Book of Eli

[quote]WolBarret wrote:

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:
Now don’t even try to say the muslim terrorists aren’t driven by religion. Muslim terrorist percieve what they do as defending their religion from the other religions and cultures of the world. In all honesty the most violent religion out there is the so called peaceful religion of Islam. Then look at the situation in Ireland the catholics vs. the protestants. And isn’t it Israel and paestine that are always fighting over the holy land marks or whatever it is they fight over all the time. Hitler trying to exterminate the jews was pure evil also, but I don’t know if that was his religious beliefs that drove him to do it or a blind hatred of the jews. Either way they were picke for extermination by their religious beliefs. [/quote]

I think Hitler believed in Darwinism.[/quote]

Nah, brah.

Instead of seeing the movie you should just donate the $10 to Haiti.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?

[quote]anonym wrote:

[quote]WolBarret wrote:

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:
Now don’t even try to say the muslim terrorists aren’t driven by religion. Muslim terrorist percieve what they do as defending their religion from the other religions and cultures of the world. In all honesty the most violent religion out there is the so called peaceful religion of Islam. Then look at the situation in Ireland the catholics vs. the protestants. And isn’t it Israel and paestine that are always fighting over the holy land marks or whatever it is they fight over all the time. Hitler trying to exterminate the jews was pure evil also, but I don’t know if that was his religious beliefs that drove him to do it or a blind hatred of the jews. Either way they were picke for extermination by their religious beliefs. [/quote]

I think Hitler believed in Darwinism.[/quote]

Nah, brah.[/quote]

You sure?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

Yes, I understand the Faith thing in regard to religion I just think it is foolish. There is a native American story that was told around the time the europeans were trying to convert the Native americans to christianity. This is the story ruffly. The N.A. god and the white man’s god were competing for the hearts of an N.A. village. The missionaries for the White God kept telling the N.A. people all the miracles he could perform and all the power he had. So the N.A. God challend the White God to a test of who was truly more powerful. There was a huge boulder known to the villagers a little ways from town, that was so big no human would be able to move it. The challenge was the first God to move the boulder would win the village over and be their god for eternity. The white god ever confident said he would go first, as he approached the boulder he knelt in front of it and began praying. For hours he prayed and nothing happened, everyone waited and waited, still nothing happened. Finally the N.A. God had enough waiting, he walked to the boulder firmly set his feet put his shoulder in to the boulder and strained with all his might till the boulder started to roll.

  The moral of the story is you could use your faith and pray all day for some thing to be done or you could just get your lazy ass up and do it. A person's own actions are more likely to get things done then their faith or their beliefs in a 2000 year old book. I loved that story and think it is a good parable to learn from actually.

Haven’t seen this movie yet, but I’d say Samuel L. is better than Denzel. Anyways, I’ll have to see this movie for sure.

I’ve always been someone who disliked getting to the end of a movie I liked only to have the big religious message behind the whole thing come out. Especially if the movie was action with violence and sex, it always made me mad because if I wanted to watch a religious message movie then i wouldn’t be looking for one with somebody cutting people up with a machete.

However, I went into The Book of Eli having only seen like one preview and not knowing much about the movie at all. And when the whole “message” came out, it didn’t bother me at all. I thought it was presented really well. And I really enjoyed the movie.

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:
Hey guys I am thinking about seeing this movie, can you give me a heads up without spoiling the ending for me?
Some one tried to tell me that all the fuss is about him carrying a fucking bible or some thing if thats true is this just a religous movie with an agenda? Or, is it infact a great movie, not based on religous overtones?

And I agree 5.0 Man on fire was a great movie, gonna be hard to top that.[/quote]

it is an excellent movie about faith and doing what it right. Many people don’t like things like faith and doing what is right. It that is you. You shouldn’t go it will only make you mad.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:

I just reread what you wrote, and I’m not sure what you mean by “Very few actors on the planet have significant range to play any part and be unrecognizable”. Of course they’re recognizable. That’s how people recognize them? It’s also how they recognize that they [Denzel] play basically the same character in every movie. I like Denzel as an actor [Ricochet baby!] but he plays every role the exact same way. He’s not a very diverse actor, but he is talented. [/quote]

I meant exactly what I wrote.

