Boxing with Son is Child Abuse? Really?

^ I totally agree BG, but whats done is done, I bent over backwards with my X. I tried to talk her into all the same things you listed. BUT she got remarried and wanted to make the Step daddy the real Daddy and move me out of the picture. Plus I forgot you had the older boys, so you sure as hell know what I am talking about.

sorry to derail. However I believe this is relevant to the discussion again, having personal experience with what the MMA father was going through does give you some insight to what his thought processes were. He may have very well been grasping at anything he could to gain control of his kid for his kids own sake.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You not agreeing with it doesn’t make the action in itself WRONG.

Wearing boxing gloves doesn’t make it wrong any more than grabbing a belt for that spanking is wrong. The OUTCOME should be the focus.

Mind you, the people above you seem to understand how that topic relates.
[/quote]

Sitting back and taking everyone’s comments in, I have to say, this part right here is a good point. A lot of you disagree with the method used by Alexander, based on some “equal footing” belief, however, let’s say you grabbed the belt or switch. What’s to stop the 16 YEAR OLD boy, who was already smelling himself (most likely), from retaliating or defending himself? And if he does, what? The war/battle/conflict is lost? Not hardly.

I am a new parent, and I am already struggling with three teenagers, however, no matter how much time goes by, lessons will continue to be taught, either thru physical means or non-physical, ie-grounding, showing the door, ex-communicating (I know, I know, religion…) My point is, I’m a grown ass man at 31, and I am still learning lessons from my mother, and other grown folk. It never stops.

What most of you are disagreeing with and disparaging is Alexander’s METHOD. As I can only go off of the very much biased report of Maggie Hendricks, I don’t know the full story, just like you all don’t. But…I get the strong feeling that the boy needed his ass whooped, and Alexander did it the best way he knew how. Call it stupid, call it abuse, call it wrong, but the fact remains, Alexander got SOLE CUSTODY OVER SIX KIDS. He must be doing something right for that to happen. [/quote]

Or the chick is fucking up really bad.
You and PX keep pointing out “what if the Kid grabs the belt or what if he fights back”
That is not the same as GIVING the kid a belt also and saying it’s cool because you are better with it.

If the kid is fighting you back you have lost total control and beating him down is not a problem ended if it didn’t work after 16years.
I’m not against spanking, even though that will not work at a certain age. It is harder if you come into a family and the kids already have no relationship with you.
It’s never one thing Spanking, Talking, taking away items non of this stuff ALONE works.

The child MUST respect you. How you get and keep that respect is what this conversation should be about.
[/quote]

I did not “keep pointing out” anything, Old Man!!! lol. I do agree that spankings don’t work after a certain age, but based upon MY assumption of what I THINK led to the gloves coming out, the boxing involved a lesson. That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement.

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You not agreeing with it doesn’t make the action in itself WRONG.

Wearing boxing gloves doesn’t make it wrong any more than grabbing a belt for that spanking is wrong. The OUTCOME should be the focus.

Mind you, the people above you seem to understand how that topic relates.
[/quote]

Sitting back and taking everyone’s comments in, I have to say, this part right here is a good point. A lot of you disagree with the method used by Alexander, based on some “equal footing” belief, however, let’s say you grabbed the belt or switch. What’s to stop the 16 YEAR OLD boy, who was already smelling himself (most likely), from retaliating or defending himself? And if he does, what? The war/battle/conflict is lost? Not hardly.

I am a new parent, and I am already struggling with three teenagers, however, no matter how much time goes by, lessons will continue to be taught, either thru physical means or non-physical, ie-grounding, showing the door, ex-communicating (I know, I know, religion…) My point is, I’m a grown ass man at 31, and I am still learning lessons from my mother, and other grown folk. It never stops.

What most of you are disagreeing with and disparaging is Alexander’s METHOD. As I can only go off of the very much biased report of Maggie Hendricks, I don’t know the full story, just like you all don’t. But…I get the strong feeling that the boy needed his ass whooped, and Alexander did it the best way he knew how. Call it stupid, call it abuse, call it wrong, but the fact remains, Alexander got SOLE CUSTODY OVER SIX KIDS. He must be doing something right for that to happen. [/quote]

Or the chick is fucking up really bad.
You and PX keep pointing out “what if the Kid grabs the belt or what if he fights back”
That is not the same as GIVING the kid a belt also and saying it’s cool because you are better with it.

