[quote]zephead4747 wrote:
Stronghold wrote:
zephead4747 wrote:
So, if nirvana never existed there wouldn’t of been more good metal bands? haha I call bullshit. They raped the rock genre too. It’s not about none, it’s about there would of been more.
Do you think that Nirvana ate up any of Death Metal’s market? Death metal was never part of the commercial market and will never follow the patterns that govern commercial music. Thats like trying to relate the cocaine market to the sale of miniskirts. Exhibit 1 that you dont know what youre talking about.
You are really proving how much you dont know here. Many people feel that death metal was at its peak around 93-two whole years after Nevermind came out.
mayhem, burzum, satyricon, dimmu borgier, immortal, darkthrone, enslaved, emperor, marduk, dissection, beherit, impaled nazarene, carcass, in flames, dark tranquility, at the gates, afflicted, entombed, amon amarth, unleashed, tiamat, cryptosy, edge of sanity, opeth, origin, sadist, cynic, atheist, pestilence, gorguts, necrophagist, spawn of posession, death, cannibal corpse, deicide, devourment, disgorge, hate eternal, nile, skinless, suffocation, autopsy, incantaion, asphyx, my dying bride, paradise lost, disembowelment, mayhem, behemoth, belphegor, angelcorpse, zyklon, sacramentum, napalm death, bolt thrower, morbid angel, obituary, sepultura, pestilence
Yeah. No death metal bands did well in the 90’s. Exhibit number 2.
The fact that you described death metal as “the same note played over and over again” is more proof. Exhibit number 3.
your mixing it up, I’m talking about the thrash/general/power metal scenes when I say nirvana killed metal.
fact number 1. Find me a death metal band with Rush esque talent. Don’t post again untill you do. Play a guitar asshat, you don’t know shit.
Death and black metal aren’t as easilly affected by mainstream as they are about as coutner mainstream as it gets.
You twist my words to make yourself sound smart, you aren’t.
Yet again, pick up a guitar you don’t know shit.[/quote]
Doooood, you have some serious bitterness in your heart. Deep breath, deep breath. It’s cool and all that you love Rush, it’s great that you play a little guitar (seems just about every other person in this world ‘plays guitar’) but this is MUSIC. It’s not a Powerlifting competition. It’s not about ‘chops’ – if we reduce it to a competition, we cheapen it as an art. I can love Neil Young’s one-note solo in Cinnamon Girl as much as I love Andres fucking Segovia’s interpretation of Recuerdos de la Alhambra – it’s just music, it’s all good. It doesn’t make Neil Young less valid as an artist.
It comes down to one thing, doooood: Does it moooove you!!! That’s it, nothing else. Not some psychobabble intellectual ‘This guy’s stuff is more complicated, he plays 32nd notes in 5/4 and then changes key, modulates into 7/8 with this crazy 11 chord – so his music must be great because Guitar World says that shit is TOUGH to do!’ – Fuck. That. If it sounds great to your ear, great. If not, then move on to something that does.
I’m curious about something, here’s a question for you as someone who ‘knows talent’: From a purely ‘chops’ perspective, who was the best musician in Led Zeppelin?