World Record Squat?

I like gear. It’s fun and it’s not just fun because it helps me lift more but for a couple other reasons.

  1. Getting and using new gear is like getting a new baseball glove and breaking it in, a birthday present you can’t wait to use, or some new gadget that just gets you wicked excited. The feeling of getting new stuf your excited about makes you feel like a little kid again, and that is fun.

  2. Believe it or not, gear does take quite some work to get the most out of. For example, I’ve been working in my bench shirt for about 10 weeks now and I’m just starting to get somewhat confident in it. I’ve had to alter my set up, my groove, etc, etc. As for squat suits, you definitely cannot just slap one on and get the most out of it. I used my new Frantz double poly the other week with knee wraps and hit a PR. Later I threw on single ply Z suit I bought used and have since used extensively and slightly altered my form and speed of decent and I hit a 5 pound PR over what I hit in the double with wraps. So, gear definitely has a learning curve.

All that being said, I’ve done a raw meet, and that was wicked fun. Raw lifting is great and raw training will ALWAYS have a place in the sport. So I think the gear debate is often silly and pointless.

To each his own. There is a place for everyone in powerlifting.

[quote]Jay Sherman wrote:
There’s a video here of Bud Jeffries doing 1000 pounds with just a belt, drug free, and starting from the bottom. I think the only one who compares is Paul Andersen. Jeffries can also quarter squat 2000 pounds.
http://www.strongerman.com/

[/quote]

Looked at that video. Obviously, it is a truly amazing lift. However, if you look at it closely, while he starts trying to move at the bottom, he is way above parallel when the bar starts moving off the pins.

http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/./1/.1109685051090.shutthefuckup.jpg

[quote]wtf wrote:

I bet this fat-so couldn’t even squat himself off the toilet without his suit on.

Ironically, these guys wear their suits tighter than a ballerina.

And yes, the gear issue is why powerlifting will never be in the olympics. That and the liability of these “athletes” having a heart attack on stage.[/quote]

WTF - “This fat-so”. You talking about Miller? You gotta be kidding me. Wear the best suit in the world, see how your squat compares to his. shit, why don’t you challenge him for a raw meet?

wtf, while I agree with you that gear is getting out of hand, to degrade the strength of these lifters is ridiculous. Thanks to Dr. Ryan for this pic and his suggestion.

Oh, and by the way, in case anyone still cares, irongame.com has miller’s 1200 as the biggest, but if big martin is right then the next biggest is mikesell’s 1140.9. The IPF (drug tested, 1 ply) record is Shane Hamman’s 457.5kg (about 1006lbs I think).

[quote]bigjoey wrote:
wtf wrote:
WTF - “This fat-so”. You talking about Miller? You gotta be kidding me. Wear the best suit in the world, see how your squat compares to his. shit, why don’t you challenge him for a raw meet?
[/quote]

Please read my other posts, so I don’t have to keep repeating myself.

It is fucking amazing that a human being can hold that much weight on his back and do a quarter squat. I am not trying to take that away from the guy, and there’s no way in hell I’ll ever be able to do that.

But, just like a shirted bench is the equivalent of a three or four board press, suited squat numbers are about the same a raw full, true squat. So, although still amazing, I want it to be seen for what it is

If weight coefficient would be considered, I’d gladly go up against Miller in a raw squat. He only trains in a suit and would get stuck in the whole, crying like a very large baby.


He’s puurty, ain’t he?


Here’s the “canvas forklift” in action.

You have to be an iidot. Mike can squat app. 900 lbs raw, just a belt. I’ve seen him do it. He doesn’t train raw because he doesn’t compete raw.

WTF i’m lovin these pics keep em comin!

Holy shit. You guys really know how to argue like women about stuff that you supposedly don’t care about. Anyway…

Extrapolating what a raw or single ply gear guy would do in more gear is completely bogus. (Going back to the Ed Coan bullshit guestimates and other comments.) We have several lifters who get zero out of their double denim shirts, and others who get around 200. Same with squat suits. You honestly don’t know what you’d get until you put on the equipment and train for it (the training is different, so asking a geared guy to step out of his gear and do well is just like asking a raw guy to throw on max gear and have a good attempt at it.)

For similar reasons, extrapolating what a geared lifter can do without their gear is impossible. All one can say is that it is probably less than what they do in the gear. We have a guy that used a bench shirt in his last meet and benched 500. Within a month, he came in and benched 500 raw. We have another lifter who has benched 688 in competition in a double denim shirt. Some people probably think he barely benches 500, but he does well over 600 raw. This dude is competing at the top levels of powerlifting and still does not get as much out of his equipment as I, a novice lifter, do. Same with squatting. Perhaps people are getting 400 pounds out of gear - perhaps not. You just don’t know until these guys train for and do a raw meet.

