Attention Leftists: Thunderbolt23 Joins Your Ranks!

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Untrue? What does truth have to do with it? One only need quote a crime statistic to be called racist where I come from. This has nothing to do with the facts, it’s moved way past that into la la land, otherwise known as the land of the politically correct. There are two groups, the first are those who actually believe that any sort of fact analysis, mentioning race is racist. The second are those who want to be seen as NOT being racist so they feel obligated to fall in line with the PC group. Can you imagine how many votes Obama got from this group of idiots? Anyway, you have no chance my friend, none at all.

[/quote]

I know. But I will continue to push this boulder uphill regardless.

I may wind up sorry I’m doin this, but let me ask each of you three a question.

To PRCalDude:
Do you believe that Mexicans are innately inferior as AS AN ETHNIC GROUP on either the intellectual or moral level? Not the ones who enter this country illegally, but as a whole simply by being Mexicans? I’m also not asking whether one group averages above or below others (I know you by now).

To Bill:
Same as to PRCalDude.

To Thunderbolt:
If Bill and PRCalDude deny that they do in fact believe that most Mexicans are stupid because they’re Mexicans does it not then follow that what we have had here is a misunderstanding?

If we get no, no, yes respectively I don’t know why we couldn’t get there sooner.

Here’s my prediction.

PRCalDude will give a somewhat over protracted answer about averages in groups anyway that in the end still amounts to a no. It is not accurate to say that Mexicans are stupid.

Bill will say no he does not believe that Mexicans are genetically lazy stupid people, but that he never did say that and Thunderbolt was putting words in his mouth by interpreting him in combination with his interaction with PRCalDude.

Thunderbolt will say this is all and well and good, but why didn’t everybody just make this clear early on as he also is not very enthusiastic about the individuals who are winding up in our southern cities and would have just agreed.

Tiribulus says these guys are pissed at each other now may or may not be interested in finding common ground even if it shown to exist =]

Time for my daughter to workout. Please disregard everything in this post if I have no idea what I’m talkin about. It just seems to me like there is a lot more agreement than disagreement in what you guys are saying. Unless somebody say they do believe Mexicans are an innately lazy stupid people. Then I know better than that.

Answer: not remotely do I think that a person, on account of being for example an illegal Mexican, cannot entirely possibly have any given ability to any degree that anyone can.

But if your question is, do I think that that collectively, speaking of demographics as PRC was, that illegal Mexicans have the same education, the same reading ability, the same writing ability, or contribute the same “intellectual capital” to California as some other groups, or are in fact able to go and do intellectually demanding, high-value-producing jobs in California, the answer is no and that is a matter of quantifiable fact.

It may disturb others that that is said, but there is nothing “racist” about it. It is simply the current condition and is probably not amenable to prompt change.

Nowhere and at no time did I state anything about genetics or what people would be capable of under different circumstances.

I really did not discuss the matter at any time, but from what I saw of PRC’s posts he attributed these different performances, demographically speaking – and he took care to make plain that he was speaking in this manner, not saying that individuals might not accomplish any given thing – to environment and not to genetics or race.

I never saw him cite race as the cause, or call for race-based discrimination.

On your predicted version of what I might say: Though I used different words above, I would have been perfectly happy with the way you put it. That was a completely accurate representation.

All this was made clear earlier. The problem (see my above post) is that it doesn’t matter what was actually said. Responses were consistently to things different than said, with unending false allegations regarding what was said. Eventually I had to realize that nothing productive could occur with further back-and-forths.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
Answer: not remotely do I think that a person, on account of being for example an illegal Mexican, cannot entirely possibly have any given ability to any degree that anyone can.

But if your question is, do I think that that collectively, speaking of demographics as PRC was, that illegal Mexicans have the same education, the same reading ability, the same writing ability, or contribute the same “intellectual capital” to California as some other groups, the answer is no and that is a matter of quantifiable fact.

It may disturb others that that is said, but there is nothing “racist” about it. It is simply the current condition and is probably not amenable to prompt change.

Nowhere at no time did I state anything about genetics or what people would be capable of under different circumstances.

I really did not discuss the matter at any time, but from what I saw of PRC’s posts he attributed these different performances, demographically speaking – and he took care to make plain that he was speaking in this manner, not saying that individuals might not accomplish any given thing – to environment and not to genetics or race.

I never saw him cite race as a cause.

