Best Split?

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Agreed, and I can guarantee if we put pics side by side of all of the people claiming “TBT works best for size gains” right next to the guys who actually got big using splits, that alone would kill the discussion.

I could care less about theory. I wanted to get big so I did what the big guys did. I got big. When I see any of you TBT guys gain like that, then we can talk. Until then, the people trying stuff just to try it based on theory and not real world results are missing the basics and will continue making less progress.

OK, let’s use me as an example. I started off at 144lbs (5’10") training with a 4 day split routine given to me by a competing bodybuilder/bouncer. I gained quite poorly on ot despite busting my ass really hard and eating like mad. I then followed a routine I read on T-Nation. Can’t remember what one, but it was a split routine.

In 8 months I went up to a whopping 160. Going by your logic I shouldn’t have tried anything else because I was doing what the big boys do, I was putting in the effort in, eating enough calories (because I was gaining fat as well), yet my gains were sub-optimal. But according to you I should’ve kept at it because it’s the thing all the big boys do.

Soon as I started messing about with TBT and two way split I went up to 210 in less than a couple of years without gaining any more fat and I started gaining strength at a far greater rate, and I noticed in the mirror myself getting bigger.

Going by your logic I would’ve continued growing at a poor rate because I would never have tried anything else. No thanks.

Anyway, I’ve been out of training for 15 months and am getting back to where I was before now (albeit with a fractured ankle so no squatting and deadlifting for a long time), but as always I like to keep an open mind (and am currently doing a three way split in fact! Shock horror!) and will continue to look at what everybody else does and keep the stuff that works and discontinue the stuff that doesn’t.

You feel free to keep living in your little bubble though. I know you’re a huge guy, but you know what? You don’t absolutely know for sure you wouldn’t have got bigger, faster if you’d tried something else, you just THINK you wouldn’t have. Surely you must be willing to acknowledge you don’t know for sure, at least?[/quote]

If you gained 16 pounds in 8 months and some of it was fat you either have shit genetics OR you didn’t know jack shit about proper nutrition. Newbie gains are notorious for simultaneous muscle gain/fat loss at a rapid pace.

And who gives a shit what you weigh. What you look like is the actual question. I have seen a lot of different 5’10 210ish lb people in my short lifting career. Some can brag about those numbers while others should keep their shirts on at the beach.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

LOL. Then show us the guys who got huge using TBT after starting out significantly skinnier IN THIS DECADE.

It is as simple as that.

The ball is in your court.[/quote]

What would be the point of that? I have said repeatedly now (I don’t know why you people keep ignoring such massive parts of my posts!) that it gets to a certain point where splits become more effective than TBT, and obviously as a result huge guys will pretty much universally use splits. I am not trying to debate the merits of TBT over splits for guys who are already advanced.

Seriously, I have said it repeatedly so why are you ignoring it? I am saying I think for many people at an earlier stage of development that TBT will give better gains. I am not saying that Ronnie Coleman and his close personal friends all do TBT. I really, honestly cannot understand why people can’t seem to understand what I’m saying.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

An upper/lower is a 2-way split. SPLIT. S-P-L-I-T. The point is to split things up so that you aren’t exhausted as fuck by the time you get to train your legs and can still put up decent numbers. How is that close to full-body? There is full-body training, there is split training.
The “spirit” of split training (Idea behind them/purpose/whatever), as you put it, lies in SPLITTING THINGS UP and has less to do with frequency as such. A 2-way over 6 days a week is a split as much as a 6-way over 6 days is.[/quote]

OK, you do make a good point here. But surely you can also appreciate my point that an upper/lower performed with moderate volume 6 days a week is very similar to a full body? That is my point. I have been coming at it less from a fatigue perspective and more from a frequency/volume perspective. Perhaps this is from where some of the confusion has arisen.

Having said that, yes, I do appreciate your point about the fatigue aspect, but ultimately a 24 set workout is a 24 set workout, whether it’s split or full body. Yes, a full body will be more tiring because it will (probably) have more compounds and each muscle will be fresher for each new exercise, but again, volume can/should be the same, however you structure your routine.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Why would anyone want to spend 2+ hours at the gym with a routine like the one Reeves was using, if you can get the same results by doing a 3-way over 3 days only, for example?

Why deal with the extra fatigue, joint-abuse and all that? Not to mention that after a certain point, these routines were simply too much for people to keep on getting stronger/growing…

People started splitting things up and stopped worrying about fat gain in the off-season for good reasons. [/quote]

Well you’ve got me there, but again, you seem to be debating against things I was never advocating in the first place. When did I ever say a 2+ hour routine was a good thing?

