[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Angry Chicken, you seem pretty hostile towards me and I’m not sure why. I am happy to talk/work through some of your points and have a discussion but I’d prefer to do it without name calling and personal attacks. [/quote]
I don’t think I’ve called you anything derogatory. I happen to hate terrorists and what they’ve done to our country. When liberals defend their “rights” it pisses me off. They don’t have rights. When you plot to blow up innocent people in a civilian setting, you don’t get rights. When liberals talk about giving these animals “due process” it pisses me off. Are you REALLY that naive to think that if the US passes a policy of “not torturing” that ALL the countries in the middle east will say, “oh, well now that the US isn’t torturing people, we WON’T cut this poor bastard’s head off on TV”. Really? Is that what you think?
I have nothing against YOU personally at all. I wouldn’t remember your screen name if someone asked me. I really don’t like what you stand for, though. It frustrates me to no end that tree hugging liberals actually have a say in policy that directly affects the way our government gathers intelligence. Intelligence that could possibly save the lives of innocent Americans. Because in your little liberal fuck-tard fantasy land, the animals trying to blow us up have “rights”… It boggles my mind how that thought can form in your tiny little brains. (speaking of liberals collectively, not you personally)
How many people did YOU lose on September 11, 2001?
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
And why did we give UBL a clean Muslim burial?[/quote]
We wouldn’t want to ‘offend’ the IslamoNazis would we? OBL was a hero in the Muslim world. It would cause offense to treat him poorly. Got to be vigilant avoiding offending IslamoNazis. Being offensive obviously caused all this in the first place. Fortunately no one in the Muslim world is ever offensive towards Christians or Westerners. Otherwise they’d be flying airliners through skyscrapers and using mongoloid children as suicide bombers too.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
Angry Chicken, you seem pretty hostile towards me and I’m not sure why. I am happy to talk/work through some of your points and have a discussion but I’d prefer to do it without name calling and personal attacks. [/quote]
People who condone torture, enhanced interrogation, whatever…are usually just fanboys and groupies. Very rarely are they on the giving end, and I suspect most wouldn’t have the stomach for conducting it.
That being said, and as the fanboys wouldn’t know this to begin with, it is counterproductive for a host of reasons, that I don’t have the time, nor inclination, to flesh out for you in between your leveling up at Call of Duty or whatever lame ass voyeristic combat you’re seeing these days. So I’ll be brief.
Aside from the aforementioned example of torture not working (Nuremberg), when word gets out that your side is torturing, the enemy not only fights harder not to become a POW, which ends up killing more of your Marines and soldiers, but it makes them more inclined to torture YOUR captured servicemen.
This was touched on in “On Killing”, along with the stupidity of shooting POWs. I’d suggest the tough guys read this book, absorb the information in it, and adjust your myopic views on the subject accordingly.
[quote]Lowe-1 wrote:
People who condone torture, enhanced interrogation, whatever…are usually just fanboys and groupies. Very rarely are they on the giving end, and I suspect most wouldn’t have the stomach for conducting it.
That being said, and as the fanboys wouldn’t know this to begin with, it is counterproductive for a host of reasons, that I don’t have the time, nor inclination, to flesh out for you in between your leveling up at Call of Duty or whatever lame ass voyeristic combat you’re seeing these days. So I’ll be brief.
Aside from the aforementioned example of torture not working (Nuremberg), when word gets out that your side is torturing, the enemy not only fights harder not to become a POW, which ends up killing more of your Marines and soldiers, but it makes them more inclined to torture YOUR captured servicemen.
This was touched on in “On Killing”, along with the stupidity of shooting POWs. I’d suggest the tough guys read this book, absorb the information in it, and adjust your myopic views on the subject accordingly. [/quote]
Really…
Reading a book is going to change my “myopic” view?
Tell me, what experience do YOU have about warfare besides reading a book on helping soldiers cope with killing on the battlefield?
You assume everyone views the world with a western mindset.
