Winstrol Only Cycle

I know i am likely to get flamed or called a troll, but then making mistakes is how we learn!!

I am not looking to do a steroid cycle, however, i am interested in learning about them.
As a result i have seen many boards/ forums where people get an ABSOLUTE roasting for even suggesting a winstrol only cycle.

Everyone gets stuck in, citing dry joints, minimal gains (add test, add deca etc)

Now, if everybody is so against it, and would never even think of doing it, then how do they know that it is such a bad cycle ?

Please flame me, for i am ignorant.

Ah, sarcastic logic!
Many thanks for the reasoned response.

Well, if you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid response.
It’s that simple.

Just like the poster above mentioned, it’s deductive reasoning. You look at the full spectrum of the idea of a Winstrol-only cycle, and you take in consideration the factors that may happen, or not happen.
Once pros and cons have been established, you make the choice.

Go ahead and try it. Then you can be a poster-child of why not to do it.

[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
Um, something called deductive reasoning.

I have never placed my pet dog in a microwave, because I know it is a bad idea. I have never recommended a winstrol-only cycle because I know it is a bad idea.

If I know the likely outcomes of a situation, then I can make an informed descision.

BBB
[/quote]

Nice example BBB.

Similarly, I have never heard of anyone doing a carb-only-diet for gaining mass, despite the anabolic properties of insulin and the protein sparing qualities of carbs.

Given that winstrol is known to have certain side effects, even when used with other AAS, why then would anyone embark on what would almost certainly be a terrible venture, when one could simply follow logic and use addition AAS?

So, my question to you, op, is WHY WOULD ANYONE DO A WINSTROL ONLY CYCLE, rather than why would we not do one? Why even ask if not to invite the flame?

Weigh pros and cons. If you’ve read other posts and forums then you’d know that a Winstrol only cycle is a bad idea. Just like putting your dog in the microwave is a bad idea, just like inhaling glass particles is a bad idea. Research WHY a ‘winstrol only cycle’ is a bad idea. We here know why it’s a bad idea, but do you know why?

[quote]porkpie wrote:
I know i am likely to get flamed or called a troll, but then making mistakes is how we learn!!

I am not looking to do a steroid cycle, however, i am interested in learning about them.
As a result i have seen many boards/ forums where people get an ABSOLUTE roasting for even suggesting a winstrol only cycle.

Everyone gets stuck in, citing dry joints, minimal gains (add test, add deca etc)

Now, if everybody is so against it, and would never even think of doing it, then how do they know that it is such a bad cycle ?

Please flame me, for i am ignorant.[/quote]

Hey Bro, Not a bad question, people hose the Winny only cause of the toxicity and the low response to gain. However everyone responds differently. I did an 8 wk winny only and saw amazing results. I went from 210 lbs 14% bf down to 193 lbs 8%bf. I was way stonger than i previously was and looked super dry and absolutly unreal. I loved it. I also had all my blood work done about 2 weeks after and everything came back 100% fine. Just do your research.

Deduction ?
Weighing up the Pros and cons.

Fair enough, although didn’t people deduce the world was flat once ?
And that was because it would be far TOO STUPID to sail near the edge ?

[quote]porkpie wrote:
Deduction ?
Weighing up the Pros and cons.

Fair enough, although didn’t people deduce the world was flat once ?
And that was because it would be far TOO STUPID to sail near the edge ?

[/quote]

The ancient Greeks deduced that the Earth is spherical. It is a misconception introduced in the 19th century that people in the middle ages believed that the Earth was flat.

To be fair, the Greeks used induction not deduction to show the earth is round. But still.

[quote]Flop Hat wrote:
To be fair, the Greeks used induction not deduction to show the earth is round. But still.[/quote]

I take it you have an issue with using the word “deduced” to mean having arrived at a conclusion by reasoning.

Hello i am 19 years old im 5’7 and weigh about 228 i am on a winstrol cycle started 1 week ago and a fat burner as well idk how i should workout or do my cardio i usually weight lift for 1 hour and cardio for about 40 min i also do boxing anyone have any info these are 10mg tabs stanazol whats the best way to shed the fat as fast as possible

[quote]billy19 wrote:
Hello i am 19 years old im 5’7 and weigh about 228 i am on a winstrol cycle started 1 week ago and a fat burner as well idk how i should workout or do my cardio i usually weight lift for 1 hour and cardio for about 40 min i also do boxing anyone have any info these are 10mg tabs stanazol whats the best way to shed the fat as fast as possible [/quote]

Go away

bonez217 its a damn ? u retartd im trying to get info on

LOL, funny post BBB. But I hate to say this as I dont want to encourage others to do it, but Ive seen guys do just winny and without knowing what they were doing, I asked them if they were on cycle. Their response (saying they were on winny only) was kind of shocking to me, but they wouldnt bullshit me about something like that. I guess some just respond more than others. One of the guys is a local competitor and eats fast food everyday and is always very lean So please dont flame me for saying that, just reporting what I`ve seen…

They bullshitted you

I know its hard to belive, but trust me, this one guy who just recently said he was on 50mg of winny a day tells me everyting he does, including his gay for pay tricks, or if hes on GH or test. But hes not very tall so the gains may look more impressive. Acutally most the very low dose users Ive talked to are under 5 feet 9. But I have no trouble understanding your point of view there bone! And again would not recommend just winny. Test in every cycle as a base…