[quote]tribunaldude wrote:
The point is its NOT a badge of honor or a tradition among african americans to ritually cause unimaginable suffering to a living creature. Or among whites.
SOME asian cultures are generally PROUD of their apathy towards suffering…read what I said about endorphins flooding the meat. And no, I’m not condemning ANY group in any way…just calling it like I sees it.
[/quote]
Maybe I misread something but didn’t you say something along the lines of…
“Look, its IN THEIR GENES (orientals, chinese, japs, viets, thai) to be apathetic to suffering (animal OR human)…its not something that can change easily.”
I was trying to point out that nearly EVERY culture that has EVER existed has tolerated, progagated and even enjoyed the suffering of others (human or animal). It’s not a function of “their” genes, its a function of human genes (or environment, upbringing, whatever…a whole other can of worms)
I don’t really understand your “badge of honour” remark about Asians. Could you explain a bit more about it? I’ve seen a lot of Asia first hand and I can’t say that I’ve seen many instances of cruelty being flaunted. More often than not its out of necessity. I’ve seen a pile of dead, skinned dogs before…this was simply because a.) in this area dog was the only meat available that people could afford and b.) because they didn’t have the luxury of distancing themselves with the gory reality of how meat is prepared.
(To be fair, I have seen some deplorably cruel acts by Asians…the circus bears of China, Vietnamese performing monkeys, etc…but these were typically in the absolute STICKS of the country, and not so different from hillbillies from the Ozarks watching dog fights IMO)
I can think of several customs that exist to this day that involve cruelty being flaunted. The fox hunts of England, bull fights of spain, mexico, parts of Africa and Okinawa, cock fighting in Mexico and Central America…the list goes on. Hell, kids burning ants with magnifying glasses! The fact that kids, the world over, enjoy torturing the hell out of ants and other bugs makes me think that the trait is inherently genetic rather than racial.
About the Japanese in particular, something worth pointing out is that, historically, SOME Japanese buddhists never considered fish animals. They were “vegetarians”, but by their definition of vegetarian fish and other sea creatures were on the same plane of existance as rice or vegetables…fair game. (For some reason, fish got lumped in with seaweed). This mentality has maintained itself somewhat over the centuries. Most Japanese wouldn’t object to eating “ikizukuri” fish but would be absolutely aghast at the thought of doing the same thing to a mammal. Not saying I agree with their viewpoint, but I can understand it.