After two plies of gear, the plies don’t really help. You would see more triple ply bench shirts in the APF if this were the case. As it stands now, they’re pretty rare. The material, cut, and fit of the shirt are much more important than the number of plies. For evidence, look at the Rage X in the IPF. A single ply shirt that guys can’t touch 700 in in a meet. The IPF is a joke now because of equipment like that. When people are getting more out of their single ply gear than the average guy gets out of his double ply gear, any purity has been destroyed.

As far as the Olympics go, there are people who really do not care at all about the Olympics. I’m sorry if this hurts anybody’s feelings, but some people don’t give a rat’s ass about that “movement”. And it’s not because they couldn’t compete under those conditions. We have a lifter who totaled 2500+ without ever having used steroids, who can squat 800-900 in just a belt, bench 650 raw, and pull 800+ in just a belt. He doesn’t give a flying fuck about the Olympics or the IPF; right now he just wants to lift massive weight. Never mind the fact that he can get paid for his lifting in the WPO.

The WPO is hands-down more exciting than the IPF. That is why there is not more interest in the IPF. If you doubt this, go to a WPO meet and feel the electricity along with the camraderie. And saying that the IPF is more “pure” than other feds is disgusting. Note 700 not touching on bench attempts and people BEATING drug tests. Outside of the US, lifters can use all year long, then just go off long enough to pass the drug tests, and that’s ignoring any kind of masking agents. To call that drug-free is ridiculous. This is why a lot of the big boys go to play in the WPO. Which is a shame to me, as I’d rather see the top guys of both feds go at it.

RickJames:

Good informative post.

A question for PLers:

As someone outside of PL, I have often wondered why there are separate PL federations. Surely this is one very big reason why PL is not as widely recognized and praised world-wide as Olympic Weightlifting.

What, in your opinion, is the main reason that there is not one American weightlifting federation?

This chart lays out the disparities in in gear rules and drug testing between the different federations:

This site has links to the many different federations:

http://www.chicagopowerlifting.com/Federations.html

By comparison, the USAW and the IWF are more put together:

http://www.msbn.tv/usavision/displayPage.aspx?id=296

http://www.iwf.net

Powerlifitng is basically fragmented because people can’t seem to agree. Within the US, lifters who don’t like the rules or administration can go start their own federation. This has happened several times.

Personally, I would love to see the federation thing go away and maybe wind up with two feds. One can be USAPL, so lifters can have the boring, politically oriented, drug tested (defintely not “drug free”) org.

The other fed should be a “run what you brung”, non-tested, geared to the max, best of everything. In my mind this would be the APF.

Of course, as it stands now, the APF is the only gateway to professional powerlifting, i.e. the WPO.

Th eonly nice thing about many feds is that you can choose the rules you want to lift under. That is a pretty nice feature.

[quote]Ross Hunt wrote:
A question for PLers:

As someone outside of PL, I have often wondered why there are separate PL federations. Surely this is one very big reason why PL is not as widely recognized and praised world-wide as Olympic Weightlifting.

What, in your opinion, is the main reason that there is not one American weightlifting federation?

This chart lays out the disparities in in gear rules and drug testing between the different federations:

This site has links to the many different federations:

http://www.chicagopowerlifting.com/Federations.html

By comparison, the USAW and the IWF are more put together:

http://www.msbn.tv/usavision/displayPage.aspx?id=296

http://www.iwf.net[/quote]

[quote]wtf wrote:
He’s puurty, ain’t he?

[/quote]

This raises another interesting question - why are powerlifters so ugly? I want to compete but I’m good-looking. Will the other powerlifters laugh at me?

LOL

Define ugly? I’m 400 pounds, bald, big gut. But I can get women left and right whenever I want.

Last I checked, thats pretty much all good looks are for.

There are lots of “pretty” powerlifters out there. The top of the elite lifters just happen to currently be us ogres. (Insert Shrek joke here)

[quote]DonM wrote:
wtf wrote:
He’s puurty, ain’t he?

This raises another interesting question - why are powerlifters so ugly? I want to compete but I’m good-looking. Will the other powerlifters laugh at me?[/quote]

while you seem to have a personal grudge against the IPF, compare the two lifters who have competed in both single (IPF/USAPL) using RageX single ply, and also competed under dual ply rules. Tiny Meekster and Brian Siders.
One has hit 800 in single, the other is bloody close. But both siders and meekster are brushing 850-900lbs in dual ply. Its not just the ply advantage either, btu the ability to move the shirt down the front of the chest, to get the neck seam low. IPF rules makes that harder to acheive.

If single ply was better than dual, all the big benchers would be using it. and they are not.