[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
Sentoguy wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
Aussie Davo wrote:
BJJ or Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, is great stuff. Many guys like to think they’ll just hit someone who tries to tackle them to the ground. Bad news is bub, that shit rarely goes to plan and statistics show something lik 60-80% of fights end up in a tussle or on the ground,
That’s not true. That’s the greatest myth in all of fighting. It started with an LAPD research thing that talked about how 47 percent of ARRESTS went to the ground- and that’s obvious, because to cuff someone you have to pin them against something.
The grappling gurus stole it and twisted it. That figure is completely untrue. I’m not saying groundfighting isn’t important, but that always gets me when I hear that “statistic”.
You also have to take into account how few people that get into fights can actually fight. Isn’t there a thread about this very subject on the main page? 
Most fights are just wild swinging for the fences punches, and then eventually one (or both) of the two combatants will grab hold of the other one and drag them down to the ground.
From there it’s just a lot of rolling around, or the one unlucky enough to be outnumbered getting beat on by the other guy’s friends, or the fight gets broken up when it’s obvious that one person has won.
Of course. This is why I say that striking is the most important part of fighting- if you can do it, you’ll end the fight in three shots before it’s even got the chance to get to the ground.
Why use a bayonet when you can use the artillery and get him from long range?
I think you make some great points but it depends on the situation. Whilst I am not exactly clueless standing up I would be very unlikely to throw a punch in a fight because I would be worried about breaking a hand (elbows and knees are a different matter.)
Also, if someone is causing trouble it is nice to have the option to just control them instead of risking problems with the police when they turn up and find you standing over someone who is bloodied up and out cold.
Someone posted on a different thread about a situation where their brother in law was drunk and being a dick at a family party. Instead of ending up with the two of them duking it out on the front lawn, he controlled the guy and put him to sleep. They then put the guy in a comfy chair and let him sleep it off. Whent he guy woke up he appologised for being a dick.
I agree, but remember that that situation isn’t “self defense”. It would far more likely be called simple assault. But yes, in situations like that where you don’t want to hurt the guy, BJJ is excellent.
But a self-defense situation is not like that. A fight? Yes, to a certain level- i.e. if you know the person, or they’re severely drunk and you’re not. But Self-defense? No.
And the point about the hands is true, too. It’s certainly always a chance you take.
And I agree with your other posts as well about deescalation and everything. Often completely overlooked. And not being a dick is a big plus. [/quote]
Absolutely, knowing the appropriate level of force that a situation calls for and being skilled in a variety of skill sets is obviously the best way to go if that’s an option.
Being able to subdue or control someone using joint locks, chokes, controls and the like are an excellent choice for situations that call for a lesser level of force. Strikes to vital targets, slams, and being able to quickly and efficiently convert joint locks into breaks (along with other more primal techniques) are better suited to more serious situations.
As far as worrying about breaking your hands, I’d probably suggest using palm strikes to the head and only using fists to hit the body (unless you’re certain that you are going to hit your target). Palm strikes have a lot more margin for error and are much less likely to leave you with a broken hand if you hit something solid (like the top of their head, elbows, etc…).
I know that I would never throw punches from a mounted position (like is common in MMA) for this same reason. If the guy bridges at the wrong time, or slips your punch, etc… you are going to break your hand(s) on the pavement. Palms won’t have nearly as much risk of that happening.
Even elbows have to be slightly modified if throwing them on pavement (not necessarily in a standing position, but striking on the ground from certain positions). Lots of “G n P” guys like to throw backwards elbows from a side control position (Hughes and Couture come to mind).
Again, problem is that if you’re on pavement and the guy bridges at the right time, you’re going to break your olecranon process right off as your elbow point smashes into the ground. So, to prevent this you’ve gotta slightly alter the angle of your backwards elbow strikes (easier to show in person than to explain), which will allow you to simply base with that hand if your opponent bridges.
If you never practice on pavement/gravel/any other “unfriendly/unforgiving” surfaces other than mats you’ll never understand a lot of the little adjustments/intricacies that are needed when you fight in such environments (or what techniques might be appropriate/inappropriate for different situations).
If you are truly serious about real world self defense, then don’t neglect including the environmental factors that might go along with it (like weather, different surfaces, lighting, furniture, etc…).