Women's Fight to Vote Tied to Declining SMV

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
First off stop calling jezebel “fringe” it is by far the most popular feminist site out there based on popularity. Secondly, it’s extremely important what is written on these sites as it shape women’s opinions and thus effects society. It is no concern to you that women are being taught that they can be as fat as they want and still be beautiful or that there’s nothing wrong with being a slut? You can’t possibly be this stupid. [/quote]

I don’t know about that, I think it probably is pretty fringe. I’d heard or read the name before, but wouldn’t have been able to identify what the site was about. I saw the Suffragist postcards on Facebook.

The girls and women I know, and I know a lot of them, are still pretty concerned about being fat or thought a slut.
[/quote]

When I said popular I mean in terms of feminist websites. It’s definitely a top 5 feminist site. If you’re friends aren’t feminist they don’t really apply.

They helped this go viral. Obese woman posts a pic of herself and gets 100,000 comments mostly compliments

http://thebodyloveblog.tumblr.com/post/32881501880/warning-picture-might-be-considered-obscene[/quote]

This picture is for Emily from middle school, who bullied me incessantly, made mocking videos about me, sent me nasty emails, and called me �?�¢??lard�?�¢??. She made me feel like I didn�?�¢??t deserve to exist. Just because I happened to be bigger than her. I was 12. And she continued to bully me via social media into high school.

Would you like to explain yourself Emily?[/quote]

That bitch was FAT!

I agree with Deb (as I almost always do). There is already plenty of shaming. It doesn’t work. The North American diet is not conducive to lean. You have to make an effort to maintain slenderness. Some people do, others don’t. This is life.

People wanting a shot at “one of the good ones” should endeavor to enhance and enrich themselves. Time spent angrily bemoaning shitty, unfair world is wasted. It also makes for an unappealing personality, and so probably reduces odds of getting the good one. No decent man is going to want to listen to a Jezebel fan bitch about what selfish assholes men are (if indeed that is what the site is about). No decent woman wants to hear the self-pity of men whipped into a “white male underdog” frenzy. It is negative and tedious, from whichever side it comes.[/quote]

Regarding the FAT bitch: Ha! Lol.

Regarding the rest: I’ll just go ahead and assume it wasn’t directed at me. (What is it with you chicks using my posts for soapboxes today!?! :-)[/quote]

If you want a good woman, Chushin, you’d better pull yourself together! Otherwise I’m going to start making nasty videos and mocking emails about YOU! lol

No, you’re right, it was a catch-all post, meant to address various conversational threads. Should have done individual quote-backs or added names.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
I’m underpaid given my level of education and the danger and difficulty of my work. Someone asked above why women overrepresented in my field…the pay is why, it’s a girl job, so pays less. More and more men are going into teaching as they move toward reasonable pay for work demands.

Interestingly, ALL of the senior management at my agency are male. Just as an aside…
[/quote]

I have to pick on this.

You’re not paid little because your job is a “girl” job. You’re paid little because your job is not valued by society. You don’t produce anything. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a volunteer fire-fighter and a paid EMT, and I don’t get much pay and even less sleep, and my job is far more dangerous than yours. I also know that, aside from the occaisional pat on the back, my job isn’t valued by society either. That’s ok.

I’m sure you work with a lot of children, and god bless you for that. We live in a society that celebrates victims and victimhood, but the only human beings who can legitimately claim victim status are children. But you also work with a lot of adults, I’m sure, and I know from experience that the more you do for some people, the less they do for themselves.

Once you enter into adulthood, you’re responsible for your own life. I don’t care about your low income or your shitty childhood or your abusive boyfriend. If you’re an adult, it’s your life, and you have to deal with the consequences of the decisions you make. I think that when your adult “clients” or “patients” or whatever you call them are transferring their dependence onto you, and I don’t think they are ever going to stand on their on feet. There is re-hab for people with physical disabilities. Is there such a thing as re-hab for people with emotional disabilities? I haven’t seen it. Once they exhaust your resources the vast majority will go right back to drugs or alcohol or their abusive relationships and nothing will change for them.

