Women's Fight to Vote Tied to Declining SMV

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]harrypotter wrote:

[quote]batman730 wrote:

[quote]harrypotter wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
I don’t know, these postcards don’t exactly seem so far off the mark…

https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=famous+suffragettes&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.yahoo:en-US:official&client=firefox&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=ja&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=RMqVUOGpKMihige9_4CQCw&biw=1280&bih=645&sei=ScqVUIvhN4yiigeZ84CoCQ[/quote]

Except for hot-dog-eating-contest girl.

But I have to admit, it looks like there IS an element of truth to the plainness thing… at least in terms of those who made a difference.

Although, I don’t think that’s much different than the success that unattractive unmarried men have had in anything else. Without the pursuit of sex or maintenance of a relationship to clutter up daily life, there’s a lot of free time and redirected sexual energy to put into other pursuits.[/quote]

I agree, though I would point out that plainness was probably the rule rather than the exception back then, given the lack of appearance-enhancing products.

Still, you’re right in that people with no mate and no kids have more time and energy for causes. I would think that the married women who undertook this fight were probably unhappy at home as well, which would reinforce other stereotypes of the time. [/quote]

The ones who were married would probably have been rather strongly discouraged by their husbands from engaging in such “frivolity.”

NOT saying they would have beat their wives, although some of them would have. But that society at that time DID actively discourage the notion that women should have a say in how the world is run. [/quote]

Yes, I’m imagining that the women out there campaigning probably had somewhat weak husbands, given that it would have been an embarrassment to them. Though maybe I underestimate them. Maybe some of them really believed in equal rights, for their unmarried daughters or sisters or whatever.

I don’t know about the pendulum swinging too far, though I acknowledge that in many cases men are now disadvantaged. I do agree that men and women are different and that’s good. I’m happy being a girl and I like boys who act like boys. But I am a feminine woman, both in the physical sense and personality-wise, who does well with both men and women. Life is less kind to women who are too big or too ugly or too masculine. They don’t live like I do. It’s good that there are honorable options for them now, and for the feminine women who somehow become “tarnished” by a man or men they shouldn’t have trusted or submitted to, but did, as is some women’s nature.

[/quote]

To clarify a little, I often see what I feel is overcompensation by women who appear to feel they need to “prove” that they can be everything that a man can be, and more. I see example after example of this, mostly in the media, but a lot on this site, too. And while it’s a great thing that women are more and more able to enjoy the rights they have been unfairly deprived of throughout basically all of human history, all too often any comparison with men in which women are viewed as not measuring up to some standard is misinterpreted as disenfranchisement. I know that my wife is a FAR better nurturer and has miles more patience than I do when one of our sons is whining or crying. By the same token, there are times when the boys NEED to be disciplined, or when one of us needs to take an aggressive leadership role in our business that requires giving orders or reprimanding an employee. She absolutely despises being put in the position to do any of these. And I’m just no good when the kids are acting up out of tiredness or frustration.

In general, there are things that women are better at, and things that men are better at, and families and societies whose members basically adhere to these roles are typically happier and more satisfied with their lives. Hell, just the fact that these arguments tend to be so evenly divided down gender lines should be a good indicator that there is something to the idea. I had a really good discussion about this with TBG back when SAMA and he were still around. I think you participated in it. The one about femininity and masculinity. [/quote]

You do know what you typed here is what feminists/equal rights people hate?

Rather than saying a woman cannot do that, they merely state that women can do that and should be given that right.

The same goes for the party girl. I have a lot of FB feeds from these girls I know and they have this thing in their head that they can and should party as hard as the guys, if not harder but don’t give a care in the world to the consequences.

Example 1

I had a job in a cinema where there were 4 female bosses above me, they were absolutely terrible and what compounded the problem was the number of female employee’s at the store where I worked. 20/25 females to 4 men.

The girls were let off home early, given easy tasks and were allowed to bullshit each boss because they were friends. They got away with a lot of shit.

Me and my friend would stock up throughout the day, get things ready for the busy walk-ins and what happens? The girls who did no preparation just took the stock we had over to their area.

Now this might sound like petty whining but compound this over 4 or more years with a lack of teamwork, lack of discipline from above regarding these matters AND the sheer audacity of the women here to take the piss and claim “teehee I’m a girl I dont have to do it”, you would be hard pressed to find a man that didn’t react badly to this.

Female bosses are utter, utter shit. Not only do they hold grudges over long periods of time, they shit talk you to everyone else.

One of these women even got the job for sucking off a manager at another cinema. Classy much? WOmens rights much?

I dont think it is a matter of rights its merely become a matter of “I am a woman, so get out of my way”.