You also seem to be ignoring the fact that I have noe said repeatedly that for advanced trainees splits are better. Why do you keep ignoring this?

I also notice you failed to identify the post in which I said TBT was better for most people. Surprise surprise.

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:

You said “lots of people WILL grow better with total body training than splits”.

Total hypocrisy for you to say that and then get on my case for making “such a ridiculous blanket statement” b/c it is the exact opposite of your view.

What?! The two are not even remotely the same thing! My position is that different people will respond differently to different things… i.e. I have an open mind. You are disagreeing and saying that your way is right, people will all respond the same way to the same thing… a closed mind. Do you not see the difference there? I am open to different approaches, you are not.
[/quote]

lol you are such a weasel.

ok how bout this, I will put it exactly like you did.

“Lots of people WILL grow better with splits than total body training.”

Now if you still think that is the most ridiculous blanket statement you have ever heard, then guess what? Your comment is in the same boat.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

If you gained 16 pounds in 8 months and some of it was fat you either have shit genetics OR you didn’t know jack shit about proper nutrition. Newbie gains are notorious for simultaneous muscle gain/fat loss at a rapid pace.

And who gives a shit what you weigh. What you look like is the actual question. I have seen a lot of different 5’10 210ish lb people in my short lifting career. Some can brag about those numbers while others should keep their shirts on at the beach. [/quote]

Put it this way: my genetics and diet remained constant throughout any training routine I have used, so you can’t really debate the effectiveness of any training routine based on that. Or maybe you can. I was eating enough to gain weight, so that covers that aspect, but the genetics part of it, sure. I am clearly one of those people (or I was at the time, at least) who I was talking about who gain better from TBT. Maybe I have shit genetics, I don’t know… but I’m sure I’m not the only person in the population with similar genetics.

BTW, I was around 14% bodyfat at the time, just in case you were interested.

[quote]Squelchy wrote:

Put it this way: my genetics and diet remained constant throughout any training routine I have used,[/quote]

I bet you actually think this is a good thing. My diet isn’t the exact same as it was even 8 months ago because I carry more muscle on me now and as such, my diet had to be adjusted.

Anyone not doing this has FAILED at one the most basic aspects of bodybuilding to begin with.

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
BONEZ217 wrote:

If you gained 16 pounds in 8 months and some of it was fat you either have shit genetics OR you didn’t know jack shit about proper nutrition. Newbie gains are notorious for simultaneous muscle gain/fat loss at a rapid pace.

And who gives a shit what you weigh. What you look like is the actual question. I have seen a lot of different 5’10 210ish lb people in my short lifting career. Some can brag about those numbers while others should keep their shirts on at the beach.

Put it this way: my genetics and diet remained constant throughout any training routine I have used, so you can’t really debate the effectiveness of any training routine based on that. Or maybe you can. I was eating enough to gain weight, so that covers that aspect, but the genetics part of it, sure. I am clearly one of those people (or I was at the time, at least) who I was talking about who gain better from TBT. Maybe I have shit genetics, I don’t know… but I’m sure I’m not the only person in the population with similar genetics.

BTW, I was around 14% bodyfat at the time, just in case you were interested.[/quote]

The “shit genetics” part was supposed to be tounge in cheek. No one has the same genetics so it’s pointless to debate it. And I believe genetics has less to do with building an impressive physique than most people think (because everyone can make improvements to their own physique, genetics may factor in when making comparisons but that isn’t relevant to this case).

Still, if you gained 14 pounds and more than 15% of it was fat you were not eating properly. Newb gains are generous to EVERYONEE.

Maybe you still don’t know how to eat right, who knows at this point??

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

You stated that the majority of people grow better on full-body training.

Where on earth did I say most people will grow better on TBT? Please, point out the post to me. You have used that adjective “most” a lot, and I know I definitely did not say that.
[/quote] Oh, my bad, LOTS of people will grow better on it… We’ll get to that below. [quote]
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

So… What do you consider a good tbt routine? (and don’t say "oh, everyone responds differently, so… I have yet to see someone under my guidance respond badly to that yates-inspired 3-way, whether trained over only 3 days a week or over 5… So I’m sure you can come up with a TBT routine that most people can do very well on? After all, you said that most grow better on tbt…)

Once again, I did not say that, I said lots of people will grow better on it, not most. Most T-Nation posters? Of course not. But most people in gyms aren’t at that stage. We’ll take as a given that most people here will grow better from a split, but Joe Average who’s just started, or been training a couple of years or less? [/quote] A couple of years or less? If you are still a beginner after a bunch of years of training, then you’ve messed up. No matter what routine you did. It’s likely not even the routine’s fault. [quote] Yeah, I’ll stand by the idea he’ll grow better on TBT. Waterbury’s TBT is a good example[/quote] Really. 99 percent of the posts of “ABBH/TBT/whatever results” show people who’ve done these routines for the 3-weeks or however long they’re supposed to be done… And gain practically nothing. Surprise. +5 or +10 lbs on your lifts make jackshit of a difference. [quote], and again, I would suggest heading over to the Mens Health forums if you want examples of less advanced lifters who are well read on T-Nation and have tried a bit of both.
[/quote] Oh, men’s health guys… Wait, isn’t this the bodybuilding forum?

