Bush's War On Porn!

[quote]BIGRAGOO wrote:
nephorm wrote:
CaptainLogic wrote:
You fool!! It’s Decepti-cons, get it right next time!

I’m so ashamed.

Actually Detructi-cons were several Decepti-cons that were construction type vehicles which assembled into one giant Transformer. I can’t remember it’s name though.

Mod Note: DEVASTATOR![/quote]

Your knowledge of Transformers far surpasses mine, I’m deeply humbled.

So this means Nephorm thinks that if we keep the neo-cons separate, they’re not too bad, but if we let them work together synergistically, we’re in for some large scale catastrophe? Nice, I’m really starting to understand American politics guys…

So, the American porn industry could be neutered.
The slack could be taken up by foreign sources.
If it will be, can we expect unilateral intervention?

Nuke Japan!

If they succeed in ridding the country of porn, you can expect all other freedoms given to us in the Constitution to be eliminated. The government will moderate everything.

[quote]BIGRAGOO wrote:
If they succeed in ridding the country of porn, you can expect all other freedoms given to us in the Constitution to be eliminated. The government will moderate everything. [/quote]

Porn is in the Constitution? I must’ve skipped that class.

[quote]nephorm wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
If they succeed in ridding the country of porn, you can expect all other freedoms given to us in the Constitution to be eliminated. The government will moderate everything.

Porn is in the Constitution? I must’ve skipped that class.[/quote]

No, but freedom of expression is. And since they are not going after just kiddie porn or beastiality, they are infringing upon your right to view your choice of media.

[quote]nephorm wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
If they succeed in ridding the country of porn, you can expect all other freedoms given to us in the Constitution to be eliminated. The government will moderate everything.

Porn is in the Constitution? I must’ve skipped that class.[/quote]

Life, Liberty and pursuit of a happy penis.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
nephorm wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
If they succeed in ridding the country of porn, you can expect all other freedoms given to us in the Constitution to be eliminated. The government will moderate everything.

Porn is in the Constitution? I must’ve skipped that class.

Life, Liberty and pursuit of a happy penis.[/quote]

Having a happy penis is part of one’s pursuit of happiness, right? I don’t get it. Why attack an industry that has it’s business look them up and consent to view/buy their material. It’s not like they hand out flyers in a mall parking lot and elicit customers. Well execpt for spammers.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Life, Liberty and pursuit of a happy penis.[/quote]

That’s not the Constitution, that’s the Declaration. :slight_smile:

[quote]BIGRAGOO wrote:
It’s not like they hand out flyers in a mall parking lot and elicit customers. Well execpt for spammers.
[/quote]

Never been to Vegas? Every night, every street corner has somebody handing out flyers (they look like color postcards) for various “entertainment”. I still have some of them from the last time I visited.

And if you call the number on the flyers, you always get a chick that looks NOTHING like the one on the flyer. One of my buddies hooked up with what must have been a fifty-year old woman. We still give him shit about it. LOL

Never ever ever ever drink rum and cokes all night, win on the blackjack tables, and say to your friends: “How bad can it be? You guys are just pussies!! I’m getting LAID tonight!!”

We called him granny-fucker for like two months straight.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
It’s not like they hand out flyers in a mall parking lot and elicit customers. Well execpt for spammers.

Never been to Vegas? Every night, every street corner has somebody handing out flyers (they look like color postcards) for various “entertainment”. I still have some of them from the last time I visited.

And if you call the number on the flyers, you always get a chick that looks NOTHING like the one on the flyer. One of my buddies hooked up with what must have been a fifty-year old woman. We still give him shit about it. LOL

Never ever ever ever drink rum and cokes all night, win on the blackjack tables, and say to your friends: “How bad can it be? You guys are just pussies!! I’m getting LAID tonight!!”

We called him granny-fucker for like two months straight.[/quote]

Ok I stand corrected. But in Vegas people there know what’s up and can descern weather or not to use the service. Vegas is like a huge porn store and all there are willing customers.

