Aneta Florczyk: Genetic Freak?

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

  1. Why on earth are you bringing this into the discussion? Who said ANYTHING like that?

  2. Where did I even mention drug use or lack thereof? You either completely misinterpreted what I was saying or your just want to argue about different topics.

  3. Way to take that comment out of context. And that’s despite admitting you don’t even know what I meant by it.

  4. No one is trying to argue that, or at least I’m not, so I still wonder why you are bringing this up.

  5. At this point I could repost what you originally quoted from me, but I guess you’re going to miss what I mean again.

  6. I think you forgot a word in there somewhere.

  7. I do think veggie has way above average genetics for this. I will leave it at that however. Too easy to accidentally insult someone.

  8. Your strawman again… That last sentence was completely unnecessary.

  9. Ah, so she has been juicing heavily for 13 years with no physical signs in evidence. Hey whatever, gear is probably one area where you actually do know more than I do. Or at least I hope so.

  10. Then don’t bring it up in response to me if it isn’t even what I discussed.

  11. What is the point of this?

And what is the point of comparing someone who has been training all of 4 years with a hap-hazard diet (…) and from what I can tell (sorry…) rather average genetics to someone like Aneta who has been doing this for longer than I have? She did heavy farm work her entire life before she started training at age 16 or so, under guidance from the start most likely. She is 29 now.
I’ll just mention this again as you seem to have missed it the first time for some reason: I am not saying that she does not have above average genetics to boot.

Furthermore… Why drag the whole 500x15 incline thing in here?
Did I ever say I even half-way believed the claim that someone could do about 8 or 9 more reps with that weight, regardless of technique/form used, than the strongest incline benchers I know of/have seen?

Who the hell cares about drugs in that case, the whole premise is ridiculous in the first place! Is there even anyone doing that on the flat bench? (I know of no one, so here you can demonstrate your superior intelligence and tell me. And then you can stop with the patronizing crap. No one with even an inkling of what is being put up in gyms and competition around the world believed that claim.)
I did not share my opinion on that issue on the boards back then because I did not want to get dragged into yet another argument, but here we go…
[/quote]

  1. Because, once again, you and others are trying to make the argument that, because outliers exist, everyone is capable of coming close to being an outlier.

  2. Oh please, every time this discussion is had, it’s in reference to natural trainees.

  3. Comment wasn’t taken out of context. You were inferring that powerlifting specific training is somehow detrimental to women for becoming very large and very strong. Not the case.

  4. I was making a comparison, so that you could understand exactly what sort of strength levels we are discussing here. Obviously, we can’t talk directly about the feat at hand because you seem to think that a woman benching 300 lbs raw and deadlifting 550 lbs raw are relatively attainable goals for the average female at moderate/low body fat levels.

  5. I got your point. Your point was that that level of strength is only world-class because most women don’t try hard enough or do the right things. And I’m saying that’s an asinine and uninformed position to take.

  6. I did. Should have said “are not”.

  7. She does. And she is what “above average” looks like for women. Veggie is 1-2 standard deviations from the norm and Aneta is 6.

  8. Do you know what a strawman is? Hint: that wasn’t one. I’m somewhat agreeing with you that there would be more big and strong women out there if more women trained seriously. I’m heavily disagreeing with your assertion that those women would be more like Aneta than like CBear and Veggie. Once again, 2 standard deviations vs. 6.

  9. Her being able to use larger than average amounts (for a female) without virilization is FAR more probable than what you are speculating.

Nice attempt at a sneaky ad hominem there, though. I obviously don’t know as much as you. Hold on, let me go change my profile information to say that I’m 275 lbs and 10% body fat and take down all pictures of me on this site. Ok, now we have an even playing field.

  1. We both know that’s how these threads end up. Now that it’s out of the way, hopefully it won’t need to be addressed again.

  2. This is the internet. There doesn’t need to be a point.

You’re saying that Aneta is above average in genetics, but implying that she is not 6 standard deviations from the norm above average. I’m calling horseshit on that and trying to illustrate how outright dumb that statement is by showing exactly how world-class her accomplishments are.

CC no! let the haters hate. don’t go down the path of prof x and fight every post “take on all comers” style.

I skimmed the last 2 pages, no pics, so I don’t know what anyone is upset about.

Stronghold seems to have a boner for the term “standard deviation” lol

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:

  1. Why on earth are you bringing this into the discussion? Who said ANYTHING like that?

  2. Where did I even mention drug use or lack thereof? You either completely misinterpreted what I was saying or your just want to argue about different topics.

  3. Way to take that comment out of context. And that’s despite admitting you don’t even know what I meant by it.

  4. No one is trying to argue that, or at least I’m not, so I still wonder why you are bringing this up.

  5. At this point I could repost what you originally quoted from me, but I guess you’re going to miss what I mean again.

  6. I think you forgot a word in there somewhere.

  7. I do think veggie has way above average genetics for this. I will leave it at that however. Too easy to accidentally insult someone.

  8. Your strawman again… That last sentence was completely unnecessary.

  9. Ah, so she has been juicing heavily for 13 years with no physical signs in evidence. Hey whatever, gear is probably one area where you actually do know more than I do. Or at least I hope so.

  10. Then don’t bring it up in response to me if it isn’t even what I discussed.

  11. What is the point of this?

And what is the point of comparing someone who has been training all of 4 years with a hap-hazard diet (…) and from what I can tell (sorry…) rather average genetics to someone like Aneta who has been doing this for longer than I have? She did heavy farm work her entire life before she started training at age 16 or so, under guidance from the start most likely. She is 29 now.
I’ll just mention this again as you seem to have missed it the first time for some reason: I am not saying that she does not have above average genetics to boot.