Joe average huh… Do you mean “guys who lack any and all intensity in the gym and look the same year in year out” ?
Who the hell gives a damn about what people with no serious intentions to make progress in the gym do? They can do whatever they want, they make little to no progress past maybe beginner gains anyway.

Or do you mean “most beginners” ?
I used to be joe below-average. Professor X used to be that, too. A ton of others as well. We got strong very fast via splits… May have been able to do it via tbt, but that would have meant more wear and tear on the joints and us being very restricted in our exercise choices… Plus that a 3 days a week full-body approach is generally more recovery intensive than even a 6-way (provided that the 6-way isn’t done with an excessive amount of exercises or with straight sets)… [quote]

Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

How about you explain to me why you think that most people grow better via TBT? “because they’re not advanced”? What?

Oh God, I can tell I’m going to sound like a twat here, but OK. I don’t want to be one of those ‘studies have shown’ guys, but studies HAVE shown that increased frequency leads to improved gains. Now obviously this needs to be balanced against sufficient overload and recovery time to grow, but a 280lb bodybuilder who squats 800lbs is going to need more recovery time from his squatting than a 120lb guy who squats 100lbs. Surely we can agree on this at least, for the obvious reasons? Thus doing exercises like squats and deadlifts more often can only be a good thing because of the growth hormone benefits [/quote] Which are totally overblown, or else you’d all gain so much faster than I or many others did during our beginner stages… And besides, OTHER studies have pretty much shown that the hormone response is overrated and generally fairly minimal.
On a split you can do 1-2 big exercises per day, for 6 or even 7 days in a row just fine… So? You’re arguing theory, and that stuff is only useful if it makes you gain strength for moderate-high reps faster without putting you at greater use of overuse injury etc when it comes to bbing…

[quote], etc. This is up until the point those exercises become more demanding and more recovery time is needed, as well as more overload for optimal growth. Which is when splitting comes in. Obviously the overwhelming majority of posters here are past that point [/quote] Only if that point is when you reach a 225 lb 1RM in the bench and MAYBE a 315 lb 1RM in the squat and deadlift… [quote], but I’d hardly say posters here are representative of the general gym-going populace.
[/quote] They aren’t? Who do you think is the general gym-going populace? The soccer moms? We a ton of kids on here, too… And again, if you simply refer to people who just don’t take training seriously, then why bring them up at all? The problem is not that they don’t train tbt, the problem is that they don’t eat properly, have zero intensity and need to be told to add weight to the bar or else they’ll forget about it completely.

[quote]
Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

I start practically all the people coming to me for help at the beginner stage off with a 4-way or 3-way… And they all do well on them from what I can tell. Strength gains sure seem to be rather good, as long as they eat a ton and do the exercises right…

Are these guys all just odd exceptions?

If you start them all off on a 3 or 4 way split and not on TBT then how would you be able to tell if they’re exceptions or not? You’re only seeing the results from the one type of training and not the other.[/quote]

Because most of them have tried several programs off this site, usually also multiple tbt approaches before and are… Surprise… Still beginners by the time they come to me.

Besides, I generally start them off with a 4-way or so because that is middle-of-the-road… They can generally decide for themselves whether they want to decrease volume or increase it and split things up more or less.
If I can have them gain strength as fast or faster on more exercises at the same time than practically all the tbt guys on here with significantly less wear and tear on the joints etc… Why not?

Edit: I’ve also used tbt with many beginners locally here in Germany. Various incarnations of it, so I have a decent idea of how people respond to it… And usually, it was way too limiting.

Since my post didn’t appear yet I can’t edit it.

Your comments about advance vs. beginners are silly. How do you know when someone moves from the beginner to intermediate to advanced stage? You don’t. Because you don’t know someones max potetial right from the start.

Anyone, at any age, can use a split with sucess. Volume should be adjusted according to training age (IMO) but choosing when to train which body parts is irrelevant to age, sex, and experience.

OK, there’s a lot of points to address here and I will, but I’m off to bed now. I shall get on tomorrow and respond to everyone though.

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Agreed, and I can guarantee if we put pics side by side of all of the people claiming “TBT works best for size gains” right next to the guys who actually got big using splits, that alone would kill the discussion.