If the kid is fighting you back you have lost total control and beating him down is not a problem ended if it didn’t work after 16years.
I’m not against spanking, even though that will not work at a certain age. It is harder if you come into a family and the kids already have no relationship with you.
It’s never one thing Spanking, Talking, taking away items non of this stuff ALONE works.

The child MUST respect you. How you get and keep that respect is what this conversation should be about.
[/quote]

I did not “keep pointing out” anything, Old Man!!! lol. I do agree that spankings don’t work after a certain age, but based upon MY assumption of what I THINK led to the gloves coming out, the boxing involved a lesson. That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement. [/quote]

If you acknowledge that “spankings don’t work after a certain age” and both are corporal punishment (the argument you’re buying), how do you support one, but intellectually reject the other (after a certain age)?

Don’t you think as a parent that you have MANY options concerning a 16 year old? He’s likely not working, can’t buy his own shit and can’t put a roof over his own head. I can think of MANY measures that will have an EFFECT over a spanking or sparring match.

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
^ I totally agree BG, but whats done is done, I bent over backwards with my X. I tried to talk her into all the same things you listed. BUT she got remarried and wanted to make the Step daddy the real Daddy and move me out of the picture. Plus I forgot you had the older boys, so you sure as hell know what I am talking about.

sorry to derail. However I believe this is relevant to the discussion again, having personal experience with what the MMA father was going through does give you some insight to what his thought processes were. He may have very well been grasping at anything he could to gain control of his kid for his kids own sake. [/quote]

Well, I know it doesn’t fix things, but your ex is completely responsible for the unfortunate trouble. It’s not on you. The ex of my oldest tried this bullshit with me too - “you have two daddy’s”, when she got a new boyfriend. He even told them they had two daddy’s.

And then when I found out…

Shortly thereafter he moved away to Florida.

You can fill in the blanks.

HA, damn right old…I wear that age like an Armani Suit.

I’m almost positive that more went on with the pops an the kid in the story. Most of my statements are not about the news story but the Method Used as a Punishment.

I’m still waiting to see someone say that when mom or dad went to the belt that they gave the Kid one to defend himself.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
^ I totally agree BG, but whats done is done, I bent over backwards with my X. I tried to talk her into all the same things you listed. BUT she got remarried and wanted to make the Step daddy the real Daddy and move me out of the picture. Plus I forgot you had the older boys, so you sure as hell know what I am talking about.

sorry to derail. However I believe this is relevant to the discussion again, having personal experience with what the MMA father was going through does give you some insight to what his thought processes were. He may have very well been grasping at anything he could to gain control of his kid for his kids own sake. [/quote]

Well, I know it doesn’t fix things, but your ex is completely responsible for the unfortunate trouble. It’s not on you. The ex of my oldest tried this bullshit with me too - “you have two daddy’s”, when she got a new boyfriend. He even told them they had two daddy’s.

And then when I found out…

Shortly thereafter he moved away to Florida.

You can fill in the blanks. [/quote]

:slight_smile: I wish things were that simple for me.

I have my son back, he has no respect for his momma and she is divorced from the “I am your daddy” she tried to replace me with.

That was the thing with my son, he never bowed up to me he never tested who was the champ. He still and always respected me, he just had the way out with his mom. He could hide behind her skirt and just ignore me. He has a long way to go but he is now on the right track.

And yes MMA’s X also may be in jail.

I don’t think Alexander thought his son could beat him.

The way I see it, 460, and I agree with you that the method may not have been the best one, it was not about giving his son a chance to defend himself. It was more about punishing him with a series of powerful punches. Just like another parent would with a series of belt lashes. I’m sure the boy knew, when getting the gloves, that he would get his ass kicked real bad.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You not agreeing with it doesn’t make the action in itself WRONG.

Wearing boxing gloves doesn’t make it wrong any more than grabbing a belt for that spanking is wrong. The OUTCOME should be the focus.

