See? It’s good!
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
Judge Reinhold in a pirate hat thinks this thread has stayed completely on topic!
[quote]buffalokilla wrote:
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
[/quote]
Exactly. If people truly think this way, I would be afraid to let a woman teach any children I might have in the future. I mean, hell, they could be going through stress and stuff, start throwing shit and kill my kid. I, of course, won’t be able to do anything about this because “she is not responsible for her actions”.
And we want a woman president?
I mean, honestly, do some of the women here understand the damage you are doing by even implying that women can act irrationally for no damn reason and they should not be held accountable for it because they may be under a lot of stress?
Shouldn’t this call into question any judgement handed down by a woman judge (she could be having her period after having surgery or something), any surgical decision made by a woman doctor (she could be under more stress than the guy docs), or any woman supervisor’s actions?
Oh, wait, this only applies when you all want it to.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
buffalokilla wrote:
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
Exactly. If people truly think this way, I would be afraid to let a woman teach any children I might have in the future. I mean, hell, they could be going through stress and stuff, start throwing shit and kill my kid. I, of course, won’t be able to do anything about this because “she is not responsible for her actions”.
And we want a woman president?
I mean, honestly, do some of the women here understand the damage you are doing by even implying that women can act irrationally for no damn reason and they should not be held accountable for it because they may be under a lot of stress?
Shouldn’t this call into question any judgement handed down by a woman judge (she could be having her period after having surgery or something), any surgical decision made by a woman doctor (she could be under more stress than the guy docs), or any woman supervisor’s actions?
Oh, wait, this only applies when you all want it to.[/quote]
Geez–and all I said was ‘didntcha’ and it started fool on a 2 page holier than thou rant. This ought to be good.
Oooops! Sorry.
I forgot who posted.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
buffalokilla wrote:
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
Exactly. If people truly think this way, I would be afraid to let a woman teach any children I might have in the future. I mean, hell, they could be going through stress and stuff, start throwing shit and kill my kid. I, of course, won’t be able to do anything about this because “she is not responsible for her actions”.
And we want a woman president?
I mean, honestly, do some of the women here understand the damage you are doing by even implying that women can act irrationally for no damn reason and they should not be held accountable for it because they may be under a lot of stress?
Shouldn’t this call into question any judgement handed down by a woman judge (she could be having her period after having surgery or something), any surgical decision made by a woman doctor (she could be under more stress than the guy docs), or any woman supervisor’s actions?
Oh, wait, this only applies when you all want it to.[/quote]
Where do you guys get off talking to women that way? Try talking to me that way! Cause I can take it! You guys sound like you beat up girls for fun, but I’ve got muscles, and… and women, they don’t, but me, I’m strong and stuff. And I’ll knock you guys out!
There. Yeah.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
Geez–and all I said was ‘didntcha’ and it started fool on a 2 page holier than thou rant. This ought to be good.
Oooops! Sorry.
I forgot who posted.[/quote]
For you, my good man.
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
I made an isolated comment on this aspect of her nature. I was neither agreeing nor disagreeing with Chinadol’s comments. I made a single, isolated comment on this particular aspect of her nature.
I think it is noble on her part to go out of her way not to put her married friends in compromising situations when she has [b]other[/b]options available to her. As we all know, no one is perfect and all it takes is the perfect moment and the perfect circumnstances for natural feelings to arise, and arise they do. It is noble of her to avoid their rising in the first place.
I am not a coward but I don’t make a habit of walking in a lonely park at 3am exposing myself to potential pshycopaths just to prove it - that would in fact reveal a gross disrespect to life, not courage.
I agree with all your comments and I disagree with Chinadol’s analogy. It was flawed at best and it has no bearing on derek’s situation but I was only making a passing comment on her nature. I saw something beautiful about her character and made a passing comment on it.
This is why I mentioned reading comprehention.
And since I am feeling agressive today, the lack of respect, lack of intelligence, humor amd depth with the first shallow, hollow post from the T-Asshole jacross, made me overreact and YES, I hold myself accountable for it. I have a low level of tolerance for the “wanna be” testosterone teens that are flooding the site lately. Some are funny but when all the above ingredients are missing it makes me want to exterminate them. But I will be the bigger person and shrugg it off and say, hey;
[/quote]
This is absoltutely ridiculous. You posted a four word sentence. I posted a four word sentence expressing my contrary opinion.
Somehow my sentence is disrespectful and has no humour, but yours is perfectly acceptable. Where did I personally attack you, call you a whore or an idiot or anything like that? I didn’t, I merely disagreed. You responded by posting a picture of ‘the bird’. I’m the disrespectful one? I do have alot of respect for you Alpha F because I have read your posts previously. There is a difference between respect and agreement however.
For the record, I knew exactly what you were referring to so you can forget your ‘err reading comprehension errr teeny boy’. I don’t think the SPECIFIC aspect of chinadoll’s post that you considered noble, is noble at all. My question is why can’t you deal with that? Why did you react in such a ridiculous manner? I specifically posted about Chinadoll’s analogy in a different post. My post to you was specifically in regards to what you singled out.