I could care less about theory. I wanted to get big so I did what the big guys did. I got big. When I see any of you TBT guys gain like that, then we can talk. Until then, the people trying stuff just to try it based on theory and not real world results are missing the basics and will continue making less progress.

OK, let’s use me as an example. I started off at 144lbs (5’10") training with a 4 day split routine given to me by a competing bodybuilder/bouncer. I gained quite poorly on ot despite busting my ass really hard and eating like mad. I then followed a routine I read on T-Nation. Can’t remember what one, but it was a split routine.
[/quote] There isn’t a single split routine available in the articles here that I’d consider doing myself… Ever.
People can hate me for that statement all they want, but I really haven’t seen one on here that I think is great to use continually (or even short term… No sense doing random shit short term if you can do something else and keep progressing long-term) for anyone with average genetics who is looking to get as big as he can as fast as possible naturally.

[quote]

In 8 months I went up to a whopping 160. Going by your logic I shouldn’t have tried anything else because I was doing what the big boys do, I was putting in the effort in, eating enough calories (because I was gaining fat as well), yet my gains were sub-optimal. But according to you I should’ve kept at it because it’s the thing all the big boys do.
[/quote] Yeah, I’m sure that like all complete beginners you actually knew perfectly what effort and eating big meant. Certainly you got your 2 grams of protein per lb of bodyweight in and were as intense as can be, didn’t party/drink all the time etc.
Care to show us what that bouncer-split looked like in detail?
As the others have said… Gaining 16 lbs in 8 months on any routine as a beginner is pathetic, so yeah, chances are you actually messed up somewhere.[quote]
Soon as I started messing about with TBT and two way split I went up to 210 in less than a couple of years without gaining any more fat and I started gaining strength at a far greater rate, and I noticed in the mirror myself getting bigger.

Going by your logic I would’ve continued growing at a poor rate because I would never have tried anything else. No thanks.

Anyway, I’ve been out of training for 15 months and am getting back to where I was before now (albeit with a fractured ankle so no squatting and deadlifting for a long time), but as always I like to keep an open mind (and am currently doing a three way split in fact! Shock horror! [/quote] And what does that one look like + your diet? [quote]) and will continue to look at what everybody else does and keep the stuff that works and discontinue the stuff that doesn’t.

You feel free to keep living in your little bubble though. I know you’re a huge guy, but you know what? You don’t absolutely know for sure you wouldn’t have got bigger, faster if you’d tried something else, you just THINK you wouldn’t have. Surely you must be willing to acknowledge you don’t know for sure, at least?[/quote]

Like anyone here says “don’t ever try anything else.”

And come on. A clueless beginner doesn’t manage to gain much. How rare. He ultimately learns more about how to do his exercises, probably gets a little more intense in the gym, maybe starts eating better or not… And suddenly gains better. Oh surprise.

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
OK, there’s a lot of points to address here and I will, but I’m off to bed now. I shall get on tomorrow and respond to everyone though.[/quote]

What? You dare flee an e-debate? :wink:

I don’t know if this has been addressed before in the thread but:
Stop using the general gym population as a source for TBT’s superiority, your at a bodybuilding sub-forum at a bodybuilding website. No one cares about them folk, they’d also probably get bigger/stronger just walking a incline(bit tongue-in-cheek). ← NB: not meant as a dig at TBT but GGP before anyone calls me out on it :().

Although since the debate is open, topics:
Straight sets vs ramped?
Juicing makes up for the pro’s lack of effort?
“Not going above 12% fat”-bulk?
TBT vs spl… no wait my bad :frowning:

[quote]Hilsen wrote:
I don’t know if this has been addressed before in the thread but:
Stop using the general gym population as a source for TBT’s superiority, your at a bodybuilding sub-forum at a bodybuilding website. No one cares about them folk, they’d also probably get bigger/stronger just walking a incline(bit tongue-in-cheek). ← NB: not meant as a dig at TBT but GGP before anyone calls me out on it :().

Although since the debate is open, topics:
Straight sets vs ramped?
Juicing makes up for the pro’s lack of effort?
“Not going above 12% fat”-bulk?
TBT vs spl… no wait my bad :([/quote]

You may want to read the thread before posting such insight and random topics. Just a thought.

[quote]giterdone wrote:
Hilsen wrote:
I don’t know if this has been addressed before in the thread but:
Stop using the general gym population as a source for TBT’s superiority, your at a bodybuilding sub-forum at a bodybuilding website. No one cares about them folk, they’d also probably get bigger/stronger just walking a incline(bit tongue-in-cheek). ← NB: not meant as a dig at TBT but GGP before anyone calls me out on it :().