Frankly, I wouldn’t pay a cent more in taxes to increase your pay, because I don’t think providing a new crutch for the emotionally disabled is worth it. I believe you do valuable work with children, but I don’t want to pay you any more to do it. Your job used to be done without tax money by churches. The Church ladies who had finished raising their own children would go out into the community to help the less fortunate. That system wasn’t perfect by any means, but folks got by, and I think a lot of people who would be your emotionally handicapped clients today learned to limp by without you. Because there was no motorized scooter to carry them around, they learned to walk. Of course, there aren’t many real communities left, and the church ladies are too busy with their “careers” to do a lot of social work for free.

Also, all of your upper managers are men because women suck as managers.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Time spent angrily bemoaning shitty, unfair world is wasted. [/quote]

I’m pretty sure this has been the first time on these boards I’ve brought up my views on feminism and it’s effect on society in the almost 4 years I’ve been a member here. I was asked a question about why I hate fat women and I answered it. And I provided evidence!

I don’t dwell on this topic, but I accept it as reality. It’s definitely a topic that riles me up when I have discussed it.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

No decent woman wants to hear the self-pity of men whipped into a “white male underdog” frenzy. It is negative and tedious, from whichever side it comes.[/quote]

I’m not a white male hah.

Most people figure that out very quickly from my username.

Want to add to Gabby’s post that women aren’t paid less, that early on in their careers they are actually paid more than men (see link I posted a few pages back).

Overall, there is no pay gap either

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/

How about this: if you want to make good money go into a profession that typically pays well.

Don’t rationalize your low salary by saying you it’s “girl job”. Take accountability for your choices, like a man :slight_smile:

I became an accountant not because I particularly love accounting but because it’s a profession that typically pays well and has an abundance of work opportunities.

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:

Once you enter into adulthood, you’re responsible for your own life. I don’t care about your low income or your shitty childhood or your abusive boyfriend. [/quote]

Re-reading that I see how I could be seen as bashing Emily for whining about her girly income, but those you’s are not directed at Emily or anyone else in this thread.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
First off stop calling jezebel “fringe” it is by far the most popular feminist site out there based on popularity. Secondly, it’s extremely important what is written on these sites as it shape women’s opinions and thus effects society. It is no concern to you that women are being taught that they can be as fat as they want and still be beautiful or that there’s nothing wrong with being a slut? You can’t possibly be this stupid. [/quote]

I don’t know about that, I think it probably is pretty fringe. I’d heard or read the name before, but wouldn’t have been able to identify what the site was about. I saw the Suffragist postcards on Facebook.

The girls and women I know, and I know a lot of them, are still pretty concerned about being fat or thought a slut.
[/quote]

When I said popular I mean in terms of feminist websites. It’s definitely a top 5 feminist site. If you’re friends aren’t feminist they don’t really apply.

They helped this go viral. Obese woman posts a pic of herself and gets 100,000 comments mostly compliments

http://thebodyloveblog.tumblr.com/post/32881501880/warning-picture-might-be-considered-obscene[/quote]

This picture is for Emily from middle school, who bullied me incessantly, made mocking videos about me, sent me nasty emails, and called me �¢??lard�¢??. She made me feel like I didn�¢??t deserve to exist. Just because I happened to be bigger than her. I was 12. And she continued to bully me via social media into high school.

Would you like to explain yourself Emily?[/quote]

That bitch was FAT!

I agree with Deb (as I almost always do). There is already plenty of shaming. It doesn’t work. The North American diet is not conducive to lean. You have to make an effort to maintain slenderness. Some people do, others don’t. This is life.

People wanting a shot at “one of the good ones” should endeavor to enhance and enrich themselves. Time spent angrily bemoaning shitty, unfair world is wasted. It also makes for an unappealing personality, and so probably reduces odds of getting the good one. No decent man is going to want to listen to a Jezebel fan bitch about what selfish assholes men are (if indeed that is what the site is about). No decent woman wants to hear the self-pity of men whipped into a “white male underdog” frenzy. It is negative and tedious, from whichever side it comes.[/quote]

I definitely agree that shaming doesn’t work. Or, rather, we’re well past it’s effectiveness point. The level we’ve reached now is justification. Many people on both sides have just given up and don’t believe they could ever succeed anyway, so, like so many other minority special interest group, they’ve begun doing what works: Redefining words and demonizing people for using OldSpeak or having the wrong ideas. The shame now flows the other way, as both a deflection and a defensive devise.

