[quote]Pinto wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
lol@ these records are getting beat daily.
i guess you missed the part about Ed Coan deadlifting 901 pounds raw @220
and the only person beating it was Mark Henry, at the Super Heavyweight class by 2 pounds.
let that sink in then tell me how easy it is to break these records. give props where they’re due.
I don’t believe I said “all of these records”. Coan’s 901 pull is peerless and everybody already knows that. But I have witnessed several high-700s squats on a 198s and 220s in wraps. Goggins pulled high 800s in the gym at 242 or 275 on several occasions raw. I’ve heard of Vogelpohl doing the same. Passanella was a local around here in the late 80s, early 90s. I’ve heard stories of him squatting a 1000 in wraps (out of jacks) and pulling high 800s with just a belt in Coffee’s Gym. I’ve heard stories of Matt Dimel doing the same back around the same time. That’s just what I can think of off the top of my head.
My point is not to disparage the these records. They are in the books, they were judged lifts, some done at very high-profile meets under rather strict judging. As such- the record have not been “beat”.
However, considering raw or belts/wraps only competition has attracted a minority of the upper echelon of the powerlifting talent pool since the late 70s (USAPL, USPF, APF, and most of the various splinter orgs are dominated by geared lifting), the population of lifters to draw from for raw records is not what it was in 1975- even though there are probably more meets and lifters than ever before. Does that mean that lifters are weaker than in the 70s? Probably not. It’s just that we are not seeing these raw lifts on platforms becuase raw lifting is a small niche for the sport’s top lifters. As such, many of these records have stood a lot longer than they would have had the sport not moved on to gear three decades ago.
My response was tailored to the comment that referred to the longstanding nature of most of these records. Nothing more- nothing less. If you want to read something else into it, that’s on you.
[/quote]
You can’t set records based on rumors of lifts, regardless of what you heard about so and so.
I really would think that if all these geared guys were breaking long standing raw records in the gym, some would want to do it at a meet to claim the record. Just doesn’t make sense to me.
As for talent pools, you could make the argument that some of the strongest guys go into strongman competitions and could have broken some of these raw and geared records, but what the hell would that prove? They never got on the platform and got white lights, so it means nothing. Maybe if there weren’t Olympic style weightlifting competitions, some of those guys would set equipped records. You should think about that the next time you look over equipped records just so they are in the perspective of a diminished talent pool.
Raw and equipped are 2 different games.
Even if you didn’t intend it, you came off sounding like you don’t think much of raw lifting. There really doesn’t seem to be much other reason for your statement.
On the other side of things, raw records should last longer than equipped records because without technological improvements lifters, past and present, are on a more even ground.