For instance, if the very first time you EVER heard of Heath Ledger was when he was playing the Joker, would you even recognize it was the same guy if you happened to be watching Brokeback mountain? I haven’t even seen the second movie but I’ve seen enough clips on other shows and the internet to see that his acting was COMPLETELY DIFFERENT and his look changed drastically enough that you probably would ignore it was the same guy.

That is what I mean by being UNRECOGNIZABLE in a part due to acting and overall look.

Few actors can pull that off. That is why I mentioned Eric Bana, because even the director noted that he kept getting calls from people asking if that was really him in Star Trek…because the character he played was drastically different than other characters he had played before.

That is about the only way you could truly judge “range” in acting. Otherwise, it is simply the same actor being himself in a different role with slight tweeks on his own personality.

In fact, I would go as far as to say that someone like Ledger who can turn into someone else on screen probably has some mental instability issues that go along with that ability to lose themselves in a role.[/quote]

if you want to see denzel doing something a touch different see mobetta blues.

agree, daniel day-lewis is right up there, but think also about anthony hopkins (silence of the lambs, fastest indian) or is it charlize theron, who did monster? eric bana is super good, even with no make-up he projects completely different mannerisms etc… compare that to your standard bland tom cruise type, same accent same looks same lines whether hes a fighter pilot or a secret agent or a lawyer…

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

Yes, I understand the Faith thing in regard to religion I just think it is foolish. There is a native American story that was told around the time the europeans were trying to convert the Native americans to christianity. This is the story ruffly. The N.A. god and the white man’s god were competing for the hearts of an N.A. village. The missionaries for the White God kept telling the N.A. people all the miracles he could perform and all the power he had. So the N.A. God challend the White God to a test of who was truly more powerful. There was a huge boulder known to the villagers a little ways from town, that was so big no human would be able to move it. The challenge was the first God to move the boulder would win the village over and be their god for eternity. The white god ever confident said he would go first, as he approached the boulder he knelt in front of it and began praying. For hours he prayed and nothing happened, everyone waited and waited, still nothing happened. Finally the N.A. God had enough waiting, he walked to the boulder firmly set his feet put his shoulder in to the boulder and strained with all his might till the boulder started to roll.

  The moral of the story is you could use your faith and pray all day for some thing to be done or you could just get your lazy ass up and do it. A person's own actions are more likely to get things done then their faith or their beliefs in a 2000 year old book. I loved that story and think it is a good parable to learn from actually.[/quote]

What an idiotic representation of what many believe. I may pray like everything depends on a greater power or greater destiny, but I will always act like everything depends on me.

The problem with guys like you is you view everyone who believes in God the same…as if there is no difference between a woman who sits at home praying while her child dies instead of taking them to a hospital…and the father who happens to be a doctor who prays as he rushes his daughter to the ER.

It often makes me wonder where people like you have gotten their point of view.

Couple of things:

  1. I thought the call out by Orion in regards to X’s “average” comment was funny. Sorry X…
  2. I liked the movie. I like guns, swords, females, and thought the message interesting
  3. I didn’t know WolBarret was black
    a) I like all peoples
  4. Nicholas Cage has the least depth/range/talent of any possible actor

Hayden Christiansen is the worst actor ever, period.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

No need to take offence, I see you meant belief in a religion, any religion. I was just thinking where do you draw the line at what you call faith. I’m guessing you mean belief in and following a certain system, and using it’s principles to guide your life. Or did you simply mean believing in the existence of a god?