Although since the debate is open, topics:
Straight sets vs ramped?
Juicing makes up for the pro’s lack of effort?
“Not going above 12% fat”-bulk?
TBT vs spl… no wait my bad :frowning:

You may want to read the thread before posting such insight and random topics. Just a thought.[/quote]

Well, the “general gym population” part did come up the page before this one…

For the OP:

All of this is bullshit, you should train daily every bodypart, if you can train for 24 fucking hours that’s the best motherfucking way, any other split comes from
1)morons who don’t want to get big because they’ll lose their hawt abz and a 35 dumbbell will spoil their manicure or
2) a weak bodybuilder who does only partial reps and is really pussywilled and doesn’t have the balls to change sissy split training for TBT.

[quote]giterdone wrote:
You may want to read the thread before posting such insight and random topics.[/quote]
I had read it through just not refreshed for a while, my bad :o. The topics part was meant as tongue-in-cheek.

[quote] Just a thought.[/quote]I’ll keep it in mind for future posts ;o

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
Professor X wrote:

LOL. Then show us the guys who got huge using TBT after starting out significantly skinnier IN THIS DECADE.

It is as simple as that.

The ball is in your court.

What would be the point of that? [/quote]

The point? If none of you can easily find SEVERAL huge bodybuilders who got that way using TBT who started out skinny, then what relevance does TBT really have to those of us who do plan on standing out?

This is a bodybuilding forum. The ONLY thing that matters is RESULTS. All of this theory can kiss my ass if it isn’t working like that in the real world.

There is nothing funnier than reading threads where little people are giving other little people advice on how to get big…advice that no really big person would give all because they are regurgitating what they read somewhere.

That doesn’t mean TBT can’t build muscle, but it DOES mean that if most of the really big bodies on the planet were built using splits, then the LOGICAL course of action is NOT to do something completely different.

Also, if most of the split routines on this site would be avoided by the really big lifters here, then maybe some of you are getting your info from the wrong source.

I did TBT @ the start (starting strength, Chad Waterbury). Yet once I split it up more via upper/lower split(ws4sb) and more bodybuilding type splits I noticed bigger gains in strenght/size and just overall morep productive workouts.

TBT is great for some beginners (most at first respond to anything) for my little sister and some older people trying to lean up or maintain whatever muscle they have. My 2 cents.

[quote]waylanderxx wrote:

lol you are such a weasel.

ok how bout this, I will put it exactly like you did.

“Lots of people WILL grow better with splits than total body training.”

Now if you still think that is the most ridiculous blanket statement you have ever heard, then guess what? Your comment is in the same boat.[/quote]

Not at all, that’s a perfectly reasonable statement. I suggest you grab a dictionary and look up the difference between “lots” and “most” though, because it seems you’re a little confused on that point.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I bet you actually think this is a good thing. My diet isn’t the exact same as it was even 8 months ago because I carry more muscle on me now and as such, my diet had to be adjusted.

Anyone not doing this has FAILED at one the most basic aspects of bodybuilding to begin with.
[/quote]

I’ve read enough of your posts to know that you and several other successful lifters follow vaguely the same sort of diet I do/did, i.e. making sure I got enough calories to grow and enough protein. I’m sure your “grabbing a big mac on the way home” isn’t exactly nutritionally calculated to the nearest gram of fat, but you’re not an idiot so you know you’re getting what you need to grow. It seems to work for Lee Priest in the off season, no?

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

The “shit genetics” part was supposed to be tounge in cheek. No one has the same genetics so it’s pointless to debate it. And I believe genetics has less to do with building an impressive physique than most people think (because everyone can make improvements to their own physique, genetics may factor in when making comparisons but that isn’t relevant to this case).

Still, if you gained 14 pounds and more than 15% of it was fat you were not eating properly. Newb gains are generous to EVERYONEE.

Maybe you still don’t know how to eat right, who knows at this point?? [/quote]

Again, why are people talking about this like it’s rocket science? It’s hardly the most difficult thing in the world to make sure your calorie intake is high enough to grow, you’re getting enough protein to grow and you?re making sure to eat enough fat and carbs. I love the way you’re still refusing to accept the possibility I just didn?t respond well to the splits. Yeah, that must have been TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

Since my post didn’t appear yet I can’t edit it.

Your comments about advance vs. beginners are silly. How do you know when someone moves from the beginner to intermediate to advanced stage? You don’t. Because you don’t know someones max potetial right from the start.

