Lightweight Baby!
How is he supposed to control the government and the reduce taxes, if he cannot control his family’s appetite and reduce their big bellies?
And notice their family uniform.Is this supposed to be some kind of Baptist insider joke?
Well, the good side, even with Bush gone, there will be still much room for ridculing the global emperor.
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
JeffR wrote
In summary, Rudy is the guy to shred radical Islam to tatters.
So what will your precious drag queen do, open up another front? Isolate and drive your pampered Pakistan further into extremism? Declare a new neverending war?
Seriously, what will he do?
JeffR wrote
Wanted to pop by and remind you that your opinion counts for nothing. I’m serious: nothing.
As if you’d be the president’s advisor. Funny, judging from the nonsense you post and the amount of shit he creates, you surely could be.
JeffR wrote
When germany steps up to the plate and gets serious about combating radical Islam, maybe you’ll have a say.
As it is, back to the nursery as you are irritating the adults.
Germany is busy doing the real thing. Actively converting millions of turks and arabs to the western way of living. And of course, supporting the US and the UN in Afghanistan and beyond.
Again, put something on the table! What should Germany do? [/quote]
I agree with the rest of what you wrote, but come on. Those millions of Turks and Arabs you’re “converting” are engaging in occasional honor killings and live largely as a foreign underclass in Germany.
And as for Afghanistan? German troops stay up north and in Kabul, and take a minimal role in any real fighting. I think they even withdrew their special forces, who were engaged in real action. The real fighting in Afghanistan is being done by the U.S., the British, the Canadians, and the Dutch. Everyone else is just window-dressing. Germany’s “contribution” is a joke, especially for a country that large and wealthy.
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Lightweight Baby!
How is he supposed to control the government and the reduce taxes, if he cannot control his family’s appetite and reduce their big bellies?
And notice their family uniform.Is this supposed to be some kind of Baptist insider joke?
Well, the good side, even with Bush gone, there will be still much room for ridculing the global emperor.[/quote]
ss,
I’d appreciate a response to my previous post. You asked what Germany could do and I responded.
Thanks.
JeffR
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I’d rather work at Vandenberg anyway than at Langley…all that underground NSA stuff…freaky to work underground…
[/quote]
I think you mean Ft. Meade.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I’d rather work at Vandenberg anyway than at Langley…all that underground NSA stuff…freaky to work underground…
I think you mean Ft. Meade.[/quote]
Damn, Varq, is there anything you DON’T know?
Does this officially make Mike Huckabee a domestic enemy of the Constitution?
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html
mike
I finally realized who Huck reminds me of. A bit more benign association than Benito Giuliani, but it’s the cuddly ones that’re the most dangerous.
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
Does this officially make Mike Huckabee a domestic enemy of the Constitution?
[/quote]
Sheesh. What a fruitcake. Yeah, I’d say it does.
I guess the first thing President Huckleberry would do would be to eliminate that atheist nonsense in the Constitution about Congress making no law respecting an establishment of religion. And speaking or printing blasphemy is obviously a sin, so we can’t protect anyone’s rights to do that. And as for freedom of assembly, well assembling for church is okay, I guess. But better chuck the whole first amendment just to make good and sure.
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
Does this officially make Mike Huckabee a domestic enemy of the Constitution?
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html
mike[/quote]
WTF is that all about? I would love to see his proposed Constitutional amendment.
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
Does this officially make Mike Huckabee a domestic enemy of the Constitution?
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html
mike[/quote]
Good find Mike!
We’ll see more of this stuff if the economy gets really bad, causing people to become delusional.
“I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution,” Huckabee told a Michigan audience on Monday. “But I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living god. And that’s what we need to do – to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than try to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view.”
Ha! Anyone willing to guess who the stubborn opponents “who do not want to change the Constitution” he has in mind?
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Lightweight Baby!
How is he supposed to control the government and the reduce taxes, if he cannot control his family’s appetite and reduce their big bellies?
And notice their family uniform.Is this supposed to be some kind of Baptist insider joke?
Well, the good side, even with Bush gone, there will be still much room for ridculing the global emperor.
ss,
I’d appreciate a response to my previous post. You asked what Germany could do and I responded.
Thanks.
JeffR
[/quote]
Oh, so you actually answered me? Forgive me for skipping this, as it was probably at the time my computer broke apart.
So:
Why would Rudy kill Bin Laden?
I’m sure it will kill Bin Laden, as he will be Roflolling in his cave when he sees Julie-Annie in his skirts, crying tears how easy it will be point out how degenerated and decadent the “great devil” and his leaders have become.
So how would he do that?
You’re far to emotional here and try to feel with your guts who is the better war buddy. Bush gave you (and countless millions of other americans) the same warm feeling as he’d be the guy who you can trust. Sadly, politicians know how they can deceive and create an image. Rudy excels the other candidates and you’re the one who’s been conned.
Musharraf is a dead end. He will happily retire somewhere in the UK.
But, you’re right in sofar that Rudy would be better with the EU, I’ll give you that. Which doesn’t take much as Bush somehow brought up the whole world against the US , which you somehow fail to realize time and again. Pre-Bush, Yay, America! Post Bush, Nay, America.
Seriously, how difficult is that? How confused must someone be if he thinks the whole world is fucked up, but ~25% of all Americans are right?
Link1:Hammadi’s release has nothing zero to do with Osthoff’s release. They gave in exchange for her a lot of cash (the sum leaked) and it was controversial enough because Germany’s official position is not to comply with terrorists’ demands and Osthoff was a mad skank (Should’ve been left rotting under a burqa).
Link2: Al Masri is probably scum, but he has certain rights you can’t deny him here in Germany. The case is particularly hazy and I didn’t have the time to follow it thoroughly.
AFAIK:
He probably was abducted by your CIA, was analy probed and beaten in Afghanistan. He probably was at one point in his life a radical, so that’s why the german authorities gave their thumbs up to your hangmen- which is ironic, cause Al Masri allegedly “fled” to Germany because he wanted to leave his past behind and that’s why he got asylum in the first place. He then was probably just released in the (!) albanian countryside since your abu-ghureib guys didn’t get the much sought after information out of him.
Seems to me like some unlucky, if personally unlikable fellow.
I believe there wouldn’t be such a fuss if you’d just be more precise with your anal-probing victims.
Shit happens.
And link 3:
Mr. Schaeuble and his minions are right now one of the most controversial politicians. They are the perfect example of how to jump on the “Neverending-GWOT” bandwagon. Most people laugh at him and call his policy “Stasi 2.0”.
He has practically zero credibility and is a crook through and through.
It is a threat, but more in a cultural manner. Some people can’t stand to see the world in it’s complexity and want to reduce it to a “clash of civilizations”, which is BS.
It’s demographics and the rapid clash of modern age culture with traditional values.
It’s solution depends on diplomacy, working out globalization as an opportunity between partners and certainly not conflict.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Ha! Anyone willing to guess who the stubborn opponents “who do not want to change the Constitution” he has in mind?[/quote]
Only one person in the race doesn’t want to fuck with the Constitution, so that sorta narrows it down.
Of course, Huckleberry is the Antipaul, who cannot meaningfully exist without Ron there to echo off of. Were Ron to retire from the race, I don’t think Huck could bear it.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Ha! Anyone willing to guess who the stubborn opponents “who do not want to change the Constitution” he has in mind?[/quote]
Dobbs. Lou Dobbs.