Mind you, the people above you seem to understand how that topic relates.
[/quote]

Sitting back and taking everyone’s comments in, I have to say, this part right here is a good point. A lot of you disagree with the method used by Alexander, based on some “equal footing” belief, however, let’s say you grabbed the belt or switch. What’s to stop the 16 YEAR OLD boy, who was already smelling himself (most likely), from retaliating or defending himself? And if he does, what? The war/battle/conflict is lost? Not hardly.

I am a new parent, and I am already struggling with three teenagers, however, no matter how much time goes by, lessons will continue to be taught, either thru physical means or non-physical, ie-grounding, showing the door, ex-communicating (I know, I know, religion…) My point is, I’m a grown ass man at 31, and I am still learning lessons from my mother, and other grown folk. It never stops.

What most of you are disagreeing with and disparaging is Alexander’s METHOD. As I can only go off of the very much biased report of Maggie Hendricks, I don’t know the full story, just like you all don’t. But…I get the strong feeling that the boy needed his ass whooped, and Alexander did it the best way he knew how. Call it stupid, call it abuse, call it wrong, but the fact remains, Alexander got SOLE CUSTODY OVER SIX KIDS. He must be doing something right for that to happen. [/quote]

Or the chick is fucking up really bad.
You and PX keep pointing out “what if the Kid grabs the belt or what if he fights back”
That is not the same as GIVING the kid a belt also and saying it’s cool because you are better with it.

If the kid is fighting you back you have lost total control and beating him down is not a problem ended if it didn’t work after 16years.
I’m not against spanking, even though that will not work at a certain age. It is harder if you come into a family and the kids already have no relationship with you.
It’s never one thing Spanking, Talking, taking away items non of this stuff ALONE works.

The child MUST respect you. How you get and keep that respect is what this conversation should be about.
[/quote]

I did not “keep pointing out” anything, Old Man!!! lol. I do agree that spankings don’t work after a certain age, but based upon MY assumption of what I THINK led to the gloves coming out, the boxing involved a lesson. That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement. [/quote]

If you acknowledge that “spankings don’t work after a certain age” and both are corporal punishment (the argument you’re buying), how do you support one, but intellectually reject the other (after a certain age)?

Don’t you think as a parent that you have MANY options concerning a 16 year old? He’s likely not working, can’t buy his own shit and can’t put a roof over his own head. I can think of MANY measures that will have an EFFECT over a spanking or sparring match.
[/quote]

I am picking up what you’re putting down, however, I don’t consider what Alexander did as a “spanking”, per se. It was a lesson, albeit a physical one. None of us knows how the household is ran, so who is to say that these lessons haven’t taken place before? But, I’m tap-dancing around your question.

As a parent (I’m new at this, so please bear with me) there are options, however, dependent on the situation, not all may be available at that present time. In Alexander’s case, he chose the route he wanted to take. I can’t sit way out here and say he was wrong or right, although it looks like I may have previously. I simply don’t disagree with it, strictly based upon the limited info we all have.

Damn…I’m going to have to re-engage in a few hours as I have to hit the road. I look forward to picking you older dads’ brains. It definitely helps me as a new father to two teenagers.

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:
That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement. [/quote]

But going toe to toe with your teenager in the ring when you’re mad at them doesn’t teach them a lesson in respect. If it’s only one time then it doesn’t teach them anything. If it goes on all the time then it teaches them fear. If you punch your kid every time they lie to you then you’re always going to be punching them. Where does that stop?

I’m definitely not saying that he shouldn’t discipline the kid. I’m saying that boxing with him is a poor choice of tools to use and the lesson of respect isn’t going to be taught. He didn’t box the kid because of the cell phone he boxed him because of the lying.

And technically it is child abuse in accordance to the standards of Nebraska that state it’s abuse if “non-accidental injury occurred”. We wouldn’t be having this discussion if he made his son dig ditches in the backyard all day.

And as far as “doing something right”. I’m sure he is doing a lot of things right. I’m sure he tries his absolute best to be a good father. I’ve read interviews with him and he seems like a good guy. But like BG pointed out, you can’t raise six kids by yourself and still be an effective parent and I think this really highlights that.