As Debra guessed, though, no, this is NOT where the heart of the matter under discussion lies.

I’ll restate it once more so that it’s clear for anyone who has joined us late:

Men and women are biologically different creatures, with inclinations, strengths, weaknesses, characteristic traits, desires and dislikes that can generally be found in more or less similar degrees in either sex.

No one has once insinuated that nurture, modeling and the inclination to fulfill the expectations of one’s peers do not strongly influence the sexes. However, this is not enough to account for the degree of difference that has existed relatively unchanged for the 10,000 plus years of verifiable history.

I’m not really sure why it’s taken 20 pages of arguing back and forth about this when the stuff seems like common sense on its face to me, but it has been posited by me, orion, raj, and I get the impression LoRez and even Emily pretty much agree with us, males and females, again speaking GENERALLY, are inclined toward a certain set of traits we call for the sake of simplicity, masculine and feminine, respectively. It is further posited that each sex, GENERALLY SPEAKING will tend both to do better at certain tasks that align with their particular gender, and, perhaps even more importantly, will be happier when engaged in activities and lifestyles that conform to these trait sets.

I believe one of the sparks that set this whole wildfire ablaze was my (?) insinuations that men tend to be more suited to leadership roles (war, politics, business, family, crises, etc.), whereas women tend to do far better than men in nurturing roles such as, of course, mothers, care givers, social workers, nurses, those who work with the physically and mentally handicapped, &c.

Now that the core has been reiterated, Debra, I’m genuinely interested in what you think on the matter.

So far the only other two women in the thread have not seemed to really have much of an issue with the overarching theme of the thread. DB Cooper, on the other hand, not only claims that we are dead wrong, but has actually preemptively declared victory multiple times now. None of us are unfurling our white flags just yet, though, I don’t think…

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:

Also, all of your upper managers are men because women suck as managers.[/quote]

Ha ha!

[quote]therajraj wrote:

I don’t dwell on this topic, but I accept it as reality. It’s definitely a topic that riles me up when I have discussed it.[/quote]

Yeah, Emily, come one, raj just wrote this about me:

Let me pop open a bottle of Krug and just bask in it for a moment.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
http://thebodyloveblog.tumblr.com/post/32881501880/warning-picture-might-be-considered-obscene[/quote]

[quote]THIS IS MY BODY, DEAL WITH IT.

and FUCK YOU ALL who tried to degrade my being and sense of self with your hurtful comments and actions.

GUESS WHAT IT DIDN’T WORK HAHAHAHAH[/quote]

Good for her. Really.

As long as she takes full responsibility for the consequences, I have no problem. But if she’s going to complain about “not getting a high paying job because she’s not thin/attractive enough”, “not getting helped when her car breaks down by the side of the road”, “not getting kissed in over 3 years”, etc. etc… then that’s on her.

Of course it’s not “fair” that attractive people simply have an easier life. But the science backs that – male and female. So if she has goals that actually benefit from attractiveness (cough, most everything in life, cough), then she’d be better served becoming more “attractive” per whatever societal standards she’s living in.

She doesn’t have to play the games, that’s fine. But she can’t expect to win without playing.

Sure, she might find a great guy (if that’s what she wants), and a great job, and be brilliantly educated (kinda doubting that based on the above), and so on and so forth, without needing to be attractive. But it helps. And if you’re not going to stack the odds in your favor, you better be prepared to deal with the consequences.

[quote]Chushin wrote:
As best I can recall, most of your posts are pretty much reasonable and informed.

This one is one of the most uninformed, ignorant and laughable ones I’ve ever seen.[/quote]

Are you going to offer an intelligent rebuttal, or are you just going to go for the quick quip?

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
I’m underpaid given my level of education and the danger and difficulty of my work. Someone asked above why women overrepresented in my field…the pay is why, it’s a girl job, so pays less. More and more men are going into teaching as they move toward reasonable pay for work demands.

Interestingly, ALL of the senior management at my agency are male. Just as an aside…
[/quote]

I have to pick on this.

