[quote]JoeGood wrote:
So far Arkansas is playing true to form for the last few years aganist top flight teams. Start strong and then mental errors trip them up. Don’t be too surprised if this game ends 42-21.[/quote]
LOL man I seriously hate your predictions.
Congrats to LSU, they fought back and whipped us in the second half. Now that the year is almost over and bowl season is almost upon us, GO SEC.
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
So far Arkansas is playing true to form for the last few years aganist top flight teams. Start strong and then mental errors trip them up. Don’t be too surprised if this game ends 42-21.[/quote]
LOL man I seriously hate your predictions.
Congrats to LSU, they fought back and whipped us in the second half. Now that the year is almost over and bowl season is almost upon us, GO SEC.[/quote]
Hey, I predicted you’d beat A&M. I like the Arkansas program but it’s still fighting one big flaw. They have a good starting 22 but their rotation after that is weak compared to the top teams. Until they can fix that they are going to win against most teams but not be able to make the jump against the best teams.
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
So far Arkansas is playing true to form for the last few years aganist top flight teams. Start strong and then mental errors trip them up. Don’t be too surprised if this game ends 42-21.[/quote]
LOL man I seriously hate your predictions.
Congrats to LSU, they fought back and whipped us in the second half. Now that the year is almost over and bowl season is almost upon us, GO SEC.[/quote]
Hey, I predicted you’d beat A&M. I like the Arkansas program but it’s still fighting one big flaw. They have a good starting 22 but their rotation after that is weak compared to the top teams. Until they can fix that they are going to win against most teams but not be able to make the jump against the best teams.[/quote]
haha fair enough.
Yeah, that is a big problem, but its one that is hopefully being worked out, for the most part we have improved every year Petrino has been here doing his own recruiting…
1st year - 5-7
2nd year - 8-4 (I think? cant remember off the top of my head)
3rd year - 10-2
4th year - 10-2
Arkansas has done twice in four years what it couldnt done more than once in ten years under Nutt, and that is get to 10 wins.
Go Blue!
Hell.
Of.
A.
Game!
The interview with Hoke at the end of the game was classy. Putting all the glory on the players and other coaches.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
[quote]Spike9726 wrote:
That UT/Aggie game was some kind of ugly. Tons of penalties, turnovers, and all around bonehead plays. But what a fantastic finish.
[/quote]
Still better than 9 to 6.[/quote]
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Good game so far. Much better than 9 to 6.[/quote]
^^LOL
[quote]gregron wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
[quote]Spike9726 wrote:
That UT/Aggie game was some kind of ugly. Tons of penalties, turnovers, and all around bonehead plays. But what a fantastic finish.
[/quote]
Still better than 9 to 6.[/quote]
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Good game so far. Much better than 9 to 6.[/quote]
^^LOL[/quote]
Gregron > 9 to 6
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.[/quote]
Michigan will get the at large before Houston
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.[/quote]
Michigan will get the at large before Houston[/quote]
As long as Notre Dame doesn’t get it.
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.[/quote]
Michigan will get the at large before Houston[/quote]
This is true but Michigan does not belong in a BCS bowl game.
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.[/quote]
Michigan will get the at large before Houston[/quote]
This is true but Michigan does not belong in a BCS bowl game.[/quote]
I agree, that is why I used them as an example. Part of the hype of the Stanford v. ND game is that ND is playing for a spot in a BCS game and this is because ND gets special preference for at large bids. That, in and of itself, demonstrates the failure of the BCS.
Houston deserves a bid over any Big East team.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Anybody think Houston will get an At Large bid to a BCS bowl? or is a team like Michigan more likely to get it?
After the career Keenum has had it would be nice to see him perform on a big stage. I am sure NFL scouts would like to see it too.[/quote]
Michigan will get the at large before Houston[/quote]
This is true but Michigan does not belong in a BCS bowl game.[/quote]
I agree, that is why I used them as an example. Part of the hype of the Stanford v. ND game is that ND is playing for a spot in a BCS game and this is because ND gets special preference for at large bids. That, in and of itself, demonstrates the failure of the BCS.
Houston deserves a bid over any Big East team.[/quote]
Agreed, and you could make a case over any ACC team as well. Though its a much tougher cell.
The refs in this Notre Dame-Stanford game are wacky, a flag on almost every play.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The refs in this Notre Dame-Stanford game are wacky, a flag on almost every play. [/quote
Yep, and both teams look kind of rough as well.
Luck is not as good as hyped up. He threw a pick on a foolish play. His flaw is his confusion when pressure comes, that is his weakness. Blitz him, show him different looks, and he folds up.
My wife just said “This game looks like its being played in slow motion.”
UCLA is getting hammered.
Another nice win for Stanford, and Andrew Luck. As much as I’d love to see him take the Heisman though, I think it will probably go to Richardson, since he’ll probably get to play in two more high profile games.
Who are other people leaning towards for the Heisman?
Jesus Christ, USC winning 50-0. Barkley just set the new Pac-12 record for touchdown passes.
Barkley should win, he is putting on a showcase.
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
Another nice win for Stanford, and Andrew Luck. As much as I’d love to see him take the Heisman though, I think it will probably go to Richardson, since he’ll probably get to play in two more high profile games.
Who are other people leaning towards for the Heisman?[/quote]
I am biased but it has to be Richardson after his dominance over Auburn, 203 yards and recieving td and that epic 57-yard run.