What if this was his daughter and not his son? Would this still be an appropriate method of discipline?

james

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
You not agreeing with it doesn’t make the action in itself WRONG.

Wearing boxing gloves doesn’t make it wrong any more than grabbing a belt for that spanking is wrong. The OUTCOME should be the focus.

Mind you, the people above you seem to understand how that topic relates.
[/quote]

Sitting back and taking everyone’s comments in, I have to say, this part right here is a good point. A lot of you disagree with the method used by Alexander, based on some “equal footing” belief, however, let’s say you grabbed the belt or switch. What’s to stop the 16 YEAR OLD boy, who was already smelling himself (most likely), from retaliating or defending himself? And if he does, what? The war/battle/conflict is lost? Not hardly.

I am a new parent, and I am already struggling with three teenagers, however, no matter how much time goes by, lessons will continue to be taught, either thru physical means or non-physical, ie-grounding, showing the door, ex-communicating (I know, I know, religion…) My point is, I’m a grown ass man at 31, and I am still learning lessons from my mother, and other grown folk. It never stops.

What most of you are disagreeing with and disparaging is Alexander’s METHOD. As I can only go off of the very much biased report of Maggie Hendricks, I don’t know the full story, just like you all don’t. But…I get the strong feeling that the boy needed his ass whooped, and Alexander did it the best way he knew how. Call it stupid, call it abuse, call it wrong, but the fact remains, Alexander got SOLE CUSTODY OVER SIX KIDS. He must be doing something right for that to happen. [/quote]

Or the chick is fucking up really bad.
You and PX keep pointing out “what if the Kid grabs the belt or what if he fights back”
That is not the same as GIVING the kid a belt also and saying it’s cool because you are better with it.

If the kid is fighting you back you have lost total control and beating him down is not a problem ended if it didn’t work after 16years.
I’m not against spanking, even though that will not work at a certain age. It is harder if you come into a family and the kids already have no relationship with you.
It’s never one thing Spanking, Talking, taking away items non of this stuff ALONE works.

The child MUST respect you. How you get and keep that respect is what this conversation should be about.
[/quote]

I did not “keep pointing out” anything, Old Man!!! lol. I do agree that spankings don’t work after a certain age, but based upon MY assumption of what I THINK led to the gloves coming out, the boxing involved a lesson. That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement. [/quote]

If you acknowledge that “spankings don’t work after a certain age” and both are corporal punishment (the argument you’re buying), how do you support one, but intellectually reject the other (after a certain age)?

Don’t you think as a parent that you have MANY options concerning a 16 year old? He’s likely not working, can’t buy his own shit and can’t put a roof over his own head. I can think of MANY measures that will have an EFFECT over a spanking or sparring match.
[/quote]

I am picking up what you’re putting down, however, I don’t consider what Alexander did as a “spanking”, per se. It was a lesson, albeit a physical one. None of us knows how the household is ran, so who is to say that these lessons haven’t taken place before? But, I’m tap-dancing around your question.

As a parent (I’m new at this, so please bear with me) there are options, however, dependent on the situation, not all may be available at that present time. In Alexander’s case, he chose the route he wanted to take. I can’t sit way out here and say he was wrong or right, although it looks like I may have previously. I simply don’t disagree with it, strictly based upon the limited info we all have.

Damn…I’m going to have to re-engage in a few hours as I have to hit the road. I look forward to picking you older dads’ brains. It definitely helps me as a new father to two teenagers. [/quote]

When you come back, you have to concede that either your argument is illogical or you have to explain yourself better because you accepted the premise that a sparring match with your 16 year old son isn’t different than a spanking (they are both corporal punishment and this is the reasoning laid out by X that you agreed to).

A few things (as an EXPERIENCED PARENT);

As an EXPERIENCED PARENT, I can tell you what the result is or isn’t of a spanking, physical punishment or THREAT of physical punishment - not my “theory” or personal feelings.

I can tell you the results of consistency and inconsistency.

I can tell you the results of your child have poor friends.