Anyone, at any age, can use a split with sucess. Volume should be adjusted according to training age (IMO) but choosing when to train which body parts is irrelevant to age, sex, and experience. [/quote]

And lots of people can use and have used TBT with success, yet you seem to be ignoring this.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Oh, my bad, LOTS of people will grow better on it… We’ll get to that below.
[/quote]

Oh goody, can’t wait!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

A couple of years or less? If you are still a beginner after a bunch of years of training, then you’ve messed up. No matter what routine you did. It’s likely not even the routine’s fault.[/quote]

Beginner or intermediate. And don’t forget some people have lives outside of the gym which make it difficult to make optimal progress.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Really. 99 percent of the posts of “ABBH/TBT/whatever results” show people who’ve done these routines for the 3-weeks or however long they’re supposed to be done… And gain practically nothing. Surprise. +5 or +10 lbs on your lifts make jackshit of a difference.[/quote]

You obviously haven?t read the same threads I have then. And again, why are you twisting what I’ve said? I wouldn’t expect most posters here to gain better from TBT because they’re already more advanced and ready for a more advanced routine. I will say AGAIN go over to MH and you will see something totally different. Why are you insisting on ignoring this very simple point that I am arguing mainly for beginners and early intermediates? Is it just so that you can argue?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Oh, men’s health guys… Wait, isn’t this the bodybuilding forum?[/quote]

Yes, it is, and therefore it is likely that the majority of routines favoured here will be splits. But not every single poster here is an advanced or even intermediate lifter, so that doesn’t mean an advanced split will always work best, no matter what you might think.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Joe average huh… Do you mean “guys who lack any and all intensity in the gym and look the same year in year out” ?
Who the hell gives a damn about what people with no serious intentions to make progress in the gym do? They can do whatever they want, they make little to no progress past maybe beginner gains anyway.

Or do you mean “most beginners” ?[/quote]

Bingo!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

I used to be joe below-average. Professor X used to be that, too. A ton of others as well. We got strong very fast via splits… May have been able to do it via tbt…[/quote]

Thank you! Finally! That’s what I was after, just a simple acknowledgement that for some people there MAY be another way that works. Doesn’t it feel good to feel that mind just opening up?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

…but that would have meant more wear and tear on the joints and us being very restricted in our exercise choices…[/quote]

Why would it mean this considering you can select the exact same exercises/rep and set ranges for a split and a full body but the only difference being how you split them up. If you listed everything you did for both over the course of the week without showing how they were organised they could be identical.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Plus that a 3 days a week full-body approach is generally more recovery intensive than even a 6-way (provided that the 6-way isn’t done with an excessive amount of exercises or with straight sets)…[/quote]

Perhaps, but as I’ve said, less advanced trainees recover more easily anyway.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Which are totally overblown, or else you’d all gain so much faster than I or many others did during our beginner stages… And besides, OTHER studies have pretty much shown that the hormone response is overrated and generally fairly minimal.
On a split you can do 1-2 big exercises per day, for 6 or even 7 days in a row just fine… So? You’re arguing theory, and that stuff is only useful if it makes you gain strength for moderate-high reps faster without putting you at greater use of overuse injury etc when it comes to bbing…[/quote]

I don’t agree that overuse injuries are anywhere near that easy to come by, especially considering the amount of people I know who squat and deadlift more often and not a one who has incurred an injury.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Only if that point is when you reach a 225 lb 1RM in the bench and MAYBE a 315 lb 1RM in the squat and deadlift…[/quote]

And maybe that is the point, who knows?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

They aren’t? Who do you think is the general gym-going populace? The soccer moms? We a ton of kids on here, too… And again, if you simply refer to people who just don’t take training seriously, then why bring them up at all? The problem is not that they don’t train tbt, the problem is that they don’t eat properly, have zero intensity and need to be told to add weight to the bar or else they’ll forget about it completely.[/quote]

The kids and the footie mums, yeah, both of those. Why bring them up? Maybe because the guy asking fits into the average kid category (or might)?

As for the food/intensity/progression thing, that can be a problem as well, but (as I have already said several times now and I am almost crying at having to repeat myself yet again), providing those things are in order, why would you not want to try several routines to find out what one works best for you?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Because most of them have tried several programs off this site, usually also multiple tbt approaches before and are… Surprise… Still beginners by the time they come to me.

Besides, I generally start them off with a 4-way or so because that is middle-of-the-road… They can generally decide for themselves whether they want to decrease volume or increase it and split things up more or less.
If I can have them gain strength as fast or faster on more exercises at the same time than practically all the tbt guys on here with significantly less wear and tear on the joints etc… Why not?

