[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
How long did you do the program? What, exactly, were your results? What was your nutrition for the duration of the plan?
EDIT: I just checked the blog in your profile. Even though you only wrote three entries over two weeks, it sounds like it started as a positive program. But you now say it sucks why?
[/quote]
I’ll get back to you on that. I lost a bunch of strength on the program, with only about 10 lbs of weight loss. I maintained, and even gained some strength doing madcow’s 5x5 linear periodization program on a caloric deficit.
I’ll find my old log and give hard results.
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
The dumbest thing is the two lower body lifts on one day.
Say what now? Since when is having two lower body lifts in the same day a bad thing? Difficult and ball-breaking, yes. Dumb, no.
[/quote]
Deadlifts & frontsquats on one day, balls to the walls effort? With two upper body lifts, also? You cannot maintain the intensity required throughout the session to really benefit from them. It burns a shit-ton of calories, though.
I wouldn’t even do that on a caloric surplus!
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
The other dumb thing is the ridiculously low rest times.
As eloquent as your objections have sounded so far, short rest periods are a key part of the program. Again, it’s ball-breakingly hard, but not dumb. Lifting weights with short rest between sets has been around for at least 50 years, and there’s probably a reason.
[/quote]
I know it’s ball-breakingly hard. I think the low rest times really kill your strength, which kills how much stress you could have been causing to your muscles.
Low rest times in general are not bad, but within the specific context of this program, it’s bad.
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
That’s one way of doing it, sure, and it works. There are a few ways to skin a cat.
[/quote]
This is a given. Unfortunately, some ways are better than others. 
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
To lose fat, total calorie intake doesn’t matter? Are you sure about that, chief?
[/quote]
Well, it does. But primarily it’s the caloric deficit that is going to spark fat loss; so that is what “really matters.”
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
G-flux is one particular nutrition plan. It’s effective, absolutely, but it isn’t meant to mesh with a 4-week training plan like 10x3 for fat loss.[/quote]
Right. Mesh it with a hypertrophy/strength plan, as I was alluding to, and get far better results than following 10x3 for fat loss. 
Look, I feel like the whole premise of the program (the reason behind two lower body lifts a day and low rest times) is to burn more calories than you would otherwise weightlifting. I say let the cardio do that and follow a more traditional program.