2014 NFL Thread II

Off Topic
941

[quote]Broncoandy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
^ great back slaps all round, cheers and all that bro shit.

I have to listen to people talk about this shit right now on NFL network on Sirius can we stop talking about it in here?

[/quote]

Cowboys sign Dez yet? Who’s getting cut this year to get back under the cap?[/quote]
Murrray will end up be let loose if it comes down to it.

I have not looked at the numbers yet for the cap for 2015. Dont know if we are still paying for guys that are not around Ware etc.

942

[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Fuck, I just saw Derek’s feeble plea for actual football talk. Sorry. Carryon.[/quote]
lol It was just a reasonable request, feeble plea? Man thats harsh.

943

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

Beans what is the line on this game?

Anybody think Lynch runs for over 150? [/quote]

Even last I checked.

All I’m saying is look what happened in 07. People should keep talking about and shitting on the Pats calling them cheaters. Outside of one hiccup (coming at the worst time possible) it didn’t work out so well for the rest fo the league that year.

So, given the new bulletin board material… I’m not sure Lynch and Co are ready for what might await them.

Or it could go the other way and Seattle stomps them. [/quote]

I think it comes down to Seattle’s run game (both Lynch & Wilson). If NE can stop it, they win. I don’t see Wilson and his receivers being able to put up any decent numbers against the Pats secondary.

On a bad day (outside of Kansas City), Brady and the offense can put up 21-24. (But I guess they said the same thing about Manning last year. LOL)
[/quote]

Yeah, and emotions will be high for both teams so that shouldn’t effect the game in either’s favor.

I just don’t have the faith in the Pats D that others do, and am worried about the OLine. If the OLine blocks… Pats score a good amount. Hawks get pressure from 4… Hawks sail to victory.

944

This has been the kryptonite for years (since NYG showed everyone how). This is why I am frightful of the Buffalo Bills in the next few years.

I have more faith in the D than you. When they won SB’s, they had a shut down corner (Law, Samuel) and versatile LB’s (Brushci, Johnson, Seau) with a decent DL. This year reminds me a lot of those defenses. I just believe the above allows Beli-cheat (LOL) to scheme effectively to accomplish what needs to be done (take away best weapon).

945

No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?

946

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he hasn’t won enough yet, and isn’t a smug prick like Brady and the Cheater in Chief.

947

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he’s sitting on his couch crying into Olivia Munns bresticules??

948

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

This has been the kryptonite for years (since NYG showed everyone how). This is why I am frightful of the Buffalo Bills in the next few years.

I have more faith in the D than you. When they won SB’s, they had a shut down corner (Law, Samuel) and versatile LB’s (Brushci, Johnson, Seau) with a decent DL. This year reminds me a lot of those defenses. I just believe the above allows Beli-cheat (LOL) to scheme effectively to accomplish what needs to be done (take away best weapon).[/quote]

Yeah, you and my buddies keep telling me the same shit, lol. I’m a negative nancy.

The good news is, if it’s close Bill will just cheat and the pats should win, so, fuck it. Why even watch film, damn don’t even need to put pads on guys. Pats can just cheat their way to the ring. :wink:

949

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]
Cause he lost. Duh

950

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he’s sitting on his couch crying into Olivia Munns bresticules??[/quote]
I just found this out, OMG this bothers me more than Brady’s wife.

951

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he’s sitting on his couch crying into Olivia Munns bresticules??[/quote]
I just found this out, OMG this bothers me more than Brady’s wife.

[/quote]

First that sombitch takes Favre’s job then he take Munn off the market, fuck that guy!

952

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m not picking on you Matty on purpose, but I can’t let this go…

[quote]MattyXL wrote:

This Joey Porter interview holds even more creedence now…

[/quote]

From the interview:

[quote]At the same time, people that played against them on the field, we know. Who they got on that team beside Tom Brady? It’s not like they’ve got a gang of dogs over there. They have a bunch of all right guys. You know what I mean? Not no just real dogs. They’ve got some beasts on the D line and stuff like that but …

Johnson: You can’t possibly think, three Super Bowls … You think they cheated in every single one of them games?

Porter: Man, I’m going to tell you, I’m taking that to the grave, man. I don’t care what nobody say.

Johnson: What about last year? All the glamour, glitz and glamour, 16-0. You think they were cheating then?

Porter: I don’t know. You know, I don’t know. Maybe he found a new way to do it or not to tell you the truth. The boy cold, man. He showed us he’s cold. The boy cold, man. Hey, the boy cold, man. He showed us man. He cold.