On your predicted version of what I might say: Though I used different words above, I would have been perfectly happy with the way you put it. That was a completely accurate representation.

All this was made clear earlier. The problem (see my above post) is that it doesn’t matter what was actually said. Responses were consistently to things different than said, with unending false allegations regarding what was said. Eventually I had to realize that nothing productive could occur with further back-and-forths.[/quote]

Why do you hate America?

Yes, that pretty much sums up the response method I’ve been dealing with.

Much more concisely than I managed! :slight_smile:

[quote]Do you believe that Mexicans are innately inferior as AS AN ETHNIC GROUP on either the intellectual or moral level? Not the ones who enter this country illegally, but as a whole simply by being Mexicans? I’m also not asking whether one group averages above or below others (I know you by now).
[/quote]

I can’t really answer a general question without the use of averages and distributions. IQ is distributed along a Gaussian and the bulk of the distribution is +/- 1 standard deviation of the mean.

I think the science on whether or not one ethnic group is smarter/stupider than another ethnic group is still unsettled. William Saletan wrote a piece called “Liberal Creationism” that I think is largely true:

Now, the science is still unsettled on the issue, but I think there’s a strong indication that there are genetic differences in intelligence. I don’t see how anyone can deny this possibility given that different environments have caused different ethnic groups to look different, have different color skins, different average heights, etc. There is no a priori reason to believe that we therefore adapted/evolved identical levels of intelligence across ethnic groups.

At this time, psychometricians believe that IQ is at least 50% heritable. The rest (less than 50%) is a combination of upbringing and environmental factors.

Simply chalking up poor academic performance entirely to culture is as illogical as chalking it up entirely to genetics.

As near as I can gather, TB23 takes the “blank slate” view that everyone is born with equal amounts of intelligence and average intelligence does not vary across race. These sorts of ideas are propagated by guys like Malcolm Gladwell and they sell a lot of books. Unfortunately,(and I sincerely mean that), I see no reason to believe this.

Very intelligent people (Gauss, Mozart, etc) often did a lot of their real work before education even had a chance to sink in. Mozart was writing symphonies at the age of 9. Gauss was developing mathematical theorems at about the same age. Newton wrote his Principia at around the age of 22, while most engineers and physicists are still trying to figure out the basics.

Bottom line is that I believe that certain people are born smarter than other people and that this probably does vary across race.

I’ve looked into the Hispanic IQ question, and from what I gather, Hispanic academic underperformance is probably mostly NURTURE/cultural, but very much there nonetheless. I can’t tell whether TB23 affirms or denies this:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2Q3YTQxNTVjZjRhM2U4ZTdjNmM4NmQ0N2RmNWU5YWQ
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/18/BAJS199Q80.DTL&tsp=1

Even with a perfect Gaussian distribution of intelligence across each race, you would still expect to see far more Hispanics entering the UC and majoring in something real besides Chicano studies. Here are some decent estimates I found:
http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2006/11/hispanic-iq-estimates-by-state.html

That said, how do you fix PURELY CULTURAL ACHIEVEMENT GAPS? We’ve been trying to fix them with blacks for quite awhile and quite unsuccessfully.
http://vdare.com/Sailer/no_excuses.htm

In summary, do I think Mexicans are stupid because they’re Mexican? No. Do I meet far more Jews and Asians than Mexicans in the engineering field? Yes. Far more. There are intelligent Mexicans out there, obviously. Do you meet many Mexicans working in the tech industry? No, you sure don’t. And this is in an area that’s overwhelmingly Mexican.

I think I’ve provided a plausible explanation for why this is the case. Let the condemnation begin!

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I may wind up sorry I’m doin this, but let me ask each of you three a question.

To PRCalDude:
Do you believe that Mexicans are innately inferior as AS AN ETHNIC GROUP on either the intellectual or moral level? Not the ones who enter this country illegally, but as a whole simply by being Mexicans? I’m also not asking whether one group averages above or below others (I know you by now).

To Bill:
Same as to PRCalDude.

To Thunderbolt:
If Bill and PRCalDude deny that they do in fact believe that most Mexicans are stupid because they’re Mexicans does it not then follow that what we have had here is a misunderstanding?

If we get no, no, yes respectively I don’t know why we couldn’t get there sooner.

Here’s my prediction.

PRCalDude will give a somewhat over protracted answer about averages in groups anyway that in the end still amounts to a no. It is not accurate to say that Mexicans are stupid.

