[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
If you love and wish to protect and cherish your wife, don’t set her up, which both of your scenarios do. It’s mean. Say “hey, what are we doing for my birthday tomorrow?” and then if she seems upset assure her that you know this isn’t like her and that it’s fine, you caught it in time. Then enjoy both your birthday and your happy wife. If she’s dodgy when you bring it up I would assume she’s got something up her sleeve and let it be. Then enjoy both your birthday and your happy wife.
And happy birthday![/quote]
I don’t see how scenario #1 is setting her up. That’s probably how he should handle it.[/quote]
Maybe it is how he should handle it, I don’t know, but this:
…is setting her up.
[/quote]
Yeah well, women play games, every now and then it makes sense to remind them that men could play them too.
If they wanted to.
[/quote]
Yes indeed! I myself love nothing better than to identify unbecoming traits in others and then match them as closely as possible. All of my relationships are depressing and dishonest, but at least they’re equitable!
[/quote]
Deliberately ambiguous as I very often am, trying to divine the worst into my mumblings is probably not good for your soul.
To be as unambiguous as possible, yes, every relationship has aspects of a power struggle and no woman is going to respect you if you at least could not best her every now and then.
Remember that I did not make women, I just try to make the best of it.
I am sure that your relationship with men is not that much different. [/quote]
I try to treat people as I like to be treated, men and women alike. Yes, romantic relationships contain elements of power and control, but these should be clean and open, not sneaky. Sex is a good outlet for this sort of thing, for example. I do respect a man who can best me, but through physical dominance or intellectual superiority, not through coy, bitchy games.
Feminine does not = bitchy. Masculine also should not = bitchy.
[/quote]
Who said anything about bitchy?
You can let a woman run into a wall in the most firm and friendliest way.
And you should, at least once.
Anyhow, I believe you that you try to be on your best behavior, but you do not judge a man on how he reacts to that.
You judge him on how he deals with you when you fail.
And you do, inevitably. [/quote]
Setting someone you love up to feel badly just for kicks strikes me as small. It becomes bitchy when your motivation for doing it is to become one-up in a secret power struggle.
But aside from that I have no quarrel with what you’re saying. However, I think your point applies to both women and men. Should I not allow my man to hit walls? Ought I not be friendly when he does? And, uh, firm?
I fail all the time. I forget things and I make mistakes. I am sometimes late and occasionally cranky. I expect him to be generous with my mistakes and oversights, patient when I occasionally cause frustration, and flatly disallowing of nasty behavior (this is the place for “firm,” no?). He does stupid shit, too, though. Different kinds from me, usually, because we’re different, but still stupid. But never because i’ve set him up to look like an ass.[/quote]
I know it is a bit obnoxious to zero in on that, but do you judge a man on how he reacts to you when you are trying to be nice, or when you fail?
That is not a trivial question because I can practically guarantee that the men you deal with on friendly terms are not the ones you really, really want.
You want the ones who can best you when you are at your worst and you can complain to all your girl friends (off, to, damn English prepositions).
And that is neither wrong nor something to be ashamed of, it just is.