As someone said, they don’t come with an instruction book. But it’s laughable to hear people that don’t have kids weigh in with an opinion. When you’re a parent, sometimes no matter what you did or didn’t do, your kids turn out okay (as with my older boy) - it might have been your parenting, or you might have gotten lucky in spite of yourself.

Parents LOVE to take credit for successes when in fact a kid could just be “wired” right and stayed on the right path, did the right things. Parents LOVE to adopt a personal bias for those GOOD results.

Likewise, we have people arguing here that love to adopt their OWN personal bias based on their experience as kids.

I say that mistakes are more instructive (as they are with most of life). Mistakes = true experience.

And I can tell you that as a parent, I have witnessed and committed mistakes. I have seen the results of inconsistency with the child and/or between parents. I have seen the results (or lack thereof) of corporal punishment. And moreover, I have seen first hand the influence of poor friends on a child.

Raising another human is a complex endeavor. It can’t be “codified” (thus the lack of an instruction manual) but it’s damn sure a bit more complicated than “you need to do more than take away their cell phone privileges” (which is code for “whoop that ass”).

Some of my worse friends (those in jail, dead or on the waiting list to go to jail) GOT THAT ASS WHOOPED.

If there is any “manual”, in my humble opinion it’s:

Lots of love and support;
Consistency;
Clear expectations and reasonable consequences for actions;
MONITOR AND MANAGE THEIR FRIENDSHIPS.

The last one is probably the most difficult, if not impossible but I assure you, it’s the most critical. I’ll say it again, show me a kid acting a fool that has GOOD friends, and I’ll eat a block of lifting chalk.

[quote]atypical1 wrote:

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:
That is most likely how he handles respect issues with the 16 y/o. Not as a true equal, but as tool to show the boy that he is not grown yet, no matter how much of himself he is smelling.

I do like how you emphasized none of the other measures ALONE works, though. That is definitely a true statement. [/quote]

But going toe to toe with your teenager in the ring when you’re mad at them doesn’t teach them a lesson in respect. If it’s only one time then it doesn’t teach them anything. If it goes on all the time then it teaches them fear. If you punch your kid every time they lie to you then you’re always going to be punching them. Where does that stop?

I’m definitely not saying that he shouldn’t discipline the kid. I’m saying that boxing with him is a poor choice of tools to use and the lesson of respect isn’t going to be taught. He didn’t box the kid because of the cell phone he boxed him because of the lying.

And technically it is child abuse in accordance to the standards of Nebraska that state it’s abuse if “non-accidental injury occurred”. We wouldn’t be having this discussion if he made his son dig ditches in the backyard all day.

And as far as “doing something right”. I’m sure he is doing a lot of things right. I’m sure he tries his absolute best to be a good father. I’ve read interviews with him and he seems like a good guy. But like BG pointed out, you can’t raise six kids by yourself and still be an effective parent and I think this really highlights that.

What if this was his daughter and not his son? Would this still be an appropriate method of discipline?

james[/quote]

You’re right. The only lesson he “taught” the kid was to fear his dad which amounts to little more than “do what I say because I said so”. And I assure you, that’s a piss poor parenting strategy.

That father is bringing his street/ring mentality to the family circle. The message is, “you disrespect me, and I’ll whip that ass”.

Respect is earned, not proclaimed by force. The latter is illusory.

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
But going toe to toe with your teenager in the ring when you’re mad at them doesn’t teach them a lesson in respect. If it’s only one time then it doesn’t teach them anything. If it goes on all the time then it teaches them fear. If you punch your kid every time they lie to you then you’re always going to be punching them. Where does that stop?

I’m definitely not saying that he shouldn’t discipline the kid. I’m saying that boxing with him is a poor choice of tools to use and the lesson of respect isn’t going to be taught. He didn’t box the kid because of the cell phone he boxed him because of the lying. [/quote]

Maybe grounding, or taking personal stuff away no longer worked for a ‘‘lying’’ offence? Boxing was probably Alexander’s new method to teach his son to respect him and to stop lying to him.

I’m sure he would have thought of something else once his son had become immune to the punishment.