[quote]redfreddy wrote:
Hey, this guy’s really funny! American tourists? Canada doesn’t have anything worth crossing the border for![/quote]

Top 10 reasons fat, stupid Americans visit Canada:

  1. Migrating north for sea lion mating season.

  2. Think they are visiting Texas; held map upside down.

  3. Heard Canada is just like the US, but without the Americans.

  4. Hurricane force winds rolled’em all the way up here.

  5. Looking for All-U-Can-Eat buffets that haven’t banned them yet.

  6. Think they are visiting Texas; held map right side up, but got lost anyway.

  7. Looking for a country in which their large ass will fit completely.

  8. Wish to enjoy freedom in more than slogan form.

  9. Refreshing experience of visiting a country governed by crooks, instead of retarded crooks.

…and the number one reason fat, stupid Americans visit Canada:

  1. Montreal Olympic Stadium the only remaining toilet seat large enough to accommodate them.

Pookie!

You are the head of the local tourism board aren’t you?

Oh well, this should set back Canadian-American relations for the next twenty years.

Priceless!

land of the free eh! bwahahahahahahaa

better order a bulk shipment of filth before they get serious

[quote]vroom wrote:

Oh well, this should set back Canadian-American relations for the next twenty years.[/quote]

Naah, Canada will continue to operate in lapdog status, Pookie’s comments notwithstanding (kidding).

As for the American scourge of uber-fatness compared to Canada’s saintly habits of uber-fitness:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v4/sub/MarketingPage?user_URL=http://www.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FRTGAM.20040622.wxhfat22%2FBNStory%2FspecialScienceandHealth%2F&ord=1128268685775&brand=theglobeandmail&force_login=true

Non-subscribed text available here:

http://www.rense.com/general54/canadaanationofliars.htm

[i]But the reality is that Canadians are neck-and-neck – or perhaps, double-chin-and-double-chin – with the United States as one of the fattest nations on Earth.

Last week, Statistics Canada released the results of the latest Canadian Community Health Survey. It showed that 48.2 per cent of adults have a body mass index – an approximation of body fat – of more than 25. As such, they were categorized as overweight. Among those surveyed, 14.9 per cent had a BMI of 30 or more, and qualified as obese.

Contrast these findings with the results of a study published in this month’s edition of the Canadian Journal of Public Health.[/i]

The largesse of Western countries is showing up on many beltlines, including Canada and Europe. We all need to reverse this trend.

That being said, of course, Pookie enjoys such fictions because of the Canadian inferiority complex. Relax, Canada - you’re good enough, smart enough, and doggonit, people like you.

Oh, and another thing about obesity.

One driver of it is the cultural perception that we feed fat people that says “it’s ok to be fat”, “you have to love yourself”, “nobody can judge you”, etc.

This mollycoddling finds its roots, where? Mean old, baby eating red-state thinking?

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Oh, and another thing about obesity.

One driver of it is the cultural perception that we feed fat people that says “it’s ok to be fat”, “you have to love yourself”, “nobody can judge you”, etc.

This mollycoddling finds its roots, where? Mean old, baby eating red-state thinking?
[/quote]

The Bible Belt? Trailor parks? People who watch Jerry Springer?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

The Bible Belt? Trailor parks? People who watch Jerry Springer?[/quote]

That is a serious answer? Why didn’t you include black urban ghettos, which is the equivalent of your trailer park charge?

And, what the hell does the Bible Belt have to do with encouraging obesity?

You’re easy to figure out, Pro X - just chomping at the bit to throw in a “white trash” or equivalent slur, even when it doesn’t answer the question.

It should be noted that the BMI doesn’t give a very good picture of overall fitness. It’s simply measured by the equation kg/m(squared).

So someone who is 100kg (220lbs) and 180cm (6 feet) would be considered obese, even if they had a body fat of 10%.

But if you do want to go by the BMI, then the US has got us beat cold.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, 30% of US adults (between the ages of 20-74) are obese, while 65% are overweight.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/obese/obse99.htm

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Professor X wrote:

The Bible Belt? Trailor parks? People who watch Jerry Springer?

That is a serious answer? Why didn’t you include black urban ghettos, which is the equivalent of your trailer park charge?

And, what the hell does the Bible Belt have to do with encouraging obesity?

You’re easy to figure out, Pro X - just chomping at the bit to throw in a “white trash” or equivalent slur, even when it doesn’t answer the question.

[/quote]

I’m easy to figure out? What was your previous post referring to? You simply didn’t put it directly into words. It was clear as day, I simply helped you out. If you can make generalizations, the rest of us can too.