Edit: I’ve also used tbt with many beginners locally here in Germany. Various incarnations of it, so I have a decent idea of how people respond to it… And usually, it was way too limiting.[/quote]

That’s fair enough, but all I can say is that I’ve seen the exact opposite of you.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

There isn’t a single split routine available in the articles here that I’d consider doing myself… Ever.
People can hate me for that statement all they want, but I really haven’t seen one on here that I think is great to use continually (or even short term… No sense doing random shit short term if you can do something else and keep progressing long-term) for anyone with average genetics who is looking to get as big as he can as fast as possible naturally.[/quote]

Again, don’t you see what you’re doing here? You’re taking a ‘my way or the highway’ approach and refusing to acknowledge that other ways may work for different people.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Yeah, I’m sure that like all complete beginners you actually knew perfectly what effort and eating big meant. Certainly you got your 2 grams of protein per lb of bodyweight in and were as intense as can be, didn’t party/drink all the time etc.
Care to show us what that bouncer-split looked like in detail?
As the others have said… Gaining 16 lbs in 8 months on any routine as a beginner is pathetic, so yeah, chances are you actually messed up somewhere.[/quote]

I have always been quite certain to get enough protein in actually, and believe me, you’re speaking to someone who used to smoke a LOT of weed in his late teens. I know more about eating big than most people will ever dream of. I used to eat two bags of shopping in one evening when I was stoned. I’ll be happy to list the sort of binge I used to have if you want.

If I messed up, perhaps you can tell me where? I followed a split routine given to me by a competing bodybuilder, and whilst I can’t prove my diet was OK, I would hope you would believe me when I tell you I was getting enough protein and calories in. As for the partying thing, I got most of that out of the way before I started training. I’ve been drinking for about 12 years now so partying/clubbing was no new thrill to me when I started training. I could give you a rough outline of what the split was like if you really wanted but it was a pretty standard moderate volume 8-15 rep per set multiple exercise four way split. I’m sure you could imagine it.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

And what does that one look like + your diet?[/quote]

I’ve gone for German Volume Training for a few reasons. It’s not the sort of thing I would normally do, but as I said, I’ve fractured my ankle and so I’m very limited in what I can do. I can’t do anything from a standing position obviously, and getting heavy dumbbells into position is impossible so I need to work with lighter weight, for the time being at least. Also safety is a concern, it’s a bit worrying for me working with heavier weight when I’m so unbalanced.

Anyway, at the moment I am signed off work so all I really have to do is sit at home with my foot up eating, so training more often breaks up the monotony a little.

I will list the routine and then explain my reasoning for certain exercise choices in case you?re curious. I’m doing an A routine and a B routine.

Chest/back A/B

Flat dumbbell press/Incline bottom position wide grip barbell press
Chins/Incline bench rows

Legs/shoulders A/B

Leg extension
Leg curl
Lateral raises/Rear raises

Arms A/B

Incline barbell overhead extension/Close grip bench press
Incline dumbbell curls/Preacher curls

It will be Chest&back/legs&shoulders/arms/rest. I could probably do with an extra rest day in there but it’s so boring being sat here on my arse I have to do something.

Anyway, exercise choices you might be curious about… the obvious ones are my legs. I am in a carbon fibre cast at the moment and even when I’m out, squatting and deadlifting are not going to be options for a long time due to the weakness from the fracture and the weak ligaments which are still incredibly badly torn and swollen. Curls and extensions are literally the only things I can do for my legs. I am only doing raises for my shoulders because too much overhead pressing hurts them. Any more questions then ask away.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

Like anyone here says “don’t ever try anything else.”[/quote]

I don’t understand why the debate then. All I’m saying is TRY and know for sure. What’s so unreasonable or hard to understand about that?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

And come on. A clueless beginner doesn’t manage to gain much. How rare. He ultimately learns more about how to do his exercises, probably gets a little more intense in the gym, maybe starts eating better or not… And suddenly gains better. Oh surprise.[/quote]

I don’t think that’s a fair comment given how much I read before I actually started lifting. I always put balls to the wall effort in from the very start as well. Ultimately nobody will ever know though.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

What? You dare flee an e-debate? ;)[/quote]

Yes, I’ve spent about an hour this morning writing this reply so far and I didn?t want to stay up even later. Sorry!

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

I don’t know if this has been addressed before in the thread but:
Stop using the general gym population as a source for TBT’s superiority[/quote]

I wasn’t, I was saying different people respond to different things. Must I keep repeating myself?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

For the OP:

All of this is bullshit, you should train daily every bodypart, if you can train for 24 fucking hours that’s the best motherfucking way, any other split comes from
1)morons who don’t want to get big because they’ll lose their hawt abz and a 35 dumbbell will spoil their manicure or
2) a weak bodybuilder who does only partial reps and is really pussywilled and doesn’t have the balls to change sissy split training for TBT. [/quote]

How about debating like an adult?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

What would be the point of that?