Bill will say no he does not believe that Mexicans are genetically lazy stupid people, but that he never did say that and Thunderbolt was putting words in his mouth by interpreting him in combination with his interaction with PRCalDude.

Thunderbolt will say this is all and well and good, but why didn’t everybody just make this clear early on as he also is not very enthusiastic about the individuals who are winding up in our southern cities and would have just agreed.[/quote]

You have crystallized it perfectly, and I have been trying to make the same point over and over. How diffcult would it have been to simply write “Thunder, your suggestion or conclusion that that comment was racist is way off - I don’t think that”.

If I was dead wrong in my reading of the comment, that is fine. Then correct my wrong-headed misunderstanding.

Instead, you’ve seen the response - from PRC’s trying to drown me in “data” to convince me of something I already agree with him on (how bad illegal immigration has been for CA) and refusing to address my basic question to Bill’s frankly bizarre responses that defy description (see above, now he is shrieking that I have misattributed some quote to him).

It’s been a disappointing episode, to say the least.

Wow, I leave you guys alone for a weekend and things go crazy. I see I have some catching up to do!

This whole thing is really none of my business so I appreciate the gracious indulgence from you guys.

I just hate to see intelligent people generally on the same side feuding like this.

I mean, as an observer I’m reading all three of you guys saying essentially the same thing as far as the substance of the topic at hand, but arguing over how it was said… in a nutshell.

Every race, ethnicity, anthropological strain, whatever you wanna call it has morons, geniuses and everything in between. I do believe that intelligence is innate and is entirely distinct from education. In other words intelligence is how big a container you’re born with and education is what and how much you put in it to use an imperfect and incomplete analogy that still makes the point.

Are there differences in average bucket size between races? I think probably there is, but I don’t think it’s large enough to declare races of morons or races of geniuses.

I also believe it is undeniable that an alarmingly large percentage of people from anywhere who violate our borders illegally do so with no intention of ever contributing anything of value to this society regardless of how intelligent they may or may not be. There are smart lazy ass lowlifes and there are not so smart hard working people of character.

I have a feeling we all pretty much agree with what I just said if not on every single point of minutia.

Actually Thunderbolt hasn’t denied, and has even made a point of, agreement on the major points. That never has been what he was arguing about.

I will leave it to his own words as to what he was arguing about, as they’re plain enough although inconsistent, as one moment he needlessly introduces or repeats his introduction of race to the matter or needlessly charges his opponent with racist statements, and the next moment he denies he ever played the race card. And then goes back and forth repeatedly between these, while never retracting either. So you have to read the entire ouevre, though I wouldn’t recommend it.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

Every race, ethnicity, anthropological strain, whatever you wanna call it has morons, geniuses and everything in between. I do believe that intelligence is innate and is entirely distinct from education. In other words intelligence is how big a container you’re born with and education is what and how much you put in it to use an imperfect and incomplete analogy that still makes the point.

Are there differences in average bucket size between races? I think probably there is, but I don’t think it’s large enough to declare races of morons or races of geniuses.

I also believe it is undeniable that an alarmingly large percentage of people from anywhere who violate our borders illegally do so with no intention of ever contributing anything of value to this society regardless of how intelligent they may or may not be. There are smart lazy ass lowlifes and there are not so smart hard working people of character.[/quote]

I generally agree with this, and that has been my point.

To begin, I simply do not think that Hispanics, as a group, are any less inherently intelligent, as a group, than any other ethnicity. That would be true for any ethnicity, in my view. Individuals certainly are not “blank slates” - inherent individual intelligence varies, and this is a matter of observable common sense - but again, as a group, Hispanics are not inherently “inferior” in the brainpower department.

If someone does, in fact, believe something different, I would not shrink away from telling them I think they are full of manure.

Many, many Hispanics - by way of legal and illegal immigration - have come into this country to merely be parasitic. They take advantage of a generous welfare state (that naturally differs by state) and refuse to assimilate, thus setting up a subsidized “subculure” predicated on taking but never giving anything back to the society that treats them as mere beneficiaries. These folks are aided and abetted by the grievance industry and the multicultural Left, which give them cover by damning anyone who dare criticize this “beneficiary only” relationship on the basis that we should respect their culture and that somehow, some way they are “victims” of American society and deserve “beneficiary” treatment.