So why don’t you play the ball and tell me why I’m wrong. My thoughts on Chinadoll’s actions have been extrapolated by others. So debate the issues instead of putting up childish photos.
[quote]Digital Chainsaw wrote:
Professor X wrote:
buffalokilla wrote:
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
Exactly. If people truly think this way, I would be afraid to let a woman teach any children I might have in the future. I mean, hell, they could be going through stress and stuff, start throwing shit and kill my kid. I, of course, won’t be able to do anything about this because “she is not responsible for her actions”.
And we want a woman president?
I mean, honestly, do some of the women here understand the damage you are doing by even implying that women can act irrationally for no damn reason and they should not be held accountable for it because they may be under a lot of stress?
Shouldn’t this call into question any judgement handed down by a woman judge (she could be having her period after having surgery or something), any surgical decision made by a woman doctor (she could be under more stress than the guy docs), or any woman supervisor’s actions?
Oh, wait, this only applies when you all want it to.
Where do you guys get off talking to women that way? Try talking to me that way! Cause I can take it! You guys sound like you beat up girls for fun, but I’ve got muscles, and… and women, they don’t, but me, I’m strong and stuff. And I’ll knock you guys out!
There. Yeah.[/quote]
hehehe
YEAH! And I will get my dad to beat you up too. My Uncle Charlie bench presses a million pounds so don’t mess with me.
Your turn Dig… I’ll play along.
What’s the point, right? Internet! Other than myself and a few others that posted pics on this site, I think about half of the posters don’t even lift.
I bet you have a huge stack of comic books in your parents basement huh Dig? Did they move your protein power to the top shelf yet?
And I was just getting ready to hit the hay.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
WOMEN… Can’t live without em’, can’t fuckin’ hit em’ upside the head with a baseball bat every once in a while.[/quote]
I just wanted to bring back this ditty to remind you of fool’s very first post on this thread.
Same guy who defended all womens honor for pages because of didntcha.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Professor X wrote:
ThatGirl77 wrote:
Please don’t hold your wife accountable for her behavior. She’s stressed.
I don’t understand this. When do we EVER hear, “Don’t hold your husband responsible for his actions…he’s stressed.” WTF?
Why doesn’t this shit work BOTH WAYS?
If women expect to get free passes for how they act based on their wild emotions and modd swings, then men should be getting a free pass when a FRIEND needs some help and we actually freaking help them.
We already got the free ride X. Just by being a man you don’t have to deal with natural discomforts of being a woman… like having a period every month and cramps and mood swings and chemistry imbalances. We don’t even have to give birth or raise the kids so to speak, the mother takes up almost all that responsibility.
I know, I have a mom that has 5 children and a dad that was a workaholic. He never complained, he knew he had it easier and didn’t have the tougher life. He also worked 60-80 hours a week. Its not to difficult to… wake up, go to work, come home, eat, fuck, sleep, repeat. Most women are multi-tasking and doing it with mutiple discomforts all the time.
The women, even a stay at home mom has the tougher job… emotionally, sometimes physically and most of all appreciativly. They don’t get alot of credit or a paycheck to show for their time put into being a mother or even being a support system to push their man to excel.
Men are naturally capable of taking on such responsibility because we just don’t have as many distractions and the job in and of itself of being a man is just flat out easier. Women do have it tougher, you have to respect that. Its not always easy being a man, but put yourself in a women’s shoes once.
You wouldn’t want to trade places with them after living the luxury life of a man, with no chemical imbalances monthly, no children to tend to 24 hours a day, and on top of that… not being appreciated for your work.
Why would a man ever complain about being physically tired or stressed out, that’s why god gave you those muscles in the first place… so you could handle it? If you think your stressed and physically or emotionally drained… imagine what the women is going through. Trust me, no matter how hard you think your life is, it will never be as hard as a womans… this is why they get the free pass.
You wouldn’t expect a blind man to walk his way around without ever asking for some help. Don’t expect a womans emotions to always be in tact without her asking for some understanding.
[/quote] sasquatch, I know you’re looking for me to disagree with the prof; I don’t know why, but frankly he never writes anything on training that I disagree with. The moment he does, you’ll be the first I notify. His advice is pretty sound so there is no point in trying to discredit him or argue with him.
Now on his relationship advice and how he views women, we’re on complete opposite sides of the track. I already stuck up for 77 and went against the prof thoughts with this post. What do you want me to do… eat the professor? Frankly, I don’t see the point of going after a guy with such sound training advice. I wouldn’t care if he started sending “I hate white people” e-mails to me. There’s his free pass. Learn to write better training philosophy and I wouldn’t bug you either.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
And I was just getting ready to hit the hay.
[/quote]
Hit it. I’m there in 10.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Digital Chainsaw wrote:
Professor X wrote:
buffalokilla wrote:
Yay, I’m a teenager now with no knowledge of women! Thanks Alpha F! You just took a few years off my life.
Because women aren’t equals or people, they’re women. It’s different. You can’t call them on being stupid sometimes or allowing the current marital dynamic in this country to persist.