Is it any wonder why men today are reacting against women in a hostile manner?[/quote]

Meh, most bosses are shit to one degree or another, regardless of gender. Most employees too for that matter. This is because most people are petty, childish, egocentric and ineffective. The suckage may tend to take a different shape for women than it does for men, but the overall level of suck is about the same. There are numerous historical examples of effective female leadership, but they are rare as are the examples of effective male leadership when expressed as a relative percentage of leaders.

I don’t care much for the current shape of popular “feminism” either, but don’t use it as an excuse to justify violence toward women. I actually tend to believe that the ugliness of we are seeing in women has a s much to do with men’s widespread failure to hold up our end of the masculine/feminine deal as it does with “women’s rights”. I suppose many will think that’s chauvinistic of me, but there it is.[/quote]

I have had 3 shit male managers in my time at the job and more than 19 different female bosses who were terrible. Having a good male boss allows me as a man to have a chat on their level, have a laugh at stuff men do and get shit done. They help and understand men who work underneath them.[/quote]

Wow, that’s a lot of different bosses, how old are you?

Is it possible that your generalized anger toward women has in some way possibly contributed to your consistently poor relationships with your female bosses?

Just sayin’…

I’ve had 8 or 9 bosses total in 20+ years of working, 4 of them were females. IMO, one was terrible in the ways you describe, one was fairly adequate, one was decent one was ineffective but basically harmless. The guys stack up about the same, with the exception that one of them was (is) quite good. But, hey, everyone’s experience is different.[/quote]

Its entertainment retail, the company is nationwide and people dont like staying in certain places too long or they are moved.

I am 28, I am not a mysygonist, how could I hate women when my mother has helped me a shitload over my life? There are plenty of women I have liked and enjoyed the company of but my experiences in my past job have compounded one thing.

I do not tolerate women who think they can get away with shit or use the power of their body to get shit.

The perfect example of one boss I had was the one who got her manager job via sucking off another manager. Just how the fuck do you try and get your head around that when she gets away with it.

The male boss above her who I had known for 5 years hated her and he knew what she did but what can you do?

This same boss comes into work pissed off her head, hangover from the night before and stays in the office the entirety of her shift, refusing to come down to assist in the running of the business.

I don’t know why I didn’t tell my boss about this but she did it twice. Not only was she drink driving, she didn’t do her job.

A girl who joined recently came into work hungover with only 2 hours sleep and said she couldn’t work the tills because she was knackered. She was friends with the bosses and they knew she got pissed the night before.

What do they do? They put her on an easy area and ask a guy (me) to cover two areas. The fuck?

I had worked there for years and I did something not as bad as that and I got a disciplinary.

That is what pisses me off about a lot of women, to quote Bill Burr, “They come at’cha like fucking robots and keep coming”.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]harrypotter wrote:

When you say to a woman; “well women are better at some things than men and men are better than women at certain things” they tend to hang onto the last part with a vice grip.

The usual response is “well what can a man do that we cant do just as well?”.

The mere mention of physical prowess will be met with scorn, even if you’re doing it in a lighthearted manner and believe me, I did this in a lighthearted manner but they persisted.

It ended up with them demanding it be a fair playing field on how a woman is not as good as a man and I just got fed up of their serious attitude towards a notsureifsrs remark so I used history.

I shot off many examples where men were the leaders and women were good at keeping the men sane.

So the question you get faced with is basically; “how is a man better at leading a corporation, military unit, group session than a woman?”

There is no reasonable way to win because they have it in their heads that they can have a good career, be a team leader and have a family at the same time.
[/quote]

Gotcha. Understood, and this is pretty much exactly what I meant by my statement that the pendulum had swung too far in the other direction.
[/quote]

Well the thing about pendulums is that they swing back, big time.

Theres quite a few horror stories regarding extensive research these past decades stating women who pursuing a career, family and good sex life are having neither or just getting one at the cost of the other, mostly the career hunters.

Not saying all women have these problems but there is a reason why so many are single, with kids, divorced etc.


This reminded me of this.

Any man who does not get why this is hilarious is doing it wrong.

At the risk of inviting a rain of hell down upon my head, I will say that I think that men are generally more suited to the role of “boss.”

Men are more comfortable giving orders and delegating authority. Women are, of course, capable of doing this, and some women are very good at it. I would imagine that Hillary Clinton is a more capable leader than almost any man on the planet. And this is coming from someone who doesn’t like her or her policies one bit. But she is as far to the right end of the bell curve as it is possible to get.