You’re not paid little because your job is a “girl” job. You’re paid little because your job is not valued by society. You don’t produce anything. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a volunteer fire-fighter and a paid EMT, and I don’t get much pay and even less sleep, and my job is far more dangerous than yours. I also know that, aside from the occaisional pat on the back, my job isn’t valued by society either. That’s ok.

I’m sure you work with a lot of children, and god bless you for that. We live in a society that celebrates victims and victimhood, but the only human beings who can legitimately claim victim status are children. But you also work with a lot of adults, I’m sure, and I know from experience that the more you do for some people, the less they do for themselves.

Once you enter into adulthood, you’re responsible for your own life. I don’t care about your low income or your shitty childhood or your abusive boyfriend. If you’re an adult, it’s your life, and you have to deal with the consequences of the decisions you make. I think that when your adult “clients” or “patients” or whatever you call them are transferring their dependence onto you, and I don’t think they are ever going to stand on their on feet. There is re-hab for people with physical disabilities. Is there such a thing as re-hab for people with emotional disabilities? I haven’t seen it. Once they exhaust your resources the vast majority will go right back to drugs or alcohol or their abusive relationships and nothing will change for them.

Frankly, I wouldn’t pay a cent more in taxes to increase your pay, because I don’t think providing a new crutch for the emotionally disabled is worth it. I believe you do valuable work with children, but I don’t want to pay you any more to do it. Your job used to be done without tax money by churches. The Church ladies who had finished raising their own children would go out into the community to help the less fortunate. That system wasn’t perfect by any means, but folks got by, and I think a lot of people who would be your emotionally handicapped clients today learned to limp by without you. Because there was no motorized scooter to carry them around, they learned to walk. Of course, there aren’t many real communities left, and the church ladies are too busy with their “careers” to do a lot of social work for free.

Also, all of your upper managers are men because women suck as managers.[/quote]

I would not argue that firefighting (your hobby) is not dangerous, however, I work with children at a community mental health center, where the paranoid schizophrenics come for their weekly shots, etc. If you picture me coloring sweetly with poor children, you are limited in your understanding of what I and others like me do. Although it is rare, I have been threatened by teens and by mentally ill parents, and one of the teens who threatened me (“I fantasize about killing you, or at least stabbing your eyes”) assaulted one of our front desk staff last year and two weeks ago kicked a nurse in the stomach at an inpatient facility. She required five point restraints off and on her first two days in the hospital. I met with her the day the incident occurred that landed her in the hospital. She called me a bitch and told me she hates me. We’ve worked together for four years now, so I just made a face at her and went on with what I was doing, which was informing her father that she was in a bad space. She weighs probably 200 lbs, to my 125 or so. I am respectful of the potential for danger she presents. (Edit: calling me a bitch had nothing to do with the hospitalization, something happened later that day.)

One adult male client came in with a hammer to attack his clinician, luckily also male, and another adult male client punched a female case manager in the face not too long ago. A woman coming in for an intake tweaked to the point of cracking our bulletproof glass. Another paranoid schizophrenic. One of the kids’ I worked with had a mom who burnt down the house of someone she didn’t like. She didn’t like me, also, because I was blocking her bid to get custody of her kids. Severely bipolar, history of significant abuse. I call the cops and child protection when I find out bad men have been putting their penises in little girls’ mouths, which can rile people. So I bear that in mind when I leave in the dark. I’ve also done both children’s and adult crisis assessments at the emergency room. There is always a guard if people are deemed a danger to self or others (which is what I am there to assess). Still, it doesn’t take a madwoman long to grab someone’s hair and claw her eyes, and frankly the guards don’t inspire a great deal of confidence. I always bear that in mind when I’m assessing where to position myself in relation to labile others and the exit. I’m not a fighter, so I make “non-threatening” an art. My job is not like slogging through the Korengal Valley with bullets spitting all around, but it carries some risk. Compared to, say, working in a corporate environment. Or even a prison, given that we deal with the same population, but without guns or night sticks or burly men or steel bars.

