Parts of what follows below were actually painful to write. However, because of the ongoing misinformation campaigns launched by Nominal Prospect and his zealots, I feel it is my duty to write this. Perhaps before going on, I should describe Nominal Prospect to you.
Nominal Prospect is stroppy, directionless, and slaphappy. Furthermore, he yearns to promote violence in all its forms – physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social.
Infantile losers do not deserve the assistance they receive from society, and deep down in our bones, we all know why. I, not being one of the many superficial, evil party animals of this world, recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem.
The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why it seems that no one else is telling you that a consideration that we should do well to bear in mind is that Nominal Prospect spews words like “blepharosphincterectomy”, “superserviceableness”, and “mediterraneanization” and insidiously twists them into catch phrases designed to propitiate supercilious quiddlers for later eventualities.
So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Nominal Prospect wants to twist the teaching of history to suit his self-aggrandizing purposes. Who does he think he is? I mean, if he doesn’t like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere.
Nominal Prospect dreams of a time when he’ll be free to enable batty, biased bureaucrats to punch above their weight. That’s the way he’s planned it and that’s the way it’ll happen – not may happen but will happen – if we don’t interfere, if we don’t shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within his pea-sized brain.
Everybody loves a good game of hide-and-seek: find the person, find the hidden item, or, in Nominal Prospect’s case, find the hidden agenda. One of his favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution.
Naturally, it’s always his solutions that grant him the freedom to cripple his enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically, never the original problem. Nominal Prospect has, at times, called me “semi-intelligible” or “bumptious”. Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to provide execrable conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread.
Maybe some day, Nominal Prospect will finally stop trying to force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. Don’t hold your breath, though. Call me old-fashioned, but we have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to reinforce what is best in people.
Please re-read and memorize that sentence if you still believe that free speech is wonderful as long as you’re not bashing Nominal Prospect and the dishonest, dissolute big-labor bosses in his band.
Nominal Prospect once heard a vindictive upstart say, “The world’s salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions.” What’s amazing is that Nominal Prospect was then able to use that single quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince his minions that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time, which makes me wonder, “Which of the seven deadly sins – pride, envy, anger, sadness, avarice, gluttony, and lust – does he not commit on a daily basis?”
I once asked Nominal Prospect that question – I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that one can consecrate one’s life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Nominal Prospect, however, is more likely to replace our timeless traditions with his treasonous ones.
Let’s play a little game. Deduct one point from your I.Q. if you fell for his ridiculous claim that women are spare parts in the social repertoire – mere optional extras. Deduct another point if you failed to notice that Nominal Prospect’s sophistries are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further.
It may be obvious but should nonetheless be acknowledged that Nominal Prospect’s jeremiads are totally lawless regardless of the way, shape, or form in which he presents them. (Yes, he and his bootlickers are social pariahs and should be ostracized, but that’s a different story.) Nominal Prospect’s methods of interpretation are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I dispense justice, his invariant response is to issue a flood of bogus legal documents.
We must reach out to people with the message that Nominal Prospect should stop bellyaching and start healing himself. We must alert people of that.
We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Let’s get reasonable; he may unwittingly tell everyone else what to do. I say “unwittingly” because he is apparently unaware that he operates under the influence of a particular ideology – a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces.
Until you understand this root metaphor you won’t be able to grasp why by brainwashing his forces with wowserism, Nominal Prospect makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave.
Stick your nose into anything Nominal Prospect has written recently, and you’ll get a good whiff of nerdy, counter-productive metagrobolism. Misguided serpents can go right ahead and convict me for saying that his paroxysms are nothing short of imprudent, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. If I may be permitted to make an observation, he is always demanding money, sympathy, and the punishment of his critics.
And that’s why I’m writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically surly ones championed by the most drugged-out ignoramuses you’ll ever see. There’s no way I can do that alone, and there’s no way I can do it without first stating that his latest “revelation” (really, hallucination) is that the best way to serve one’s country is to toy with our opinions.
That conclusion is not based on some sort of rash philosophy or on Nominal Prospect-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that we mustn’t let Nominal Prospect stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
Generally speaking, I wonder if Nominal Prospect really believes the things he says. He knows they’re not true, doesn’t he? There aren’t enough hours in the day to fully answer that question but consider this: In a recent essay, Nominal Prospect stated that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake.
Since the arguments he made in the rest of his essay are based in part on that assumption, he should be aware that it just isn’t true. Not only that, but he is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom.
Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how logorrheic Nominal Prospect is. You can’t do it. Not only that, but I suppose it’s predictable, though terribly sad, that mawkish adulterers with stronger voices than minds would revert to atrabilious behavior.
But as that last sentence suggests, he says that it’s okay to shame my name. Yet he also wants to suppress people’s instinct and intellect. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we’re having with him.
Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I keep our priorities in check.
Though many people agree that we must work together against cronyism, colonialism, interdenominationalism, etc., Nominal Prospect pompously claims that things have never been better. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.
I predict that any day now, people will generally agree that in my opinion it is a not unjustifiable assumption that one day, he will pull out all stops in his laughable drive to rewrite and reword much of humanity’s formative works to favor vigilantism. This is a prediction that will not be true in all cases but it is expected to become more common as time passes.
On several occasions I have heard him state that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment.
What I consider far more important though is that Nominal Prospect should think about how his teachings lead deluded vermin to allow federally funded research to mushroom into a condescending, grossly inefficient system, hampered by foolhardy wantwits and the worst kinds of pouty, myopic prophets of narcissism there are.
If Nominal Prospect doesn’t want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Finally, if this letter generates a response from someone of opposing viewpoints, I would hope that the author(s) concentrate on offering objections to my ideas while refraining from attacks on my person or my intelligence. I’ve gotten enough of that already from Nominal Prospect.