On the other hand, there are many Hispanics here - by way of legal and illegal immigration - who want to escape desolate countries in search of the opportunities presented by America. They are willing to work hard. They are religious - often Catholic - and family-oriented. They don’t fear hard work and they contribute to society, if not as engineers or investment bankers, then as tradesmen and ultimately small business owners.

The salient point being - they are human. They are a mixed bag - some awful, lazy, and shaneful…some diligent, responsible, and appreciative. California exacerbates the problem by attracting the worst of this lot due to bad public policies - but that doesn’t mean that the entire group is subject to vile stereotyping at best or racism at worst.

However, regardless of which “subgroup” better defines the larger group, their illegal status is a problem that cannot continue - our national security and national sovereignty has to trump all else. Additionally, even for those that are here legally, their lack of assimilation on the broader American culture cannot continue.

America should be immigrant-friendly - we are a tribe based on ideas above all else. There should always be a place for non-Americans to come into this country legally if they want to take advantage of the “shining city on a hill”. But one of the aspects that makes America better than so many places in the world is our near-religious approach to the Rule of Law (even if it has waned). And we cannot undermine one of the very things that makes America worth coming to.

These are my views on the matter. I don’t support amnesty or anything like it, but nor do I support - or tolerate - hateful idiocy that is merely designed to slander an entire race of people but is cloaked in “public policy concerns”.

When I think that someone is coming a little too close to racist remarks, I don’t look the other way - I challenge them on them. If that causes a case of the vapors among our more delicate readers, not my problem to fix. The US had worked too hard, made too many mistakes along the way, and spent too much blood and treasure to protect our “tribe of ideas” grown out of the Declaration of Independence to yield to the kinds of sloppy and destructive ideas we see emerge in the debate on illegal immigration.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Do you believe that Mexicans are innately inferior as AS AN ETHNIC GROUP on either the intellectual or moral level? Not the ones who enter this country illegally, but as a whole simply by being Mexicans? I’m also not asking whether one group averages above or below others (I know you by now).

I can’t really answer a general question without the use of averages and distributions. IQ is distributed along a Gaussian and the bulk of the distribution is +/- 1 standard deviation of the mean.

I think the science on whether or not one ethnic group is smarter/stupider than another ethnic group is still unsettled. William Saletan wrote a piece called “Liberal Creationism” that I think is largely true:

I wish these assurances were true. They aren’t. Tests do show an IQ deficit, not just for Africans relative to Europeans, but for Europeans relative to Asians. Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there’s strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic. It’s time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true.

Now, the science is still unsettled on the issue, but I think there’s a strong indication that there are genetic differences in intelligence. I don’t see how anyone can deny this possibility given that different environments have caused different ethnic groups to look different, have different color skins, different average heights, etc. There is no a priori reason to believe that we therefore adapted/evolved identical levels of intelligence across ethnic groups.

At this time, psychometricians believe that IQ is at least 50% heritable. The rest (less than 50%) is a combination of upbringing and environmental factors.

Simply chalking up poor academic performance entirely to culture is as illogical as chalking it up entirely to genetics.

As near as I can gather, TB23 takes the “blank slate” view that everyone is born with equal amounts of intelligence and average intelligence does not vary across race. These sorts of ideas are propagated by guys like Malcolm Gladwell and they sell a lot of books. Unfortunately,(and I sincerely mean that), I see no reason to believe this.

Very intelligent people (Gauss, Mozart, etc) often did a lot of their real work before education even had a chance to sink in. Mozart was writing symphonies at the age of 9. Gauss was developing mathematical theorems at about the same age. Newton wrote his Principia at around the age of 22, while most engineers and physicists are still trying to figure out the basics.

Bottom line is that I believe that certain people are born smarter than other people and that this probably does vary across race.

I’ve looked into the Hispanic IQ question, and from what I gather, Hispanic academic underperformance is probably mostly NURTURE/cultural, but very much there nonetheless. I can’t tell whether TB23 affirms or denies this:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2Q3YTQxNTVjZjRhM2U4ZTdjNmM4NmQ0N2RmNWU5YWQ

Even with a perfect Gaussian distribution of intelligence across each race, you would still expect to see far more Hispanics entering the UC and majoring in something real besides Chicano studies. Here are some decent estimates I found:
http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2006/11/hispanic-iq-estimates-by-state.html

That said, how do you fix PURELY CULTURAL ACHIEVEMENT GAPS? We’ve been trying to fix them with blacks for quite awhile and quite unsuccessfully.
http://vdare.com/Sailer/no_excuses.htm

In summary, do I think Mexicans are stupid because they’re Mexican? No. Do I meet far more Jews and Asians than Mexicans in the engineering field? Yes. Far more. There are intelligent Mexicans out there, obviously. Do you meet many Mexicans working in the tech industry? No, you sure don’t. And this is in an area that’s overwhelmingly Mexican.