My point is that I think that many times nowadays you have a female who has either been forced or forced herself into a leadership position she did not really want to occupy. My wife, whom I already mentioned, is a perfect example of this. We own a business together. We are ostensibly both “The Boss.” However, for the most part, all of the “boss” duties are left up to me. There have been a few times where she has had to take the reins and do the ordering and delegating; and I have witnessed firsthand how wholly unsuited she is for such work. She gets pissy, resentful, frustrated and contentious in short order, and she is typically NEVER this sort of person. For the most part, she is a nurturer and peacemaker, kind and amiable to a fault. She feels uncomfortable in a masculine position because that’s not what she was made to do. Again, she is a nurturer, NOT a leader. There is NOTHING wrong with this. In fact, if the world was filled with leaders and no nurturers, there wouldn’t be much world to enjoy anyway.

More often than not, it is MEN who fill the role of leader. I know that females do not like to hear this, but it is NOT an indictment nor is it a sexist statement of any sort. It is, simply, a rational assessment of reality.

I would tend to believe harrypotter has, indeed, had some crappy experiences with female bosses, most likely because they just did not feel comfortable in their positions, and were most likely compensating in one way or another. It isn’t even wholly their fault. That’s why I get angry at the messages modern society sends to young women. They DO NOT have to do it all. We both need to work together to “do it all.” Neither of us can get “it all” done by ourselves.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
And we totally won![/quote]

Look around you.

If that is what winning looks like I would not even have strated the fight.

Anyhow, emergent properties and whatnot, there are more happy cats out there than ever, so there.

[quote]orion wrote:
This reminded me of this.

Any man who does not get why this is hilarious is doing it wrong. [/quote]

I’m literally lolling right now. Is that an actual picture?

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
And we totally won![/quote]

Look around you.

If that is what winning looks like I would not even have strated the fight.

Anyhow, emergent properties and whatnot, there are more happy cats out there than ever, so there.[/quote]

Lol, honestly, this is so true.

[quote]Cortes wrote:
At the risk of inviting a rain of hell down upon my head, I will say that I think that men are generally more suited to the role of “boss.”
[/quote]

More suited for semi-anonymous hierarchies in general.

They establish a hierarchy and get the job done.

All this bruhahaha about women being more “emotionally intelligent” and whatnot that has been all the rage a few years ago completely left out that men in groups get their shit together so amazingly fast that all the emoting is simply not needed.

Small groups, different story.

There, women actually do run circles around men.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
This reminded me of this.

Any man who does not get why this is hilarious is doing it wrong. [/quote]

I’m literally lolling right now. Is that an actual picture? [/quote]

I know that the quote is real and I know what early sufragettes looked like so if its not real, it is real enough.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
This reminded me of this.

Any man who does not get why this is hilarious is doing it wrong. [/quote]

I’m literally lolling right now. Is that an actual picture? [/quote]

I know that the quote is real and I know what early sufragettes looked like so if its not real, it is real enough. [/quote]

Well if it isn’t real, it should be.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
This reminded me of this.

Any man who does not get why this is hilarious is doing it wrong. [/quote]

I’m literally lolling right now. Is that an actual picture? [/quote]

I know that the quote is real and I know what early sufragettes looked like so if its not real, it is real enough. [/quote]

I’ve seen this joke too many times… Only ugly women are feminist

On the topic of female voting there was a study posted on female hormones and voting but CNN removed it likely due to political correctness.

Basically women tend to vote liberal while ovulating because they feel sexy

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
And we totally won![/quote]

Look around you.

If that is what winning looks like I would not even have strated the fight.

Anyhow, emergent properties and whatnot, there are more happy cats out there than ever, so there.[/quote]

I was JOKING! Women did not win the right to make men marry us. That’s why it’s funny!

I have a lot more to say :slight_smile: but I need to take care of some womanly tasks first.

Edit: Er…these would be putting away groceries and starting a pot of soup, not giving BJs or douching.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Edit: Er…these would be putting away groceries and starting a pot of soup, not giving BJs or douching. [/quote]

This would have been so much better in my mind, but you just had to go and ruin it…

Also, the blowjob is a lost art form.

I hereby revoke the right of all women to complain about lousy sex until at least 3 out of ten have mastered it.

[quote]harrypotter wrote:
Its entertainment retail, the company is nationwide and people dont like staying in certain places too long or they are moved.

I am 28, I am not a mysygonist, how could I hate women when my mother has helped me a shitload over my life? There are plenty of women I have liked and enjoyed the company of but my experiences in my past job have compounded one thing.

I do not tolerate women who think they can get away with shit or use the power of their body to get shit.

The perfect example of one boss I had was the one who got her manager job via sucking off another manager. Just how the fuck do you try and get your head around that when she gets away with it.

The male boss above her who I had known for 5 years hated her and he knew what she did but what can you do?

This same boss comes into work pissed off her head, hangover from the night before and stays in the office the entirety of her shift, refusing to come down to assist in the running of the business.