As for girl pay, I quite disagree. Again I point to teaching as being almost exclusively female at one time, but the economy continues to stagnate while teacher pay increases due to union stranglehold, and more and more men are thinking it’s a good gig. Nursing as well. I don’t complain about my pay. I chose it. It’s fine, I have other resources and I like my job. But it is historically chick work, born, as you note, out of charitable impulse. It will be interesting to see what will happen as our aging society needs more and more caretaking with less and less family available to give it to them. Will pay increase? If so, will men show up at the gates? Maybe. Anyway, I wasn’t whining, I was answering a question. Lot of school for low pay, depressing work (if you find it so), and risk of assault or yucky things transmitted (e.g. head lice, MRSA, hep b).

As for what I create, I create dignity and money. I civilize people so the state won’t have to pay to house them in prison. I teach parenting skills so kids will hopefully make it through some reasonable amount of schooling. I cock block by teaching girls self-respect, which reduces teen pregnancy. I give smart, sweet kids one person they can trust and sometimes I succeed in teaching them the word “college.” I tell kids and their parents that I know they can do it, whatever “it” is, and sometimes as a result they do. I’ve gotten both kids and parents through all manner of unexpected success, and they are now better able to contribute to society.

I also save lives. I don’t know whether you’re an encourager of suicide, but one of my kids is studying physics at the moment (because what else would he be doing at college at 10 pm but studying) because we got him through. WIth that kid, actually, I used AC’s sentence stems. I expect taxes from him eventually. One of the kids I work with once said, in response to being mocked (by an adult) for being in counseling, that “I don’t come here because there’s something wrong with me, I come here so I don’t wind up killing anybody.” That kid (my all-time favorite) also once told me that she was spending a lot of time just walking around, talking to herself. I asked what she said and she answered, “Mostly I’m like, what the fuck?” Which, yeah. Ethical, hard-working kid, messed up family, abuse, foster care. That kid will someday pay taxes, though.

So. I produce dignity, which in turn produces money, or at least limits the drain. And I save lives, but not the lives of smoking, drinking, gravy-guzzling 50-year-olds, like you do, who will live to suffer another costly heart attack, and then another. I save young physicists. YOU’RE WELCOME.

Edited for clarity. I needed to add a little more detail because it seemed lacking. lol

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
First off stop calling jezebel “fringe” it is by far the most popular feminist site out there based on popularity. Secondly, it’s extremely important what is written on these sites as it shape women’s opinions and thus effects society. It is no concern to you that women are being taught that they can be as fat as they want and still be beautiful or that there’s nothing wrong with being a slut? You can’t possibly be this stupid. [/quote]

I don’t know about that, I think it probably is pretty fringe. I’d heard or read the name before, but wouldn’t have been able to identify what the site was about. I saw the Suffragist postcards on Facebook.

The girls and women I know, and I know a lot of them, are still pretty concerned about being fat or thought a slut.
[/quote]

When I said popular I mean in terms of feminist websites. It’s definitely a top 5 feminist site. If you’re friends aren’t feminist they don’t really apply.

They helped this go viral. Obese woman posts a pic of herself and gets 100,000 comments mostly compliments

http://thebodyloveblog.tumblr.com/post/32881501880/warning-picture-might-be-considered-obscene[/quote]

This picture is for Emily from middle school, who bullied me incessantly, made mocking videos about me, sent me nasty emails, and called me �?�¢??lard�?�¢??. She made me feel like I didn�?�¢??t deserve to exist. Just because I happened to be bigger than her. I was 12. And she continued to bully me via social media into high school.

Would you like to explain yourself Emily?[/quote]

That bitch was FAT!

I agree with Deb (as I almost always do). There is already plenty of shaming. It doesn’t work. The North American diet is not conducive to lean. You have to make an effort to maintain slenderness. Some people do, others don’t. This is life.

People wanting a shot at “one of the good ones” should endeavor to enhance and enrich themselves. Time spent angrily bemoaning shitty, unfair world is wasted. It also makes for an unappealing personality, and so probably reduces odds of getting the good one. No decent man is going to want to listen to a Jezebel fan bitch about what selfish assholes men are (if indeed that is what the site is about). No decent woman wants to hear the self-pity of men whipped into a “white male underdog” frenzy. It is negative and tedious, from whichever side it comes.[/quote]

I definitely agree that shaming doesn’t work. Or, rather, we’re well past it’s effectiveness point. The level we’ve reached now is justification. Many people on both sides have just given up and don’t believe they could ever succeed anyway, so, like so many other minority special interest group, they’ve begun doing what works: Redefining words and demonizing people for using OldSpeak or having the wrong ideas. The shame now flows the other way, as both a deflection and a defensive devise.

