[quote]awesomeguy1234 wrote:
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
[quote]awesomeguy1234 wrote:
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
[quote]awesomeguy1234 wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]awesomeguy1234 wrote:
there were people picketing and rallying calling for mike vicks head on a platter because he participated in the murdering of dogs, while joe paterno ignores the molestation and rape of young children at the hands of one of his top assistant coaches and people create mobs and riot in his defense…!?
[/quote]
Totally different (kind of) people. I don’t like this line of thought.
“If it rains, people complain! If it’s sunny, people complain! People are crazy and don’t know what they want!”.[/quote]
what do u mean ‘different kind’ of people?
they are both prominent public figures in athletics who knew of illegal activity going on under their watch and let it continue, granted vick participated and paterno did not, but i think its a more than fair comparison.[/quote]
How can you compare Vick to this issue…
Vick - Before his illegalites he was an erratic QB and excellent athlete who does not represent professional football and the best that it had to offer, he was simply a popular player and represented nothing off the field to many.
PSU (Paterno) - Was looked upon as all that is right with College Sports, was looked as the moral minority who turned his nose at other Universities for their questionable behavior, Paterno represented all that is or was right with Colgiate Athletics, he was loved and reveared for his reputation. To have known about these atrocities destroys his legend and what he represented.
Vick was not a living legend at the time, and when he was caught for his callous and horrible acts was just a professional football player. Even with this there were the “just a dog” people that still believed he received a raw deal.
At times no matter what the behavior there are people who are blinded by loyalty wether it be Vick or Paterno…
Just look at Michael fucking Jackson, he was viewed as the PERPTRATOR of fondling and sexual conduct of young boys yet there were and are jackasses still extolling his virtues!
The vick issue is a totally different and much smaller animal (pun intended)
EDIT: I guess under the general terms of your comparisons (i.e. Athletics, public figures, illegal activity) you can correlate the two…but not really[/quote]
-
how does vick not represent professional football or the best it could offer? you said it yourself he was an incredible athlete, endless potential, inconsistent, but he found ways to win and coaches and analysts would spend endless amounts of time discussing how to defend him let alone hopefully contain him.
-
granted paterno and psu never had any recruiting scandals, but vick before his jail term was extremely important and meant a lot to the city of atlanta and african americans as a role model along with being a source of pride for both and was very near considered a living legend among blacks, but i guess our opinion doesnt really count in these situations.
-
people supported vick in spite of those who took the case as an opportunity to not support animal rights but to express their hatred for wealthy successfull black athletes, especially one that played quarterback. there was no unfair treatment of joe paterno in his firing and the riots completely disregarded the victims and the root of the problem which was paternos negligence in stopping ‘callous’ and ‘horrible’ acts of sexual abuse, not dog killing, SEXUAL ABUSE.
look back at your post and you yourself just took it as an opportunity to bash vick, trumpet about how great a man paterno is despite what we know now, and in the end admit that it is an understandable comparison.
[/quote]
Understandable comparison based on general terms…
Im not a Paterno booster in fact up until to this fiasco could care less about the man or PSU.
Comparing Michael Vick to Paterno is drivel, there is no comparison Paterno, represents more to College Athletics than Vick does to the NFL. If the comparison was Paterno and say a Jim Brown and his illustrious career on and off the football field it would be a different story.
I simply called Vick an erratic qb and excellent athlete, where did I bash him? You may be overstating his “greatness” however espescially on the field with the Falcons.
It seems as if your a big fan of Vick thats fine, my opinions of him dont relate to this thread. IMO you cannot relate Vicks ordeal with Paternos…to me Paterno meant more to colegiate sports than Vick does professional football…im talking on and off of the field.
Paterno will never resusciate his image he will always be known for this atrocitie. Vick has already to an extent repaired his image and even to my own admission has done his due dilligence with the animal rights crowd.
.
[/quote]
read again or for the first time:
all i am saying is that the focus should be on the fact that paterno ignored sexual abuse going on within his program, people ignored vicks accomplishments and how important he was in the black community in order to make an example out of him, paterno should be treated as such and his acclompishments and status as a public figure should be ignored and he should be made an example of how sexual abuse is allowed to flourish especially in sports because no one wants to step up and talk about it and be the whistle blower, instead its been about how he donated money for a library and won a national championship over 20 years ago.[/quote]
I read your posts, I agree with your above statement, however disagree with the comparison…maybe you should read my post, especially when I said the following
I tell you this right now, this child abuse issue is something dear to my heart, I would Never defend a man that could of possibly saved so much heartache if he took the right actions. I am NOT trumpeting Paterno I am stating that no matter what GOOD he did for colegiate athletics it will never surpass the evil he allowed to happen…
Basically Im saying exactly what you are, no matter what good he did it will never overshadow the bad he allowed to happen under his nose…