The point? If none of you can easily find SEVERAL huge bodybuilders who got that way using TBT who started out skinny, then what relevance does TBT really have to those of us who do plan on standing out?

This is a bodybuilding forum. The ONLY thing that matters is RESULTS. All of this theory can kiss my ass if it isn’t working like that in the real world.

There is nothing funnier than reading threads where little people are giving other little people advice on how to get big…advice that no really big person would give all because they are regurgitating what they read somewhere.

That doesn’t mean TBT can’t build muscle, but it DOES mean that if most of the really big bodies on the planet were built using splits, then the LOGICAL course of action is NOT to do something completely different.

Also, if most of the split routines on this site would be avoided by the really big lifters here, then maybe some of you are getting your info from the wrong source.[/quote]

You have completely ignored pretty near all of my last response to you which responded to this point you have just made. Why do you do this? I have noticed you do it to other people too. You completely ignore parts of their posts which inconvenience you and which address points you have to make.

In this recent post you said this:

“If none of you can easily find SEVERAL huge bodybuilders who got that way using TBT who started out skinny, then what relevance does TBT really have to those of us who do plan on standing out?”

I will now post my response to you which you completely ignored and which addresses your latest post:

"What would be the point of that? I have said repeatedly now (I don’t know why you people keep ignoring such massive parts of my posts!) that it gets to a certain point where splits become more effective than TBT, and obviously as a result huge guys will pretty much universally use splits. I am not trying to debate the merits of TBT over splits for guys who are already advanced.

Seriously, I have said it repeatedly so why are you ignoring it? I am saying I think for many people at an earlier stage of development that TBT will give better gains. I am not saying that Ronnie Coleman and his close personal friends all do TBT. I really, honestly cannot understand why people can’t seem to understand what I’m saying."

Maybe you will read and respond to it this time. If you don’t then I don’t really see why I should put the effort in responding to all of your posts if you won’t extend to me the same courtesy.

I will also re-post another reply to you and your ‘do what the big boys do and don’t try anything else’ mentality:

“OK, let’s use me as an example. I started off at 144lbs (5’10”) training with a 4 day split routine given to me by a competing bodybuilder/bouncer. I gained quite poorly on ot despite busting my ass really hard and eating like mad. I then followed a routine I read on T-Nation. Can’t remember what one, but it was a split routine.

In 8 months I went up to a whopping 160. Going by your logic I shouldn’t have tried anything else because I was doing what the big boys do, I was putting in the effort in, eating enough calories (because I was gaining fat as well), yet my gains were sub-optimal. But according to you I should’ve kept at it because it’s the thing all the big boys do.

Soon as I started messing about with TBT and two way split I went up to 210 in less than a couple of years without gaining any more fat and I started gaining strength at a far greater rate, and I noticed in the mirror myself getting bigger.

Going by your logic I would’ve continued growing at a poor rate because I would never have tried anything else. No thanks.

Anyway, I’ve been out of training for 15 months and am getting back to where I was before now (albeit with a fractured ankle so no squatting and deadlifting for a long time), but as always I like to keep an open mind (and am currently doing a three way split in fact! Shock horror!) and will continue to look at what everybody else does and keep the stuff that works and discontinue the stuff that doesn’t.

You feel free to keep living in your little bubble though. I know you’re a huge guy, but you know what? You don’t absolutely know for sure you wouldn’t have got bigger, faster if you’d tried something else, you just THINK you wouldn’t have. Surely you must be willing to acknowledge you don’t know for sure, at least?"

Again, I will ask: are you saying that you do not think it’s a good idea to try different routines and find one that works optimally for you, particularly if your current one isn’t doing the business? If so, then what is your objection to me suggesting that someone TRIES both splits and TBT so they KNOW what works best for them?

OK, that post took me ages to write and I’m not too keen on doing another one so if people could keep their replies to me small it would be appreciated. Thanks!

[quote]Squelchy wrote:
waylanderxx wrote:

lol you are such a weasel.

ok how bout this, I will put it exactly like you did.

“Lots of people WILL grow better with splits than total body training.”

Now if you still think that is the most ridiculous blanket statement you have ever heard, then guess what? Your comment is in the same boat.

Not at all, that’s a perfectly reasonable statement. I suggest you grab a dictionary and look up the difference between “lots” and “most” though, because it seems you’re a little confused on that point.
[/quote]

When did I ever use the word “most”?

All I said was “coughbullshitcough” in response to your statement “Lots of people WILL grow better with total body training then splits” and you freaked out.

Then I used your own words, but switched the two “Lots of people WILL grow better with splits than total body training.”

And you had no issue.

I never even used the word “most” in any of my posts.

Interesting.