[quote]detazathoth wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
detazathoth wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
your mixing it up, I’m talking about the thrash/general/power metal scenes when I say nirvana killed metal.
fact number 1. Find me a death metal band with Rush esque talent. Don’t post again untill you do. Play a guitar asshat, you don’t know shit.
You twist my words to make yourself sound smart, you aren’t.
Yet again, pick up a guitar you don’t know shit.
Nirvana didnt kill thrash…Megadeth was still making albums in 93? What about Anthrax, Slayer, Suicidal Tendencies, Testament, Annihilator, Neverland, Kreator, Dark Angel, and Iced Earth? How about the Clash of the Titans tour?
I just got a boner from hearing all these good thrash bands. Rust in Peace is a religion to me.
Bands where still playing OMG? You don’t think the huge change in music nirvana brought didn’t affect metal, you are WRONG.
That’s really ironic, just got done listening to iced earth, DA, slayer, exodus playlist.
And that’s why I said Rust in Peace, and not say their album, Youthanasia. I said metal didn’t die out because of Nirvana, it continued to thrive. Nirvana MAY have affected the mainstream, but for the most part, metal continued to grow, the second wave of black metal was during the early 90’s for crying out loud, are you serious?
[/quote]
read a post about how death/black metal are so outside the mainstream. You don’t think some of the more radio friendly genres wouldn’t have done better? I realise you don’t give a shit about them but COME ON. Your also using megadeth, a band that probably could have survived a total purge on metal. Simply put I think the 90s would have produced a lot more good music had say, nirvana never existed.