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
What if this was his daughter and not his son? Would this still be an appropriate method of discipline?

james[/quote]

I’m certain that Alexander has different methods of punishment for his daughter.

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
But going toe to toe with your teenager in the ring when you’re mad at them doesn’t teach them a lesson in respect. If it’s only one time then it doesn’t teach them anything. If it goes on all the time then it teaches them fear. If you punch your kid every time they lie to you then you’re always going to be punching them. Where does that stop?

I’m definitely not saying that he shouldn’t discipline the kid. I’m saying that boxing with him is a poor choice of tools to use and the lesson of respect isn’t going to be taught. He didn’t box the kid because of the cell phone he boxed him because of the lying. [/quote]

Maybe grounding, or taking personal stuff away no longer worked for a ‘‘lying’’ offence? Boxing was probably Alexander’s new method to teach his son to respect him and to stop lying to him.

I’m sure he would have thought of something else once his son had become immune to the punishment.

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
What if this was his daughter and not his son? Would this still be an appropriate method of discipline?

james[/quote]

I’m certain that Alexander has different methods of punishment for his daughter.

[/quote]

Making him sammiches and cleaning the windows.

hhahaahahahahaahahaahahahahaahah j/k dont kill me DN

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Making him sammiches and cleaning the windows.
hhahaahahahahaahahaahahahahaahah j/k dont kill me DN[/quote]

LOL!!

On a second thought, if the daughter is MA trained and is as difficult as I was in my teens, yes, fuck it, Alexander may as well box with her too.

Lol.

[quote]Rodimus Black wrote:

As a parent (I’m new at this, so please bear with me) there are options, however, dependent on the situation, not all may be available at that present time. In Alexander’s case, he chose the route he wanted to take. I can’t sit way out here and say he was wrong or right, although it looks like I may have previously. I simply don’t disagree with it, strictly based upon the limited info we all have. [/quote]

Agree with this 100%.

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Making him sammiches and cleaning the windows.
hhahaahahahahaahahaahahahahaahah j/k dont kill me DN[/quote]

LOL!!

On a second thought, if the daughter is MA trained and as difficult as I was in my teens, yes, fuck it, Alexander may as well box with her too.

Lol.
[/quote]

If there are 6 kids, they all probably know how to choke each other out, girls or guys.

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I don’t see a problem.

Different strokes for different folks.

My wrestling coach wrestles His son when he fights in school or wherever.
[/quote]

Being a Parent can be fucking hard (PERIOD). Trying to do it with the world looking over your shoulder is harder.

I get it, really I get it. A athlete is trying to teach his kid right from wrong and keep the respect of being DAD reverts back to his sport to teach the kid a lesson.

But you end up teaching the kid that his WRONG actions His defiance of YOUR rules earns him a shot to get away with it if one day he can be Stronger and Faster than the person in charge.

Is that what you want the kid to walk away with by this CHALLENGE.

So its no longer Do what I say becuase I"M RIGHT and YOU are WRONG its Obey My rules or BEAT ME???

I think the dad was trying to be a good father to the kid.

I don’t agree with the lesson he is teaching.

[/quote]

That isn’t what I see.

When I see physical discipline I see a parent showing a child that the child is not the biggest and baddest. Thing breathing. It gives and obstacle he or she cannot overcome and teaches limits.

Fear has been lost in raising kids. This is why, I feel, there are so many of my peers who are so fearless or walking around not giving a fuck. They haven’t been shown real limits, I.e. you will be left seeing stars and blood if you cross people.

That is a valuable life lesson. Is it not,

Who else to teach it than a parent?

It isn’t even fear of the parent. Or actual fear at all moreso knowledge that you can and will be cut down if you cross lines.

And it doesn’t take a violent beating to do that…as there was no violent beating in the story.

For a group of guys who like to use the idea of following past generations y’all are missing this pretty bad.

Idk

Seeing your own blood is good stuff…

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:

[quote]four60 wrote:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
I don’t see a problem.

Different strokes for different folks.

My wrestling coach wrestles His son when he fights in school or wherever.
[/quote]

Being a Parent can be fucking hard (PERIOD). Trying to do it with the world looking over your shoulder is harder.

