[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
fightingtiger wrote:
And since were all about some ignorance on this thread, shouldnt you be counting your money or something?
Oh yeah… There you go that is the way to prove a point. Or rather Dweezil proved his and you are ignorant?
[/quote]
I am assuming that since you quoted the last thing I said in my post that you actually read the rest of it. If this is the case, you are an idiot.
[quote]EmperialChina wrote:
I still don’t understand why people are still ranting on how Wrestling is fake, as if it is some secret as if it is not part of the show itself. [/quote]
Wait. Wait just a damned minute. Who the hell is saying that wrestling is fake? I completely missed that part of the argument.
[quote]texasguy wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
texasguy wrote:
SWR wrote:
Large Dave wrote:
do you think any one has stopped to think that maybe the “family emergency” was Benoit’s family being held hostage by some nutter and benoit"s suicide was in total despair of finding his wife and kid killed by said nutter? Or does the time scale not fit?
No! That would not fit into the politicians’ and media’s agenda against steroids!
Unless they can accuse the murderer of also being on steroids.
i wonder if the chris benoit conspiracy theory will reach the 9/11 commission cover up.
LMAO @ the douche bags who can’t accept that their “hero” (a guy they only knew by turning on a black box in their homes) had serious mental problems and killed some people.
It happenes. Every day. It happened to an actual friend (re: not someone who I only knew from watching television) of mine.
Stop being morons and looking for reasons to excuse his conduct. And stop swinging from the nut sack of a murderer you only “knew” because he was on TV.
i’ve never understood how a fake personality, tight spandex underwear, fake story lines and fake fights make anyone a hero.
they don’t do anything but memorize a handful of cheesy lines, stage holds and throws and wear gay costumes.
it’s like idolizing brad pitt in fight club. he isn’t really tyler durden.
he is brad pitt and probably has a totally different personality in real life than in any of his character roles.[/quote]
I agree. People shouldnt assume things about a person based on what fictional character they play. The two are totally seperate.
Then again, I see nothing wrong with respecting the mans performances while accepting that he turned out to be a psychotic murderer. Again, keeping the two seperate.
[quote]buffalokilla wrote:
Death to the False Emperor.
[/quote]
You mean Corpse Emperor, you Chaos filth! I say let the man die, so the next star child can be born and once and for all destroy all of Chaos and rule the Immaterium as is our destiny.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
It is also a little disheartening that this discussion has been degraded to bullshit about who likes wrestling and whether they have evolved like the rest of us.
[/quote]
I agree. As a professional wrestler myself, it’s been very hard to read this thread and not reply with an angry diatribe. But why perpetuate the stereotype, right?
There’s a lot of generalization going on this thread and it’s pretty offensive. In my limited years of experience, I have met wrestling fans with PHDs, wrestling fans who are succesful millionaire entrepreneurs, and wrestling fans who are gasp pretty girls! I’ve also met my fair share of weirdos, there’s no denying that.
I wonder how some of the anti-wrestling folk in this thread would feel if someone attacked one of their favorite hobbies?
But I digress. To sum up my thoughts I’ll leave you with a quote by Jeff Jarret:
“For those who don’t understand, no explanation will do. For those who do understand, no explanation is necessary.”
[quote]fightingtiger wrote:
I am assuming that since you quoted the last thing I said in my post that you actually read the rest of it. If this is the case, you are an idiot.[/quote]
I read your post.
You’re the one who devolved your argument into a stupid cliche/stereotype slinging match one in which you weren’t even original.
If you are going to go that route at least do it with some flair, but you have no play and a pitiful argument.
[quote]esk221 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
It is also a little disheartening that this discussion has been degraded to bullshit about who likes wrestling and whether they have evolved like the rest of us.
I agree. As a professional wrestler myself, it’s been very hard to read this thread and not reply with an angry diatribe. But why perpetuate the stereotype, right?
There’s a lot of generalization going on this thread and it’s pretty offensive. In my limited years of experience, I have met wrestling fans with PHDs, wrestling fans who are succesful millionaire entrepreneurs, and wrestling fans who are gasp pretty girls! I’ve also met my fair share of weirdos, there’s no denying that.
I wonder how some of the anti-wrestling folk in this thread would feel if someone attacked one of their favorite hobbies?
But I digress. To sum up my thoughts I’ll leave you with a quote by Jeff Jarret:
“For those who don’t understand, no explanation will do. For those who do understand, no explanation is necessary.” [/quote]
Well said.
I can only imagine how intelligent and well written you’ll be when you’re as “evolved” as Professor X.
I think maybe before the continued running of the mouths continue people might want to wait for the facts of this whole deal to come out. I think it may be a little more complicated than it seems. Even though I agree…most grown-ups gave up watching “rasslin” at age 12
[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
fightingtiger wrote:
I am assuming that since you quoted the last thing I said in my post that you actually read the rest of it. If this is the case, you are an idiot.
I read your post.
You’re the one who devolved your argument into a stupid cliche/stereotype slinging match one in which you weren’t even original.
If you are going to go that route at least do it with some flair, but you have no play and a pitiful argument.
[/quote]
Did you read my post? Did I do that?
If I recall correctly, I was saying that it was ignorant for Dweezil to stereotype people based soley upon their choice in television. My “ignorant statement” was a jab at the sort of logic Dweezil had been making in his posts.
You have no reading comprehension and therefore no argument.
[quote]kroby wrote:
buffalokilla wrote:
Death to the False Emperor.
You mean Corpse Emperor, you Chaos filth! I say let the man die, so the next star child can be born and once and for all destroy all of Chaos and rule the Immaterium as is our destiny.
BTW, Abaddon the Despoiler wears panties.
/hijack[/quote]
I used to play 40k when I was 13 or so. Iv still got my army and everything. I think theyve changed the rules like 8 times since I last messed with it though.
[quote]fightingtiger wrote:
Did you read my post? Did I do that?
If I recall correctly, I was saying that it was ignorant for Dweezil to stereotype people based soley upon their choice in television. My “ignorant statement” was a jab at the sort of logic Dweezil had been making in his posts.
You have no reading comprehension and therefore no argument.[/quote]
You didni’t succeed in pulling off what you were trying to do with the “ignorant statement.”
“Therefore” (what a stupid transition to use) your post reads like a loser trying to mimic a better argument.
[quote]fightingtiger wrote:
I used to play 40k when I was 13 or so. Iv still got my army and everything. I think theyve changed the rules like 8 times since I last messed with it though.[/quote]