As Debra guessed, though, no, this is NOT where the heart of the matter under discussion lies.

I’ll restate it once more so that it’s clear for anyone who has joined us late:

Men and women are biologically different creatures, with inclinations, strengths, weaknesses, characteristic traits, desires and dislikes that can generally be found in more or less similar degrees in either sex.

No one has once insinuated that nurture, modeling and the inclination to fulfill the expectations of one’s peers do not strongly influence the sexes. However, this is not enough to account for the degree of difference that has existed relatively unchanged for the 10,000 plus years of verifiable history.

I’m not really sure why it’s taken 20 pages of arguing back and forth about this when the stuff seems like common sense on its face to me, but it has been posited by me, orion, raj, and I get the impression LoRez and even Emily pretty much agree with us, males and females, again speaking GENERALLY, are inclined toward a certain set of traits we call for the sake of simplicity, masculine and feminine, respectively. It is further posited that each sex, GENERALLY SPEAKING will tend both to do better at certain tasks that align with their particular gender, and, perhaps even more importantly, will be happier when engaged in activities and lifestyles that conform to these trait sets.

Now that the core has been reiterated, Debra, I’m genuinely interested in what you think on the matter.

So far the only other two women in the thread have not seemed to really have much of an issue with the overarching theme of the thread. DB Cooper, on the other hand, not only claims that we are dead wrong, but has actually preemptively declared victory multiple times now. None of us are unfurling our white flags just yet, though, I don’t think…
[/quote]

I largely agree with all of this. I maintain, however, that reproductive differences account for the lack of major movement into the public sphere on women’s part for the 10,000 plus years of verifiable history. We are not slaves to that particular element of our biology any longer, however, so I expect a certain percentage of women to take on the public sphere. And kick its ass. Not all women need to chant “BE AGGRESSIVE.” Some are already there.

Yes, this is where I disagree. Not that women may be gentler on average, but that most people, men and women alike, lack leadership skills. I will say that possibly men DESIRE to have leadership qualities in greater numbers than women, given that they have been taught they should. But “desire” and “possess” are not the same. And I agree that aggression runs higher in men, but it is not absent in women. The gas station attendant who goes home to smack his wife and kids is not a leader, despite high levels of aggression.

Woman in the pic isnt ugly. Id hit it. Shes got a big booty i bet.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

Time spent angrily bemoaning shitty, unfair world is wasted. [/quote]

I’m pretty sure this has been the first time on these boards I’ve brought up my views on feminism and it’s effect on society in the almost 4 years I’ve been a member here. I was asked a question about why I hate fat women and I answered it. And I provided evidence!

I don’t dwell on this topic, but I accept it as reality. It’s definitely a topic that riles me up when I have discussed it.[/quote]

Really? I thought you’ve been a strong decrier of female oppression of men through courts, income redistribution, etc. Seems like we’ve taken our respective sides on this matter before.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

No decent woman wants to hear the self-pity of men whipped into a “white male underdog” frenzy. It is negative and tedious, from whichever side it comes.[/quote]

I’m not a white male hah.

Most people figure that out very quickly from my username.

[/quote]

Yeah, I was responding in general, it was something orion said. I need to stop doing that.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
Really? I thought you’ve been a strong decrier of female oppression of men through courts, income redistribution, etc. Seems like we’ve taken our respective sides on this matter before.
[/quote]

Nah.

This is the first thread I’ve gone the full 9 yards on this type of discussion. Even it what you wrote were correct, it still would only be 3-4 threads in 3.5 years on a bodybuilding forum, a highly male space.

Don’t worry though, this discussion is purely academic since you (feminists) have successfully thrown off the shackles of your oppressors (men).

So go ahead and lead. Just be sure to pop your anti-depressants daily and take a shot of testosterone to the ass now and then, ya know to compete ‘fairly’ with men.

In completely unrelated news birth rates are abysmal in Canada and Western Europe. What’s the deal with that?