I get it, really I get it. A athlete is trying to teach his kid right from wrong and keep the respect of being DAD reverts back to his sport to teach the kid a lesson.

But you end up teaching the kid that his WRONG actions His defiance of YOUR rules earns him a shot to get away with it if one day he can be Stronger and Faster than the person in charge.

Is that what you want the kid to walk away with by this CHALLENGE.

So its no longer Do what I say becuase I"M RIGHT and YOU are WRONG its Obey My rules or BEAT ME???

I think the dad was trying to be a good father to the kid.

I don’t agree with the lesson he is teaching.

[/quote]

That isn’t what I see.

When I see physical discipline I see a parent showing a child that the child is not the biggest and baddest. Thing breathing. It gives and obstacle he or she cannot overcome and teaches limits.

Fear has been lost in raising kids. This is why, I feel, there are so many of my peers who are so fearless or walking around not giving a fuck. They haven’t been shown real limits, I.e. you will be left seeing stars and blood if you cross people.

That is a valuable life lesson. Is it not,

Who else to teach it than a parent?

It isn’t even fear of the parent. Or actual fear at all moreso knowledge that you can and will be cut down if you cross lines.

And it doesn’t take a violent beating to do that…as there was no violent beating in the story.

For a group of guys who like to use the idea of following past generations y’all are missing this pretty bad.

Idk

Seeing your own blood is good stuff…[/quote]

For a serious post you get white people clapping. :slight_smile:

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
That isn’t what I see.

When I see physical discipline I see a parent showing a child that the child is not the biggest and baddest. Thing breathing. It gives and obstacle he or she cannot overcome and teaches limits.

Fear has been lost in raising kids. This is why, I feel, there are so many of my peers who are so fearless or walking around not giving a fuck. They haven’t been shown real limits, I.e. you will be left seeing stars and blood if you cross people.

That is a valuable life lesson. Is it not,

Who else to teach it than a parent?

It isn’t even fear of the parent. Or actual fear at all moreso knowledge that you can and will be cut down if you cross lines.

And it doesn’t take a violent beating to do that…as there was no violent beating in the story.

For a group of guys who like to use the idea of following past generations y’all are missing this pretty bad.

Idk

Seeing your own blood is good stuff…[/quote]

Excellent post, Rock.

When I saw the title of the article regarding child abuse, I actually thought Alexander smashed his son’s jaw or broke his nose. And none of that had happen.

He was obviously powerful, yet controlled enough not to hurt his son badly but, at the same time his aim was to teach the boy a lesson, which to me is, ‘‘do not mess with me. Do not lie to me. I am your father. I am the pack leader.’’

And I agree with you on the fear factor. Nowadays Kids do not fear their parents ( not fearing them as if they were their abusers, no, but fearing them as head of the house, as the authority, the pack leaders.) They don’t respect them. Hell, these days, parents want to be BBF with their kids.

Like I said in my previous post, at 16, I was a fighter and I feared no one but my parents and my Sensei, the main three authority figures in my life. There was so much my parents could take from me but I knew my limits. I knew when to stop misbehaving and follow their rules.

Hell, my Sensei and Coach had trained me since age 7 and was a second father figure to me. I remember once during a training session I was messing around with team mates and he warned us to stop. I was at the rebellious years, the stage where he was seriously pissing me off for making us train hard and not having any fun. I told him something in the sense of fuck you. The man, didn’t care I was a girl. I had disrespected him. He kicked my ass right there in front of everyone. If that is not humiliating enough to respect someone older and stronger than you, I don’t know what else is… lol

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Fear has been lost in raising kids. This is why, I feel, there are so many of my peers who are so fearless or walking around not giving a fuck. They haven’t been shown real limits, I.e. you will be left seeing stars and blood if you cross people.[/quote]

It’s a lack of respect that causing what you see with your peers not a lack of fear. It’s not supposed to be about teaching your kid that they aren’t the biggest and the baddest because I think they already know that. It’s about teaching them to have enough respect for others that they don’t do the things that cause them to get into trouble.

Are they going to push the limits? Of course they are. Then it’s a matter of reinforcing the respect lesson. It’s not about teaching them fear.

james