I think I’ve provided a plausible explanation for why this is the case. Let the condemnation begin!

[/quote]

Interesting, I read some studies a while ago which had clearly proven that blacks, as a group, have a lower IQ. However, does one atribute this low intelligence to heredity or the extreme poverty that many blacks grow up in? I think the latter. I also think that you have to be very careful when you cast such a wide net regarding intelligence. There are many factors involved in measuring IQ, not the least of which is motivation. Those who desire to do better will raise their scores accordingly.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
<<< A long sensible post >>>[/quote]

I don’t see Bill for sure or PRCalDude with some qualification (he can’t help himself =] ) disagreeing with this which is my point.

I wasn’t taking sides BTW not that it’s even my place to do so.

For the record I don’t think I believe PRCalDude is a racist. I do believe he intentionally pushes his language, or at least makes no effort at qualification sometimes just to prove he won’t be intimidated by the racial industry. I also don’t think I believe this is effective in every case though I get his point.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:

Every race, ethnicity, anthropological strain, whatever you wanna call it has morons, geniuses and everything in between. I do believe that intelligence is innate and is entirely distinct from education. In other words intelligence is how big a container you’re born with and education is what and how much you put in it to use an imperfect and incomplete analogy that still makes the point.

Are there differences in average bucket size between races? I think probably there is, but I don’t think it’s large enough to declare races of morons or races of geniuses.

I also believe it is undeniable that an alarmingly large percentage of people from anywhere who violate our borders illegally do so with no intention of ever contributing anything of value to this society regardless of how intelligent they may or may not be. There are smart lazy ass lowlifes and there are not so smart hard working people of character.

I generally agree with this, and that has been my point.

To begin, I simply do not think that Hispanics, as a group, are any less inherently intelligent, as a group, than any other ethnicity. That would be true for any ethnicity, in my view. Individuals certainly are not “blank slates” - inherent individual intelligence varies, and this is a matter of observable common sense - but again, as a group, Hispanics are not inherently “inferior” in the brainpower department.

If someone does, in fact, believe something different, I would not shrink away from telling them I think they are full of manure.

Many, many Hispanics - by way of legal and illegal immigration - have come into this country to merely be parasitic. They take advantage of a generous welfare state (that naturally differs by state) and refuse to assimilate, thus setting up a subsidized “subculure” predicated on taking but never giving anything back to the society that treats them as mere beneficiaries. These folks are aided and abetted by the grievance industry and the multicultural Left, which give them cover by damning anyone who dare criticize this “beneficiary only” relationship on the basis that we should respect their culture and that somehow, some way they are “victims” of American society and deserve “beneficiary” treatment.

On the other hand, there are many Hispanics here - by way of legal and illegal immigration - who want to escape desolate countries in search of the opportunities presented by America. They are willing to work hard. They are religious - often Catholic - and family-oriented. They don’t fear hard work and they contribute to society, if not as engineers or investment bankers, then as tradesmen and ultimately small business owners.

The salient point being - they are human. They are a mixed bag - some awful, lazy, and shaneful…some diligent, responsible, and appreciative. California exacerbates the problem by attracting the worst of this lot due to bad public policies - but that doesn’t mean that the entire group is subject to vile stereotyping at best or racism at worst.

However, regardless of which “subgroup” better defines the larger group, their illegal status is a problem that cannot continue - our national security and national sovereignty has to trump all else. Additionally, even for those that are here legally, their lack of assimilation on the broader American culture cannot continue.

America should be immigrant-friendly - we are a tribe based on ideas above all else. There should always be a place for non-Americans to come into this country legally if they want to take advantage of the “shining city on a hill”. But one of the aspects that makes America better than so many places in the world is our near-religious approach to the Rule of Law (even if it has waned). And we cannot undermine one of the very things that makes America worth coming to.

