achieving their true potential.
Michigan is another HIT culprit. Unlike PSU though, they still bring in a ton of talented kids that will be good in spite of their poor training. Imagine how much better Michigan would be if their S&C program was of the same caliber of a Texas or USC?
[/quote]
big bump, I work with a guy who used to be and S&C coach from Penn State, very close minded opinions