Furthermore… Why drag the whole 500x15 incline thing in here?
Did I ever say I even half-way believed the claim that someone could do about 8 or 9 more reps with that weight, regardless of technique/form used, than the strongest incline benchers I know of/have seen?

Who the hell cares about drugs in that case, the whole premise is ridiculous in the first place! Is there even anyone doing that on the flat bench? (I know of no one, so here you can demonstrate your superior intelligence and tell me. And then you can stop with the patronizing crap. No one with even an inkling of what is being put up in gyms and competition around the world believed that claim.)
I did not share my opinion on that issue on the boards back then because I did not want to get dragged into yet another argument, but here we go…
[/quote]

  1. Because, once again, you and others are trying to make the argument that, because outliers exist, everyone is capable of coming close to being an outlier.
    [/quote] I made no such argument. [quote]

  2. Oh please, every time this discussion is had, it’s in reference to natural trainees.
    [/quote] What kind of reasoning is that? [quote]

  3. Comment wasn’t taken out of context. You were inferring that powerlifting specific training is somehow detrimental to women for becoming very large and very strong. Not the case.
    [/quote] No. Had that been my intention, I would have written just “Powerlifting routines” or "“powerlifting specific routines”. [quote]

  4. I was making a comparison, so that you could understand exactly what sort of strength levels we are discussing here. Obviously, we can’t talk directly about the feat at hand because you seem to think that a woman benching 300 lbs raw and deadlifting 550 lbs raw are relatively attainable goals for the average female at moderate/low body fat levels.
    [/quote] I’d like you to quote where I said that. [quote]

  5. I got your point. Your point was that that level of strength is only world-class because most women don’t try hard enough or do the right things. And I’m saying that’s an asinine and uninformed position to take.
    [/quote] Oh, why? Do you deny that most women who train aren’t working and eating (and taking gear, since you brought it up) for the purpose of getting as strong as humanly/womanly possible?

Furthermore, I said that the female field is (for various reasons) not as saturated as the male field.

It has only relatively recently (by comparison) become more populated. Hence a lot less data is available so far on all factors involved.

20-30 years from now will probably be a better time for judging all this stuff.

Will you at least read my original post again, or must I explain it all in detail? [quote]

  1. I did. Should have said “are not”.
    [/quote] For the record, that little comment of mine here wasn’t meant as an insult or anything either, just in case you thought so. [quote]

  2. She does. And she is what “above average” looks like for women. Veggie is 1-2 standard deviations from the norm and Aneta is 6.
    [/quote] How exactly can you compare the two if veggie is (it seems to me) not in a similar situation training and diet (etc) -wise at least? Plus pre-training history? Training age?
    You are merely speculating here.

[quote]
8) Do you know what a strawman is? Hint: that wasn’t one. I’m somewhat agreeing with you that there would be more big and strong women out there if more women trained seriously. I’m heavily disagreeing with your assertion that those women would be more like Aneta than like CBear and Veggie. Once again, 2 standard deviations vs. 6.
[/quote] Of course it is a strawman, considering that you are arguing against a position which may sound vaguely similar to mine but which I did not actually take.

[quote]
9) Her being able to use larger than average amounts (for a female) without virilization is FAR more probable than what you are speculating.
[/quote] So you want to believe. Discussing this further is pointless. [quote]
Nice attempt at a sneaky ad hominem there, though. I obviously don’t know as much as you. Hold on, let me go change my profile information to say that I’m 275 lbs and 10% body fat and take down all pictures of me on this site. Ok, now we have an even playing field.
[/quote] It was not meant to be an ad hominem. I was being serious. You likely know more about gear than I do. [quote]
10) We both know that’s how these threads end up. Now that it’s out of the way, hopefully it won’t need to be addressed again.

  1. This is the internet. There doesn’t need to be a point.

You’re saying that Aneta is above average in genetics, but implying that she is not 6 standard deviations from the norm above average. I’m calling horseshit on that and trying to illustrate how outright dumb that statement is by showing exactly how world-class her accomplishments are.[/quote]
No. I am saying it is difficult to judge how far above average in genetics she actually is, or to be more precise, how rare her deviation actually is because so few others are in a situation where it makes sense to compare them to her. Plus various things such as the whole looks issue can influence even the more serious female trainees.

And again… You compared 2 people to Aneta whith way too many critical factors being vastly different.

[quote]UFgator11 wrote:
CC no! let the haters hate. don’t go down the path of prof x and fight every post “take on all comers” style.

I skimmed the last 2 pages, no pics, so I don’t know what anyone is upset about.[/quote]

I posted one of her a little earlier, go back another page or two…

But here is another one (she is the one doing the massage)


May as well post some more I guess.

With Mariusz

In Japan. For Bug, if he reads this haha


Oly event.


Same event

Just so people know who we’re even talking about.

[quote]UFgator11 wrote:
prof x
[/quote]

Whatever happened to him, anyway?

Holidays?

Anybody got a vid of her benching?

I’ve had no luck finding any so far.

If you don’t have haters, then you’re doing something wrong.

I saw the 2 pics you posted on page 2, good stuff. You’re a good guy

[quote]gregron wrote:
LOUND NOISES!!! [/quote]

SPELLING MISTAKES!!!

Sorry, I just wanted to join in.

[quote]fraggle wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:
LOUND NOISES!!! [/quote]

SPELLING MISTAKES!!!

Sorry, I just wanted to join in.[/quote]

I edited that but I guess it didnt take. ehhh

Good for her. She is clearly very strong AND she is gorgeous. She looks like a well built Jewel DeNyle. That is intended as a compliment of the highest order.

I’d put it all up in her tough pooper.