I don’t know why I didn’t tell my boss about this but she did it twice. Not only was she drink driving, she didn’t do her job.

A girl who joined recently came into work hungover with only 2 hours sleep and said she couldn’t work the tills because she was knackered. She was friends with the bosses and they knew she got pissed the night before.

What do they do? They put her on an easy area and ask a guy (me) to cover two areas. The fuck?

I had worked there for years and I did something not as bad as that and I got a disciplinary.

That is what pisses me off about a lot of women, to quote Bill Burr, “They come at’cha like fucking robots and keep coming”.
[/quote]

I actually do see where you’re coming from here. It really isn’t fair. But I think you’re going about it the wrong way.

The thing that stands out most from your post is that you just haven’t learned how to play the politics game. I know you’re probably thinking “but I shouldn’t have to, it just shouldn’t be like that”. And you’re probably right that it shouldn’t be that way… but reality is rarely ever how it “should” be. You don’t want to keep getting the short end of the stick? Learn to play the politics.

Based on what you’ve described, probably your best move is to figure out how to get yourself promoted to an equal level of one of your female bosses. Barring that, figure out how to get on the right side of these women (subtle flattery is a pretty standard way to start), and learn how to cater to their own ambitions and desires. You can do that without crossing into sexual harassment territory. If you befriend her, joke with her, hang out with her (and some other coworkers) after work, you’re much less likely to get screwed over from the deal.

On the other hand, if one of them ever comes in trashed and unable to do their job… you can approach and offer your help, provided you do it in a way that says that you want to learn how to do it (and that you’re considering moving into management). Just don’t let her have the idea that she can use you.

Or, I mean, you can continue to feel shafted and complain on here. Up to you.

[quote]orion wrote:
Also, the blowjob is a lost art form.

I hereby revoke the right of all women to complain about lousy sex until at least 3 out of ten have mastered it.

[/quote]

How do you ever get laid, given all the time you spend on this site and the shit you read that allegedly informs your opinions on here?

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
Also, the blowjob is a lost art form.

I hereby revoke the right of all women to complain about lousy sex until at least 3 out of ten have mastered it.

[/quote]

How do you ever get laid, given all the time you spend on this site and the shit you read that allegedly informs your opinions on here?[/quote]

I lay a trail of fluffy kittens and wait until the inevitable bedable female falls right into my moms basement through my ingenious trapdoor system.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:
Also, the blowjob is a lost art form.

I hereby revoke the right of all women to complain about lousy sex until at least 3 out of ten have mastered it.

[/quote]

How do you ever get laid, given all the time you spend on this site and the shit you read that allegedly informs your opinions on here?[/quote]

I lay a trail of fluffy kittens and wait until the inevitable bedable female falls right into my moms basement through my ingenious trapdoor system. [/quote]

Are the kittens still alive?

[quote]Cortes wrote:

To clarify a little, I often see what I feel is overcompensation by women who appear to feel they need to “prove” that they can be everything that a man can be, and more. I see example after example of this, mostly in the media, but a lot on this site, too. And while it’s a great thing that women are more and more able to enjoy the rights they have been unfairly deprived of throughout basically all of human history, all too often any comparison with men in which women are viewed as not measuring up to some standard is misinterpreted as disenfranchisement. I know that my wife is a FAR better nurturer and has miles more patience than I do when one of our sons is whining or crying. By the same token, there are times when the boys NEED to be disciplined, or when one of us needs to take an aggressive leadership role in our business that requires giving orders or reprimanding an employee. She absolutely despises being put in the position to do any of these. And I’m just no good when the kids are acting up out of tiredness or frustration.

In general, there are things that women are better at, and things that men are better at, and families and societies whose members basically adhere to these roles are typically happier and more satisfied with their lives. Hell, just the fact that these arguments tend to be so evenly divided down gender lines should be a good indicator that there is something to the idea. I had a really good discussion about this with TBG back when SAMA and he were still around. I think you participated in it. The one about femininity and masculinity. [/quote]

And there is nothing wrong with that if that is what both of you want. However not everyone wants this type of relationship. I for one hate most things that come with a woman that is a good nurturer. My preference is more of a tom boyish girl/woman. I hate girly girls. The gossiping, the constant make up, the bags/jewelry, painted nails, I don’t find any of that attractive.

Coincidentally most girls I’ve dated were not the marrying kind, did not want kids and generally were more like guys in behavior than the stereotypical woman in a relationship. If these girls were not given the chance (through today’s society) on being able to lead such an alternate lifestyle then more likely I would have been a very lonely guy.

On the other hand some feminist can out right piss me off with their hypocrisy. Especially with the attitude we want equal right, we want to be treated just like men yet still expect, in relationships, to be treated like princesses.