Oy.
Exactly. If people truly think this way, I would be afraid to let a woman teach any children I might have in the future. I mean, hell, they could be going through stress and stuff, start throwing shit and kill my kid. I, of course, won’t be able to do anything about this because “she is not responsible for her actions”.
And we want a woman president?
I mean, honestly, do some of the women here understand the damage you are doing by even implying that women can act irrationally for no damn reason and they should not be held accountable for it because they may be under a lot of stress?
Shouldn’t this call into question any judgement handed down by a woman judge (she could be having her period after having surgery or something), any surgical decision made by a woman doctor (she could be under more stress than the guy docs), or any woman supervisor’s actions?
Oh, wait, this only applies when you all want it to.
Where do you guys get off talking to women that way? Try talking to me that way! Cause I can take it! You guys sound like you beat up girls for fun, but I’ve got muscles, and… and women, they don’t, but me, I’m strong and stuff. And I’ll knock you guys out!
There. Yeah.
hehehe
YEAH! And I will get my dad to beat you up too. My Uncle Charlie bench presses a million pounds so don’t mess with me.
Your turn Dig… I’ll play along.
What’s the point, right? Internet! Other than myself and a few others that posted pics on this site, I think about half of the posters don’t even lift.
I bet you have a huge stack of comic books in your parents basement huh Dig? Did they move your protein power to the top shelf yet?
[/quote]
As predicted, tail between the legs!
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:
WOMEN… Can’t live without em’, can’t fuckin’ hit em’ upside the head with a baseball bat every once in a while.
I just wanted to bring back this ditty to remind you of fool’s very first post on this thread.
Same guy who defended all womens honor for pages because of didntcha.
[/quote]
Exactly! That post says it all. No matter how bad women piss you off, you bite your fuckin’ tongue. Do it, or get real aquainted with your palms.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:
WOMEN… Can’t live without em’, can’t fuckin’ hit em’ upside the head with a baseball bat every once in a while.
I just wanted to bring back this ditty to remind you of fool’s very first post on this thread.
Same guy who defended all womens honor for pages because of didntcha.
Exactly! That post says it all. No matter how bad women piss you off, you bite your fuckin’ tongue. Do it, or get real aquainted with your palms.
[/quote]
so it’s not about defending their honor, it’s about keeping them fake happy so you can blow seed. Why didn’t you say that to begin with.
I’m not hoping for you to get in a fight with X, I’ve already predicted it won’t happen. You’re a phony, a player, a liar. You’re trying to form alliances with people based on your interpretation of their popularity.
A real man would just take a stance for the sake of taking a stance regardless of who they may have to make that stand against. Not you—you just fall back on some lame ass picture/training info reason and cram that tail up your ass.
You’ve been exposed.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
As predicted, tail between the legs![/quote]
sasquatch, you couldn’t predict which nut you were squirted out of and you had a 50/50 chance.
[EDIT] Edited joke by the way, the original was much funnier.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
Go heavy fool wrote:
WOMEN… Can’t live without em’, can’t fuckin’ hit em’ upside the head with a baseball bat every once in a while.
I just wanted to bring back this ditty to remind you of fool’s very first post on this thread.
Same guy who defended all womens honor for pages because of didntcha.
Exactly! That post says it all. No matter how bad women piss you off, you bite your fuckin’ tongue. Do it, or get real aquainted with your palms.
[/quote]
I’d rather have my dignity and masturbate than…oh wait.
[quote]Go heavy fool wrote:
Something or other
[/quote]
Holy shit… just… holy shit. Here’s a guy who claims to be ‘in touch with reality’. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
All kidding aside, you actually come off as mental. Not just another slightly wacky internet poster, which is how you seemed initially, but actual, “Call me a shrink, get me on medication as soon as possible” mental.
One long, barely-comprehensible rant after another just pours out of you whenever someone dares to question your wisdom, and yet you seem incapable of checking the flaws and contradictions in your own posts for even a second. I wonder why? And what’s with the double- and triple-post replies to the same poster? Are they the equivalent of drawing a long, deep breath before you go off some more?
I must not be a very nice person, because in a twisted way I can’t help poking at you one more time to see what amusing little bromides come pouring out of you next. Bad, bad me.
I wonder how much of the apparent contempt you feel for men in general you happen to direct toward yourself, because buddy, something ain’t right here.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
so it’s not about defending their honor, it’s about keeping them fake happy so you can blow seed. Why didn’t you say that to begin with.
[/quote]
Who said anything about defending an honor? And I did say that to begin with. “I’ll be fucking my wife”, do you not read my posts? I have many a posts with references to needing my wife for sex. I am open and honest about that. The only fake thing I see is you are afraid to be yourself and it takes someone like me to bring it out of you. You’re pathetic.
Keep your posts comming, they’re getting better. Another thing, don’t ever say anything about my wife unless you’d like to say to my face. (refering to your post before its deleted)
You know where I Lift. If you have something to say about my wife, you come to Gold’s Gym in Talahassee Florida and say it to me personally. I’m off to bed. Think about that for a minute… who’s the fake?