Just curious as depending on your view of the word faith, it is something that many atheists may possess. Just thinking out loud more than anything.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

Yes, I understand the Faith thing in regard to religion I just think it is foolish. There is a native American story that was told around the time the europeans were trying to convert the Native americans to christianity. This is the story ruffly. The N.A. god and the white man’s god were competing for the hearts of an N.A. village. The missionaries for the White God kept telling the N.A. people all the miracles he could perform and all the power he had. So the N.A. God challend the White God to a test of who was truly more powerful. There was a huge boulder known to the villagers a little ways from town, that was so big no human would be able to move it. The challenge was the first God to move the boulder would win the village over and be their god for eternity. The white god ever confident said he would go first, as he approached the boulder he knelt in front of it and began praying. For hours he prayed and nothing happened, everyone waited and waited, still nothing happened. Finally the N.A. God had enough waiting, he walked to the boulder firmly set his feet put his shoulder in to the boulder and strained with all his might till the boulder started to roll.

  The moral of the story is you could use your faith and pray all day for some thing to be done or you could just get your lazy ass up and do it. A person's own actions are more likely to get things done then their faith or their beliefs in a 2000 year old book. I loved that story and think it is a good parable to learn from actually.[/quote]

What an idiotic representation of what many believe. I may pray like everything depends on a greater power or greater destiny, but I will always act like everything depends on me.

The problem with guys like you is you view everyone who believes in God the same…as if there is no difference between a woman who sits at home praying while her child dies instead of taking them to a hospital…and the father who happens to be a doctor who prays as he rushes his daughter to the ER.

It often makes me wonder where people like you have gotten their point of view.[/quote]

X I seriously think you are overly sensitive and read into shit way to much. Plus I think you are just one of those angry fuckers that can turn some one saying Hi into a fight. But truly X don’t close your mind off to the story I told, there is a lot to learn in it. You insult my beliefs by calling them idiotic and you are the stupid mother fucker that probably believes in a 2000 year old book put together by churches to get 10 percent of your income. You are one that probably believes a true virgin gave birth to the child of our creator. That that child sacrificed himself to save us all and then got resurected. I mean in reality who’s views seem more idiotic? I say yours do sir.

GOOD DAY SIR!

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

No need to take offence, I see you meant belief in a religion, any religion. I was just thinking where do you draw the line at what you call faith. I’m guessing you mean belief in and following a certain system, and using it’s principles to guide your life. Or did you simply mean believing in the existence of a god?

Just curious as depending on your view of the word faith, it is something that many atheists may possess. Just thinking out loud more than anything.[/quote]

No need to explain yourself TheOtherRob X is an angry asshole no matter what you say.

I think we find Headhunter Jr.

HYPOCRISY!

[quote]mcstoots082 wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]The other Rob wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Also, if you don’t understand the strength a man has who simply has faith (specific religion or belief is irrelevant), then this discussion is pointless. I wish we had better debates on this forum. [/quote]

What do you mean by faith? A belief in an afterlife? Belief in a creator? Do you believe that
it’s limited to religious people? One could take the word faith to mean many things.[/quote]

So when I wrote the specific words “specific religion or belief is irrelevant” AND put this in parenthesis, this was not clear enough to the degree you needed to make another post about it?

I mean, as if someone couldn’t anticipate someone making a post just like the one you made which is WHY the sentence was written to begin with?[/quote]

No need to take offence, I see you meant belief in a religion, any religion. I was just thinking where do you draw the line at what you call faith. I’m guessing you mean belief in and following a certain system, and using it’s principles to guide your life. Or did you simply mean believing in the existence of a god?

Just curious as depending on your view of the word faith, it is something that many atheists may possess. Just thinking out loud more than anything.[/quote]

No need to explain yourself TheOtherRob X is an angry asshole no matter what you say. [/quote]

You can see where he’s coming from most of the time. Especially with the amount of idiocy we see around here, you can see why people assume the worst from comments rather than take the time to actually read what’s being asked :slight_smile:

I’m not throwing my 2p in here, no minds are being changed tonight, nor does it really matter to me.

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
Couple of things:

  1. I thought the call out by Orion in regards to X’s “average” comment was funny. Sorry X…

  2. I liked the movie. I like guns, swords, females, and thought the message interesting

  3. I didn’t know WolBarret was black
    a) I like all peoples

  4. Nicholas Cage has the least depth/range/talent of any possible actor
    [/quote]

  5. Shhh. Wol doesn’t know either.

  6. You may have forgotten Keanu Reeves