These are my views on the matter. I don’t support amnesty or anything like it, but nor do I support - or tolerate - hateful idiocy that is merely designed to slander an entire race of people but is cloaked in “public policy concerns”.

When I think that someone is coming a little too close to racist remarks, I don’t look the other way - I challenge them on them. If that causes a case of the vapors among our more delicate readers, not my problem to fix. The US had worked too hard, made too many mistakes along the way, and spent too much blood and treasure to protect our “tribe of ideas” grown out of the Declaration of Independence to yield to the kinds of sloppy and destructive ideas we see emerge in the debate on illegal immigration.[/quote]

Excellent post.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Interesting, I read some studies a while ago which had clearly proven that blacks, as a group, have a lower IQ. However, does one atribute this low intelligence to heredity or the extreme poverty that many blacks grow up in?
[/quote]
That’s the purpose of twin studies - to control for environment. Those studies have not been supportive of environmental factors lowering IQ

[quote]I think the latter. I also think that you have to be very careful when you cast such a wide net regarding intelligence. There are many factors involved in measuring IQ, not the least of which is motivation. Those who desire to do better will raise their scores accordingly.
[/quote]

Yes, but IQ is believed to be at least 50% heritable, meaning you can only influence it so much through effort. A good chunk of it is just plain genetics.

Incidentally, Saletan got nearly excommunicated by the PC Kommissars at Slate for his article. But it covers the stuff you just brought up.
[/quote]

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
<<< A long sensible post >>>

I don’t see Bill for sure or PRCalDude with some qualification (he can’t help himself =] ) disagreeing with this which is my point.

I wasn’t taking sides BTW not that it’s even my place to do so.

For the record I don’t think I believe PRCalDude is a racist. I do believe he intentionally pushes his language, or at least makes no effort at qualification sometimes just to prove he won’t be intimidated by the racial industry. I also don’t think I believe this is effective in every case though I get his point.

[/quote]

Perhaps you’re right.

I still see far too many conservatives pushing happy-talk about what Mexican illegal immigration means for this country.

The academic underperformance is real and, thus far, persistent. This is an extremely bad sign for this country if we want to maintain 1st world status. California is already drifting 3rd world, IMO. In fact, when I was down in Baja a couple of months ago, I noticed that many parts of it were quite a bit better than what you’d see in Los Angeles county. Victor Davis Hanson’s “Mexifornia” thesis has largely been confirmed, IMO. Given that the Mexicans are the fastest growing demographic in this country, you can now extrapolate the fate of California to the nation at large, as far as I’m concerned.

Secondly, this talk about “Hispanic family values” is all nonsense and George W. Bushian happy-talk:

I find no comfort in the fact that they show up at church. This country does not need more half-baked religiosity. Many of them come here and simply stop going to church or become evangelicals. Evangelicalism is the most anti-intellectual religious movement to come along in this country’s history. Despite their religiosity, they STILL VOTED FOR OBAMA BY A 2:1 RATIO. They are not natural Republicans.

This country DOES NOT NEED more immigrants for the foreseeable future. We have 20% U-6 unemployment in California and 17.5% U-6 unemployment nationwide. We DO NOT NEED more immigrants to do the jobs Americans won’t do.

TB23 appears to believe that ethnic diversity will not affect the social capital of a particular country. All of the data refutes this, as well as anyone who’s lived in an extremely ethnically diverse state. The most public volunteerism takes place in the much-more-homogeneous midwest. Right now, California is a balkanized territory of different ethnic enclaves. Social capital is at a nadir in this state, as far as I’m concerned. There is nothing to be gained by more immigration upsetting the ethnic balance of this country:
http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/10/putnam-on-diversity.html

Typically, large ethnically diverse territories are called “empires.” That is precisely what the United States has become, IMO. It has followed along the lines of the USSR and all of the other empires before them. Look at the UK now. Do we want to follow in the footsteps of these empires? None of them have been particularly democratic. We hear every day about some UK Arab or Pakistani sheikh calling for the beheading of infidels. No amount of “assimilation” programs will fix the mess they’ve got.

Currently, 50% of the children under 5 in this country are non-white. This is a fact cheered on by the likes of Bill Klinton and other Democratic apparatchiks, for the reasons I’ve mentioned previously. If any conservatives here think that this will have no consequences for the health of our Republic and presidential elections, I have a bridge to sell you.

As Lee Kuan Yew put it, “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.” Weeee! Everyone vote according to race/religion! That’ll form “a more perfect union!”