I don’t trust him.
[/quote]

Translated: They got caught doing the same video taping every other team did and still does, from the wrong section of the ballpark, and I feel like I’m more talented than the other players on their team. Therefore the only reason I lost is they HAD to cheated. I’m too good to lose to THEM!

Sounds like… A highschool girl angry at a prom date.

I get it. I used to hate the Yankees like people hate the Pats.
[/quote]

That’s how you translated it not me. I still think your missing my point . You said yourself if they are found guilty of this latest bout of cheating it’s rotten . Which I agree, I feel because it has happened again it taints their success , somewhat .

To be clear:

I’m not saying that all their winning is due to deflated balls
I’m not saying that all their winning is due to spy gate
I am saying that there may be some credence that some of their success is due to their “methods”

And yes I hate the pats but I hate the dolphins almost as much and they suck just as much if not more than the jets.

It also piles onto the smugness of bellicheck and brady. Yeah we got caught cheating but fuck you we will do it again

953

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

OR it could be Rodgers didn’t get caught cheating once before.

You guys make it seem like the pats have no responsibility in this, it’s only jealousy. Sorry but jealousy may be part of it BUT precedence is the other.

But I get it how dare any other fan not bestow anything but kudos to the Pats. It ain’t cheating it’s gamesmanship

954

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he’s sitting on his couch crying into Olivia Munns bresticules??[/quote]
I just found this out, OMG this bothers me more than Brady’s wife.

[/quote]

First that sombitch takes Favre’s job then he take Munn off the market, fuck that guy![/quote]

955

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

This has been the kryptonite for years (since NYG showed everyone how). This is why I am frightful of the Buffalo Bills in the next few years.

I have more faith in the D than you. When they won SB’s, they had a shut down corner (Law, Samuel) and versatile LB’s (Brushci, Johnson, Seau) with a decent DL. This year reminds me a lot of those defenses. I just believe the above allows Beli-cheat (LOL) to scheme effectively to accomplish what needs to be done (take away best weapon).[/quote]

Yeah, you and my buddies keep telling me the same shit, lol. I’m a negative nancy.

The good news is, if it’s close Bill will just cheat and the pats should win, so, fuck it. Why even watch film, damn don’t even need to put pads on guys. Pats can just cheat their way to the ring. ;)[/quote]

I’m not a Pats hater; they have accomplished a lot and have been a great team for a long time. But it does seem like Belichick just enjoys cheating for the sake of cheating. Its almost like Ed Norton in rounders. He’s got Matt Damon sitting next to him mopping the floor with everyone on the up-and-up, but he just feels compelled to stack the deck because he wants to get something over on his marks.

956

If you’re not cheating, you’re not trying hard enough.

Please remind me, did they throw LeGarrette Blount 30 passes for 148 yards, or did they hand him the ball?

bad look for the Pats, but it had 0 impact on the results of the game.

957

[quote]Aggv wrote:
If you’re not cheating, you’re not trying hard enough.

Please remind me, did they throw LeGarrette Blount 30 passes for 148 yards, or did they hand him the ball?

bad look for the Pats, but it had 0 impact on the results of the game. [/quote]

I don’t think people would care as much if Billichick wasn’t such a smug douchebag. I just heard part of an interview where he acts like a fucking retard that doesn’t know what’s going on. No one buys you dumb guy act anymore Bill, you smug bastard.

958

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
No one responded to me- why is no one raising a stink about Rodgers? He openly admitted to manipulating PSI in the balls this year just like the Pats did. How come there isn’t a lynch mob out for him/Packers too?[/quote]

Because he’s sitting on his couch crying into Olivia Munns bresticules??[/quote]
I just found this out, OMG this bothers me more than Brady’s wife.

[/quote]

First that sombitch takes Favre’s job then he take Munn off the market, fuck that guy![/quote]
[/quote]

Oh that motha fucka!

959

[quote]Aggv wrote:
If you’re not cheating, you’re not trying hard enough.

Please remind me, did they throw LeGarrette Blount 30 passes for 148 yards, or did they hand him the ball?

bad look for the Pats, but it had 0 impact on the results of the game. [/quote]

Right. I don’t think Belichick needs to cheat to win; it appears he just likes to cheat for the sake of cheating.

960

Agreed he’s a smug douche, and this is a perfect storm for people who just want to hate.