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
ZEB wrote:

Interesting, I read some studies a while ago which had clearly proven that blacks, as a group, have a lower IQ. However, does one atribute this low intelligence to heredity or the extreme poverty that many blacks grow up in?

That’s the purpose of twin studies - to control for environment. Those studies have not been supportive of environmental factors lowering IQ

I think the latter. I also think that you have to be very careful when you cast such a wide net regarding intelligence. There are many factors involved in measuring IQ, not the least of which is motivation. Those who desire to do better will raise their scores accordingly.

Yes, but IQ is believed to be at least 50% heritable, meaning you can only influence it so much through effort. A good chunk of it is just plain genetics.

Incidentally, Saletan got nearly excommunicated by the PC Kommissars at Slate for his article. But it covers the stuff you just brought up.

[/quote]

If one looks into the current scientific literature (I mean reading the actual published studies), the degree of heritability of IQ is more contested in the scientific community that you’re implying.

Anyhow, most recent data indicate that the heritability of IQ is around 30% during very young childhood and then actually increases to up to as much as 80% in adulthood. This also brings into question how long environmental influences persist throughout life and any potential confounding this may produce into adulthood.

Twin studies have also widely been criticized from a variety of angles as well (mainly pointing out how children may be treated differently whether they are a twin, sibling or adopted). There are also plenty of case studies where children from low socioeconomic backgrounds that were adopted out to more affluent families ended up with substantially higher IQ scores than their parents.

The inability to find any genetic variations (even when considered together) that can actually explain the any substantial variations in IQ hasn’t helped matters.

Genetics certainly do play a role in IQ but some papers have speculated that it isn’t heritable, or at least, very little of it is (this is partially because it is difficult to define “intelligence genetically”. In other words, it’s just a role of the dice regardless.

I know of one paper that actually found that 60% of the variance in IQ was explained by environment in poor families while in affluent families, they found nearly 60% of the variance was explained by genetics. Again, it just points out how complicated these matters are and that it’s not written in stone as you seem to be implying.

Most data, however, do indicate that IQ is heritable but without any genetic data to support it directly, it’s still nothing but correlations coupled with plenty of potential confounders. I personally tend to believe that IQ is heritable but environmental influences are extremely important during the initial years of a child’s life. This is actually supported by the finding of heritability being much lower during these years.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
What I said was (more or less): “it’s racist to say that Mexicans have zero intellectual ability and could thus never contribute…”. I don’t believe that, and I would snarl at anyone who does.
[/quote]

The vast majority of illegal Mexicans in the US they can NEVER EVER do as well as the average adult born and raised in the states. Never ever god damn ever. Because intelligence develops at a young age. So they don’t have any intellectual ability and never will.

Even if you throw 100k per illegal they still won’t have the intellectual ability of the average American.

And if you look at the areas their children are growing up in, i.e. mini Mexico’s, the children have no chance either.

If immigration was controlled and the parents had a solid work ethic and good culture, or they were immersed in western culture, then the children could do great things. You see this all the time with Asian families. It is very rarely the parents who are intellectual powerhouses; it is the children.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
<<< ethnic diversity >>>
<<< multiracial societies >>>
[/quote]
These two are not necessarily the same. I think multiculturalism is a poisonous viral destructive force in this nation, but people of varying ethnicities can be and have been compatible productive members of a single culture.

I have no problem with anybody from anywhere coming here and becoming an American, even if they privately hold dear their heritage. On the other hand I have no tolerance for anybody from anywhere bringing their country here. If I wanted to live in their country I’d move there.

I do agree about immigration in general. I’ve been calling forever for a moratorium of at least 5 years for us to have actual Americans with American interests and sensibilities at heart get a grip on who’s here, where and 86ing anybody here illegally. Or even if they are here legally, if they’re drawing public money they can get the hell out as far as I’m concerned. The United States is becoming an international soup kitchen.

Of course the really illogical issue is how tough the US makes it for legitimate,qualified (legally applying) immigrants who would add value to the country and embrace its principles to get in,while making it so ridiculously easy for illegal, minimal value ,coffer draining illegals to stay.

I would propose that perhaps counter-intuitively,it may better serve the US to relax its bureaucratic procedures and streamline the methodology for those who add value to your society to come in,while of course dealing more strongly with those that don’t follow the law of the land and drain the collective wallet.

Just a thought.